Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis

Gülizar KURTOĞLU AKKAYA, (Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü, Konya, Türkiye)
Nur AYVAZ ÇAVDAROĞLU, (Kadir Has Üniversitesi, İşletme Bölümü, Fatih, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Mehmet BİLGİLİ (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Environmental Research & Technology
1 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 128 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.35208/ert.774770 İndeks Tarihi: 18-12-2020

Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis

Öz:
Herein, landfill leachate containing high amount of organic matter, which is quite difficult to treat, was first treatedusing the new submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) system. Aluminum (Al) electrode was used for thetreatment of leachate in the SMEBR and Al accumulation was detected. This study aims to examine Al accumulation inthe treatment of leachate with high organic content in the SMEBR system. The Al values obtained were plotted on agraph using MS Excel, and Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine whether there is a statistical difference betweenthe observed Al values. Also, correlations between Al accumulations and conductivity and TOC in SMEBR and SMBRwere evaluated. Resultantly, it was found that relationship between Al and conductivity is very weak, correlationbetween Al and TOC% is a weak-moderate, the Al accumulation in the SEMBR has a linear relationship with time andthere is a very strong correlation between the two variables (R2= 0.7591). Its correlation with time in the SMBR ismoderate (R2= 0.3316). MS Excel 2016 and Minitab 16.0 programs were utilized in the statistical analyses.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. S. Renou, J.G. Givaudan, S. Poulain, F. Dirassouyan, and P. Moulin, “Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 150 (3), pp. 468–493, 2008.
  • [2]. D. Kulikowska, and E. Klimiuk, E, “The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99 (13), pp. 5981- 5985, 2008.
  • [3]. A.A. Tatsi, and A.I. Zouboulis, "A field investigation of the quantity and quality of leachate from a municipal solid waste landfill in a mediterranean climate (Thessaloniki, Greece)," Advances in Environmental Research, Vol. 6 (3), 207-219, 2002.
  • [4]. F.N. Ahmed, and C.Q. Lan, “Treatment of landfill leachate using membrane bioreactors: A review,” Desalination, Vol. 287, pp. 41–54, 2012.
  • [5]. Ü.T. Ün, S. Uğur, A.S. Koparal, and Ü.B. Öğütveren, “Electrocoagulation of olive mill wastewaters,” Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 52(1), pp. 136-141, 2006.
  • [6]. N. Adhoum, and L. Monser, “Decolourization and removal of phenolic compounds from olive mill wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, Vol. 43(10), pp. 1281-1287, 2004.
  • [7]. M. Agustin, W. Sengpracha, and W. Phutdhawong, “Electrocoagulation of palm oil mill effluent,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 5(3), 177-180, 2008.
  • [8]. C. Barrera-Díaz, G. Roa-Morales, L. Ávila-Córdoba, T. Pavón-Silva, and B. Bilyeu, “Electrochemical treatment applied to food-processing industrial wastewater,” Industrial & engineering chemistry research, Vol. 45(1), pp. 34-38, 2006.
  • [9]. C.T. Wang, W. L. Chou, and Y. M. Kuo, “Removal of COD from laundry wastewater by electrocoagulation/electroflotation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 164(1), pp. 81-86, 2009.
  • [10]. M. Murugananthan, G.B. Raju, and S. Prabhakar, “Separation of pollutants from tannery effluents by electro flotation,” Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 40(1), pp. 69-75, 2004.
  • [11]. S. Zodi, J.N. Louvet, C. Michon, O. Potier, M.N. Pons, F. Lapicque, and J.P. Leclerc, “Electrocoagulation as a tertiary treatment for paper mill wastewater: Removal of nonbiodegradable organic pollution and arsenic,” Separation and purification, Vol. 81(1), pp. 62-68, 2011.
  • [12]. A.K. Golder, A.N. Samanta, and S. Ray, “Removal of trivalent chromium by electrocoagulation,” Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 53(1), pp. 33-41, 2007.
  • [13]. C.L. Lai, and K.S. Lin, “Sludge conditioning characteristics of copper chemical mechanical polishing wastewaters treated by electrocoagulation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 136(2), pp. 183-187, 2008.
  • [14]. S. Hasan, “Design and performance of a pilot submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) for wastewater treatment,” Concordia University, 2012.
  • [15]. V. Suganthi, M. Mahalakshmi, and N. Balasubramanian, “Development of hybrid membrane bioreactor for tannery effluent treatment,” Desalination, Vol. 309, pp. 231-236, 2013.
  • [16]. S.W. Hasan, M. Elektorowicz, and J.A. Oleszkiewicz, “Start-up period investigation of pilot-scale submerged membrane electrobioreactor (SMEBR) treating raw municipal wastewater,” Chemosphere, Vol. 97, pp. 71–77, 2014.
  • [17]. M. Hosseinzadeh, G.N. Bidhendi, A. Torabian, N. Mehrdadi, and M. Pourabdullah, “A new flat sheet membrane bioreactor hybrid system for advanced treatment of effluent, reverse osmosis pretreatment and fouling mitigation,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 192, pp. 177–184, 2015.
  • [18]. J. P. Chen, C.Z. Yang, J.H. Zhou, andX.Y. Wang, “Study of the influence of the electric field on membrane flux of a new type of membrane bioreactor,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 128, pp. 177-180, 2007.
  • [19]. K. Akamatsu, Y. Yoshida, T. Suzaki, Y. Sakai, H. Nagamoto, and S. I. Nakao, “Development of a membrane-carbon cloth assembly for submerged membrane bioreactors to apply an intermittent electric field for fouling suppression,” Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 88, pp. 202–207, 2012.
  • [20]. L. Liu, J. Liu, B. Gao, and F. Yang, “Minute electric field reduced membrane fouling and improved performance of membrane bioreactor,” Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 86, pp. 106–112, 2012.
  • [21]. S. Ibeid, M. Elektorowicz, and J. A. Oleszkiewicz, “Novel electrokinetic approach reduces membrane fouling,” Water Research, Vol. 47(16), pp. 6358–6366, 2013.
  • [22]. S. Ibeid, M. Elektorowicz, and J. A. Oleszkiewicz, “Electro-conditioning of activated sludge in a membrane electro-bioreactor for improved dewatering and reduced membrane fouling,” Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 494, pp. 136– 142, 2015.
  • [23]. K. Bani-Melhem, and M. Elektorowicz, “Performance of the submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) with iron electrodes for wastewater treatment and fouling reduction,” Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 379(1–2), pp. 434–439, 2011.
  • [24]. G.K. Akkaya, E. Sekman, S. Top, E. Sagir, M.S. Bilgili, and S.Y. Guvenc, “Enhancing filterability of activated sludge from landfill leachate treatment plant by applying electrical field ineffective on bacterial life,” Environmental Science and PollutionResearch, Vol. 24, 2017.
  • [25]. G.K. Akkaya, and M.S. Bilgili, “Evaluating the Performance of an Electro-Membrane Bioreactor in Treatment of Young Leachate.” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 104017, 2020.
  • [26]. M. Kobya, H. Hiz, E. Senturk, C. Aydiner, and E. Demirbas, “Treatment of potato chips manufacturing wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Desalination, Vol. 190(1–3), pp. 201–211, 2006.
  • [27]. F. Ilhan, U. Kurt, O. Apaydin, and M.T. Gonullu, “Treatment of leachate by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron electrodes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 154(1-3), pp. 381-389, 2008.
  • [28]. C.T. Wang, W.T. Chou, Y.M. Kuo, “Removal of COD from laundry wastewater by electrocoagulation/electroflotation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 164(1), pp. 81-86, 2009.
  • [29]. M.Y. Mollah, P. Morkovsky, J.A. Gomes, M. Kesmez, J. Parga, D.L. Cocke, “Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 114, pp. 199- 210, 2004.
  • [30]. Ö. Apaydin, U. Kurt and M.T. Gonullu, “An investigation on the treatment of tannery wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Global NEST Journal, Vol. 11(4), pp. 546-555, 2009.
  • [31]. M.K. Oden, “Treatment of CNC industry wastewater by electrocoagulation technology: an application through response surface methodology,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 100(1), pp. 1-19, 2020.
  • [32]. M.K. Oden, “Treatment of wastewater by usıng aluminum and stainless steel electrodesassessment wıth response surface methodology,” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Vol. 28(12), pp. 9049-9057, 2019.
  • [33]. M. K. Oden, and H. Sari-Erkan, “Treatment of metal plating wastewater using iron electrode by electrocoagulation process: Optimization and process performance,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 119, pp. 207-217, 2018.
  • [34]. Y. Feng, X. Li, T. Song, Y. Yu, and J. Qi, “Stimulation effect of electric current density (ECD) on microbial community of a three dimensional particle electrode coupled with biological aerated filter reactor (TDE-BAF),” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 243, pp. 667-675, 2017.
  • [35]. S. Paris, G. Lind, H. Lemmer, and P.A. Wilderer, “Dosing aluminum chloride to control Microthrix parvicella,” Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, Vol. 33(3), pp. 247-254, 2005.
  • [36]. E.J. Lees, B. Noble, R. Hewitt, and S.A. Parsons, “The impact of residual coagulant on downstream treatment processes,” Environmental technology, Vol. 22(1), pp. 113- 122, 2001.
  • [37]. S. Alimoradi, R. Faraj, and A. Torabian, “Effects of residual aluminum on hybrid membrane bioreactor (Coagulation-MBR) performance, treating dairy wastewater,” Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, Vol. 133, pp. 320-324, 2018.
  • [38]. T. Okuda, W. Nishijima, M. Sugimoto, N. Saka, S. Nakai, K. Tanabe, and M. Okada, “Removal of coagulant aluminum from water treatment residuals by acid,” Water research, Vol. 60, pp. 75- 81, 2014.
  • [39]. J. Keeley, P. Jarvis, A.D. Smith, S.J. Judd, “Coagulant recovery and reuse for drinking water treatment,” Water research, Vol. 88, pp. 502-509, 2016.
  • [40]. A. Hovsepyan, and J.C.J. Bonzongo, “Aluminum drinking water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs) as sorbent for mercury: Implications for soil remediation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 164(1), pp. 73-80, 2009.
  • [41]. Y.F. Zhou, and R.J. Haynes, “Removal of Pb (II), Cr (III) and Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using alum-derived water treatment sludge,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 215(1-4), pp. 631-643, 2011.
  • [42]. W. Chu, “Lead metal removal by recycled alum sludge,” Water Research, Vol. 33(13), pp. 3019- 3025, 1999.
  • [43]. S.N.I. Ngatenah, S.R.M. Kutty, and M.H. Isa, “Optimization of heavy metal removal from aqueous solution using groundwater treatment plant sludge (GWTPS),” In:International Conference on Environment (ICENV 2010), 2010.
  • [44]. P.G. Owen, “Water treatment works’ sludge management,” Water and Environment Journal, Vol. 16(4), pp. 282-285, 2002.
  • [45]. M. Moodley and J.C. Hughes, “The effects of a polyacrylamide-derived watertreatment residue on the hydraulic conductivity, water retention andevaporation of four contrasting South African soils and implications for land disposal,” In: Proceedings of IWA Specialized Conference on Management of Residues Emanating from Water and Wastewater Treatment, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2005.
  • [46]. L.V. Kochian, O.A. Hoekenga, and M.A. Pineros, “How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? - Mechanisms of Aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol. 55, pp. 459−493, 2004.
  • [47]. “Why have aluminium levels increased dramatically?,” http://www.ccmaknowledgebase.vic.gov.au/bro wn_book/21_Aluminium.htm, (Accessed 19.06.2019).
  • [48]. S.K. Panda, F. Baluška, and H. Matsumoto, “Aluminum stress signaling in plants,” Plant Signaling & Behavior, Vol. 4(7), pp. 592-597, 2009.
APA Kurtoğlu Akkaya G, Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N, Bilgili M (2020). Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. , 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
Chicago Kurtoğlu Akkaya Gülizar,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu Nur,Bilgili Mehmet Sinan Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. (2020): 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
MLA Kurtoğlu Akkaya Gülizar,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu Nur,Bilgili Mehmet Sinan Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. , 2020, ss.119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
AMA Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. . 2020; 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
Vancouver Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. . 2020; 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
IEEE Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M "Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis." , ss.119 - 128, 2020. 10.35208/ert.774770
ISNAD Kurtoğlu Akkaya, Gülizar vd. "Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis". (2020), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.774770
APA Kurtoğlu Akkaya G, Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N, Bilgili M (2020). Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. Environmental Research & Technology, 3(3), 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
Chicago Kurtoğlu Akkaya Gülizar,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu Nur,Bilgili Mehmet Sinan Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. Environmental Research & Technology 3, no.3 (2020): 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
MLA Kurtoğlu Akkaya Gülizar,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu Nur,Bilgili Mehmet Sinan Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. Environmental Research & Technology, vol.3, no.3, 2020, ss.119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
AMA Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. Environmental Research & Technology. 2020; 3(3): 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
Vancouver Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis. Environmental Research & Technology. 2020; 3(3): 119 - 128. 10.35208/ert.774770
IEEE Kurtoğlu Akkaya G,Ayvaz-Çavdaroğlu N,Bilgili M "Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis." Environmental Research & Technology, 3, ss.119 - 128, 2020. 10.35208/ert.774770
ISNAD Kurtoğlu Akkaya, Gülizar vd. "Aluminum accumulation in treatment using submerged membrane electro-bioreactor of young landfill leachate: Statistical analysis". Environmental Research & Technology 3/3 (2020), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.774770
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
25-04-2024 5:1

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları