Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 28 Sayfa Aralığı: 77 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108 İndeks Tarihi: 05-12-2020

A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1

Öz:
This study aims to present the findings of afield research on “urban resilience” as wellas offering an overview of some recenttheoretical developments concerning theconcept, which has recently enjoyed widecurrency in the field of urban planning. First,it discusses the scope of resilienceassessment from the social-ecologicalsystemic viewpoint and then scrutinizes thecontribution of social-ecological networkanalysis to the field of urban planning byemploying this method in an empirical case.For the social-ecological network analyzingand resilience assessment, this study dealswith the case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul. It is adistrict which came into being in ahaphazard fashion in the 1980s and whichhas grown very rapidly ever since due toinformal housing and shanty settlements.The residents of Sultanbeyli are particularlyvulnerable in terms of a number of socioeconomic and spatial issues. Moreover, thewhole area of the district lies within theÖmerli Basin, one of the largest fresh watersources for Istanbul. Unplanned growth ofthe district gives rise to very importantenvironmental problems such as theshrinkage of the basin and water pollution.Thus, a resilience assessment analysis onSultanbeyli bears on some vital issuesconcerning the entire city. The studycomprises two main parts. First of all, aliterature overview is presented regardingthe current definitions and scope of urbanresilience as well as the attempts to developmethods to assess it. Secondly, an empiricalcase is examined so as to shed light onresilience assessment by employing themethod of social-ecological networkanalysis. It is found that the analysis ofresilience assessment alongside with itsmethod and instruments contributes tosustainable urban development and strategicurban planning. It is also argued that themethod of social-ecological networkanalyzing is of great benefit to partneranalysis, information flow, and participatoryprocesses in urban planning.
Anahtar Kelime:

-

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı şehir planlama alanında çoğunlukla tartışılan bir konu haline gelen kentsel dirençlilik konusunda hazırlanmış teorik çerçeve ve saha çalışmasını sunmaktır. Çalışmada sosyoekolojik sistem bakış açısıyla kentsel dirençlilik değerlendirmesi kapsamı tartışması yapılmış ve literatürde önerilen sosyo-ekolojik ağ analizi yöntemi denenerek bu yöntemin planlama alanına katkısı tartışılmıştır. Sosyo-ekolojik ilişki ağları analizi ve dirençlilik değerlendirmesi için İstanbul ili, Sultanbeyli ilçesi seçilmiştir. Sultanbeyli İstanbul’un gecekondu ve kaçak yapılaşma ile 1980 li yıllardan itibaren düzensiz olarak büyümüş bir ilçesidir. Sultanbeyli halkı pek çok sosyo-ekonomik ve mekânsal kırılganlık sahiptir. Yanı sıra yerleşimin tamamı İstanbul’un önemli temiz su kaynaklarından biri olan Ömerli Havası içerisinde kalmaktadır. Kontrolsüz büyüme havzanın küçülmesinden, kirlenmesine kadar çok sayıda konuda etki etmektedir. Bu nedenle Sultanbeyli için yapılan dirençlilik değerlendirmesi tüm şehri etkileyebilecek bir konu haline gelmektedir. Araştırma iki ana koldan oluşmaktadır. Birinci kol kentsel dirençliliği tanımlama, kapsam ve yöntem geliştirmeye çalışan literatür taramasını ifade etmektedir. İkinci kol ise bu kapsamda sosyo-ekolojik ilişki ağları analizi yöntemi ile kentsel dirençlilik değerlendirmesinin denendiği saha çalışmasını ifade etmektedir. Araştırma sonucunda dirençli kent değerlendirmesinin, yönteminin ve kullandığı araçların sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişme ve stratejik planlama deneyimlerine katkı sağlayacağı tespit edilmiş olup, sosyal ilişki ağları analizi yönteminin şehir planlamada paydaş analizi ve bilgi akışı, katılım sağlama amacıyla bir araç olarak kullanılabileceği kanaatine varılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adger, W.N. 2000. Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?. Progress in Human Geography 24, pp. 347–364.
  • Ahern, J., Cilliers, S. and Niemela, J. 2014. The Concept of Ecosystem Services in Adaptive Urban Planning and Design: A Framework for Supporting Innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning 125, pp. 254-259.
  • Alberti, M. and Marzluff, J. M. 2004. Ecological Resilience in Urban Ecosystems: Linking Urban Patterns to Human and Ecological Functions. Urban Ecosystems 7, pp. 241-265.
  • Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgtrom, S., Colding, J., Elmqviat, T., Folke, C. and Gren, A. 2014. Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services. Ambio 43, pp. 445-453.
  • Beck, M.B. 2005. Vulnerability of Water Quality in intensively developing urban watersheds. Environmental Modeling & Software 20, pp. 381-400.
  • Berkes, F. and Folke, C. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambiridge University Press.
  • Berkes, F. and Ross H. 2013. Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach, Society & Natural Resources, 26 (1), pp. 5-20, DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
  • Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. 2004. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bosher, L., Dinty, A., Carrillo, P., Glass, J. and Price, A. 2007. Integrating Disaster Risk Management into Construction: A UK Perspective. Building Research & Information 35:2, pp. 163-177.
  • Brand, S. F. And Jax, K. 2007. Focusing the Meaning (s) of Resilience. Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object. Ecology and Society 12(1):23.
  • Carlsson, L. and Berkes, F. 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications, Journal of Environmental Management 75, pp. 65–76.
  • Çavuşoğlu, E. 2004. Hegemonik Bir Süreç Olarak Türkiye Kentleşmesi. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University.
  • Colding, J. 2006. “Ecological Land-Use Complementation” for Building Resilience in Urban Ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 81, pp. 46–55.
  • Davoudi, S, Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünggeld, H., McEvoy, d., Porter, L., 2013. Resilience: A Briding Concep or a Dead End?. Planning Theory & practice. Routledge.
  • Eraydin, A., Taşan-kok, T. 2013. Reilience Thinking in Urban planning, Geo Journal Library 106 . springer Science +Business Media. Dordreht.
  • Erkan, R. 2002. Kentleşme ve Sosyal Değişme, Bilimadamı Yayınları.
  • Ernstson, H., Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C. and Elmqvist, T. 2010. Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems. AMBIO 39, pp. 531-545.
  • Ernstson, H., Sorlin, S. and Elmqvist, T. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services-the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13(2): 39.
  • Fleischhauer, M. 2008. The Role of Spatial Planning in Strengthening Urban Resilience. In: Posman, H. J. and Kirillov I.A. eds. Resilience of Cities to Terrorist and Other Threats. Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 273-298.
  • Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social Ecological System Analysis. Global Environmental Change (16), pp 253–267.
  • Folke, C., S. R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15(4), 20.
  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norgberg, J. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social- Ecological Systems 30, pp. 441-473.
  • Godschalk, D.R. 2003. Urban Hazard Mitigation, Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazards Review 4 (3).
  • Granovetter, M. S. 1977. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, pp. 347-367.
  • Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
  • Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic Vol.4, pp. 1-23.
  • Işık, O. and Pınarcıoğlu, M.M. 2001. Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk. Istanbul: İletişim.
  • İBB, 2009. İstanbul Çevre Düzeni Planı Analitik Rapor. İstanbul: Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
  • Jha, A. K., Miner, T. W. and Stanton-Geddes, Z. 2013. Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools, and Practice. Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
  • Keleş, R. 1978. 100 Soruda Türkiye’de Şehirleşme, Konut ve Gecekondu. İstanbul: Gerçek Yayınevi.
  • Kışlalıoğlu, M. and Berkes, F. 2007. Ekoloji ve Çevre Bilimleri. İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi.
  • Maclean, K., Cuthill, M. and Ross, H. 2013. Six Attributes of Social Resilience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (1), pp. 144-16, DOI :10.1080/09640568.2013.763774.
  • McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqviat, T. and Frantzeskaki, N. 2015. Resilience of and through Urban Ecosystem Services. Ecosystem Services. 12, pp. 152-156.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystem and Human Wellbeing, General Synthesis, Island Press.
  • Medd, W. and Marvin, S. 2005. From the Politics of Urgency to the Governance of Preparedness: A Research Agenda on Urban Vulnerability. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 13(2), pg.44- 49.
  • Mullin, J. W. and Arce, M. 2008. Resilience of Families living in Poverty. Journal of Family Social Work 11(4), pp. 424-440.
  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., Berkes, F., 2004. Adaptive Management for Building Resilience in SocialEcological Systems. Environmental Management 34 (1), pp. 75-99.
  • Ozyetgin Altun, A. 2011. The role of social-ecological networks and structuring for improving urban resilience. Unpublished MSc dissertation, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Urban Design Interdisciplinary Program.
  • Paavola, J., Gouldson, A. and Oravská, T, K. 2009. Interplay of Actors, Scales, Frameworks and Regimes in the Governance of Biodiversity. Environmental Policy and Governance Env. Pol. Gov. 19, pp. 148–158.
  • Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenosso, M.L., Grove, J.M. 2004. Resilient cities; meaning and metaphor for integrating ecological, social-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69, pp. 369–384.
  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K. and Reed, M. 2009. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society&Natural Resources 22, pp. 501-518.
  • Selberg, M. M., Wilkinson, C. and Peterson, G. D. 2015. Resilience assessment: a useful approach to navigate urban sustainability challenges. Ecology and Society 20(1): 43.
  • Tezer, A., Akşehirli, İ., Yaman, Z.D. and Özyetgin, A. 2010. Ömerli Havzası’nda Kentsel Dayanıklılığın Ölçülmesi ve Kentsel Dayanıklılığı Artırmaya Yönelik Öneriler, URBAN-NET (Integrating Ecosystem Services in Urban Planning) Gelişme Raporu, Temmuz. In Tezer, A., , Ulugtekin, N.,Göksel, Ç., Ertekin, O., Terzi, F. 2009-2011. URBAN-NET Integrating Ecosystem Services in Urban Planning. Sweden, The Netherlands, Turkey, funded by EU Urban NET. TÜBİTAK 108K615.
  • Tzoulas, K, Korpela, K, Venn, S, YliPelkonen, V, Kazmierczak, A, Niemela, J and James, P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81, pp. 167–178.
  • Walker, B., 2007. Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems a workbook for scientists. Version 1.1 draft for testing and evaluation. Resilience Alliance.
  • Walker, B., S. Carpenter, J. Anderies, N. Abel, G. S. Cumming, M. Janssen, L. Lebel, J. Norberg, G. D. Peterson, and R. Pritchard. 2002. Resilience Management in Social-Ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1): 14.
  • Walker, B., Anderies, M. J., Kinzig, P.A., Ryan, P. 2006. Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems through Comparative Studies and Theory Development: Introduction to the Special issue. Ecology and Society 11(1): 12.
  • Wallace D. and Wallace R. 2008. Urban Systems During Disasters: Factors for Resilience. Ecology and Society 13 (1): 18.
  • Walsh, F. 2007. Traumatic Loss and Major Disasters: Strengthening Family and Community Resilience. Family Process 46 (2), pp. 207-227.
  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • White, J.M. and Stromberg, J.C. 2009. Resilience, Restoration, and Riparian Ecosystems: Case Study of a Dryland, Urban River. Restoration Ecology Vol. 17 (3), pp. 1–11.
APA ALTUN A, Tezer A (2019). A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. , 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
Chicago ALTUN Ayşe ÖZYETGİN,Tezer Azime A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. (2019): 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
MLA ALTUN Ayşe ÖZYETGİN,Tezer Azime A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. , 2019, ss.77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
AMA ALTUN A,Tezer A A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. . 2019; 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
Vancouver ALTUN A,Tezer A A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. . 2019; 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
IEEE ALTUN A,Tezer A "A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1." , ss.77 - 95, 2019. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
ISNAD ALTUN, Ayşe ÖZYETGİN - Tezer, Azime. "A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1". (2019), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
APA ALTUN A, Tezer A (2019). A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. Tasarım+Kuram, 15(28), 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
Chicago ALTUN Ayşe ÖZYETGİN,Tezer Azime A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. Tasarım+Kuram 15, no.28 (2019): 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
MLA ALTUN Ayşe ÖZYETGİN,Tezer Azime A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. Tasarım+Kuram, vol.15, no.28, 2019, ss.77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
AMA ALTUN A,Tezer A A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. Tasarım+Kuram. 2019; 15(28): 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
Vancouver ALTUN A,Tezer A A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1. Tasarım+Kuram. 2019; 15(28): 77 - 95. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
IEEE ALTUN A,Tezer A "A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1." Tasarım+Kuram, 15, ss.77 - 95, 2019. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108
ISNAD ALTUN, Ayşe ÖZYETGİN - Tezer, Azime. "A Preliminary Study On Defining Urban Resilience for Urban Planning: The Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul1". Tasarım+Kuram 15/28 (2019), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.07108