THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS

Bilgen KIRAL (Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Aydın, Türkiye)
IOJET
10 3
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 248 - 265 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 25-12-2020

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS

Öz:
This research which aimed to investigate the relationship between the empowerment ofteachers by high school administrators and school commitments of teachers was designed inrelational screening model. The study group of the research was composed of 188 volunteerteachers working in the public Anatolian High Schools in Aydin during 2017. “BehavioralTeacher Empowerment” and “Organizational Commitment” scales were used. As a result ofthe research, it was determined that the highest empowerment was in the administrativesupport dimension and the highest commitment level was in the affective commitmentdimension. It was revealed that there was not a significant difference in the dimensions ofempowerment according to gender, seniority and branch variables of teachers. In the analysesperformed regarding the commitment levels of teachers, while there was not a significantdifference in terms of the dimensions according to branch variable, it was found that femaleteachers had higher affective commitments than male teachers. Teachers with professionalseniority of 31-40 years had higher affective commitments than those with professionalseniority of 11-20 years. It was determined that the highest level of relationship was betweencommunication and affective commitment dimensions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acaray, T. (2010). Ankara ili ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim okul müdürlerinin öğretmenleri güçlendirme örüntüleri [The teacher empowerment patterns of principals in the public schools of central districts in Ankara province] (Master Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Aksanaklu, P. (2018). Okul yöneticilerinin örgütsel bağlılıkları ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [With organizational contributions of school administrators the investigation of the relationship between binding levels] (Master Thesis). Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
  • Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.
  • Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276.
  • Aselage, J. & Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491-509.
  • Balay, R. (2000). Yönetici ve öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık [Organizational commitment in managers and teachers]. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Balci, A. (2003). Örgütsel sosyalleşme kuram strateji ve taktikler[Organizational socialization theory strategies and tactics]. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Balci, A. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [Research in social sciences].Ankara: PegemA.
  • Balcik, E. (2018). Örgüt kültürü, psikolojik güçlendirme ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkiler[The relationships between organizational culture, psychological empowerment and organizational commitment](Master Thesis). Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
  • Basyigit, A. (2006). Örgütsel iletişimin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi [The effect of organizational communication on organizational commitment] (Master Thesis). Dumlupınar University, Kutahya, Turkey.
  • Baysal, A. C. & Paksoy, M. (1999). Mesleğe ve örgüte bağlılığın çok yönlü incelenmesinde Meyer-Allen Modeli [Meyer-Allen Model in a multi-dimensional study of commitment to the profession and organization]. Istanbul University Journal of Business Research, 28(1), 7-15.
  • Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1995). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher’s perspectives. Social Psychology, 1, 117-145.
  • Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1996). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teacher’s sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 138-164.
  • Blase, J. & Kirby, P. (2000). Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do. London: Corwin.
  • Boezeman, E. J. & Ellemers, N. (2008). Pride and respect in volunteers’ organizational commitment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 159-172.
  • Bogler, R. & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers‟ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and teacher education, 20(3), 277-289.
  • Bredeson, P. V. (March 27-31, 1989). Redefining leadership and the roles of school principals: Responses to changes in the professional worklife of teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • Bredeson, P. V. & Johansson, O. (2006). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26 (2), 385-401.
  • Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, O. A., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods ]. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Buyukozturk, S. (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı istatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation]. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Byron, K. & Kerchner, C. T. (1991). Defining principal leadership in an era of teacher empowerment. Chicago: The American Educational Research Association.
  • Can, A. (2015). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde veri analizi [Data analysis in the process of scientific research with SPSS]. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Chang, C. S. & Chang, H. C. (2008). Perceptions of internal Marketing and Organizational Commitment by Nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65 (1), 92–100.
  • Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B. & Duemer, L. (2002). Structural Antecedents and Psychological Correlates of Teacher Empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257-277.
  • Deniz, A. (2013). Okullarda güç mesafesi ve örgütsel bağlılık [The relationship between power distance and organizational commitment at schools] (Master thesis). Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey.
  • Dincer, A. (2013). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin yetki kullanma eğilimlerine ilişkin öğretmen ve müdür görüşleri [Reviews of teachers and principals about the primary school principals' tending to use the authority] (Master thesis). Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.
  • Dufor, R. & Berkey, T. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development, 16 (4).
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. & Lamastro, V. D. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology,75(1),51-59.
  • Egriboyun, D. (2013). Ortaöğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel güven, örgütsel destek ve örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki [Relation among organizational trust, organizational support and organizational commitment of the administrators/teachers who are charged in secondary education schools] (Doctoral dissertation). Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
  • Everard, K. B.; Morris, G. & Wilson, I. (2004). Effective school management. California: Sage.
  • Firestone, W. A. (1993). Why “professionalizing” teaching is not enough. Educational Leadership, 6-11.
  • Gard, G., Lindstrom, K. & Dallner, M. (2003). Towards a learning organization: The introduction of aclient-centered team-based organization in administrative surveying work. Applied Ergonomics, 34(2), 97-105.
  • Gardenhour, C. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of empowerment in their work environments as measured by the psychological empowerment instrument (Doctoral dissertation). East Tennessee State University
  • Goyne, J., Pedgett, D., Rowicki, M. A. & Triplitt, T. (1999). The journey to teacher empowerment.http://files.eric.ed.gov (Retrived date:14.10.2016).
  • Gok, E. E. (2007). Örgütsel kültür bağlamında örgütsel vatandaşlık olgusu ve bir araştırma [Organizational citizenship behaviour in terms of organizational cultur ] (Master thesis). Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
  • Gozen, E. D. (2007). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık sigorta şirketleri üzerine bir uygulama]A research on job satisfaction and organizational commitment insurrances companies] (Master thesis). Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Huge, J. (1977). The Principal as Staff Development Leader. Educational Leadership, 384- 386.
  • Joo, B. K.,& Shim, J. H. (2010). Psychological empowerment and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of organizational learning culture. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 425-441.
  • Jha, S.(2011).Influence of psychological empowerment on affective, normative and continuance commitment- A study in the Indian IT industry. Journal of Indian Business Research,3(4),263-282
  • Karakus, M. (2008). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin duygusal zekâ yeterliklerinin, öğretmenlerin duygusal adanmışlık, örgütsel vatandaşlık ve iş doyumu düzeylerine etkisi [The effect of emotional intelligence competencies of primary school administrators and teachers on organizational commitment, organizational citizenship and job satisfaction levels of teachers] (Doctoral Dissertation). Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
  • Karasar, N. (1991). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Nobel
  • Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1977). Social psychology of organizations. H. Can & Y. Bayar (Trans. Edts.). Ankara: TODAIE.
  • Kirkman, B. L. & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
  • Keiser, N. M. & Shen, J. (2000). Principals' and teachers' perceptions of teacher empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,7, 115-121.
  • Kiral, B. (2015). Lise yöneticilerinin öğretmenleri güçlendirmesi ve öğretmenlerin kayıtsızlık (sinizm) davranışı ile ilişkisi [The relationship between teacher cynicism of high school administrators and cynicism behaviors of teachers] (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kiral, B. (2019). Eğitim yönetiminde öğretmen güçlendirme [Teacher Empowerment in Educational administration ]. (627-668). Eğitim yönetimi [Educational administration]. N. Cemaloglu ve M. Ozdemir (Edt). Ankara: PegemA.
  • Kiral, B., Arslan, M. M. & Kiral, E. (2011). Okulda oluşturulabilecek takımlar [Teams that can be created at school ]. Journal of Education and Training in the World, 1(1), 49– 55.
  • Kiral, E. & Kacar, O. (2016). The relationship between teachers’ school commitment and school culture. International Education Studies, 9(12), 90-108.
  • Klecker, B. & Loadman, W. E.(1996). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction. Chicago: The Mid-Western Educational Research Association.
  • Kocak, E. (2011). ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin yetki devri, otonomi ve hesap verebilirliklerine ilişkin algılarının belirlenmesi [A research on empowerment, autonomy and accountability perception of teachers who work in Turkish elemantary schools ] (Master thesis). Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
  • Kocak, O. (2013). Ortaokullarda görev yapan okul yöneticilerinin sosyal iletişim becerileri ile branş öğretmenlerinin motivasyonu arasındaki ilişki [The relation between the social communication skills of school administrators ı̇n secondary schools and the motivation of branch teachers] (Master thesis). Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
  • Kurtulmus, M. (2014). Farklılıkların yönetiminin öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıklarına ve vatandaşlık davranışlarına etkisi [The diversity management's effects on high school teachers' organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors] (Doctoral dissertation). Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
  • Kursunoglu, A., Bakay, E. & Tanriogen, A. (2010). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri [Organizational commitment levels of elementary school teachers]. Pamukkale University Journal of Faculty of education, 28(1),101- 115.
  • Lashinger, H. K., Finegan, J. E., Shamian, J. & Wilk, P. (2004). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of workplace empowerment on satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 527-545.
  • Luthans, F. (1995). Organizational behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Maeroff, G. (1988). The empowerment of teachers. New York: Teachers College.
  • Maral, S. (2015). İlkokul ve ortaokul müdür yardımcılarının örgütsel bağlılıklarının bir yordayıcısı olarak okul kültürü [Vice of primary and secondary school as predictors of organizational commitment culture] (Master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Melenyzer, B. J. (1990). Teacher Empowerment: The discourse, meanings and social actions of teachers. The Annual Conference of the National Council of States on Inservice Education, Orlando, Florida.
  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: theory, research and application.California: Sage.
  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A Tree-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J. & Parfyonova , N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1–16.
  • Meyer, J. E., Allen, N. J. & Gellatly, I. R. (1990). Affective and Continuance Commitment to the Organization: Evaluation of Measures and Analysis of Concurrent and TimeLagged Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710-720.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
  • Meyer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 671-684.
  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L.W.,& Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic.
  • Moye, M. J., Henkin, A. B. & Egley, R. J. (2005). Teacher-principal relationships exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260-277.
  • Nayir, F. (2013). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyi [Primary school administrators’ organizational commitment level]. Elementary Education Online, 1, 179 – 189.
  • Niehoff, B. P., Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. & Fuller, J. (2001). The Influence of Empowerment and Job Enrichment on Employee Loyalty in a Downsizing Environment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 93-113.
  • Odabas, I. (2014). Yapısal güçlendirme ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik güçlendirmenin ara değişken rolü: Öğretmenler üzerinde bir çalışma [The role of structural and psychological empowerment on realization of commitment to the organization: Study on teachers] (Master thesis). Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • O'Reilly, C. A. & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
  • Ozbakir, R. (2015). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez teşkilatında görev yapan milli eğitim uzman yardımcılarının örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Research of the organization of commitment among the assistant specialist at Ministry of National Education] (Master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Payne, D. & Wolfson, T. (2000). Teacher professional development-the principal’s critical role. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 13-21.
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective Commitment to the Organization: The Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psyshology, 86(5). 825-836.
  • Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory structure, design and applications. NewJersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Samadov, S. (2006). İş doyumu ve örgütsel bağlılık: Özel sektörde bir uygulama [Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A application on private sector](Master thesis). Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Scandura, T. A. & Lankau, M. (1997). Relationship of gender, family, responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 377-391.
  • Schermerhorn, J. R.; Hunt, J. G. & Osborn, R. N. (2002). Organizational behavior. America: JohnWiley & Sons.
  • Sharma, B. R., Mohapatra, M.,& Rai, S.(2013).Organizational commitment as a measure of administrative motivation search for its predictors in a multinational organization. Management and Labour Studies, 38(3), 139–153.
  • Short, P. M. & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). Teacher empowerment and school climate. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • Short , P. & Greer , J. (1997). Leadership in empowered schools. USA: Quebecor Book.
  • Short, P. M. (1992). Dimensions of Teacher Empowerment.http://files.eric.ed.gov (Retrived date: 10.12.2014)
  • Somech, A. (2005). Teachers’ personal and team empowerment and their relations to organizational outcomes: Contradictory or compatible constructs? Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237-266.
  • San, B. C. (2017). Öğretmenlerin ve okul yöneticilerinin psikolojik güçlendirme ve örgütsel bağlılıklarına ilişkin algıları [Perceptions of teachers and school managers on psychological empowerment and organizational commitment] (Master thesis). Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
  • Tavsancil, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Terry, P. M. (1995). Empowering teachers as leaders.www.nationalforum.com. (Retrived date: 10.12.2015)
  • Ural, A. & Kilic, I. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Scientific research process and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Detay.
  • Wasti, S. A. (2000). Meyer and Allen's three-dimensional organizational commitment scale validity and reliability analysis. 8th National Management and Organization Congress, Nevsehir.
  • Whetton, D. A. & Cameron, K. S. (2011). Developing Management Skills. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Yumusak, H. (2013). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin bezdiri (mobbing) yaşama düzeyi ile örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [The relationship between the mobbing experience of primary school teachers in the education institution they work and their organizational commitment] (Master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yuksel, R. F. (2015). Okul çalışanlarının örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel sessizlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Analyzing the relationship between the levels of organizational loyalty and organizational silence of school employees] (Master thesis). Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.
APA Kiral B (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. , 248 - 265.
Chicago Kiral Bilgen THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. (2020): 248 - 265.
MLA Kiral Bilgen THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. , 2020, ss.248 - 265.
AMA Kiral B THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. . 2020; 248 - 265.
Vancouver Kiral B THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. . 2020; 248 - 265.
IEEE Kiral B "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS." , ss.248 - 265, 2020.
ISNAD Kiral, Bilgen. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS". (2020), 248-265.
APA Kiral B (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. IOJET, 7(1), 248 - 265.
Chicago Kiral Bilgen THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. IOJET 7, no.1 (2020): 248 - 265.
MLA Kiral Bilgen THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. IOJET, vol.7, no.1, 2020, ss.248 - 265.
AMA Kiral B THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. IOJET. 2020; 7(1): 248 - 265.
Vancouver Kiral B THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS. IOJET. 2020; 7(1): 248 - 265.
IEEE Kiral B "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS." IOJET, 7, ss.248 - 265, 2020.
ISNAD Kiral, Bilgen. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EMPOWERMENT OF TEACHERS BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS OF TEACHERS". IOJET 7/1 (2020), 248-265.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
16-04-2024 6:31

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları