Fatih ORDU
(Işık Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Klinik Psikoloji Programı, Şile, Türkiye)
Mustafa Kemal YÖNTEM
(Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Nevşehir, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 11Sayı: 39ISSN: 2146-1961Sayfa Aralığı: 69 - 91İngilizce

80 0
DEVELOPMENT OF DIVERGENT THINKING SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE
The aim of this study is to develop a scale for determining the divergent thinking self-assessment levels of adults over 18 years of age. In line with the aim of the present study, a 28-item-trial form was applied to the participants. Exploratory factor analysis based on the method of oblique rotation revealed that the scale had a 21-item and two-factor components structure. Subdimensions are entitled as rationality and subjectivity. The eigenvalue of the rationality subdimension was found to be 6.90. The eigenvalue of the subjectivity sub-dimension was found to be 3.94. The total variance of the two-factor structure was found to be about 50.66%. The Cronbach coefficient score for the whole scale was.91. The Cronbach coefficient reliability scores for the sub-scales of rationality and subjectivity were .92 and .85, respectively. Moreover, item correlation coefficients were above .50 for all the items of the form. Consequently, validity and reliability analysis indicate that the final form can measure the levels of divergent thinking selfassessment of the participants. The Divergent Thinking Self-Assessment Scale may provide an opportunity to reveal whether there is a relationship between self-assessment scale and performance assessment scale on divergent thinking, which can be a suggestion for further studies. The Divergent Thinking Self-Assessment Scale is considered to contribute to the studies related to creativity and divergent thinking.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Althuizen, N., Wierenga, B. & Rossiter, J. (2010). “The Validity of Two Brief Measures of Creative Ability.” Creatıvıty Research Journal, 22(1): 53-61.
  • Aslan, E. (2001). “Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünce Testi'nin Türkçe Versiyonu.” M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 14: 19-40.
  • Baer, J. (2011). “How Divergent Thinking Tests Mislead Us: Are the Torrance Tests Still Relevant in the 21st Century? The Division 10 debate”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 5(4): 309-313.
  • Bowden, E. M. & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). “Normative Data for 144 Compound Remote Associate Problems.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments ve Computers, 35(4): 634-639.
  • Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N. & Salovey, P. (2006). “Relating Emotional Abilities to Social Functioning: A Comparison of Self-report and Performance Measures of Emotional Intelligence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4): 780-795. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.780
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). “Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı.” Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32: 470-483.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Chıld, D. (2006). The Essentials of Factor Analysis. London: Continuum.
  • Cohen, R.J. & Swerdlık, M.E. (2015). Psikoloik Test ve Değerleme. Çev: Ezel Tavşancıl. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Diedrich, j., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J.M., Neubauer, A.C., Benedek, M. (2018) Assessment of Real-Life Creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 12 (3)304-316
  • Ferrandiz, C., Ferrando, M., Soto, G., Sainz, M. & Prieto, D.M. (2017). “Divergent Thinking and Its Dimensions: What We Talk About and What We Evaluate?” Anales de Psicologia. 33 (1): 40-47.
  • Guilford, J.P. (1982). “Cognitive Psychology's Ambiguities, Some Suggested Remedies.” Psychological Review. 89(1): 48-59.
  • Güngör, D. (2016). “Psikolojide Ölçme Araçlarının Geliştirilmesi ve Uyarlanması Kılavuzu.” Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19 (38): 104-112.
  • Dirlik, M.E. (2014). Ölçek Geliştirme Konulu Doktora Tezlerinin Test ve Ölçek Geliştirme Standartlarına Uygunluğunun İncelenmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2): 62-78.
  • Erkuş, A., Sünbül, A., Sünbül, S.Ö., Yormaz, S. & Aşiret, S. (2017). Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme II. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hawthorne G., Saggar, M., Quintin, E.M., Bott N., Keinitz, E., Liu, N., Chien, Y.H., Hong, D., Reiss, A.L. (2016) Designing a Creativity Assessment Tool for the Twenty-First Century: Preliminary Results and Insights from Developing a Design-Thinking Based Assessment of Creative Capacity. Design Thinking Research. 111-123. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_8.
  • Heller, K.A. (2004). “Identification of Gifted and Talented Students.” Psychology Science, 46(3): 302 – 323.
  • Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Creativity and Confidence: Price of Achievement": Comment. American Psychologist. 57(5): 375-376.
  • Karakoç, F.Y. & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek Gelişṫ irme Çalışma ̇ larında Temel İlkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 5 (40): 39- 49.
  • Lee, Y. J. (2004). Effects of Divergent Thinking Training/Instructions on Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creative Performance. Doktora Tezi, University of Tennessee.
  • Lucas, B. (2016) A Five-Dimensional Model of Creativity and its Assessment in Schools. Applıed Measurement In Educatıon. 29 (4) 278-290.
  • Mednick, S. A. (1968). “The Remote Associates Test.” The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2(3): 213-214.
  • Özen, G., Doğan, A. & Cinan, S. (2015). “Uzak Bağlantılar Testi: Norm ve Güvenirlik Çalışması.” Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 35:2-25.
  • Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. (1990). “Motivational And Self-Regulated Learning Components Of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1): 33-40
  • Reisman, F., Keiser, L., Otti, O. (2016) Development, Use and Implications of Diagnostic Creativity Assessment App, RDCA – Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment. Creatıvıty Research Journal, 28(2) 177-187.
  • Shen, T., Lai, J.C. (2014). “Exploring the Relationship between Creative Test of ATTA and the Thinking of Creative Works” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (112): 557-566.
  • Siegel, J. & Bugg, J. M. (2016). “Dissociating Divergent Thinking and Creative Achievement by Examining Attentional Flexibility and Hypomania.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4): 416- 424.
  • Soper, D.S. (2017). “A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models Software.” Available from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
  • Sümer, N. (2000). “Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar.” Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6): 49-74.
  • Sünbül, A.M. (2004). “Düşünme Stilleri Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği.” Eğitim ve Bilim, 29 (132): 25-42.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Pearson Education.
  • Zeng, L., Proctor, R.W. & Salvendy, G. (2011). “Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity?” Creativity Research Journal, 23:1, 24-37.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.