Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 805 - 810 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2020

Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment

Öz:
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical treatment and conservative treatmentwith bracing in neurologically intact patients with score 4 of TLICS thoracolumbar vertebra fractures.METHODS: Patients with traumatic thoracolumbar junction fractures (T11-L2), the score of TLICS 4, and minimum 24-monthfollow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into surgery and bracing groups. The groups were compared concerningclinical and demographical features, local kyphotic angles (LKA), vertebra height loss percentage (VHL), Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and time to return to work.RESULTS: There were 74 patients (71 males, 3 females) in the surgery group and 76 patients (58 males, 18 females) in the bracinggroup. Although the surgery group showed better improvement in VAS scores within six months postoperatively, no significant differencewas observed at the 24th-month evaluation (p<0.001 and p=0.270, respectively). ODI, LKA and VHL were significantly lowerin the surgery group (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). In addition, return to work was significantly earlier in the surgerygroup (p<0.001).CONCLUSION: The findings obtained in this study suggest that the surgical treatment for TLICS 4 patients with thoracolumbarfractures has better clinical and radiographic outcomes than the bracing. Moreover, returning time to the work of patients is shortenedwith surgical treatment. The surgical treatment seems to be the first and the appropriate choice in the management of TLICS 4thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Torakolomber yaralanma sınıflaması ve ciddiyet skoru 4 (TLICS = 4) olan torakolomber vertebra kırıklarının yönetimi: Cerrahi mi, konservatif tedavi mi?

Öz:
AMAÇ: Torakolomber yaralanma sınıflaması ve ciddiyet skoru 4 (TLICS = 4) olan nörolojik intakt torakolomber vertebra kırıklı hastalarda cerrahi tedavi ve korse tedavisinin klinik ve radyografik sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Travmatik torakolomber kırık (T11-L2), TLICS 4 skoru ve en az 24 ay takip edilen hastalar alındı. Hastalar cerrahi ve korse gruplarına ayrıldı. Gruplar klinik ve demografik özellikler, lokal kifoz açıları (LKA), vertebra yükseklik kaybı yüzdesi (VYK), Oswestry Engellilik İndeksi (ODI), Visual Analog Skala (VAS) ve işe geri dönme süresi açısından karşılaştırıldı. BULGULAR: Cerrahi grubunda 74 hasta (71 erkek, 3 kadın), korse grubunda 76 hasta (58 erkek, 18 kadın) vardı. Cerrahi grupta ameliyat sonrası ilk altı ay içinde VAS skorlarında daha iyi olsa da 24. ayda gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi (sırasıyla, p<0.001 ve p=0.270). ODI, LKA ve VYK cerrahi grubunda anlamlı olarak düşüktü (sırasıyla, p<0.001, p<0.001 ve p<0.001). İşe geri dönüş süresi ameliyat grubunda anlamlı olarak daha kısa idi (p<0.001). TARTIŞMA: Torakolomber kırıkları olan nörolojik olarak intakt TLICS 4 hastaların cerrahi tedavisinin, korseye göre daha iyi klinik ve radyografik sonuçları olduğunu saptandı. Ayrıca, hastaların işe dönüş sürelerinin cerrahi tedavi ile kısaltıldığı gösterildi. TLICS 4 torakolomber vertebral kırıkların tedavisinde cerrahi tedavi ilk ve uygun seçenek olarak görünmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Joaquim AF, Patel AA, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR. A simplified treatment algorithm for treating thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42:416−22.
  • 2. Schroeder GD, Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR. Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017;28:23−9.
  • 3. Mohamadi A, Googanian A, Ahmadi A, Kamali A. Comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with Score 4 of TLICS: A randomized, single-blind, and single- central clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9842.
  • 4. Dodwad SN, Dodwad SJ, Wisneski R, Khan SN. Retrospective Analysis of Thoracolumbar Junction Injuries Using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score, American Spinal Injury Association Class, Injury Severity Score, Age, Sex, and Length of Hospitalization. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015;28:E410−6.
  • 5. Joaquim AF, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H, Batista UC, Patel AA. Clinical results of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma treated according to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;20:562−7.
  • 6. van der Roer N, de Lange ES, Bakker FC, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2005;14:527−34.
  • 7. Radcliff K, Su BW, Kepler CK, Rubin T, Shimer AL, Rihn JA, et al. Correlation of posterior ligamentous complex injury and neurological injury to loss of vertebral body height, kyphosis, and canal compromise. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1142−50.
  • 8. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, Yörükan S, Ureten K, Turan D, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:581−5; discussion: 585.
  • 9. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45−56.
  • 10. Joaquim AF, de Almeida Bastos DC, Jorge Torres HH, Patel AA. Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its Safety. Global Spine J 2016;6:80−5.
  • 11. Thomas KC, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Kwon B, Fisher C. Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:351−8.
  • 12. Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ, et al. Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2881−90.
  • 13. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1038−45.
  • 14. Pneumaticos SG, Karampinas PK, Triantafilopoulos G, Koufos S, Polyzois V, Vlamis J. Evaluation of TLICS for thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J 2016;25:1123−7.
  • 15. Nataraj A, Jack AS, Ihsanullah I, Nomani S, Kortbeek F, Fox R. Outcomes in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score (TLICS) of 4 Treated With Surgery Versus Initial Conservative Management. Clin Spine Surg 2018;31:E317−21.
  • 16. Hitchon PW, Abode-Iyamah K, Dahdaleh NS, Shaffrey C, Noeller J, He W, et al. Nonoperative Management in Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:483−9.
  • 17. Khurana B, Sheehan SE, Sodickson A, Bono CM, Harris MB. Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries: what the spine surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 2013;33:2031−46.
  • 18. Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Thoracolumbar spine trauma: Evaluation and surgical decision-making. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2013;4:3−9.
  • 19. Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Thomas KC, Boyd MC, Paquett S, Kwon BK, et al. Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:295−303.
  • 20. Shamji MF, Roffey DM, Young DK, Reindl R, Wai EK. A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:370−5.
APA karaali e, Ciloglu O, duramaz a, Kusvuran A, Ekiz T (2020). Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. , 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
Chicago karaali evren,Ciloglu Osman,duramaz altuğ,Kusvuran Aslihan,Ekiz Timur Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. (2020): 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
MLA karaali evren,Ciloglu Osman,duramaz altuğ,Kusvuran Aslihan,Ekiz Timur Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. , 2020, ss.805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
AMA karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. . 2020; 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
Vancouver karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. . 2020; 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
IEEE karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T "Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment." , ss.805 - 810, 2020. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
ISNAD karaali, evren vd. "Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment". (2020), 805-810. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
APA karaali e, Ciloglu O, duramaz a, Kusvuran A, Ekiz T (2020). Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 26(5), 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
Chicago karaali evren,Ciloglu Osman,duramaz altuğ,Kusvuran Aslihan,Ekiz Timur Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 26, no.5 (2020): 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
MLA karaali evren,Ciloglu Osman,duramaz altuğ,Kusvuran Aslihan,Ekiz Timur Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.26, no.5, 2020, ss.805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
AMA karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2020; 26(5): 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
Vancouver karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2020; 26(5): 805 - 810. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
IEEE karaali e,Ciloglu O,duramaz a,Kusvuran A,Ekiz T "Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 26, ss.805 - 810, 2020. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
ISNAD karaali, evren vd. "Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 26/5 (2020), 805-810. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524