Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 401 - 410 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21121/eab.463383 İndeks Tarihi: 26-12-2020

Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model

Öz:
Permanent or particular financial insufficienciesof households cause crucial interruptions oncompulsory payments of households. In this study,the determining factors of financial insufficiency of11918 households that surveyed in TurkStat’s Surveyof Income and Living Conditions (SILC) 2012 areanalyzed. The financial insufficiency of householdscan be denoted by several indicators. The responsesof household head for three questions on financialconditions of household in survey are treated asindicators for financial insufficiency. MultivariateProbit Model is used to determine the effects of theproperties of household head and households asindependent variables on three dependent variablesabout financial conditions and to estimate thesemodels simultaneously. The findings show thathousehold size, being a tenant, changing the job,being unemployment but looking for a job and beingchronic illness for household head have positive,income, being a female and being a graduate fromuniversity or a higher degree for household headhave negative effects on each financial insufficiency indicators.
Anahtar Kelime:

Türkiye’de Hanehalklarının Finansal Yetersizliğinin Multivariate Probit Model ile Analizi

Öz:
Hanelerin zaman içerisinde sürekli ya da kısmı zamanlı olarak ekonomik anlamda sıkıntıya girmeleri yani finansal durumlarının yetersiz olması hanelerin zorunlu ödemelerinde aksaklıklar meydana getirebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada TÜİK 2012 yılı Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması (GYKA)’nda yer alan 11918 hanenin finansal yetersizliğinin belirleyicileri analiz edilmiştir. Hanelerin finansal yetersizliği çeşitli göstergelerle ifade edilebilmektedir. Çalışmada hanehalkı reisinin, ankette yer alan hanelerin ekonomik durumlarına ilişkin üç soruya verdiği yanıtlar finansal yetersizliğinin birer göstergesi olarak ele alınmaktadır. Hanelerin ekonomik durumları üzerine bilgi sağlayan üç bağımlı değişken için hanehalkı reisi ve hanenin özelliklerinin etkilerinin belirlenebilmesi ve bu modellerin aynı anda tahmin edilmesi amacıyla çalışmada Multivariate Probit Model kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular incelendiğinde, her bir finansal yetersizlik göstergesi üzerinde hanehalkı büyüklüğünün, hanehalkının kiracı olmasının, hanehakı reisinin iş değişikliği yapmasının, iş arıyor olmasının ve kronik hasta olmasının pozitif, hanenin gelirinin, hanehalkı reisinin kadın olmasının ve hanehalkı reisinin üniversite ve üstü eğitim düzeyinde olmasının ise negatif etkisi bulunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acar, A. ve Baslevent, C. (2013) “Examination of the Transition of Turkish Households into and out of Poverty between 2007-2010” (No. 5779), EcoMod.
  • Alkire, S. ve Foster, J. (2009) “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement” OPHI Working Paper. No. 32. December. Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford.
  • Andriopoulou, E. ve Tsakloglou, P. (2011) “The Determinants of Poverty Transitions in Europe and the Role of Duration Dependence” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5692.
  • Bhalla, A. ve Lapeyre, F. (1997) “Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework” Development and Change, 28: 413-433.
  • Bourguignon, F. ve Chakravarty, S.R (2003) “The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty” The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1 (1): 25-49.
  • Brock, K. (1999) “It’s Not Only Wealth That Matters - It’s Peace of Mind Too: A Review of Participatory Work on Poverty and Illbeing” Washington: World Bank.
  • Cappellari, L. ve Jenkins, S. P. (2003) “Multivariate Probit Regression using Simulated Maximum Likelihood” The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278-294.
  • Castillo-Manzano, J. I. (2010) “Determinants of Commercial Revenues at Airports: Lessons Learned from Spanish Regional Airports” Tourism Management, 31(6), 788-796.
  • Chambers, R. ve Conway, G. (1992) “Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century” IDS Discussion Paper. No. 296. Brighton: IDS.
  • Çevik, N. K. ve Korkmaz, O. (2014) “Türkiye’de Yaşam Doyumu ve İş Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin İki Değişkenli Sıralı Probit Model Analizi” Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 126.
  • Dal, S. ve Sevüktekin, M. (2018) “Türkiye’de Öznel İyi Oluş’un Yaşam Alanları Yaklaşımı İle Ölçülmesi” Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 2018: 433-446.
  • Dalgıç, B., İyidoğan, P. V. ve Güven, A. (2015) “Yoksulluk ve Yoksulluk Geçişlerinin Belirleyenleri: Türkiye Örneği”, Sosyoekonomi, 23(24):51-70.
  • Devicienti, F. (2002) “Poverty Persistence in Britain: A Multivariate Analysis using the BHPS, 1991–1997” Journal of Economics, 9:307-340.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E. ve Oishi, S. (1997) “Recent Findings on Subjective Well-being” Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24: 25-41.
  • Easterlin, R.A. (1974) “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human lot? Some Empirical Evidence” In David, P.A., and Reder, M.W. (eds.). Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89- 125). Academic Press, NY.
  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001) “Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory”, The Economic Journal, 111(473): 465-484.
  • Eren, K. A. ve Aşıcı, A. A. (2017) “The Determinants of Happiness in Turkey: Evidence from City Level Data”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3): 647-669.
  • Golob, T. F. ve Regan, A. C. (2002) “Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Multivariate Discrete Choice Model”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10(3): 205-228.
  • Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education: India.
  • Morduch, J. (1994) “Poverty and Vulnerability” The American Economic Review, 84(2): 221-225, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May).
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press. Orshansky, M. (1969) “How Poverty is Measured” Monthly Labor Review, 92(2): 37-41.
  • Oswald, A. J. (1997) “Happiness and Economic Performance” The Economic Journal, 107(445): 1815-1831.
  • Pradhan, M. ve Ravallion, M. (2000) “Measuring Poverty using Qualitative Perceptions of Consumption Adequacy” Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3): 462-471.
  • Ravallion, M. (1996) “Issues in Measuring and Modelling Poverty” The Economic Journal. 106(438): 1328- 1343.
  • Rodgers, G., Gore, C. ve Figueiredo, J. B. (1995) “Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses” International Institute for Labour Studies: UNDP.
  • Runciman, W.G. (1966) “Relative Deprivation and Social Justice”, Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
  • Selim, S. (2008) “Life Satisfaction and Happiness in Turkey” Social Indicators Research, 88(3):531-562.
  • Sen, A. (1985) “Commodities and Capabilities”, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Streeten, P., Burki, S. J., ul Haq, M., Hicks, N. ve Stewart, F. (1981) “First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs In The Developing Countries” Washington D. C.: OUP.
  • Tilak, J. B. (1989) “Education and Its Relation to Economic Growth, Poverty, and Income Distribution: Past Evidence and Further Analysis” World Bank Discussion Paper No.46.
  • Timur, B. ve Akay, E. Ç.(2017) “Kadın ve Erkeklerin Mutluluğunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin Genelleştirilmiş Sıralı Logit Modeli ile Analizi” Social Sciences Res. Jou., 6(3): 88-105.
  • Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom, University of California Press.
  • TÜİK (2012) Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması. TÜİK: Ankara.
  • ul Haq, M. (1995) Reflections on Human Development. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
  • UNDP (1990) Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • van Praag, B.M.S. (1971) “The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation” European Economic Review, 2, 337-69.
  • van Praag, B.M.S. ve Kapteyn, A. (1973) “Further Evidence on the Individual Welfare Function of Income: An Empirical Investigation in the Netherlands” European Economic Review, 4: 33-62.
  • van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P. ve Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003) “The Anatomy of Subjective Well-being” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1):29-49.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1984) The Concept of Happiness, In R. Veenhoven (ed.), Conditions of Happiness (pp. 12- 38). Springer: Dordrecht.
  • Veenhoven, R. (2000) “The Four Qualities of Life” Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1-39.
  • Veenhoven, R. (2008) “Sociological Theories of Subjective Wellbeing”, In Michael Eid & Randy Larsen (Eds). The Science of Subjective Well-being: A tribute to Ed Diener (pp. 44-61), Guilford Publications, New York.
  • Walelign, S. Z., Charlery, L., Smith-Hall, C., Chhetri, B. B. K. ve Larsen, H. O. (2016) “Environmental Income Improves Household-Level Poverty Assessments and Dynamics” Forest Policy and Economics, 71:23- 35.
  • World Bank (1990) World Development Report 1990: Poverty. New York: OUP.
APA SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç, Ugur M (2019). Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. , 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
Chicago SIGEZE GÜNEY ÇILER,Ugur Mehmet Sedat Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. (2019): 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
MLA SIGEZE GÜNEY ÇILER,Ugur Mehmet Sedat Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. , 2019, ss.401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
AMA SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. . 2019; 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
Vancouver SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. . 2019; 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
IEEE SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M "Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model." , ss.401 - 410, 2019. 10.21121/eab.463383
ISNAD SIGEZE GÜNEY, ÇILER - Ugur, Mehmet Sedat. "Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model". (2019), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.463383
APA SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç, Ugur M (2019). Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış, 19(4), 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
Chicago SIGEZE GÜNEY ÇILER,Ugur Mehmet Sedat Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış 19, no.4 (2019): 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
MLA SIGEZE GÜNEY ÇILER,Ugur Mehmet Sedat Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış, vol.19, no.4, 2019, ss.401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
AMA SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış. 2019; 19(4): 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
Vancouver SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış. 2019; 19(4): 401 - 410. 10.21121/eab.463383
IEEE SIGEZE GÜNEY Ç,Ugur M "Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model." Ege Akademik Bakış, 19, ss.401 - 410, 2019. 10.21121/eab.463383
ISNAD SIGEZE GÜNEY, ÇILER - Ugur, Mehmet Sedat. "Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model". Ege Akademik Bakış 19/4 (2019), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.463383