Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis

SİLİG, Yavuz; Atabey, Mustafa; TOPÇU, Ömer; TAŞ, Ayça

doi:10.14744/etd.2019.70973

Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis

Mustafa ATABEY, (Biruni Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ayça TAŞ, (Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyet Bölümü, Sivas, Türkiye)

Ömer TOPÇU, (Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye)

Yavuz SİLİG (Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye)

Erciyes Medical Journal

1 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 12 - 17 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/etd.2019.70973 İndeks Tarihi: 26-11-2020

Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis

Öz:

Objective: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage observed after colorectal surgery is one of the major complications. One ofthe factors affecting the anastomosis healing is the type of suture material used. This study aims to investigate the effects ofthe suture material polydioxanone (PDS, Ethicon), which is late absorbable and has a monofilament structure, and the suturematerial polyglactin 910 (Vicryl, Ethicon), which is absorbable and has a multifilament structure, on the healing of colonicanastomosis, and to compare the traditional forms of these sutures with their antibacterial effective triclosan-impregnatedforms (PDS Plus, Ethicon and Vicryl Plus, Ethicon).Materials and Methods: The rats were divided into four equal groups consisting of 10 subjects each: Group I: Vicryl;Group II: Vicryl Plus; Group III: PDS; and Group IV: PDS Plus. The presence of wound infection, whether the integrity ofthe abdominal wall was maintained, intra-abdominal adhesion scoring, the presence of intra-abdominal abscess, and whetherthe macroscopic integrity of anastomosis was maintained were evaluated.Results: According to the results of this experimental study, while the highest ABP and hydroxyproline levels were observed inthe PDS Plus group, the lowest values were observed in the Vicryl group. However, the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Slowly absorbable and monofilament PDS suture material causes less tissue reaction and inflammatory response compared to the Vicryl suture material that is absorbable in the colonic anastomosis line and multifilament.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Reisinger KW, Poeze M, Hulsewé KW, van Acker BA, van Bijnen AA, Hoofwijk AG, et al. Accurate prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using plasma markers for intestinal damage and inflammation. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219(4): 744–51.
2. Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(21): 2247–60.
3. Kuckelman J, Barron M, Kniery K, Kay J, Kononchik J, Hoffer Z, et al. Crystalloid fluid suspension results in decreased adhesion burden when compared to bioresorbable membranes in a rat model. Am J Surg 2019; 217(5): 954–8.
4. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92(2): 211–6.
5. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, J ørgensen T, Harling H; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(1): 37–43.
6. Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(10): e661–7.
7. Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: Healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery 2006; 26(3): 131–6.
8. Koruda MJ, Rolandelli RH. Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res 1990; 48(5): 504–15.
9. Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection. Ann Surg 1981; 194(1): 35–41.
10. Gristina AG, Price JL, Hobgood CD, Webb LX, Costerton JW. Bacterial colonization of percutaneous sutures. Surgery 1985; 98(1): 12–9.
11. Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013; 148(2): 190–201.
12. Jones RD, Jampani HB, Newman JL, Lee AS. Triclosan: a review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28(2): 184–96.
13. Heath RJ, Rubin JR, Holland DR, Zhang E, Snow ME, Rock CO. Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem 1999; 274(16): 11110–4.
14. Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S, Burkley D. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2002; 3 Suppl 1: S79–87.
15. Dogan M, Sen M, Koc M, Silig Y, Akyol G, Karadayi K, et al. Effects of the Pringle manoeuvre on the healing of left colonic anastomoses in rats. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 2014; 114(1): 63–5.
16. Phillips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW, Zeng H, Dindar H. Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin A on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1992; 163(1): 71–7.
17. Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AL. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1974; 108(6): 849–53.
18. Srinivas L, Venkatesh B, Ahmad S. A study of factors leading to postoperative leaks following bowel anastomosis. Int Surg J 2018; 5(11): 3510–4.
19. Agren MS, Andersen TL, Mirastschijski U, Syk I, Schi ødt CB, Surve V, et al. Action of matrix metalloproteinases at restricted sites in colon anastomosis repair: an immunohistochemical and biochemical study. Surgery 2006; 140(1): 72–82.
20. Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968; 126(4): 747–53.
21. Hawley P. Causes and prevention of colonic anastomotic breakdown. Dis Colon Rectum 1973; 16(4): 272–7.
22. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011; 253(5): 890–9.
23. Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H. Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 2014; 259(5): 930–8.
24. Foresman PA, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT. The effect of new monofilament absorbable sutures on the healing of musculoaponeurotic incisions, gastrotomies, and colonic anastomoses. Arch Surg 1989; 124(6): 708–10.
25. Andersen E, S øndenaa K, Holter J. A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989; 4(4): 251–4.
26. Khoury GA, Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review. Br J Surg 1983; 70(2): 61–3.
27. Dragović M, Pejović M, Stepić J, Dragović S, Nikolić N, Kuzmanović- Pfićer J, et al. Microbial adherence affinity and clinical characteristics of polypropylene versus silk sutures in oral surgery. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2018; 146(5-6): 258–63.
28. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004; 239(5): 599–605; discussion 605–7.
29. Nakamura T, Kashimura N, Noji T, Suzuki O, Ambo Y, Nakamura F, et al. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2013; 153(4): 576–83.
30. Wang ZX, Jiang CP, Cao Y, Ding YT. Systematic review and metaanalysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2013; 100(4): 465–73

APA	Atabey M, TAŞ A, TOPÇU Ö, SİLİG Y (2020). Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. , 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
Chicago	Atabey Mustafa,TAŞ Ayça,TOPÇU Ömer,SİLİG Yavuz Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. (2020): 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
MLA	Atabey Mustafa,TAŞ Ayça,TOPÇU Ömer,SİLİG Yavuz Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. , 2020, ss.12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
AMA	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. . 2020; 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
Vancouver	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. . 2020; 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
IEEE	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y "Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis." , ss.12 - 17, 2020. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
ISNAD	Atabey, Mustafa vd. "Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis". (2020), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2019.70973

APA	Atabey M, TAŞ A, TOPÇU Ö, SİLİG Y (2020). Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. Erciyes Medical Journal, 42(1), 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
Chicago	Atabey Mustafa,TAŞ Ayça,TOPÇU Ömer,SİLİG Yavuz Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. Erciyes Medical Journal 42, no.1 (2020): 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
MLA	Atabey Mustafa,TAŞ Ayça,TOPÇU Ömer,SİLİG Yavuz Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. Erciyes Medical Journal, vol.42, no.1, 2020, ss.12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
AMA	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2020; 42(1): 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
Vancouver	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2020; 42(1): 12 - 17. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
IEEE	Atabey M,TAŞ A,TOPÇU Ö,SİLİG Y "Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis." Erciyes Medical Journal, 42, ss.12 - 17, 2020. 10.14744/etd.2019.70973
ISNAD	Atabey, Mustafa vd. "Effects of Triclosan-Impregnated Suture Materials on Colonic Anastomosis". Erciyes Medical Journal 42/1 (2020), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2019.70973