A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 385 - 393 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 İndeks Tarihi: 25-11-2020
A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures
Öz: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the conventional versus individualizedthree-dimensional (3D) printing model-assisted pre-contoured plate fixation in the treatment of patients with acetabular fractures.Methods: The data from 18 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the acetabular fractures were retrospectivelyanalyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (9 in each): conventional and 3D printed model-assisted. The groupswere then compared in terms of the duration of surgery, time of instrumentation, time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, andvolume of blood loss. The quality of the fracture reduction was also evaluated postoperatively by radiography and computedtomography in both the groups. The quality of the fracture reduction was defined as good (<2 mm) or fair (>2 mm) basedon the amount of displacement in the acetabulum.Results: The conventional group included 9 patients (9 males; mean age=41.7 years; age range=16-70) with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months (range=8-15); the 3D printed model-assisted group consisted of 9 patients (9 males; mean age=46.2years; age range=30-66) with a mean follow-up of 10.33 months (range=7-17). The average duration of surgery, mean timeof instrumentation, time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and mean volume of blood loss were 180.5±9 minutes, 36.2±3.6minutes, 6±1 times, and 403.3±52.7 mL in the 3D printed model-assisted group, and 220±15.6 minutes, 57.4±10.65 minutes,10.4±2.2 times, and 606.6±52.7 mL in the conventional group, respectively. Procedurally, the average duration of surgery,mean time of instrumentation, and mean time of fluoroscopy were significantly shorter, and the mean volume of blood losswas significantly lower in the 3D printed model-assisted group (p<0.05). The quality of the fracture reduction was good in 7patients (78%) in the conventional group and 8 patients (89%) in the 3D printed model-assisted group.Conclusion: As compared with the conventional surgery, the 3D printing model-assisted pre-contoured plate fixation technique can improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of the acetabular fractures, with shorter surgery, instrumentation,intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and blood loss.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M. Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 229-36. [Crossref]
- 2. Halvorson JJ, Lamothe J, Martin CR, et al. Combined acetabulum and pelvic ring injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22: 304-14. [Crossref]
- 3. Bi C, Ji X, Wang F, Wang D, Wang Q. Digital anatomical measurements and crucial bending areas of the fixation route along the inferior border of the arcuate line for pelvic and acetabular fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 125. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0974-2. [Crossref]
- 4. Cimerman M, Kristan A. Preoperative planning in pelvic an acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 2007; 38: 442-9. [Crossref]
- 5. Amorosa LF, Kloen P, Helfet DL. High-energy pediatric pelvic and acetabular fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2014; 45: 483- 500. [Crossref]
- 6. Ding A, O’Toole RV, Castillo R, et al. Risk factors for early reoperation after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: 251-7. [Crossref]
- 7. Hung CC, Li YT, Chou YC, et al. Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. Int Orthop 2019; 43: 425-31. [Crossref]
- 8. Dagnino G, Georgilas I, Köhler P, Morad S, Atkins R, Dogramadzi S. Navigation system for robot-assisted intra-articular lower-limb fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016; 11: 1831-43. [Crossref]
- 9. Upex P, Jouffroy P, Riouallon G. Application of 3D printing for treating fractures of both columns of the acetabulum: Benefit of pre-contouring plates on the mirrored healthy pelvis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103: 331-4. [Crossref]
- 10. Wang H, Wang F, Newman S, et al. Application of an innovative computerized virtual planning system in acetabular fracture surgery: A feasibility study. Injury 2016; 47: 1698-701. [Crossref]
- 11. Hu Y, Li H, Qiao G, Liu H, Ji A, Ye F. Computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for acetabular fractures based on real CT data. Injury 2011; 42: 1121-24. [Crossref]
- 12. Liu ZJ, Jia J, Zhang YG, Tian W, Jin X, Hu YC. Internal fixation of complicated acetabular fractures directed by preoperative surgery with 3D printing models. Orthop Surg 2017; 9: 257-60. [Crossref]
- 13. Maini L, Verma T, Sharma A, Sharma A, Mishra A, Jha S. Evaluation of accuracy of virtual surgical planning for patient-specific pre-contoured plate in acetabular fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138: 495-504. [Crossref]
- 14. Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D, et al. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 547-52. [Crossref]
- 15. Chana-Rodríguez F, Mañanes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, Gil P, Martínez-Gómiz JM, Vaquero-Martín J. 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures. Injury 2016; 47: 2507-11. [Crossref]
- 16. Chen X, Chen X, Zhang G, et al. Accurate fixation of plates and screws for the treatment of acetabular fractures using 3D-printed guiding templates: An experimental study. Injury 2017; 48: 1147-54. [Crossref]
- 17. Duncan JM, Nahas S, Akhtar K, Daurka J. The use of a 3D printer in pre-operative planning for a patient requiring acetabular reconstructive surgery. J Orthop Case Rep 2015; 5: 23- 5.
- 18. Huang Z, Song W, Zhang Y, et al. Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0191328. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0191328. eCollection 2018. [Crossref]
- 19. Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, Sharma A, Tiwari A. Three-dimensional printing and patient-specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018; 44: 215-24. [Crossref]
- 20. Manganaro MS, Morag Y, Weadock WJ, Yablon CM, Gaetke-Udager K, Stein EB. Creating three-dimensional printed models of acetabular fractures for use as educational tools. Radiographic 2017; 37: 871-80. [Crossref]
- 21. Merema BJ, Kraeima J, Ten Duis K, et al. The design, production and clinical application of 3D patient-specific implants with drilling guides for acetabular surgery. Injury 2017; 48: 2540-7. [Crossref]
- 22. Bagaria V, Deshpande S, Rasalkar DD, Kuthe A, Paunipagar BK. Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 814-20. [Crossref]
- 23. Boudissa M, Courvoisier A, Chabanas M, Tonetti J. Computer assisted surgery in preoperative planning of acetabular fract ure surgery: State of the art. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018; 15: 81-9. [Crossref]
- 24. Farouk O, Kamal A, Badran M, El-Adly W, El-Gafary K. Minimal invasive para-rectus approach for limited open reduction and percutaneous fixation of displaced acetabular fractures. Injury 2014; 45: 995-9. [Crossref]
- 25. Liu ZJ, Jia J, Zhang YG, Tian W, Jin X, Hu YC. Internal fixation of complicated acetabular fractures directed by preoperative surgery with 3D printing models. Orthop Surg 2017; 9: 257-60. [Crossref]
- 26. Shen F, Chen B, Guo Q, Qi Y, Shen Y. Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013; 8: 169-79. [Crossref]
- 27. Zeng C, Xing W, Wu Z, Huang H, Huang W. A combination of three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for preoperative planning of acetabular fracture reduction. Injury 2016; 47: 2223-7. [Crossref]
- 28. Zeng CJ, Huang WH, Huang HJ, Wu ZL. Laparoscopic acetabular fracture fixation after three-dimensional modelling and printing. Indian J Orthop 2017; 51: 620-3. [Crossref]
- 29. Zhang Y, Zhao X, Tang Y, Zhang C, Xu S, Xie Y. Comparative study of comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture treated with the acetabular tridimensional memory fixation system. Injury 2014; 45: 725-31. [Crossref]
- 30. Zhuang Y, Cao S, Lin Y, Li R, Wang G, Wang Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of acetabular anterior column fractures using the two-incision minimally invasive approach and a preshaped three dimension plate. Int Orthop 2016; 40: 2157- 62. [Crossref]
- 31. Kashyap S, Mahajan S, Lal M. Effects of topical tranexamic acid during open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures: A retrospective study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019; 53: 175-9. [Crossref]
- 32. Kilinc CY, Acan AE, Gultac E, Kilinc RM, Hapa O, Aydogan NH. Treatment results for acetabulum fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019; 53: 6-14. [Crossref]
| APA | OZTURK A, Süer O, Sirinturk S, Aktuglu K, govsa f, OZER M (2020). A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. , 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| Chicago | OZTURK ANIL MURAT,Süer Onur,Sirinturk Suzan,Aktuglu Kemal,govsa figen,OZER MEHMET ASIM A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. (2020): 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| MLA | OZTURK ANIL MURAT,Süer Onur,Sirinturk Suzan,Aktuglu Kemal,govsa figen,OZER MEHMET ASIM A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. , 2020, ss.385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| AMA | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. . 2020; 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| Vancouver | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. . 2020; 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| IEEE | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M "A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures." , ss.385 - 393, 2020. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| ISNAD | OZTURK, ANIL MURAT vd. "A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures". (2020), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| APA | OZTURK A, Süer O, Sirinturk S, Aktuglu K, govsa f, OZER M (2020). A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 54(4), 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| Chicago | OZTURK ANIL MURAT,Süer Onur,Sirinturk Suzan,Aktuglu Kemal,govsa figen,OZER MEHMET ASIM A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 54, no.4 (2020): 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| MLA | OZTURK ANIL MURAT,Süer Onur,Sirinturk Suzan,Aktuglu Kemal,govsa figen,OZER MEHMET ASIM A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol.54, no.4, 2020, ss.385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| AMA | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2020; 54(4): 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| Vancouver | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2020; 54(4): 385 - 393. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| IEEE | OZTURK A,Süer O,Sirinturk S,Aktuglu K,govsa f,OZER M "A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures." Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 54, ss.385 - 393, 2020. 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
| ISNAD | OZTURK, ANIL MURAT vd. "A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures". Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 54/4 (2020), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.19054 |
