Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 70 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 122 - 132 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034 İndeks Tarihi: 26-11-2020

Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method

Öz:
The main purpose of the present paper was to investigate, weigh, and prioritize criteria, indicators, and options aiming to protect Zagros forests in Kermanshah province. We focused on developing a preferred prioritizing approach based on the fuzzy version of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (namely, fuzzy ideal responses) (FTOPSIS). The proposed method was intended to identify forest protection options, as well as to evaluate standards for Zagros forest protection through the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy Delphi method. The present study was descriptive-practical in terms of the research type and quantitative in terms of implementing a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. A statistical sample used in this study comprised experts and university researchers in the field related to natural resource protection, including 54 people in total; the applied research tool was a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using the MATLAB software, Lingo, and the nonlinear programming model (2004), which was applied to evaluate the efficiency of the options aimed at protecting the forests of Kermanshah province by using FTOPSIS and prioritizing the criteria through FAHP. Based on the results of prioritizing the options by using FTOPSIS, the empowerment option of local communities with a relative proximity index, namely, commodity channel index (CCI), equal to 0.599, was identified as the most important option in terms of protecting forest in Kermanshah province. From the viewpoint of the expert team, the collaborative protection option and the training and promotion approach with the values of CCI equal to 0.559 and 0.521 were ranked as the second and third, respectively. Then, it was noted that watershed operation, protection and conservation, patrolling and maintaining natural resources, supplying fuel to forest dwellers, outsourcing policies, supplying manpower and equipment for forest protection, and modification of the forest protection structure were ranked in a descending order. The results of FAHP based on the nonlinear programming model using Lingo software indicated that the technical criterion with the weight of 0.192 had the first priority among others. The social criterion with the weight of 0.188 was assigned the second priority, and the preventive criterion with that of 0.179 obtained the third priority.
Anahtar Kelime:

Bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemine dayalı orman koruma yönetimi

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kermanshah eyaletindeki Zagros ormanlarını korumayı amaçlayan kriterlerin, göstergelerin ve seçeneklerin araştırılması, belirlenmesi ve öncelik sırasına koyulması olarak belirlenmiştir. En uygun çözüm (bulanık ideal çözümler) benzerlik yöntemi (FTOPSIS) kullanılarak, tercihli bir önceliklendirme yaklaşımı geliştirilmesine çalışılmıştır. Önerilen yöntem, orman koruma seçeneklerini tanımlamanın yanı sıra, bulanık analitik hiyerarşi süreci (FAHP) ve bulanık Delphi yöntemi yoluyla, Zagros orman alanının korunması için standartların değerlendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, araştırma türü açısından tanımlayıcı, pratik ve bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yönteminin uygulanması açısından nicel özellikler taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmada kullanılan istatistiksel veriler, doğal kaynakların korunması ile ilgili alanda çalışan uzman ve üniversite araştırmacılarından oluşan toplam 54 kişiye uygulanan ankete dayanmaktadır. Veri analizi MATLAB yazılımı, Lingo ve doğrusal olmayan programlama modeli (2004) kullanılarak yapılmış olup elde edilen veri analizi, FTOPSIS’de değerlendirilmiş ve Kermanshah eyaleti ormanlarının korunmasına yönelik seçeneklerin etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesinde ve FAHP aracılığıyla oluşturulan kriterlere öncelik verilmesi amacıyla kullanılmıştır. FTOPSIS kullanılarak yapılan önceliklendirilme sonuçlarına göre, yani 0,599'a eşit CCI endeksine göre, ormanların korunması en önemli seçenek olarak belirlenmiştir. Anket uygulanan kişilerin bakış açısına göre, Kermanshah eyaletinde katılımcı orman koruma seçeneğinin birinci, orman alanında eğitim ve tanıtım yaklaşımlarının (CCI değerlerinin 0,559 ve 0,521'e eşit olduğu) ise sırasıyla ikinci ve üçüncü sırada olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, havza işletmesinin yapılması, doğal kaynakların kontrol edilmesi ve sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanması, orman köylülerine yakacak odun sağlanması, kaynakların dışarından elde edilmesi, orman koruması için insan gücü ve ekipman sağlanması ve orman koruma yapısının değiştirilmesi şeklinde bir sıralama sonucu elde edilmiştir. Lingo yazılımı kullanan doğrusal olmayan programlama modeline dayanan FAHP sonuçları, 0,192 ağırlığında teknik ölçüt kriterinin birinci önceliğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ağırlığı 0,188 olan sosyal ölçüt ikinci önceliğe, 0,179 değere sahip olan önleyici ölçüt ise üçüncü önceliği almıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Azar, A., Rajabzadeh, A., 2002. Applied decision-making MADM approach. Tehran: Negahe Danesh Puplication.
  • Azizi, Y.F., Badian, Z., 2015. The role of culture and training in environmental protection. Second National Conference on Conservation of Natural Resources and Environment.
  • Chauoli., Yaoqiu, K., Ningsheng, H., Chao, Zh., 2014. The Long-Term Relationship between Population Growth and Vegetation Cover: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data of 21 Cities in Guangdong Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10: 660-677. [Crossref]
  • Chen, C.T., 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114: 1-9. [Crossref]
  • Chen, Sun-Jen., Hwang, Chin La., 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [Crossref]
  • CIFOR, 1999. Guidelines for Applying Multi-Criteria Analysis to the Assessment of Criteria and Indicators. Toolbox 9: 85.
  • Colombo, S.J., Chen, J., Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., McKechnie, J., Elkie, P.C., MacLean, H.L., Heath, L.S., 2012. Forest protection and forest harvest as strategies for ecological sustainability and climate change mitigation. Forest Ecology and Management 281: 140-151. [Crossref]
  • Ebrahimi Rastaghi, M., 2006. The role of policy-making and decision-making in protection of outside North forests. Conference on protection of forests in sustainable forest management. Forestry Community of Iran 137-151.
  • Ebrahimi Rostaghi, M., 2006. The role of policy-making and decision-making in protection of outside North forests. Conference on protection of forests in sustainable forest management. Forestry Community of Iran 1: 137-151. (In Persian)
  • Gao, L., Ma, Ch., Wang, Q., Zhou, A., 2014. Sustainable use zoning of land resources considering ecological and geological problems in Pearl River Delta Economic Zone, China. Scientific Reports 9: 1-14. [Crossref]
  • Ghazanfari, H., 2003. An investigation of increment and changes in the diameter distribution of Quercus infectoria-libani stands to propose the model of forest structure at Bane region (case study of Havarh khvl). PhD thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Tehran University, in northern Zagros, Iran. Forest Ecology and Management 327: 221-230.
  • Gomontean, B., Gajaseni, J., Edwards-Jones, G., Gajaseni, N., 2008. The development of appropriate ecological criteria and indicators for community forest conservation using participatory methods: A case study in northeastern Thailand. Ecological Indicators 8: 614-624. [Crossref]
  • Häyhä, T., Franzese, P.P., Paletto, A., Fath, B.D., 2015. Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services 14: 12-23. [Crossref]
  • Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications springer, New York, [Crossref]
  • Ildermi, A., Ghasemi, F., Bahmani, N., 2018. Investigating the role of socio-economic factors in biodegradation of Zagros Forests (Kakareza region in Lorestan province). Research and Protection of Iranian Forests and Rangelands 13 (2): 139-149.
  • Jana, S.K., Lise, W., Ahmed, M., 2014. Factors affecting participation in joint forest management in the West Bengal state of India. Journal of Forest Economics 20 (4): 317-332 [Crossref]
  • Karimian, V., Safaee, M., Matinkhah, S.H., 2014. Using Indigenous Knowledge of Nomadic People as a Suitable Guidance for Optimal Management in Forest Natural Ecosystems. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology 21 (4): 95-114. (In Persian)
  • Kazana, V., Tsourgiannis, L., Iakovoglou, V., Stamatiou, C., Alexandrov, A., Araújo, S., 2015. Public attitudes towards the use of transgenic forest trees: a cross-country pilot survey. iForest-Biogeosci For 9: 344-353. [Crossref]
  • Khosravi, S., Namiranian, M., Ghazanfari, H., Shirvani, A., 2012. Crown biomass relationships of Lebanon oak in northern Zagros forests of Iran. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 33 (2): 239-247.
  • Mehrbani, W., Khodadadi, F., 2018. External effects of formal training on forest preservation. Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy 7 (25):17-34.
  • Mikhailov, L., Tsvetinov, P., 2004. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing 5 (1): 23-33. [Crossref]
  • Moayeri, M.H., Abedi-Sarvestani, A., Shahraki, M.R., Kooseh-Gharvi, Y., 2015. Analysis of relationship between participation and forest rural development (Case Study: Forestry cooperatives in Golestan province). Iranian Journal of Forest 7 (2): 138-150. (In Persian)
  • Moomaw, W., Masino, S.A., K.Fasion, E., 2019. Intact Forests in the United States: Proforestation Mitigates Climate Change and Serves the Greatest Good. Frontiers DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00027. [Crossref]
  • Napier, T.L. Napier, A.S., 1991. Perceptions of conservation compliance among farmers in a highly erodible area of Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46 (3): 220-224.
  • Nilsson, H., Nordström, E.M., Öhman, K., 2016. Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSI. Journal of Forests 7 (100): 1-17. [Crossref]
  • Patil, S. K., Kant, R., 2014. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Systems with Applications 41 (2): 679-693. [Crossref]
  • Pirzadian, I., Adeli, I., Kia-Daliri, H., 2009. Investigating the status of local communities in the Conservation and Development Project of Zagros Forests (Case Study: Kermanshah Province). Proceedings of the Third National Forest Conference, Karaj, Iran.
  • Pourhashemi, M., Panahi, P., Zandebasiri, M., 2013. Application of visual surveys to estimate acorn production of Brant’s oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) in northern Zagros Forests of Iran. Caspian Journal Environ Science 11: 85-95.
  • Purnomo, H., Yasmi, Y., Prabhu, R., Hakim, S., Jafar, A., Suprihatin, A., 2013. Collaborative modelling to support forest management: qualitative systems analysis at Lumut Mountain, Indonesia. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 2 (2): 259-275. [Crossref]
  • Purvis, B., Darren Robinson, Y.M., 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science 14 (3): 681-695. [Crossref]
  • Rajabi,M., Abarzadeh,P., 2018. Investigating the role of empowerment of local communities in sustainable management of natural resources using Spearman test and two-variable linear regression, 3rd National Conference on Soil Conservation and Watershed Management.
  • Sadeghi Ravesh, M. H., Zehtabian, G., Ahmadi, H., Khosravi, H., 2014. Application of AHP and ELECTRE models for Assessment of de-desertification alternatives. Desert 19 (2): 141-153.
  • Salam, M. A., Noguchi, T., Koike, M., 2005. Factors influencing the sustained participation of farmers in participatory forestry: a case study in central Sal forests in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management 74 (1): 43-51. [Crossref]
  • Salehi, F., Mirdamadi, S.M., 2014. Investigating the role of non-governmental organizations in conservation and restoration of forests and rangelands in Mazandaran Province. Journal of Forests and Rangelands 65: 56-63.
  • Samari, D., Azadi, H., Zarafshani, K., Hosseininia, G.H., Witlox, F., 2011. Determining appropriate forestry extension model: Application of AHP in the Zagros area, Iran. Forest Policy and Economics 15: 91-97. [Crossref]
  • Soltani, A., Shamekhi, T., Noori Naieni, M.S., Arabmazar, A., 2011. Effects of forest resources on income distribution and poverty (case study: watershed of Tang Tamoradi). Journal of Forest and Wood Products 63 (4): 369-385. (In Persian)
  • Tinto, R., 2019. Biodiversity, https://www.riotinto.com/ourcommitment/biodiversity-24292.aspx (accessed on 22 April 2019).
  • Valipour, A., Plieninger, T., Shakeri, Z., Ghazanfari, H., Namiranian, M., Lexer, M. J., 2014. Traditional silvopastoral management and its effects on forest stand structure in northern Zagros, Iran. Forest Ecology and Management 327: 221-230. [Crossref]
  • Wayman, W, Meinrad, K, Kai, J., Theresia, S., 2010. Evaluating the Potential of WorldViewData to Classify Tree Species and Different Levels of Ash Mortality. Remote Sensing 6: 4515-4545. [Crossref]
  • Wu, Z., Lei, Sh., He, B.J., Bian, Z., Wang, Y., Lu, Q., Peng, Sh, Duo, L., 2019. Assessment of Landscape Ecological Health: A case study of a mining city in aSemi-Arid Steppe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (5): 752-762. [Crossref]
  • Zanakis, S.H. Solomon, A. Wishart, N., Dublish, S., 1998. Multi-attribute decision-making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research 107 (3): 507-529. [Crossref]
  • Zandebasiri, M., Ghazanfari, H., 2010. The main consequences of affecting factors on forest management of local settlers in the Zagros forests (case study: Ghalegol watershed in Lorestan province). Iranian Journal of Forest 2: 127-138.
APA tasse m, Kiadaliri H, Babaie Kafaky S, Naderloo L, sadeghiravesh m (2020). Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. , 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
Chicago tasse mojtaba,Kiadaliri Hadi,Babaie Kafaky Sasan,Naderloo Leila,sadeghiravesh mohammad hassan Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. (2020): 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
MLA tasse mojtaba,Kiadaliri Hadi,Babaie Kafaky Sasan,Naderloo Leila,sadeghiravesh mohammad hassan Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. , 2020, ss.122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
AMA tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. . 2020; 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
Vancouver tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. . 2020; 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
IEEE tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m "Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method." , ss.122 - 132, 2020. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
ISNAD tasse, mojtaba vd. "Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method". (2020), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
APA tasse m, Kiadaliri H, Babaie Kafaky S, Naderloo L, sadeghiravesh m (2020). Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. FORESTIST, 70(2), 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
Chicago tasse mojtaba,Kiadaliri Hadi,Babaie Kafaky Sasan,Naderloo Leila,sadeghiravesh mohammad hassan Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. FORESTIST 70, no.2 (2020): 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
MLA tasse mojtaba,Kiadaliri Hadi,Babaie Kafaky Sasan,Naderloo Leila,sadeghiravesh mohammad hassan Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. FORESTIST, vol.70, no.2, 2020, ss.122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
AMA tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. FORESTIST. 2020; 70(2): 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
Vancouver tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. FORESTIST. 2020; 70(2): 122 - 132. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
IEEE tasse m,Kiadaliri H,Babaie Kafaky S,Naderloo L,sadeghiravesh m "Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method." FORESTIST, 70, ss.122 - 132, 2020. 10.5152/forestist.2020.19034
ISNAD tasse, mojtaba vd. "Forest conservation management based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method". FORESTIST 70/2 (2020), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2020.19034