A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION

ACITAŞ, Şükrü; ARSLAN, M. S. Talha

doi:10.20290/estubtdb.529328

A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION

Şükrü ACITAŞ, (Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, İstatistik Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

M. S. Talha ARSLAN (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ekonometri Bölümü, Van, Türkiye)

Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler

3 1

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 33 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20290/estubtdb.529328 İndeks Tarihi: 07-01-2021

A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION

Öz:

In this study, we consider different estimation methods for the parameters of Weibull Lindley distribution introduced byAshgarzadeh et al. [1]. In this context, maximum likelihood (ML), least squares (LS), weighted least squares (WLS), CramerVon Mises (CVM) and Anderson Darling (AD) estimation methods are utilized. The main focus of this study is to examineperformances of these estimation methods. For this purpose, we carry out a Monte-Carlo simulation study based on differentparameter settings and various values of the sample size. Results show that the AD estimators are almost preferable. Two reallife data sets taken from the literature are also considered at end of the study.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Asgharzadeh A, Nadarajah S, Sharafi F. Weibull Lindley distribution. REVSTAT-Statistical Journal 2018; 16(1): 87-113.
[2] Lindley DV. Fiducial distributions and Bayes' theorem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1958; 102-107.
[3] Ghitany ME, Atieh B, Nadarajah S. Lindley distribution and its application. Mathematics and computers in simulation 2008; 78(4): 493-506.
[4] Nadarajah S, Bakouch HS, Tahmasbi R. A generalized Lindley distribution. Sankhya B 2011; 73(2): 331-359.
[5] Oluyede BO, Yang T. A new class of generalized Lindley distributions with applications. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 2015; 85(10): 2072-2100.
[6] Ghitany ME, Alqallaf F, Al-Mutairi DK, Husain HA. A two-parameter weighted Lindley distribution and its applications to survival data. Mathematics and Computers in simulation 2011; 81(6): 1190-1201.
[7] Bakouch HS, Al-Zahrani BM, Al-Shomrani AA, Marchi VA, Louzada F. An extended Lindley distribution. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 2012; 41(1): 75-85.
[8] Ghitany ME, Al-Mutairi DK, Balakrishnan N, Al-Enezi LJ. Power Lindley distribution and associated inference. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2013; 64: 20-33.
[9] Kantar YM, Senoglu B. A comparative study for the location and scale parameters of the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter. Computers & Geosciences 2008; 34(12): 1900-1909.
[10] Akgul FG, Senoglu B, Arslan T. An alternative distribution to Weibull for modeling the wind speed data: Inverse Weibull distribution. Energy Conversion and Management 2016; 114, 234- 240.
[11] Akgul FG. Comparison of the Estimation Methods for the Parameters of Exponentiated Reduced Kies Distribution. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2018; 22(3): 1209-1216.
[12] Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK, Freimer M. The exponentiated Weibull family: A reanalysis of the bus-motor-failure data. Technometrics 1995; 37(4): 436-445.
[13] Xie M, Tang Y, Goh TN. A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2002; 76(3): 279-285.
[14] Lai CD, Xie M, Murthy DNP. A modified Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on reliability 2003; 52(1): 33-37.
[15] Carrasco JM, Ortega EM, Cordeiro GM. A generalized modified Weibull distribution for lifetime modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008; 53(2): 450-462.
[16] Cordeiro GM, Gomes, AE, da-Silva C Q, Ortega EM. The beta exponentiated Weibull distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 2013; 83(1): 114-138.
[17] Lai CD. Generalized Weibull Distributions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
[18] Wolfowitz, J. The minimum distance method. Ann. Math. Statist. 1957; 28, 75-88.
[19] Koul, H.L. Weighted Empirical Processes in Dynamic Nonlinear Models, New York: SpringerVerlag, 2002.
[20] Hettmansperger, TP, Hueter, I, Hüsler, J. Minimum distance estimators. Journal of statistical Planning and Inference. 1994; 41(3), 291-302.
[21] Mazucheli J, Louzada F, Ghitany ME. Comparison of estimation methods for the parameters of the weighted Lindley distribution. Applied Mathematics and Computation 201; 220: 463-471.
[22] Akgul FG, Senoglu B. Comparison of Estimation Methods for Inverse Weibull Distribution. In: Tez M, Rosen von D. Trends and Perspectives in Linear Statistical Inference. Springer, 2018. pp. 1-22.
[23] Swain J, Venkatraman S, Wilson J. Least squares estimation of distribution function in Johnson’s translation system. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1988; 29: 271–297.
[24] Duchesne T, Rioux J, Luong A. Minimum Cramer-von Mises estimators and their influence function, Actuarial Research Clearing House 1997; 1: 349-361.
[25] Boos DD.. Minimum distance estimators for location and goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1981; 76: 663–670.
[26] Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data., New York: Springer Verlag, 1997.

APA	ACITAŞ Ş, ARSLAN M (2020). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. , 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
Chicago	ACITAŞ Şükrü,ARSLAN M. S. Talha A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. (2020): 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
MLA	ACITAŞ Şükrü,ARSLAN M. S. Talha A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. , 2020, ss.19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
AMA	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. . 2020; 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
Vancouver	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. . 2020; 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
IEEE	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M "A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION." , ss.19 - 33, 2020. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
ISNAD	ACITAŞ, Şükrü - ARSLAN, M. S. Talha. "A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION". (2020), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.20290/estubtdb.529328

APA	ACITAŞ Ş, ARSLAN M (2020). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler, 8(1), 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
Chicago	ACITAŞ Şükrü,ARSLAN M. S. Talha A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler 8, no.1 (2020): 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
MLA	ACITAŞ Şükrü,ARSLAN M. S. Talha A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler, vol.8, no.1, 2020, ss.19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
AMA	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler. 2020; 8(1): 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
Vancouver	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler. 2020; 8(1): 19 - 33. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
IEEE	ACITAŞ Ş,ARSLAN M "A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION." Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler, 8, ss.19 - 33, 2020. 10.20290/estubtdb.529328
ISNAD	ACITAŞ, Şükrü - ARSLAN, M. S. Talha. "A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBULL LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION". Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi b- Teorik Bilimler 8/1 (2020), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.20290/estubtdb.529328