The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 122 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 İndeks Tarihi: 03-12-2020
The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth
Öz: Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of artificial saliva,disinfectant solution, distilled water, and thermocycling on Vickershardness of 4 commercial brands of acrylic resin denture teeth.Methodology: Four different brands of acrylic resin denture teeth (MajorDent, Acry Lux, Acry Rock, Imident Lux) were evaluated. 15 anterior and15 posterior teeth of each group embedded in autopolymerized acrylicresin. The occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth and the vestibule surfacesof anterior teeth were flattened by using silicon carbide paper. Afterpolishing, microhardness measurements were repeated three times foreach teeth. The teeth were submitted to different conditions: (1) storagein distilled water at 37±2°C for 7 days; (2) storage in artificial saliva at37±2°C for 30 days and (3) storage in 1 % sodium hypochlorite. After,thermal cycling between 5 and 55 °C for 2500 cycles was made. Themicrohardness measurements were repeated. Data were analyzed withone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan test (p<0.05).Results: There were statistically significant differences between initialand final microhardness values of different brands of acrylic resin dentureteeth. Anterior teeth showed lower microhardness values than posteriorteeth.Conclusions: Storage in different solutions and thermal cyclingsignificantly reduced the Vickers hardness of the acrylic resin dentureteeth.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Eckert SE, Jacob RF, Fenton AH, Merickske-stern RM. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete denture and Implant-supported prosthesis. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 195-8.
- 2. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p. 544-6.
- 3. Rhan AO, Heartwell CM. Text book of complete dentures. 5th ed., London, 1993, Lea&Febiger.
- 4. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-95. (Crossref)
- 5. Phillips RW. Science of Dental Materials. 9th ed., Philadelphia, 1991, W.B. Saunders Co.
- 6. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials, 10th ed., Philadelphia, 1996, W.B. Saunders Co.
- 7. Wakefield CW. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:143-6. (Crossref)
- 8. Kahn RC, Lancaster MV, Kate W Jr. The microbiologic crosscontamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:556-9. (Crossref)
- 9. Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Teraoka MT. The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:749–52. (Crossref)
- 10. Brace ML, Plummer KD. Practical denture disinfection. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:538-40. (Crossref)
- 11. Lin JJ, Cameron SM, Runyan DA, Craft DW. Disinfection of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:202-6. (Crossref)
- 12. McCabe JF, Smith BH. A method for measuring the wear of restorative materials in vitro. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:557–68.
- 13. Blau PJ, Lawn BR, editors. Microindentation techniques in materials science and engineering, ASTM STP 889. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1986. p. 196–205.
- 14. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater 1992;8:218–23. (Crossref)
- 15. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied dental materials, 8th ed., Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 4–28.
- 16. Abe Y, Sato Y, Taji T, Akagawa Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. An in vitro wear study of posterior denture tooth materials on human enamel. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:407–12. (Crossref)
- 17. Zeng J, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Hosoi T. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:453–7. (Crossref)
- 18. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:243–7.
- 19. Campanha NH, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Machado AL. Effect of microwave sterilization and water storage on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:483–7. (Crossref)
- 20. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Influence of thermal cycles in water on flexural strength of laboratoryprocessed composite resin. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:703–7. (Crossref)
- 21. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Inoue K. Physical and mechanical properties of PMMA resins containing gamma methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:166–71. (Crossref)
- 22. Yap AU, Mah MK, Lye CP, Loh PL. Influence of dietary simulating solvents on the hardness of provisional restorative materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:370–6. (Crossref)
- 23. Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET. Hardness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:171– 6. (Crossref)
- 24. Assunção WG, Gomes ÉA, Barão VAR, Barbosa DB, Delben JA, Tabata LF. Effect of storage in artificial saliva and thermal cycling on Knoop hardness of resin denture teeth. J Prost Research 2010;54:123-7. (Crossref)
- 25. Senna PM, Da Silva WJ, Faot F, Del Bel Cury AA. Microwave disinfection: cumulative effect of different power levels on physical properties of denture base resins. J Prosthodont 2011;20:606-12. (Crossref)
- 26. 2Klironomos T, Katsimpali A, Polyzois G. The effect of microwave disinfection on denture base polymers, liners and teeth: A basic overview. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015;49:242-53. (Crossref)
- 27. Archadian N, Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Flexural strength of rebased denture polymers. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:690–6. (Crossref)
- 28. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89–99. (Crossref)
- 29. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Takahashi T, Habu T. Bonding durability of conventional resinous denture teeth and highly crosslinked denture teeth to a pour-type denture base resin. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:112–6.
- 30. Schneider RL, Curtis ER, Clancy JM. Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:145–50. (Crossref)
- 31. Amin WM. Durability of acrylic tooth bond to polymeric denture base resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:57–61.
- 32. Low IM. Effects of load and time on the hardness of a viscoelastic polymer. Mater Res Bull, 1998;33:1753-8. (Crossref)
- 33. Kinani L, Najıh R, Chtaını A. Corrosion inhibition of titanium in artificial saliva containing fluoride. Leonardo J Sci 2008;12:243-50.
- 34. Shahdad SA, McCabe JF, Bull S, Rusby S, Wassell RW. Hardness measured with traditional Vickers and Martens hardness methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:1079-85. (Crossref)
- 35. Gandhi N, Daniel S, Benjamin S, Kurian N, Varghese VS. Evaluation of surface microhardness following chemical and microwave disinfection of commercially available acrylic resin denture teeth. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC87-ZC91. (Crossref)
- 36. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swaın M, Kılpatrıck N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: anultra-microindentation study. J Dent 2000;28:589-94. (Crossref)
- 37. Phoenix RD. Denture base resins. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips’ science of dental materials. St Louis: Elsevier; 2003. p. 721-57.
- 38. Polyzois GL, Zissis AJ, Yannikakis SA. The effect of glutaraldehyde and microwave disinfection on some properties of acrylic denture resin. Int J Prost,1995;8:150-4.
- 39. Asad T, Watkınson AC, Huggett R. The effect of various disinfectant solutions on the surface hardness of acrylic resin denture base material. Int J Prost, 1993;6:9-12.
| APA | ÖZDEMİR H, YESIL DUYMUS Z (2018). The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. , 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| Chicago | ÖZDEMİR Hatice,YESIL DUYMUS Zeynep The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. (2018): 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| MLA | ÖZDEMİR Hatice,YESIL DUYMUS Zeynep The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. , 2018, ss.117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| AMA | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. . 2018; 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| Vancouver | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. . 2018; 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| IEEE | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z "The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth." , ss.117 - 122, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| ISNAD | ÖZDEMİR, Hatice - YESIL DUYMUS, Zeynep. "The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth". (2018), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| APA | ÖZDEMİR H, YESIL DUYMUS Z (2018). The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research, 8(3), 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| Chicago | ÖZDEMİR Hatice,YESIL DUYMUS Zeynep The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research 8, no.3 (2018): 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| MLA | ÖZDEMİR Hatice,YESIL DUYMUS Zeynep The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research, vol.8, no.3, 2018, ss.117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| AMA | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(3): 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| Vancouver | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(3): 117 - 122. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| IEEE | ÖZDEMİR H,YESIL DUYMUS Z "The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth." International Dental Research, 8, ss.117 - 122, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
| ISNAD | ÖZDEMİR, Hatice - YESIL DUYMUS, Zeynep. "The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth". International Dental Research 8/3 (2018), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.4 |
