MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS

Karakaş, Serkan; KIRMIZI, MEHMET

MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS

Serkan KARAKAŞ, (Piri Reis Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Mehmet KIRMIZI (Piri Reis Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering

2 0

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 38 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 08-12-2020

MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS

Öz:

A large part of the world energy requirement is provided from offshore oiland gas fields. The Kashagan site in the Northern Caspian Sea has one ofthe largest known reserves and marine operations are important for thecontinuation of activities regarding oil and gas production in area.However, the geographical features of the region make the maritime-relatedactivities difficult. There are different types of marine equipment inoperation within the scope of the Kashagan project and one of the mostwidely used vessel is Multi-Purpose Tugboat / AHT (Anchor Handling Tug).As far as the requirements of the task are concerned, the geographicchallenges of the region (especially low water depth) should be taken intoconsideration when selecting the AHT by the management. In this study, theoptimum AHT vessel will be selected to operate in the North Caspian Sea byutilizing MOORA (Ratio and Reference Point approaches) and TOPSISmethods and the concordance among three methods will be tested byKendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (Kendall’s W)

Anahtar Kelime:

MOORA VE TOPSIS YÖNTEMLERİ KULLANILARAK KUZEY HAZAR DENİZİNDE KULLANILACAK ÇOK AMAÇLI RÖMORKÖR SEÇİMİ YAPILMASI

Öz:

Dünya enerji ihtiyacının önemli bir bölümü açık deniz petrol ve gaz sahalarından temin edilmektedir. Kuzey Hazar Denizinde yer alan Kashagan petrol sahası bilinen en büyük rezervlerden birine sahip olup, denizcilik operasyonları bölgedeki petrol üretimi ile ilgili faaliyetlerin devamlılığı açısından büyük öneme sahiptir. Nitekim, bölgenin coğrafik özellikleri genel olarak bölgede denizcilik ile ilgili faaliyetlerin yapılmasını zorlaştırmaktadır. Kashagan projesi kapsamında bölgede farklı tipte deniz taşıtları ve ekipmanları kullanılmaktadır ve bunlar içerisinde en çok yaygın olarak kullanılanlardan bir tanesi Çok Amaçlı Römorkör / Demir Zinciri Elleçleyebilen Römorkör (AHT)’dir. Görevin gereklilikleri dikkate alındığında AHT seçiminde bölgenin coğrafi özellikleri de (özellikle düşük su derinliği) yöneticiler tarafından dikkate alınmalıdır. Bu çalışmada MOORA (oran yöntemi ve referans nokta yaklaşımı) ve TOPSIS yöntemleri kullanılarak Kuzey Hazar Denizinde kullanılacak optimum AHT seçimi yapılacak, ve üç yöntem arasındaki uyum Kendall’ın uyum katsayısı (Kendall’s W) ile test edilecektir

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Rui, Z., Li, C., Peng, F., Ling, K., Chen, G., Zhou, X., & Chang, H. (2017). Development of industry performance metrics for offshore oil and gas project. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 39, 44-53.
[2] NCOC (2016). Sustainability Report 2016. Retrieved from the North Caspian Operating Company website: https://www.ncoc.kz/Documents/Sustainability_report 2016_en.pdf
[3] Javaid, U., & Rashid, A. (2015). Oil and Gas Potentials of Central Asian Republics and Relations with Pakistan. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 30 (1), 127-148.
[4] Temizel C., Canbaz C. H., Palabiyik Y., Moreno R., Najy A. K., Xie J., Wang H., Ranjith R., Mofti M., & Mukanov A. (2018). An Economical and Technical Analysis of Oil and Gas Resources of Central Asia under Demand and Supply Dynamics of World Hydrocarbon Production. 2018 SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition Symposium. Astana, Kazakhstan.
[5] Saurbayev, I., Reedy, J., Bukharbayeva, A., Hatiboglu, C. & Massingill, A. (2018). Challenges and Value of Interference Testing During Early Production of Kashagan Field. 2018 SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition Symposium Proceedings. Astana, Kazakhstan.
[6] Shiganova, T. A., Kamakin, A.M., Zhukova, O. P., Ushivtsev, V. B., Dulimov, A. B., & Musaeva, E. I. (2001). The Invader into the Caspian Sea Ctenophore Mnemiopsis and Its Initial Effect on the Pelagic Ecosystem. Oceanology, 41 (4), 542-549.
[7] Aladin, N., & Plotnikov I. (2004). The Caspian Sea. Retrieved from the Vliz.be website: http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/ 133415.pdf
[8] Tsoraev, S. (2018). Artificial island concept – specifics of construction and usage in the Caspian Sea (Master's thesis). University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Stavanger. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/ handle/11250/2562596/Thesis_Tsoraev.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed =y
[9] NCOC (2017). Sustainability Report 2017. Retrieved from the North Caspian Operating Company website: https://www.ncoc.kz/Documents/sustainability%202017 en.pdf
[10] Olaniran, O. J., Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Olatunji, O. & Matthews, J. (2015). Chaotic Dynamics of Cost Overruns in Oil and Gas Megaprojects: A Review. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 9(7), 911-917.
[11] Johnston, D., & Johnston, D. (2001). Kashagan and Tengiz - Castor and Pollux. Retrieved from the DanielJohnston.com website: http://www.danieljohnston.com/pdf/kashagan_and_tengiz.pdf
[12] ENKA (2019). Kashagan oil field development. Retrieved from the Enka.com website: https://www.enka.com/portfolio-item/kashaganoil-field-development/
[13] Albertini, C., Bado, L., Calabrese, M., Francesconi, A., Leoni, G., & Tarantini, V. (2013). Kashagan Field Approaching Production StartUp: Insight Into Reservoir Characteristics. 2013 EAGE Annual Conference Symposium Proceedings. London,UK. [14] ACCESS (2013). D4.31 - Report on rescue and evacuation systems. Retrieved from the Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society website: www.accesseu.org/modules/resources/download/access/.../D4-31 IMPaC_Revised.pdf
[15] MarineInsight (2017). What are Offshore Vessels? Retrieved from the MarineInsight.com website: https://www.marineinsight.com/types-of-ships/what-are-offshorevessels/
[16] Skoko, I., Jurčević, M., & Božić, D. (2013). Logistics Aspect of Offshore Support Vessels on the West Africa Market. Transportation Economy Review, 25(6), 587- 593.
[17] Kaiser, M. J. (2017). The global offshore pipeline construction service market 2017 – Part I. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(1), 65-95.
[18] Pardo, M. L., Couce, L. C., Castro-Santos, L., & Couce, J. C. C. (2017). A review of the drive options for offshore anchor handling winches. Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding, 68(3), 119-134..
[19] Çakıroğlu, G., Şener, B., & Balın, A. (2018). Applying a fuzzy-ahp for the selection of a suitable tugboat based on propulsion system type. Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding, 69(4), 1-13..
[20] Dalgic, Y., Dinwoodie, I., Lazakis, I., McMillan, D., & Revie, M. (2014). Optimum CTV Fleet Selection for Offshore Wind Farm O&M Activities. 2014 ESREL Symposium Proceedings.Wroclaw, Poland
[21] Sperstad, I. B., Stålhane, M., Dinwoodie, I., Endrerud, O. V., Martin, R., & Warner E. (2017). Testing the robustness of optimal access vessel fleet selection for operation and maintenance of offshore wind farms. Ocean Engineering, 145, 334-343.
[22] Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S., & Wang, J. (2011). Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14523-14534.
[23] Aas, B., Halskau, Ø., & Wallace, S. W. (2009). The role of supply vessels in offshore logistics. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(3), 302-325.
[24] Pelorus H. K. (2017). The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators. Transportation Research Part D, 52, 172-184.
[25] Koseoglu B., Buber M., & Toz A. C. (2018). Optimum site selection for oil spill response center in the Marmara Sea using the AHPTOPSIS method. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(4), 38- 49.
[26] Aktepe A., & Ersöz S. (2014). Application of AHP-VIKOR and MOORA Methods in WareHouse Site Selection Problem. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 25(1-2), 2-15.
[27] Vatansever K., & Ulukoy M. (2013). Determining Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Through Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MOORA Methods: An Implementation on Manufacturing Sector. Celal Bayar University The Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 274- 293.
[28] Şimşek A., Çatır O., & Ömürbek N. (2015). Vendor Choice with TOPSIS and MOORA Methods: A Practice in Tourism Sector. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 18(33), 133-161.
[29] Metin S., Yaman S., & Korkmaz T. (2017). Determination of the Financial Performance by TOPSIS and MOORA Methods: A Comparative Application on BIST Energy Companies. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 371-394.
[30] Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445-469.
[31] Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Application of multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Materials and Design, 37, 317-324.
[32] Uğur, L. O. (2017). Construction project maneger selection with the MOORA optimisation method: A multi-objective optimization application. Journal of Polytechnic, 20(3), 717-723.
[33] Görener, A., Dinçer, H. and Hacıoğlu, Ü. (2013). Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method for Bank Branch Location Selection. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 2(2), 41-52.
[34] Atmaca, H. E., & Özçelik, G. (2014, May 15). Supplier Selection Problem by the MOORA Method for the Procurement Process. 3rd National Logistics and Supply Chain Congress. Trabzon, İstanbul
[35] Brauers, W. K. M., Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2010). Regional development in Lithuania considering multiple objectives by the Moora method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(4), 613-640
[36] Brauers, W. K. M., & Ginevičius, R. (2009). Robustness in regional development studies: The case of Lithuania. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 121-140.
[37] Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications.Berlin, Springer
[38] Karim, R., & Karmaker, C. L. (2016). Machine selection by AHP and TOPSIS methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 4(1), 7-13.
[39] Liaudanskiene, R., Ustinovicius, L., & Bogdanovicius, A. (2009). Evaluation of construction process safety solutions using the TOPSIS method. Economics of Engineering Decisions, 4, 32-40.
[40] Uzun, S., & Kazan, H. (2016). Comparing MCDM methods of AHP, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE: A study on the selection of ship main engine system. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 1(1), 99- 113.
[41] Gökkaya, H., & Kellegöz, T. (2017). AHP, TOPSIS and Hungarian Algorithm based decision support model for staff appointment. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 28(1), 2-18.
[42] Sevgin, H., & Kundakcı, N. (2017). Ranking of European Union Member Countries and Turkey according to the economic indicators with TOPSIS and MOORA methods. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 87-108.
[43] Gearhart, A., Booth, D. T., Sedivec, K., & Schauer, C. (2013). Use of Kendall’s coefficient of concordance to assess agreement among observers of very high resolution imagery. Geocarto International, 28(6), 517-526.
[44] Nisel, S., & Nisel, R. (2013). Using VIKOR Methodology for Ranking Universities by Academic Performance. GSTF Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, 2(1), 86-92.

APA	Karakaş S, KIRMIZI M (2019). MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. , 21 - 38.
Chicago	Karakaş Serkan,KIRMIZI MEHMET MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. (2019): 21 - 38.
MLA	Karakaş Serkan,KIRMIZI MEHMET MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. , 2019, ss.21 - 38.
AMA	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. . 2019; 21 - 38.
Vancouver	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. . 2019; 21 - 38.
IEEE	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M "MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS." , ss.21 - 38, 2019.
ISNAD	Karakaş, Serkan - KIRMIZI, MEHMET. "MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS". (2019), 21-38.

APA	Karakaş S, KIRMIZI M (2019). MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, 15(1), 21 - 38.
Chicago	Karakaş Serkan,KIRMIZI MEHMET MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering 15, no.1 (2019): 21 - 38.
MLA	Karakaş Serkan,KIRMIZI MEHMET MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, vol.15, no.1, 2019, ss.21 - 38.
AMA	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering. 2019; 15(1): 21 - 38.
Vancouver	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering. 2019; 15(1): 21 - 38.
IEEE	Karakaş S,KIRMIZI M "MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS." Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, 15, ss.21 - 38, 2019.
ISNAD	Karakaş, Serkan - KIRMIZI, MEHMET. "MULTI-PURPOSE TUGBOAT/AHT SELECTION FOR NORTHERN CASPIAN SEA WITH TOPSIS AND MOORA METHODS". Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering 15/1 (2019), 21-38.