Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?

Muhammed Nur OGUN, (Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Nöroloji Anabilim Dalı, Bolu, Türkiye)
Ramazan KURUL (Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu, Türkiye)
Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia
4 1
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 135 - 139 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/scie.2019.50251 İndeks Tarihi: 27-11-2020

Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?

Öz:
Objective: To investigate the ability of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores topredict functional independence in the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions instroke patients.Methods: A total of 59 patients with stroke with a mean age of 61.10±9.12 were includedin this study. Forty-one (69.5%) of the patients were male, and 18 (30.5%) were female.After obtaining the demographic data of the patients who were followed up in the strokeoutpatient clinic after the stroke, upper extremity functions were evaluated using ARATtest, and functional independence was evaluated with Performance Assessment of Self CareSkills (PASS) and Functional Independence Scale (FIM) tests. The data were retrospectivelyevaluated and recorded.Results: The mean stroke duration was 15.38±7.16 months. According to Spearman correlation test results, there was no correlation between ARAT and PASS (p=0.902), PASS-BADL(Basic activities of daily living) (p=0.480), PASS-IADL (Instrumental activities of daily living)(p=0.524) and between ARAT and FIM (p=0.451), FIM Motor (p=0.393), and FIM Cognitive(p=0.553). There was a weak correlation between the FIM and the PASS scores (r=0.278,p=0.033).Conclusion: ARAT scores routinely used in the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions were not correlated with functional independence. In addition to the ARAT test, functional independence scales may be appropriate for the evaluation of upper extremity motorfunctions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Kol Hareket Araştırma Testi İnmeli Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlığı Ön Gördürebilir mi?

Öz:
Amaç: İnmeli hastalarda üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan Kol Hareket Araştırma Testi (ARAT) skorlarının fonksiyonel bağımsızlığı ön görebilme kapasitesini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 61.10±9.12 olan toplam 59 inmeli hasta alındı. Hastaların 41’i (%69.5) erkek 18’i (%30.5) kadındı. İnme sonrası inme polikliniğinde takip edilen hastaların demografik bilgileri alındıktan sonra üst ekstremite fonksiyonları ARAT testi ve fonksiyonel bağımsızlıkları Kendine Bakım Becerilerin Performans Değerlendirmesi (PASS) ve Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği (FIM) testleri ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama inme geçirme süreleri 15.38±7.16 ay olarak bulundu. Spearman korrelasyon testi sonuçlarına göre ARAT ve PASS arasında (p=0.902), PASS-BADL (temel günlük yaşam aktiviteleri) (p=0.480), PASS-IADL (enstrümental günlük yaşam aktiviteleri) (p=0.524) ARAT ve FIM (p=0.451), FIM Motor (p=0.393) ve FIM Cognitive (p=0.553). arasında korelasyon görülmedi). FIM ve PASS skorları arasında zayıf bir korelasyon vardı (r=0.275, p=0.033). Sonuç: Üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde rutin olarak kullanılan ARAT skorları fonksiyonel bağımsızlık ile korele olmadığı saptandı. Üst ekstremite motor fonskiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde ARAT testine ek olarak fonksiyonel bağımsızlık ölçeklerinin kullanılması uygun olabilir
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma J. The global burden of disease: 2004 update: World Health Organization; 2008. Available at: https://www. who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf. Accessed Apr 11, 2020.
  • 2. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1980;58:113–30.
  • 3. Sims NR, Muyderman H. Mitochondria, oxidative metabolism and cell death in stroke. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010;1802:80–91.
  • 4. Bilir Kaya B, Süslü S. Role of Gender in the Quality of Life and Functional Status in Stroke Patients with Urinary Incontinence. South Clin Ist Euras 2019;30(1):77–82.
  • 5. Levine DA, Morgenstern LB, Langa KM, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Karve SJ. Recent trends in cost-related medication nonadherence among stroke survivors in the United States. Ann Neurol 2013;73:180–8.
  • 6. Sandercock P, Berge E, Dennis M, Forbes J, Hand P, Kwan J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1–112.
  • 7. Wainapel SF, Fast A. Alternative medicine and rehabilitation: a guide for practitioners. Demos Medical Publishing; 2003. p. 277–92.
  • 8. Nomikos PA, Spence N, Alshehri MA. Test-retest reliability of physiotherapists using the action research arm test in chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2018;30:1271–7.
  • 9. Sheikh K. Disability scales: assessment of reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:245–9.
  • 10. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369–75.
  • 11. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing 1998;27:107–13.
  • 12. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981;4:483–92.
  • 13. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, Chen CH, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2009;89:840–50.
  • 14. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2009;40:1386–91.
  • 15. McKenna H, Cutcliffe J, McKenna P. Evidence-based practice: demolishing some myths. Nurs Stand 2000;14:39–42.
  • 16. Valach L, Selz B. Rehabilitation Programs monitored by Functional Independence Measure: An Observational Study. Int Phys Med Rehab J 2017;2:173–8.
  • 17. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:84–9.
  • 18. Holm MB, Rogers JC, Hemphill-Pearson B. The performance assessment of self-care skills (PASS). Assessments in occupational therapy mental health. 2 ed. SLACK; 2008. p. 101–10.
  • 19. Chisholm D, Toto P, Raina K, Holm M, Rogers J. Evaluating capacity to live independently and safely in the community: Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills. Br J Occup Ther 2014;77:59–63.
  • 20. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226–32.
  • 21. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Exploring the declining case fatality in acute stroke. Population-based observations in the northern Sweden MONICA Project. J Intern Med 1996;240:143–9.
  • 22. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394–8.
  • 23. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1605–10.
  • 24. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:962–6.
  • 25. Fong KN, Chan CC, Au DK. Relationship of motor and cognitive abilities to functional performance in stroke rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2001;15:443–53.
APA ögün m, Kurul R (2020). Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. , 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
Chicago ögün muhammed nur,Kurul Ramazan Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. (2020): 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
MLA ögün muhammed nur,Kurul Ramazan Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. , 2020, ss.135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
AMA ögün m,Kurul R Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. . 2020; 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
Vancouver ögün m,Kurul R Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. . 2020; 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
IEEE ögün m,Kurul R "Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?." , ss.135 - 139, 2020. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
ISNAD ögün, muhammed nur - Kurul, Ramazan. "Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?". (2020), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.14744/scie.2019.50251
APA ögün m, Kurul R (2020). Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, 31(2), 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
Chicago ögün muhammed nur,Kurul Ramazan Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia 31, no.2 (2020): 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
MLA ögün muhammed nur,Kurul Ramazan Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, vol.31, no.2, 2020, ss.135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
AMA ögün m,Kurul R Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia. 2020; 31(2): 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
Vancouver ögün m,Kurul R Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia. 2020; 31(2): 135 - 139. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
IEEE ögün m,Kurul R "Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?." Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, 31, ss.135 - 139, 2020. 10.14744/scie.2019.50251
ISNAD ögün, muhammed nur - Kurul, Ramazan. "Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?". Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia 31/2 (2020), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.14744/scie.2019.50251
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 17:24

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları