Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 659 - 667 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843 İndeks Tarihi: 19-12-2020

Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems

Öz:
One of the important parameters for cooling systems is the choice of refrigerant. Refrigerants used in cooling systems damage the atmosphere and cause global warming. For these reasons, alternative refrigerants which are not harmful to the environment and atmosphere have been used. In this study, the performance and exergy efficiency of R407C, R410A and R448A refrigerants which are alternative to R22 refrigerant in vapor compression refrigeration system were theoretically calculated. Engineering equation solver (EES) has been used for the thermodynamic analysis. The highest COP and exergy efficiency values were achieved in the system operating with refrigerant R22. The highest COP and exergy efficiency values after R22 fluid were determined in the system operating with R448A refrigerant. For different evaporator temperatures, the COP values of the R22 system vary between 2.7 and 2.81. The COP values of the R448A system vary between 2.5 and 2.63. The exergy efficiency of the system operating with R22 varies between %39.4 and %52.2. The exergy efficiency of the system operating with R448A varies between %36.6 and %48.8. R448A instead of R22 are found to be replacement refrigerants among other alternatives refrigerants as a result of the analysis.
Anahtar Kelime:

R22 ve Alternatifleri R407C, R410A ve R448A Soğutkanlarının Buhar Sıkıştırmalı Soğutma Sistemlerindeki Enerji ve Ekserji Performanslarının Karşılaştırmalı İncelenmesi

Öz:
Soğutma sistemleri için önemli parametrelerden biri soğutucu akışkanın seçimidir. Soğutma sistemlerinde kullanılan soğutucu akışkanlar atmosfere zarar vermekte ve küresel ısınmaya sebep olmaktadır. Bu sebeplerden dolayı, çevreye ve atmosfere zararı olmayan alternatif soğutucu akışkanlar kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, R22 soğutucu akışkanına alternatif olan R407C, R410A ve R448A soğutucu akışkanlarının buhar sıkıştırmalı soğutma sistemindeki performansları ve ekserji verimleri teorik olarak hesaplanmıştır. Termodinamik analizler için Engineering Equation Solver (EES) programı kullanılmıştır. En yüksek COP ve ekserji verimi değerlerine R22 soğutkanı ile çalışan sistemde ulaşılmıştır. R22 akışkanından sonraki en yüksek COP ve ekserji verimleri R448A soğutucu akışkanı ile çalışan sistemde tespit edilmiştir. Farklı evaporatör sıcaklıkları için, R22 sisteminin COP değerleri 2.7 ile 2.81 arasında değişmektedir. R448A sisteminin COP değerleri 2.5 ile 2.63 arasında değişmektedir. R22 ile çalışan sistemin ekserji verimliliği % 39 ile % 52 arasında değişmektedir. R448A ile çalışan sistemin ekserji verimliliği % 36 ile% 48 arasında değişmektedir. Analizler sonucunda diğer alternatif soğutkanlar arasında R448 soğutkanının R22 soğutkanı yerine kullanılabileceği görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. Onat, A., İmal, M., İnan, A.T., “Investigation the Effects of Refrigerants on Ozone Layer and Alternative Refrigerants”, KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2004, 7(1), In Turkish.
  • [2]. Sogut, M.Z., Karakoç, H., Kılkış, B., “Examination of Enviromental Performances of Refrigerants on the basis of Exergy Efficiency”, 6. Uluslararası İleri Teknolojiler Sempozyumu (IATS’11), Elazığ, Türkiye, 16-18 May 2011, In Turkish.
  • [3]. Onat, A., “Investigation of the Effects of Refrigerants on Ozone Layer Investigation of the Effects of Cooling Fluids on Ozone Layer”, Makine Eğitimi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,1994, In Turkish.
  • [4]. Dalkilic, A. S., & Wongwises, S., “A performance comparison of vapour-compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants”, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 37(9): 1340-1349.
  • [5]. Sagia, Z., & Rakopoulos, C., “Alternative refrigerants for the heat pump of a ground source heat pump system”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 100: 768-774.
  • [6]. Vaghela, J. K., “Comparative evaluation of an automobile air-conditioning system using R134a and its alternative refrigerants”, Energy Procedia, 2010, 109: 153-160.
  • [7]. Mohanraj, M., Jayaraj, S., & Muraleedharan, C., “Environment friendly alternatives to halogenated refrigerants—A review”, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2009, 3(1): 108-119.
  • [8]. Harby, K., “Hydrocarbons and their mixtures as alternatives to environmental unfriendly halogenated refrigerants: An updated overview”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 73: 1247-1264.
  • [9]. Devecioğlu, A. G., Oruç, V., Berk, U., & Ender, S., “İklimlendirme sistemlerinde R22 yerine R442A kullanılmasının enerji parametrelerine etkisinin incelenmesi”, Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 2016, 7(3): 551-558.
  • [10]. Demircioğlu, A., “Theoretical investigation of performances of R22 and R407c and R410a which are substitutes for R22 in a heat pump”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,2010, In Turkish.
  • [11]. Ergün A., Gürel, A.E., Ceylan, İ., “Performance Analysis of R438a and R417a Refrigerants as an Alternative to R22 in Commercial Cooling Systems”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018, 6(4): 824-833, In Turkish.
  • [12]. Mota-Babiloni, A., Navarro-Esbri, J., Peris, B., Molés, F., Verdú, G., “Experimental evaluation of R448A as R404A lower-GWP alternative in refrigeration systems”, Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 105: 756–762.
  • [13]. Mendoza-Miranda,J.,M., Mota-Babiloni,A., Navarro-Esbrí, J., “Evaluation of R448A and R450A as low-GWP alternatives for R404A and R134a using a micro-fin tube evaporator model”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 98: 330–339.
  • [14]. Sethi, A., Pottker, G., Motta, S.Y., “Experimental evaluation and field trial of low global warming potential R404A replacements for commercial refrigeration”, Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 2016, 22: 1175-1184.
  • [15]. Park, K. J., Seo, T., & Jung, D., “Performance of alternative refrigerants for residential airconditioning applications”, Applied Energy, 2007, 84: 985-991.
  • [16]. La Rocca, V., & Panno, G., “Experimental performance evaluation of a vapour compression refrigerating plant when replacing R22 with alternative refrigerants”, Applied Energy, 2011, 88: 2809-2815.
  • [17]. Park, K. J., & Jung, D., “Thermodynamic performance of HCFC22 alternative refrigerants for residential air-conditioning applications”, Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39(6): 675-
  • [18]. Bolaji, B. O., “Performance investigation of ozone-friendly R404A and R507 refrigerants as alternatives to R22 in a window air-conditioner”, Energy and Buildings, 2011, 43(11): 31393143.
  • [19]. Han, X. H., Wang, Q., Zhu, Z. W., & Chen, G. M., “Cycle performance study on R32/R125/R161 as an alternative refrigerant to R407C”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(14-15): 2559-2565.
  • [20]. Venkataiah, S., & Rao, G. V., “Analysis of alternative refrigerants to R22 for air-conditioning applications at various evaporating temperatures”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2014, 4(3): 39-46.
  • [21]. Joudi, K. A., & Al-Amir, Q. R., “Experimental Assessment of residential split type airconditioning systems using alternative refrigerants to R-22 at high ambient temperatures”, Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 86: 496-506.
  • [22]. Karagoz, S., Yilmaz, M., Comakli, O., & Ozyurt, O., “R134a and various mixtures of R22/R134a as an alternative to R22 in vapour compression heat pumps”, Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45(2): 181-196.
  • [23]. Chen, W., “A comparative study on the performance and environmental characteristics of R410A and R22 residential air conditioners”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(1): 1-7.
  • [24]. Park, K. J., Shim, Y. B., & Jung, D., “Experimental performance of R432A to replace R22 in residential air-conditioners and heat pumps”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(2-3): 597600.
  • [25]. Çengel, Y. A., Boles, M.A., “Termodinamik - Mühendislik Yaklaşımıyla”, Güven Bilimsel Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2012.
APA ALTINKAYNAK M, Olgun E, Şencan Şahin A (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. , 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
Chicago ALTINKAYNAK MEHMET,Olgun Engin,Şencan Şahin Arzu Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. (2019): 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
MLA ALTINKAYNAK MEHMET,Olgun Engin,Şencan Şahin Arzu Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. , 2019, ss.659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
AMA ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. . 2019; 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
Vancouver ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. . 2019; 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
IEEE ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A "Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems." , ss.659 - 667, 2019. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
ISNAD ALTINKAYNAK, MEHMET vd. "Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems". (2019), 659-667. https://doi.org/doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
APA ALTINKAYNAK M, Olgun E, Şencan Şahin A (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(3), 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
Chicago ALTINKAYNAK MEHMET,Olgun Engin,Şencan Şahin Arzu Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering 6, no.3 (2019): 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
MLA ALTINKAYNAK MEHMET,Olgun Engin,Şencan Şahin Arzu Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, vol.6, no.3, 2019, ss.659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
AMA ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering. 2019; 6(3): 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
Vancouver ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering. 2019; 6(3): 659 - 667. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
IEEE ALTINKAYNAK M,Olgun E,Şencan Şahin A "Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems." El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 6, ss.659 - 667, 2019. doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843
ISNAD ALTINKAYNAK, MEHMET vd. "Comparative Evaluation of Energy and Exergy Performances of R22 and its Alternative R407C, R410A and R448A Refrigerants in Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems". El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering 6/3 (2019), 659-667. https://doi.org/doi:10.31202/ecjse.565843