Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 18 Sayı: TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı Sayfa Aralığı: 281 - 294 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 İndeks Tarihi: 18-12-2020
Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors
Öz: The aim of this study is to shed light on the type of experience people usein choosing the source concepts of theirmetaphors. To this end, the following research question is posed: Are sensory or extra-sensory experiences more determinative in choosing the source concepts of metaphors? Participants of the study were asked to complete a number of metaphors with possible source concepts. Abstract source concepts predominated at all times the use of concrete ones by the participants.Results of this study indicate that what is more‘experiential’does not necessarily mean ‘what is attained through sense experiences’. Our experiential world is complex and incorporates many feelings, emotions, and ideas which can be closer to our cognition than sensory experiences in choosing the source concepts of metaphors.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Aristotle (2008).Poetics(S. H. Butcher, Trans.). New York: Cosimo Classics (Original work published 1895).
- Grady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford handbookof cognitive linguistics (pp.188-213). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Katz, A. N. (1989). On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(4), pp.486-499.
- Kövecses, Z. (2017). The conceptual metaphor. In E. Semino & Z. Demjen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language(pp.13-28). New York: Routledge.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought.New York: Basic Books.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University ofChicago Press.
- Margolies, S. O. (2008). Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition & Emotion, 22(7), pp. 1401-1414.
- Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), pp. 199-244.
- Ramscar, M., Boroditsky L., & and Matlock, T. (2009). Time, motion and meaning: The experiential basis of abstract thought. In K. S. Mix, L. B. Smith, and M. Gasser (Eds.), The spatial foundations of language and cognition(pp. 67-82). Oxford: OUP.
- Rapp, C. "Aristotle's Rhetoric",The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2010 Edition), EEdward N. Zalta(ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/ aristotle-rhetoric/>.
- Shen, Y. (1999). Principles of metaphor interpretationand the notion of ‘domain’: A proposal for a hybrid model. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), pp.1631-1653.
| APA | Demir Y (2020). Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. , 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| Chicago | Demir Yeliz Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. (2020): 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| MLA | Demir Yeliz Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. , 2020, ss.281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| AMA | Demir Y Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. . 2020; 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| Vancouver | Demir Y Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. . 2020; 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| IEEE | Demir Y "Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors." , ss.281 - 294, 2020. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| ISNAD | Demir, Yeliz. "Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors". (2020), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| APA | Demir Y (2020). Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı), 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| Chicago | Demir Yeliz Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18, no.TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı (2020): 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| MLA | Demir Yeliz Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.18, no.TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı, 2020, ss.281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| AMA | Demir Y Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 18(TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı): 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| Vancouver | Demir Y Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 18(TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı): 281 - 294. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| IEEE | Demir Y "Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors." Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, ss.281 - 294, 2020. 10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
| ISNAD | Demir, Yeliz. "Sensory or Extra-Sensory Input?A Study on the Experiential Nature of Source Concepts of Metaphors". Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18/TBMM 100. Yıl Özel Sayısı (2020), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.635185 |
