Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 39 Sayfa Aralığı: 166 - 202 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-12-2020

BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA

Öz:
The aim of the study is to determine the blind spots of women’s entrepreneurship. This studywas conducted with 46 women entrepreneurs registered to Adana Chamber of Industry in Turkeyin September 2019. A phenomenological research method was adopted in this research. Thecoding process (conceptualization, classification, component analysis) proposed by Miles andHuberman (1994) was used respectively in data analysis. Findings revealed that the blind spot inentrepreneurship is the dead spot in entrepreneurship according to the field of view of theentrepreneur, which can be prevented with a different perspective and proactive behaviors,which prevents the predicting of unexpected results. A second eye is required to identify theblind spots. In addition, teamwork, transparent management, outsourcing, increasing employeeleader interaction, and referring to external stakeholder opinions can make the blind spot visible.Arrogance and unflexible personality traits, transform the desire of self-realization into anirrepressible ambition, excessive self-confidence are other factors that cause the blind spot. Asecond eye (consultant, coach, CEO, etc.) is needed to reduce the negative impact of the blindspot on entrepreneurship success. In addition, referring to the ideas of the stakeholders,suppliers, customers, consumers, employees about the success and path of entrepreneurship,teamwork, transparent management, are crucial issues for determining the blind spots.Exceptional circumstances such as illness, legal barriers, climate, and war may cause essentialblind spots. Preventing them may be possible by creating vision and strategy in entrepreneurship,and proactive behaviors. In the context of all these findings and recommendations, this studycontributes to the literature regarding the subjects of determination of blind spot inentrepreneurship and cope with, and blind-spot leadership. The limitation of the sample to theprovince of Adana limited the generalizability of the study. The practical implications of the studyshow that outsourcing, exceptional circumstances, transparent management, proactive behavior,personal characteristics are the key factors for the blind spots of the women’s entrepreneurship.Training can be provided to women entrepreneurs to raise awareness about blind spots ofentrepreneurship, and chambers of commerce and industry can organize some activities on thisissue. This is the first study which reveals the blind spots of the women’s entrepreneurship.Theoretical background, discussion, managerial implications, limitations and recommendationsfor future studies are discussed.
Anahtar Kelime:

KADIN GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN KÖR NOKTALARI: ADANA ÖRNEĞİ

Öz:
Çalışmanın amacı kadın girişimciliğinin kör noktalarını belirlemektir. Bu çalışma Eylül 2019'da Türkiye'de Adana Sanayi Odası'na kayıtlı 46 kadın girişimci ile yürütülmüştür. Bu araştırmada fenomenolojik bir araştırma yöntemi benimsenmiştir. Veri analizinde sırasıyla Miles ve Huberman (1994) tarafından önerilen kodlama süreci (kavramsallaştırma, sınıflandırma, bileşen analizi) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, girişimcinin görüş alanına göre girişimciliğin kör noktasının farklı bir bakış açısı ve proaktif davranışlarla önlenebilen ve beklenmedik sonuçların tahmin edilmesini engellediğini ortaya koydu. Kör noktaları tanımlamak için ikinci bir göz gereklidir. Buna ek olarak, ekip çalışması, şeffaf yönetim, dış kaynak kullanımı, çalışan-lider etkileşimini artırma ve dış paydaş görüşlerine gönderme kör noktayı görünür hale getirebilir. Kibir ve esnek olmayan kişilik özellikleri, kendini gerçekleştirme arzusunu geri çevrilemez bir tutkuya dönüştürür, aşırı kendine güven kör noktaya neden olan diğer faktörlerdir. Kör noktanın girişimcilik başarısı üzerindeki olumsuz etkisini azaltmak için ikinci bir göze (danışman, koç, CEO, vb.) İhtiyaç vardır. Ayrıca, paydaşların, tedarikçilerin, müşterilerin, tüketicilerin, çalışanların girişimcilik, takım çalışması, şeffaf yönetimin başarısı ve yolu hakkındaki fikirlerine başvurmak, kör noktaları belirlemek için çok önemlidir. Hastalık, yasal engeller, iklim ve savaş gibi istisnai durumlar, önemli kör noktalara neden olabilir. Bunları önlemek, girişimcilik ve proaktif davranışlarda vizyon ve strateji oluşturarak mümkün olabilir. Tüm bu bulgular ve öneriler bağlamında, bu çalışma girişimcilikte kör noktanın belirlenmesi ve kör nokta liderliği konularında literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır. Örneklemin Adana iliyle sınırlandırılması çalışmanın genellenebilirliğini sınırlandırmıştır. Çalışmanın pratik sonuçları, dış kaynak kullanımı, istisnai durumlar, şeffaf yönetim, proaktif davranış, kişisel özelliklerin kadın girişimciliğinin kör noktaları için anahtar faktörler olduğunu göstermektedir. Kadın girişimcilere girişimciliğin kör noktaları hakkında farkındalık yaratmak için eğitim verilebilir ve ticaret ve sanayi odaları bu konuda bazı etkinlikler düzenleyebilir. Bu, kadın girişimciliğinin kör noktalarını ortaya koyan ilk çalışmadır. Teorik altyapı, tartışma, yönetsel çıkarımlar, sınırlamalar ve gelecekteki çalışmalar için öneriler tartışılmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595-621.
  • Bey, G. S., Jesdale, B., Forrester, S., Person, S. D. & Kiefe, C. (2019). Intersectional Effects of Racial and Gender Discrimination on Cardiovascular Health Vary Among Black and White Women and Men in the CARDIA study. SSM-population health, 8, 100446.
  • Bowen, D. D. & Hisrich, R. D. (1986). The Female Entrepreneur: A Career Development Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 393-407.
  • Bowen, P. & Zhang, R. P. (2020). Cross-Boundary Contact, Work-Family Conflict, Antecedents, and Consequences: Testing an Integrated Model for Construction Professionals. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04020005.
  • Brindley, C. (2005). Barriers to Women Achieving their Entrepreneurial Potential: Women and Risk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11(2), 144-161.
  • Bruni, A., Gherardi, S. & Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur-Mentality, Gender and The Study of Women Entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256-268.
  • Brush, C. G. (2006). Women Entrepreneurs: a Research Overview. In The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship.
  • Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene, P. & Hart, M. (2004). Clearing the Hurdles: Women Building HighGrowth Businesses. FT Press.
  • Brush, C. G., De Bruin, A. & Welter, F. (2009). A Gender-Aware Framework for Women's Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8-24.
  • Brush, C. G., De Bruin, A., Gatewood, E. J. & Henry, C. (Eds.). (2010). Women Entrepreneurs and the Global Environment for Growth: A Research Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Buchanan, T., Das, A. & McFarlane, A. (2020). Gender Differences in within-Couple Influences on Work–Family Balance Satisfaction: When Benefits Become Threats. Journal of Family Studies, 26(1), 106-125.
  • Burke, R. J. (2017). 26. Supporting Women’s Career Development. Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership, 409.
  • Buttner, E. H. & Moore, D. P. (1997). Women's Organizational Exodus to Entrepreneurship: Self-Reported Motivations and Correlates With Success. Journal of Small Business Management, 35, 34-46.
  • Byrne, M. (2001). Sampling for Qualitative Research. AORN journal, 73(2), 494-494.
  • Cabrera, E. M. Y. & Mauricio, D. (2017). Factors Affecting the Success of Women’s Entrepreneurship: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 31-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-01-2016-0001
  • Cantillon, B., Parolin, Z. & Collado, D. (2019). A Glass Ceiling on Poverty Reduction? An Empirical Investigation into the Structural Constraints on Minimum Income Protections. Journal of European Social Policy, 0958928719880500.
  • Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R. & Sánchez García, J. C. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2939.
  • Chadwick, C. & DeBlaere, C. (2019). The Power of Sisterhood: The Moderating Role of Womanism in the Discrimination-Distress Link among Women of Color in the United States. Sex Roles, 1-12.
  • Cohn, S. (2019). Race, gender, and discrimination at work. Routledge.
  • Collins, S. A. (2000). Men's Voices and Women's Choices. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 773-780.
  • Damm-Ganamet, K. L., DesJarlais, R., Marrone, T., Shih, A. Y., Schiffer, J., Perez Benito, L. & Mirzadegan, T. (2020). Breaking the Glass Ceiling in Simulation and Modeling: Women in Pharmaceutical Discovery. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
  • Dean, H., Larsen, G., Ford, J. & Akram, M. (2019). Female Entrepreneurship and the Metanarrative of Economic Growth: a Critical Review of Underlying Assumptions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 24-49.
  • De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G. & Welter, F. (2007). Advancing a Framework for Coherent Research on Women's Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 323-339.
  • Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-79.
  • Foss, L., Henry, C., Ahl, H. & Mikalsen, G. H. (2019). Women’s Entrepreneurship Policy Research: a 30-Year Review of the Evidence. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 409-429.
  • Franck, A. K. (2012). Factors Motivating Women's Informal Micro-Entrepreneurship: Experiences from Penang, Malaysia. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 65-78.
  • Gamber, W. (1998). A Gendered Enterprise: Placing Nineteenth-Century Businesswomen in History. Business History Review, 72(2), 188-218.
  • Gramm, V., Dalla Torre, C. & Membretti, A. (2020). Farms in Progress-Providing Childcare Services as a Means of Empowering Women Farmers in South Tyrol, Italy. Sustainability, 12(2), 467.
  • Gundry, L. K., Ben-Yoseph, M. & Posig, M. (2002). The Status of Women's Entrepeneurship: Pathways to Future Entrepreneurship Development and Education. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 39.
  • Hasan, S. M. (2020). Female Entrepreneurship: Do Urban Centers Ease Out the Challenge? An Analysis for Pakistan. In Urban Studies and Entrepreneurship (pp. 163-179). Springer, Cham.
  • Hechavarria, D., Bullough, A., Brush, C. & Edelman, L. (2019). High‐Growth Women’s Entrepreneurship: Fueling Social and Economic Development. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 5-13.
  • Katz, J. A. (2003). The Chronology and Intellectual Trajectory of American Entrepreneurship Education: 1876– 1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283-300.
  • Kimura, D. (1987). Are Men's and Women's Brains Really Different?. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 28(2), 133.
  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Motivational Factors in a Push-Pull Theory of Entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346-364.
  • Kishore, S. (2020). A Socio-economic Study of Entrepreneurial Abilities of Rural and Urban Women in Ranchi District, Jharkhand and Need of ICT for Transforming Their Abilities. In Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications (pp. 111-122). Springer, Singapore.
  • Koerber, A. & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative Sampling Methods: A Primer for Technical Communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454-473.
  • Kwolek-Folland, A. (1998). Incorporating Women: a History of Women and Business in the United States (p. 65). New York, NY: Twayne Publishers.
  • Langowitz, N. & Minniti, M. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Propensity of Women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341-364.
  • Lexico (2019). https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/blind_spot, 24.10.2019.
  • Lopez-Claros, A. & Zahidi, S. (2005). Womens Empowerment: Measuring the Global Gender Gap. Geneva Switzerland World Economic Forum 2005.
  • Lucky, A. T. & Obiosio, M. I. (2019). The Role Of Public Library Relation Services In The Promotion Of Women Entrepreneurship In Nsukka Local Government Area Of Enugu State. Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, 4(1), 08-24.
  • Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for Qualitative Research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: an Interactive Approach. California: SAGE Publications.
  • Meyer, N. & Hamilton, L. (2020). Female Entrepreneurs’ Business Training and its Effect on Various Entrepreneurial Factors: Evidence From a Developing Country. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12(1), 135-151.
  • Mihas, P. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 18 Jan. 2020, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore9780190264093-e-1195.
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Mitchelmore, S. & Rowley, J. (2013). Entrepreneurial Competencies of Women Entrepreneurs Pursuing Business Growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 125-142.
  • Nair, S. R. (2020). To Examine Women Social Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Opportunities and Challenges. In Handbook of Research on Smart Territories and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Social Innovation and Sustainable Growth (pp. 326-345). IGI Global.
  • Navarro-Astor, E., Román-Onsalo, M. & Infante-Perea, M. (2017). Women’s Career Development in the Construction Industry Across 15 Years: Main Barriers. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(2), 199-221.
  • Nicholson, L. (2013). Feminism/Postmodernism. Routledge.
  • Noor, S., Isa, F. M. & Nor, L. M. (2020). Ageing Care Centre Women Entrepreneur: A Silver Bullet for Ageing Tsunami in Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 12(1).
  • Offen, K. (1988). Defining Feminism: a Comparative Historical Approach. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(1), 119-157.
  • Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (second edition). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Ondiba, H. A. & Matsui, K. (2019). Social Attributes and Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Behaviors among Rural Women in Kakamega County, Kenya. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 2.
  • O’Neil, D. A., Brooks, M. E. & Hopkins, M. M. (2018). Women’s Roles in Women’s Career Advancement: What Do Women Expect of Each Other?. Career Development International, 23(3), 327-344.
  • Orhan, M. & Scott, D. (2001). Why Women Enter into Entrepreneurship: an Explanatory Model. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 232-247.
  • Özsungur, F. (2019). A Research on Women's Entrepreneurship Motivation: Sample of Adana Province. In Women's Studies International Forum, 74, 114-126)
  • Padmavathi, D. (2011). Sustainable Development of Rural Women Entrepreneurs. In International Conference on Business, Economics and Tourism Management (Vol. 24, pp. 67-70).
  • Pallarès-Blanch, M., Tulla, A. F. & Vera, A. (2015). Environmental Capital and Women’s Entrepreneurship: a Sustainable Local Development Approach. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 10(3), 133-146.
  • Peiss, K. (1998). Vital Industry and Women's Ventures: Conceptualizing Gender in Twentieth Century Business History. Business History Review, 72(2), 219-241.
  • Phillips, A. (Ed.). (1998). Feminism and Politics. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • Plambeck, L. E. & Ramdas, K. (2020). Alleviating Poverty by Empowering Women Through Business Model Innovation: M&SOM Insights and Opportunities. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.
  • Powell, G. N. (1990). One More Time: Do Female and Male Managers Differ?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 4(3), 68-75.
  • Presser, H. & Sen, G. (2000). Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo. Oxford University Press.
  • Purushothaman, S. (1998). Empowerment of Women in India-Grassroots Women's Networks and the State.
  • Reinharz, S. & Davidman, L. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford University Press.
  • Reynolds, N., Diamantopoulos, A. & Schlegelmilch, B. (1993). Pre-Testing in Questionnaire Design: Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Further Research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35(2), 171- 182.
  • Riley, S., Brooks, J., Goodman, S., Cahill, S., Branney, P., Treharne, G. & Sullivan, C. (2019). Celebrations amongst challenges: Considering the Past, Present and Future of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychology Society. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(3), 464- 482, DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275
  • Roos, A. (2019). Embeddedness in Context: Understanding Gender in a Female Entrepreneurship Network. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(3-4), 279-292.
  • Salant, P. & Dillman, D.A. (1994). How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New york: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Scholaske, L., Brose, A., Spallek, J. & Entringer, S. (2019). Perceived Discrimination and risk of Preterm Birth among Turkish Immigrant Women in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 236, 112427.
  • Silberstein, L. R., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Timko, C. & Rodin, J. (1988). Behavioral and Psychological Implications of Body Dissatisfaction: Do Men and Women Differ?. Sex roles, 19(3-4), 219-232.
  • Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Spiers, J. & Riley, R. (2019). Analysing one Dataset with Two Qualitative Methods: The distress of General Practitioners, a Thematic and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 276-290.
  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (5), 1442-1465.
  • Srivastava, S. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative: A Way Towards Women Entrepreneurship Development in India. Journal of Industrial Relationship, Corporate Governance & Management Explorer (e ISSN 2456-9461), 3(2), 1-10.
  • Stevenson, L. A. (1986). Against All Odds: the Entrepreneurship of Women. Journal of Small Business Management, 24, 30.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  • Tankibayeva, А. & McDonald, S. (2019). Organizational Perspective on Women Senior-Managers in Kazakhstan: Examination of Leadership Roles, Updating Evidence and Research Agenda. Вестник КазНУ. Серия психологии и социологии, 70(3), 85-93.
  • Thurman, P. W. (2016). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: Business Solutions for Poverty Alleviation from Around the World. Routledge.
  • Walcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Wilkinson, S. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist Social Psychology: Developing theory and practice (pp. 77-96). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Wynarczyk, P. & Marlow, S. (Eds.). (2010). Innovating Women: Contributions to Technological Advancement. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Vondracek, F. W., Lerner, R. M. & Schulenberg, J. E. (2019). Career Development: A Life-Span Developmental Approach. Routledge.
  • Yukongdi, V. & Cañete, J. M. (2020). The Influence of Family, Human, Social Capital & Government Support Services on Women Entrepreneurial Start-up Decisions: A Qualitative Study. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9, 307-318.
APA Özsungur F (2020). BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. , 166 - 202.
Chicago Özsungur Fahri BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. (2020): 166 - 202.
MLA Özsungur Fahri BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. , 2020, ss.166 - 202.
AMA Özsungur F BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. . 2020; 166 - 202.
Vancouver Özsungur F BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. . 2020; 166 - 202.
IEEE Özsungur F "BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA." , ss.166 - 202, 2020.
ISNAD Özsungur, Fahri. "BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA". (2020), 166-202.
APA Özsungur F (2020). BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(39), 166 - 202.
Chicago Özsungur Fahri BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11, no.39 (2020): 166 - 202.
MLA Özsungur Fahri BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.11, no.39, 2020, ss.166 - 202.
AMA Özsungur F BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 11(39): 166 - 202.
Vancouver Özsungur F BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 11(39): 166 - 202.
IEEE Özsungur F "BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA." Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11, ss.166 - 202, 2020.
ISNAD Özsungur, Fahri. "BLIND SPOTS OF WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CASE OF ADANA". Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11/39 (2020), 166-202.