BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI

Ahmet Selçuk BAŞARICI, (Piri Reis Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Tuzla, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Tanzer SATIR (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Deniz Ulaştırma Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Tuzla, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi
6 2
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 87 - 116 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 14-12-2020

BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI

Öz:
Literatürde boş konteyner konumlamasına dair pek çok çalışmamevcuttur. Bu çalışmaların sınıflandırılması, gelecek çalışmalara dair hangialanlarda araştırma yapılabilecek bir derinlik olduğunu belirlemede kritiktir. Buçalışma, literatürde mevcut çalışmaları stratejik, taktik ve operasyonel planlamadüzeyleri bağlamında sınıflandırmıştır. Sınıflandırma yapılırken planlama düzeyibelirleme kriterleri ile 2010-2018 seneleri arasında yayınlanan çalışmaiçerikleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma, önerilen çözümlere dair yararlanılanmatematiksel modelleri de incelemektedir. İlgi dönemde literatür çalışmalarınınpek çoğu taktik planlama düzeyindedir. Operasyonel düzeydeki çalışmalar isenispeten seyrektir. Stratejik planlamaya yönelik çalışma sayısı ise son derecekısırdır. Politik ve ekonomik gelişmelerden hızla etkilenen, belirsizliğin yüksekolduğu küresel taşımacılığa ilişkin akademik çalışmalarda stokastik modellerbeklenildiği düzeyde kullanılmamaktadır. Kısa dönem konteyner kiralamauygulamalarının, boş konteyner hareket sayılarının azaltılabilmesi üzerineetkileri gelecekte araştırma yapılabilecek önde gelen bakir alanlar içinde öneçıkmaktadır. Dolu/boş konteyner bekleme sürelerinin azaltılması, gemi limanuğraklarına dair sabit günlü zaman çizelgesi oluşturulması, demirbaş ve kiralıkkonteynerlerin birlikte kullanımı konuları son senelerde kısıtlı çalışmaya konuolmasına rağmen sektör pratiğine hitap etme potansiyeli taşımaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

TAXONOMY OF PLANNING LEVELS AND MODELS IN EMPTY CONTAINER POSITIONING

Öz:
There are several studies in the literature about empty container problems. Taxonomy of them is crucial to define the solution areas that can be deeply researched in future. In this study the solution, areas of empty container problems have been categorised in terms of planning level defined as strategic, tactical and operational. When categorising them, the criteria determining planning level have been compared with the contents of the relevant studies issued between 2010 and 2018. The mathematical models in these studies have been reviewed as well. The majority of the reviewed studies are at tactical level. The number of studies at operational level is relatively scarce. At strategic level, the number of studies is awfully poor. Utilization of stochastic modelling is quite poor in an environment where uncertainty is rather high in terms of political and economic developments. Particularly, the effects of short term container leasing practices decreasing empty container movements may be prominent for future studies. Some areas are promising to suggest practical solutions for the maritime sector. These are, decreasing dwell time for both full and empty containers, fixed-day scheduling, common operation of containers in assets and leased.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akyuz, M.H. ve Lee, C.Y. (2016). Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 88, 46-71.
  • Alfandari, L., Davidovic, T., Furini, F., Ljubic, I., Maras, V. ve Sebastien, M. (2019). Tighter MIP models for Barge Container Ship Routing. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science, 82, 38-54.
  • Basarici, A.S. ve Satir, T. (2019). Empty container movements beyond the effect of trade imbalance: Turkish terminals. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 33(2), 141-166.
  • Bell, M.G.H., Liu, X., Angeloudis, P., Fonzone, A. ve Hosseinloo, S.H. (2011). A frequency-based maritime container assignment model. Transportaion Research Part B: Methodological, 45(8), 1152-1161.
  • Bell, M.G.H., Liu, X., Rioult J. ve Angeloudis, P. (2013). A cost-based maritime container assignment model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 58, 58-70.
  • Boile, M., Theofanis, S., ve Mittal, N. (2004). Empty Intermodal Containers A Global Issue, Annual Forum of the Transportation Research Forum, Northwestern University, Transportation Center, Evanston, Illinois, March 21 – 24.
  • Boile, M. (2006). Empty Intermodal Container Management (Final Report FHWA NJ-2006-005). Piscataway, NJ: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The State University of New Jersey in cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, New Jersey.
  • Braekers, K., Janssens, G. K. ve Caris, A. (2011). Challenges in managing empty container movements at multiple planning levels. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 681–708.
  • Braekers, K., Caris, A., ve Janssens, G.K. (2013). Optimal shipping routes and vessel size for intermodal barge transport with empty container repositioning. Computers in Industry, 64 (2), 155-164.
  • Caglar, T. ve Esmer, S. (2015). Repositioning of empty containers problem in Turkey: A qualitative approch. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(31), 242-256.
  • Chang, H., Jula, H., Chassiakos, A., ve Ioannou, P. (2008). A heuristic solution for the empty container substitution problem, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(2), 203–216.
  • Chen, J. ve Yahalom, S. (2013). Container slot co-allocation planning with joint fleet agreement in a round voyage for liner shipping. The Journal of Navigation, 66(4), 589–603.
  • Cheung, R. K. ve Chen, C. Y. (1998). A two-stage stochastic network model and solution methods for the dynamic empty container allocation problem. Transportation Science, 32(2), 142–162.
  • Cimino, A., Diaz, R., Longo, F. ve Mirabeli, G. (2010). Empty containers repositioning: A state of the art overview, SpringSim’10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Article No: 72, OrlandoFlorida, April 11-15.
  • Dang, Q.V., Nielsen, I.E. ve Yun, W.Y. (2013). Replenishment policies for empty containers in an inland multi-depot system. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15 (1), 120-149.
  • Dejax, P.J., ve Crainic, T. G. (1987). Survey Paper - A Review of Empty Flows and Fleet Management Models in Freight Transportation. Transportation Science, 21(4), 227-248.
  • Dong, J.X., Xu, J., ve Song, D.P. (2013). Assessment of empty container repositioning policies in maritime transport. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 24(1), 49-72.
  • Drozhzhyn, O. (2016). Container Traffic Optimization on Feeder Shipping Line. Transport and Telecommunication, 17(4), 314–321.
  • Edirisinghe, L., Zhihong, J. ve Wijeratne, A.W. (2016). The global impact of container inventory imbalance and the factors that influence container inventory management strategies. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Business Management (ICBM) 2016, (pp.593-621). Sri Lanka: University of Sri Jayewardenepura.
  • Epstein, E., Neely, A. ve Weintraub, A. (2012). A Strategic Empty Container Logistics Optimization in a Major Shipping Company. Interfaces, 42(1), 5–16.
  • Feng, C.M. ve Chang, C.H. (2008). Empty container reposition planning for intra-Asia liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 35(5), 469- 489.
  • Graf von Westarp, A. ve Schinas, O. (2016). A fuzzy approch for container positioning considering sustainable profit optimization. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 92, 56-66.
  • Hilmola, O.P., Ujvari, S., Torkkeli, M., Lorentz, H. ve Andersson, T. (2010). From Northern Europe to Russia and Asia, and vice versa: traffic flow analysis – current situation and development trends. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 6(2), 205-217.
  • Jahn, C., ve Schlingmeier, J. (2014). Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. In T. Blecker, W. Kersten, C.M. Ringle (Eds.), Cooperation in Empty Container Logistics, pp.499-51). https://hicl.org/publications/2014/19/499.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2018.
  • Jiao, W., Yan, H. ve Pang K.W. (2016). Nonlinear pricing for stochastic container leasing system. Transportation Research Part B, 89, 1-18.
  • Jula, H., Chassiakos, A. ve Ioannou, P. (2006). Port dynamic empty container reuse. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(1), 43–60.
  • Liu, C., Jiang, Z., Liu, L. ve Geng, N. (2012). Solutions for flexible container leasing contracts with options under capacity and order constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 403- 413.
  • Liu, X., Ye, H.Q. ve Yuan, X.M. (2011). Tactical planning models for managing container flow and ship deployment. Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 38(5), 487-508.
  • Løfstedt, B., Alvarez, J.F., Plum, C.E.M, Pisinger, D. ve Sigurd, M.M. (2010). An integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner shipping network design (Report No: 19). Technical University of Denmark: DTU Management Engineering.
  • Long, Y., Lee, L.H., ve Chew, E.P. (2012). The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(1), 65-75.
  • Meng, Q. ve Wang, S. (2011). Liner shipping service network design with empty container repositioning. Transport Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(5), 695-708.
  • Meng, Q., Wang, T., ve Wang, S. (2015). Multi-period liner ship fleet planning with dependent uncertain container shipment demand. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(1), 43-67.
  • Monemi, R.N. ve Gelareh, S. (2017). Network design, fleet deployment and empty repositioning in liner shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 108, 60-79.
  • Monios, J. ve Wang, Y. (2014). Regional stakeholder solutions to empty container repositioning costs in peripheral regions, Scottish Transport Applications & Research (STAR) Conference, Glasgow.
  • Moon, I.K. , Ngoc, A.D.D. ve Hur, Y.S. (2010). Positioning empty containers among multiple ports with leasing and purchasing considerations. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 765-786.
  • Moon, I.K., Ngoc, A.D.D., ve Konings, R. (2012). Foldable and standard containers in empty container repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1), 107-124.
  • Rathnayake, J. ve Wijeratne, A.W. (2012). Second container port in Sri Lanka; Hambanthota or Trincomalee: an analysis using the game theory. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 13(3), 358- 378.
  • Rodrigue, J.P. (2017). The Geography of Transport Systems. Repositioning size and cost of empty containers. https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/appl5en/ch5a3en.html, Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2018.
  • Shi, N. ve Xu, D. (2011). A Markov Decision Process Model for an Online Empty Container Repositioning Problem in a Two-port Fixed Route. International Journal of Operations Research, 8(2), 8-17.
  • Song, D. P. ve Carter, J. (2009). Empty container repositioning in liner Shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(4), 291–307.
  • Song, D.P. ve Dong, J.X. (2010). Effectiveness of an empty container repositioning policy with flexible destination ports. Transport Policy, 18(1), 92-101.
  • Song, D.P. ve Dong, J.X. (2011). Flow balancing-based empty container repositioning in typical shipping service routes. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(1), 61–77.
  • Song, D.P., ve Dong, J.X. (2012). Cargo routing and empty container positioning in multiple shipping service routes. Transportation Research Part B, 46(2012), 1556-1575.
  • Song, D.P., ve Zhang, Q. (2010). A fluid flow model for empty container repositioning policy with a single port and stochastic demand. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48(5), 3623-3642.
  • Van der Meer, R., De Boer, M.K., Liebich, V., Hallers, C.T., Veldhuis, M. ve Ree, K. (2016). Ballast Water Risk Indication for the North Sea. Coastal Management, 44(6), 547-568.
  • Varshavets, A., Voß, S. ve Pawellek, G. (2013). Empty container repositioning and short term leasing option in global container management. http://www.isci.cl/tristan/data/Maritime%20Transport/ TRISTAN8_paper_116.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2015.
  • Verstrepen, S., Cools, M., Cruijssen, F. ve Dullaert, W. (2009). A dynamic framework for managing horizontal cooperation in logistics. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(3/4), 228-248.
  • Vojdani, N., Lootz, F. ve Rosner, R. (2013). Optimizing empty container logistics based on a collaborative network approach. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 467–493.
  • Wang, S. (2013). Essential elements in tactical planning models for container liner shipping. Transportation Research Part B, 54, 84–99.
  • Yun, W.Y., Lee, Y.M. ve Choi, Y.S. (2011). Optimal inventory control of empty containers in inland transportation system. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 451-457.
  • Zheng, J., Sun, Z. ve Gao, Z. (2015). Empty container exchange among liner carriers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 83, 158-169.
  • Zheng, J., Sun, Z. ve Zhang, F. (2016). Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 94, 123-140.
APA BAŞARICI A, Satir T (2019). BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. , 87 - 116.
Chicago BAŞARICI Ahmet Selçuk,Satir Tanzer BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. (2019): 87 - 116.
MLA BAŞARICI Ahmet Selçuk,Satir Tanzer BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. , 2019, ss.87 - 116.
AMA BAŞARICI A,Satir T BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. . 2019; 87 - 116.
Vancouver BAŞARICI A,Satir T BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. . 2019; 87 - 116.
IEEE BAŞARICI A,Satir T "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI." , ss.87 - 116, 2019.
ISNAD BAŞARICI, Ahmet Selçuk - Satir, Tanzer. "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI". (2019), 87-116.
APA BAŞARICI A, Satir T (2019). BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 87 - 116.
Chicago BAŞARICI Ahmet Selçuk,Satir Tanzer BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no.1 (2019): 87 - 116.
MLA BAŞARICI Ahmet Selçuk,Satir Tanzer BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2019, ss.87 - 116.
AMA BAŞARICI A,Satir T BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 11(1): 87 - 116.
Vancouver BAŞARICI A,Satir T BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 11(1): 87 - 116.
IEEE BAŞARICI A,Satir T "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI." Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, ss.87 - 116, 2019.
ISNAD BAŞARICI, Ahmet Selçuk - Satir, Tanzer. "BOŞ KONTEYNER KONUMLAMASI PLANLAMA DÜZEYİ VE MODEL TÜRLERİ SINIFLANDIRMASI". Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (2019), 87-116.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 15:59

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları