EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY

almarrawi, khetam; Al-Nesser, Salma; raies, abdullah

doi:10.7126/cumudj.650713

EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY

Abdullah R. RAIES, (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hama University, Hama, Syria)

Khetam ALMARRAWI, (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hama University, Hama, Syria)

Salma F. AL NESSER (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

1 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 5 - 12 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.650713 İndeks Tarihi: 17-12-2020

EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY

Öz:

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare penetration depth ofsodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules after passive ultrasonic agitationand ER; YAG activation.Materials and methods:Twenty-four single rooted human maturemandibular premolars were decoronated and accessed. After locating theapex and determining the working length, preparation of root canal was doneup to #35 file using Mtwo system and with 5.25%NaOCl irrigation. Teethwere then sealed apically with wax and submerged in a crystal violet dye for48 hours to stain dentin. NaOCl Irrigation was activated with eitherUltrasonic or ER;YAG laser. Specimens were sectioned longitudinally anddepth of bleached zone was evaluated under a stereomicroscope 40X.Results:Penetration depth was significantly higher in overall root canal inultrasonic group than ER;YAG laser group (P=.000). In ER;YAG Lasergroup, the highest penetration depth was in the coronal third followed bymiddle and apical, with significant difference between apical third and bothmiddle and coronal thirds (P=.009, .003 respectively), and no significantdifference between middle and coronal thirds (P=.083).Highest penetrationdepth was seen in the middle third, followed by coronal and apical,withnosignificant difference in penetration depth between the three sections of theroot canal activated with Ultrasonic (P=.664).Conclusion: ultrasonic activation can lead to more NaOCl penetration intodentinal tubules than activation with ER;YAG.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Maciel Filho M, Zotarelli-Filho I, Linhares de Castro F. Main Predictors of Root Canal Endodontical Treatment: Systematic Review. Int J Dent Oral Sci 2018;5:595-600.
2. Peters OA, Schonenberger K, Laib A. effects of NiTi preparation technique on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001;34:221-230.
3. Jena A, Sahoo SK, Govind S. Root canal irrigants: a review of their interactions, benefits, and limitations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015;36:256-261.
4. Ramachandra JA, Nihal NK, Nagarathna C, Vora MS. Root canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth. World J Dent 2015;6:229-234.
5. Ismail S, Adyanthaya A, Sreelakshmi N. Intracanal irrigants in pediatric endodontics : A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2017;3:246-251.
6. He L, Zhong J, Gong Q, Kim SG, Zeichner SJ, Xiang L, Ye L, Zhou X, Zheng J, Liu Y, Guan C, Cheng B, Ling J, Mao JJ. Treatment of Necrotic Teeth by Apical Revascularization: Meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:1-11.
7. Kuştarcı A, Oktay EA, Kılıç A, Özan Ü, Altunbaş D. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, propolis, octenidinedihydrochloride and chlorhexidine on microorganisms. Cumhur Dent J 2011;14:183-190.
8. Buldur B, Kapdan A. Comparison of the EndoVac System and Conventional Needle Irrigation on Removal of the Smear Layer in Primary Molar Root Canals. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:1168-1174.
9. Walsh LJ. Activation of Alkaline Irrigation Fluids in Endodontics. Materials (Basel)2017;10:1-10.
10. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM. Ultrasonics in Endodontics : A Review of the Literature. J Endod 2007;33:81-95.
11. Wright PP, Walsh LJ. Optimizing Antimicrobial Agents in Endodontics. In: Kumavath RN, (eds). Antimicrobial Agents. Croatia: InTech; 2017:87-107.
12. van der Sluis L, Versluis M, Wu M, Wesselink P. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007;40:415-426.
13.Bryce G, MacBeth N, Gulabivala K. The efficacy of supplementary sonic irrigation using the EndoActiva- torâ system determined by removal of a collagen film from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 2018;51:489-497.
14. Schlichting R, Widbiller M. Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic , ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation. Int Endod J 2019;52:1210- 1217.
15. Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM, Leonardi DP, Di Giorgio G, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J 2016;27:3-8.
16. Ghorbanzadeh A, Aminsobhani M, Chiniforush N, Shamshiri AR. Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dentinal Tubules after Conventional Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Agitation and Nd:YAG Laser Activated Irrigation. Laser Appl Med Sci Res Cent 2016;7:105-111.
17. Moor RJG De, Meire M, Goharkhay K. Efficacy of Ultrasonic versus Laser-activated Irrigation to. J Endod 2010;36:1580-1583.
18. Deleu E, Meire MA. Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. Laser Med Sci 2013;30:831-835.
19. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Medi Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275.
20. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellestein JW. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short- term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 2003;29:647-648.
21. William S, Goldman M. penetrrabilty of the smeared layerby a strain of Proteus vulgaris. J Endod 1985;11:385-388.
22. Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-398.
23. Nair B, Reddy K. Advances in root canal disinfection. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2011;5:1-3.
24. Fogel H, Pashley D. Dentine pwemeability: effects of endodontic procedures on root slabs. J Endod 1990;16:442-445.
25. Olivi G. Laser Use in Endodontics : Evolution from Direct Laser Irradiation to Laser-Activated Irrigation. J Laser dent 2013;21:58-71.
26. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical Extrusion of Root Canal Irrigants When Using Er : YAG and Er , Cr : YSGG Lasers with Optical Fibers : An In Vitro Dye Study. J Endod 2008;34:706-708.
27. Hazar E, Sağlam BC, Koçak S, Koçak MM. Efficacy of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic iRRIGATION on Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste Removal. Cumhur Dent J 2019;22:108-113.
28. Uzunoglu E, Gorduysus M, Nagas E. Efficacy of different devices in removing calcium hydroxide from the root canal. Cumhur Dent J 2015;18:318-326.
29. Schafer E, Bossmann K. antimicrobial efficacy of chlorohexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Entrococcus fecalis. J Endod 2005;31:53-56.
30. Siqueira JF, Rocas I, Lopez H. patterns of microbial colonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology2002;93:174-178.
31. Peters L, Wesselink P, Buijs J, Winkelholf A. viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001;27:76-81.
32. Haapasalo M, Qrastavik D. in vitro infection and disinficton of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987;66:1375-1379.
33.Rajakumaran A, Ganesh A. Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Penetration of Root Canal Irrigant After Using Manual, Passive Ultrasonic, and Diode Laser-Assisted Irrigant Activation Technique. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11:216-220.
34. Paqué F, Luder HU, Sener B, Zehnder M. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. Int Endod J 2006;39:18-25.
35. Macías D, Bravo V, Echeverri D. Effect of sonic versus ultrasonic activation on aqueous solution penetration in root canal dentin. J oral Res 2018;7:24- 29.
36. Vandrangi P. Evaluating Penetration Depth of Treatment Fluids into Dentinal Tubules Using the GentleWave ® System. Dentistry 2016;6:3-7.
37.Castelo-baz P, Cantatore G, Ru M. In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation in Simulated Lateral Canals of Extracted Teeth. J Endod 2012;38:688-691.

APA	raies a, almarrawi k, Al-Nesser S (2020). EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. , 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
Chicago	raies abdullah,almarrawi khetam,Al-Nesser Salma EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. (2020): 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
MLA	raies abdullah,almarrawi khetam,Al-Nesser Salma EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. , 2020, ss.5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
AMA	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. . 2020; 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
Vancouver	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. . 2020; 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
IEEE	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S "EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY." , ss.5 - 12, 2020. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
ISNAD	raies, abdullah vd. "EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY". (2020), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.650713

APA	raies a, almarrawi k, Al-Nesser S (2020). EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 23(1), 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
Chicago	raies abdullah,almarrawi khetam,Al-Nesser Salma EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 23, no.1 (2020): 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
MLA	raies abdullah,almarrawi khetam,Al-Nesser Salma EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.23, no.1, 2020, ss.5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
AMA	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2020; 23(1): 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
Vancouver	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2020; 23(1): 5 - 12. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
IEEE	raies a,almarrawi k,Al-Nesser S "EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 23, ss.5 - 12, 2020. 10.7126/cumudj.650713
ISNAD	raies, abdullah vd. "EVALUATION OF PENETRATION DEPTH OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INTO DENTINAL TUBULES AFTER PASSIVE ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION COMPARED TO ER;YAG LASER ACTIVATION. AN IN-VITRO STUDY". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 23/1 (2020), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.650713