Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri

YILMAZ, Remzi; SEYDALİYEVA, Tünzale; ÜNLÜ, Durmuş; ULUÇAY, Abdullah

Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri

Remzi YILMAZ, (Harran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Tünzale SEYDALİYEVA, (Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Hatay, Türkiye)

Durmuş ÜNLÜ, (Harran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Abdullah ULUÇAY (Harran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi

3 1

Yıl: 2004 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 217 - 222 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri

Öz:

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül (SV) geometrisi ile miyokardiyal performans indeksi (MPİ) arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Sistolik ve diyastolik ventriküler fonksiyonun bir göstergesi olan MPİ, 64 hipertansif hastada ve 15 sağlıklı bireyde (kontrol) hesaplandı. Göreceli duvar kalınlığı (GDK) ve SV kitle indeksine (SVKİ) göre hipertansif hastalar 4 alt gruba ayrıldı: normal (N), 17 hasta (% 26.6); konsantrik yeniden biçimlenme (KR), 21 hasta (%32.8); konsantrik hipertrofi (KH), 16 hasta (%25); eksantrik hipertrofi (EH), 10 hasta (%15.6). Bulgular: Miyokardiyal performans indeksi, kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında (0.44 ± 0.09), tüm hasta gruplarında daha yüksek bulundu (N, 0.56 ± 0.11; KR, 0.59 ± 0.11; KH, 0.68 ± 0.19; EH, 0.57 ± 0,10) (sırasıyla, p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 ve p = 0.002). Ayrıca MPI, KH grubunda N, KR ve EH gruplarından da daha yüksek idi (sırasıyla, p = 0.006, p < 0.03 ve p = 0.009). Normal, KR ve EH grupları arasında anlamlı farklılık görülmedi. Miyokardiyal performans indeksi, SVKİ ile (r = 0.28, p = 0.014), GDK ile (r = 0.24, p = 0.035) ve interventriküler septum diyastolik kalınlığı ile (r = 0,32, p = 0.004) ilişkili bulundu. Sonuç: Hipertansif hastalarda SV sistolik ve diyastolik fonksiyonları SV geometrik paternine göre tüm alt gruplarda kontrol grubuna göre bozulmaktadır. Bu bozukluk SV konsantrik hipertrofisi olan hastalarda, diğer sol ventrikül geometrilerine sahip olanlara göre daha ileri düzeydedir.

Anahtar Kelime: Kalp ventrikülleri Ekokardiyografi Ventriküler fonksiyon Hipertansiyon

Konular: Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Fizyoloji Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi

The effect of left ventricular geometry on myocardial performance index in hypertensive patients

Öz:

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the myocardial performance index (MPI) and left ventricular (LV) geometry in hypertensive patients. Methods: The MPI, which is a marker of systolic and diastolic ventricular function, was measured in 64 hypertensive patients and in 15 healthy persons (Control). According to the value of relative wall thickness (RWT) and LV mass index (LVMI), hypertensive patients were subdivided into four groups: normal (N), 17 patients (26.6%); concentric remodeling (CR), 21 patients (32.8%); concentric hypertrophy (CH), 16 patients (25%); and eccentric hypertrophy (EH), 10 patients (15.6%). Results: A higher MPI was found in all patient groups (N, 0.56 ± 0.11; CR, 0.59 ± 0.11; CH, 0.68 ± 0.19; EH, 0.57 ± 0.10) compared with the controls (0.44 ± 0.09) (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the CH group, the MPI was also higher than in N, CR and EH groups (p = 0.006, p < 0.03 and p = 0.009, respectively). No significant difference was found among N, CR and EH groups. The MPI was correlated with LVMI (r = 0.28, p = 0.014), RWT (r = 0.24, p = 0.035) and interventricular septum diastolic thickness (r = 0.32, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The systolic and diastolic LV functions are impaired in all subgroups of hypertensive patients according to their LV geometry compared to control group. This impairment is more advanced in patients with concentric hypertrophy than in those with the other LV geometric patterns.

Anahtar Kelime: Echocardiography Ventricular Function Hypertension Heart Ventricles

Konular: Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Fizyoloji Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1550-8.
2. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 345-52.
3. Ghali JK, Liao Y, Cooper RS. Influence of left ventricular geometric patterns on prognosis in patients with or without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1635-40.
4. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 197-202.
5. Devereux RB, Savage DD, Sachs I, Laragh JH. Relation of hemodynamic load to left ventricular hypertrophy and performance in hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 171-6.
6. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1444-51.
7. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, Mensah GA, Casale PN, Laragh JH. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Circulation 1996; 93: 259-65.
8. Shimizu G, Hirota Y, Kita Y, Kawamura K, Saito T, Gaasch WH. Left ventricular midwall mechanics in systemic arterial hypertension. Myocardial function is depressed in pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation 1991; 83: 1676-84.
9. Aurigemma GP, Silver KH, Priest MA, Gaasch WH. Geometric changes allow normal ejection fraction despite depressed myocardial shortening in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 195-202.
10. Kobayashi T, Tamano K, Takahashi M, Honda T, Uetake S, Ohrui M. Myocardial systolic function of the left ventricle along the long axis in patients with essential hypertension: a study by pulsed tissue Doppler imaging. J Cardiol 2003; 41: 175-82.
11. Bonow RO, Udelson JE. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a cause of congestive heart failure. Mechanisms and management. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 502-10.
12. Cohn JN, Johnson G. Heart failure with normal ejection fraction. The V-HeFT Study Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. Circulation 1990; 81: 48-53.
13. Lorell BH, Apstein CS, Weinberg EO, Cunningham MJ. Diastolic function in left ventricular hypertrophy: clinical and experimental relationships. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 54-64.
14. Kapuku GK, Seto S, Mori H, et al. Impaired left ventricular filling in borderline hypertensive patients without cardiac structural changes. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 1710-6.
15. Inouye I, Massie B, Loge D, et al. Abnormal left ventricular filling: an early finding in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 120-6.
16. Wachtell K, Rokkedal J, Bella JN, et al. Effect of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy on left ventricular systolic function in systemic hypertension (The LIFE Study). Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 54-60.
17. Wachtell K, Smith G, Gerdts E, et al. Left ventricular filling patterns in patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (the LIFE study). Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 466-72.
18. Tei C. New non-invasive index for combined systolic and diastolic ventricular function. J Cardiol 1995; 26: 135-6.
19. Tei C, Ling LH, Hodge DO, et al. New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function-a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol 1995; 26: 357-66.
20. Tei C, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 169-78.
21. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413-46.
22. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-83.
23. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450-8.
24. Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 956-60. X
25. Reichek N, Devereux RB. Reliable estimation of peak left ventricular systolic pressure by M-mode echographic-determined end-diastolic relative wall thickness: identification of severe valvular aortic stenosis in adult patients. Am Heart J 1982; 103: 202-9.
26. Roman MJ, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE, Pini R, Devereux RB. Relation of arterial structure and function to left ventricular geometric patterns in hypertensive adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 751-6.
27. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 426-40.
28. Nishimura RA, Housmans PR, Hatle LK, Tajik AJ. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part I. Physiologic and pathophysiologic features. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 71-81.
29. Casale PN, Devereux RB, Milner M, et al. Value of echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass in predicting cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive men. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 173-8.
30. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561-6.
31. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of concentric remodeling of the left ventricle in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular mass. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 871-8.
32. Li L, Shigematsu Y, Hamada M, Hiwada K. Relative wall thickness is an independent predictor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2001; 24: 493-9.
33. Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS, Shemanski L, Gardin J, Kitzman D. Predictive value of systolic and diastolic function for incident congestive heart failure in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1042-8.
34. Wachtell K, Palmieri V, Olsen MH, et al. Change in systolic left ventricular performance after 3 years of antihypertensive treatment: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Study. Circulation 2002; 106: 227-32.
35. Dujardin KS, Tei C, Yeo TC, Hodge DO, Rossi A, Seward JB. Prognostic value of a Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic performance in idiopathic-dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1071-6.
36. Yeo TC, Dujardin KS, Tei C, Mahoney DW, McGoon MD, Seward JB. Value of a Doppler-derived index combining systolic and diastolic time intervals in predicting outcome in primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1157-61.
37. Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Tei C, Seward JB, Egstrup K. Value of the Doppler index of myocardial performance in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 723-30.
38. Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Nielsen JC, Moller JE, Egstrup K. Serial changes and prognostic implications of a Doppler-derived index of combined left ventricular systolic and diastolic myocardial performance in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 19-25.
39. Bruch C, Schmermund A, Marin D, et al. Tei-index in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1888-95.
40. Brutsaert DL, Sys SU, Gillebert TH: Diastolic failure: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 318-25.
41. Schillaci G, Vaudo G, Pasqualini L, Reboldi G, Porcellati C, Verdecchia P. Left ventricular mass and systolic dysfunction in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 117-22.
42. Zabalgoitia M, Rahman NU, Haley WE, et al. Disparity between diastolic mitral flow characteristics and left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 1255-8.
43. Bonaduce D, Breglio R, Conforti G, et al. Myocardial hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive patient: an echo Doppler evaluation. Eur Heart J 1989; 10: 611-21.
44. Inouye I, Massie B, Loge D, et al. Abnormal left ventricular filling: An early finding in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 120-6.
45. Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ, Mrosek D, Williams GA, Kennedy HL. Assessment of diastolic function in normal and hypertrophied hearts: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and M-mode echocardiography. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 1417-25.
46. Altınmakas S, Yıldız S, Oğuş T, ve ark. Esansiyel hipertansiyonda sol ventrikül kitlesi ile bölgesel diyastolik fonksiyon arasındaki ilişki. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2000; 28: 678-83.
47. Balcı B, Yazıcı M, Yılmaz Ö, Yeşildağ O. Hipertrofisi olan ve olmayan hipertansif hastalarda doku Doppler yöntemi ile elde edilen mitral anüler velositelerin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2002; 30: 428-33.
48. Andersen NH, Poulsen SH, Helleberg K, Ivarsen P, Knudsen ST, Mogensen CE. Impact of essential hypertension and diabetes mellitus on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003; 4: 306-12.

APA	YILMAZ R, SEYDALİYEVA T, ÜNLÜ D, ULUÇAY A (2004). Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. , 217 - 222.
Chicago	YILMAZ Remzi,SEYDALİYEVA Tünzale,ÜNLÜ Durmuş,ULUÇAY Abdullah Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. (2004): 217 - 222.
MLA	YILMAZ Remzi,SEYDALİYEVA Tünzale,ÜNLÜ Durmuş,ULUÇAY Abdullah Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. , 2004, ss.217 - 222.
AMA	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. . 2004; 217 - 222.
Vancouver	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. . 2004; 217 - 222.
IEEE	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A "Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri." , ss.217 - 222, 2004.
ISNAD	YILMAZ, Remzi vd. "Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri". (2004), 217-222.

APA	YILMAZ R, SEYDALİYEVA T, ÜNLÜ D, ULUÇAY A (2004). Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 4(3), 217 - 222.
Chicago	YILMAZ Remzi,SEYDALİYEVA Tünzale,ÜNLÜ Durmuş,ULUÇAY Abdullah Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 4, no.3 (2004): 217 - 222.
MLA	YILMAZ Remzi,SEYDALİYEVA Tünzale,ÜNLÜ Durmuş,ULUÇAY Abdullah Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, vol.4, no.3, 2004, ss.217 - 222.
AMA	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2004; 4(3): 217 - 222.
Vancouver	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2004; 4(3): 217 - 222.
IEEE	YILMAZ R,SEYDALİYEVA T,ÜNLÜ D,ULUÇAY A "Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri." Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 4, ss.217 - 222, 2004.
ISNAD	YILMAZ, Remzi vd. "Hipertansif hastalarda sol ventrikül geometrisinin miyokardiyal performans indeksi üzerine etkileri". Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 4/3 (2004), 217-222.