Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi

ÖZCAN, Evrencan; DANIŞAN, Tuğba; EREN, Tamer

doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.602774

Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi

Evrencan OZCAN, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Tuğba DANIŞMAN, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Tamer EREN (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

15 3

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1815 - 1827 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774 İndeks Tarihi: 13-01-2021

Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi

Öz:

Bakım, endüstriyel işletmelerde üretim, personel ve malzeme ile eş zamanlı yönetilmesi gereken önemli birprosestir. Bu önemli prosesin kritik aşamalarının başında bakım planlaması gelmektedir. Bakım planlamasıiçin gerekli olan iki aşama bulunmaktadır. İlk aşama bakım stratejilerinin belirlenmesi ve ikinci aşama isebakım çizelgelerinin oluşturulmasıdır. Bu çalışma, bakım planlamasının ilk adımını oluşturan bakım stratejiseçiminin gerçekleştirildiği bir çalışmanın devamı olarak bakım çizelgelemesi için yapılmıştır. Bakım stratejiseçimi için gerçekleştirilen ilk adımdaki çalışmada [5], Türkiye’deki büyük ölçekli bir hidroelektrik santraldayer alan 1330 elektriksel ekipman incelenmiş ve santral açısından kritiklik seviyesi belirlenmiştir. Çalışmasonucunda bir zaman çizelgesi doğrultusunda gerçekleştirilebilecek olan, periyodik bakım stratejisininuygulanabileceği kritik elektriksel 7 ana ekipman grubu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar bakımplanlamasındaki bakım çizelgeleme aşamasını oluşturan bu çalışmada kullanılmıştır ve periyodik bakımstratejisinin uygulanabileceği bu kritik elektriksel 7 ana ekipman grubu için bakım çizelgesi oluşturulmuştur.Bakım çizelgeleme için yapılan bu çalışmanın ilk aşamasında santralın bir yıllık üretim tahmini Yapay SinirAğı (YSA) yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve bu tahmin sonucunda elde edilen verilerden çalışma-bakımsüreleri hesaplanmıştır. Tutarlı tahmin değerlerinin santralın bakım planlama gerçek ve gereklilikleriniyansıtan 0-1 Tam sayılı Programlama (TP) modelinde kullanılmasıyla, beş farklı periyodik bakım türüçizelgelenmiş ve santral işletme ve bakım gerçekleri ile tutarlı optimal bir bakım planı elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime:

A hybrid model proposal for maintenance scheduling in hydropower plants

Öz:

Maintenance is an important process that must be managed simultaneously with personnel and materials, production in industrial enterprises. Maintenance planning comes at the beginning of the critical stages of this important process. There are two stages required for maintenance planning. The first stage is the determination of maintenance strategies and the second stage is the generation of maintenance schedules. This study is carried out for maintenance scheduling as a continuation of the maintenance strategy selection which is the first step of maintenance planning. In the first step study realized for maintenance strategy selection, 1330 electrical equipment located in a large-scale hydroelectric power plant in Turkey is examined and the criticality level is determined for the plant. As a result of the study can be realized in accordance with a timeline, 7 critical electrical equipment groups in which preventive maintenance strategy can be applied. As a result of the study can be realized in accordance with a timeline, critical electrical 7 equipment groups determined which preventive maintenance strategy can be applied. These results are used in this study which constitutes the maintenance scheduling stage in maintenance planning and the maintenance schedule has been established for these critical electrical 7 equipment groups to which preventive maintenance strategy can be applied. In the first stage of this study for maintenance scheduling, one-year generation estimation of the plant is realized by using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method and operating-maintenance periods are calculated from the data obtained from this estimation. By using consistent estimation values in the 0-1 Integer Programming (IP) model, which reflects the power plant's maintenance planning realities and requirements, five different types of periodic maintenance are scheduled and an optimal maintenance plan consistent with the power plant operation and maintenance facts is achieved.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. TEİAŞ. Kurulu Güç Raporları Haziran 2019. https://www.teias.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2019- 07/KURULU%20G%C3%9C%C3%87%20%C4%B0 NTERNET%20HAZ%C4%B0RAN%20AYI_0.pdf Erişim tarihi Ağustos 3, 2019.
2. Özcan E.C., Bakım Yönetim Sistemi: Kurulum ve İşletme Esasları, Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye, 2016.
3. Özcan E.C., Yumuşak R., Eren T., Risk based maintenance in the hydroelectric power plants, Energies, 12 (8), 1502, 2019.
4. Özcan E.C., Ünlüsoy S., Eren T., A combined goal programming–AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 78, 1410-1423, 2017.
5. Özcan E.C., Danışan T., Eren T., Hidroelektrik santralların en kritik elektriksel ekipman gruplarının bakım stratejilerinin optimizasyonu için matematiksel bir model önerisi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 25 (4), 498-506, 2019.
6. White H., Learning in artificial neural networks: A statistical perspective, Neural Comput., 1 (4), 425-464, 1989.
7. Ripley B.D., Statistical aspects of neural networks, Networks and chaos statistical and probabilistic aspects, 50, 40-123, 1993.
8. Cheng B., Titterington D.M., Neural networks: A review from a statistical perspective, Statistical Science, 2-30, 1994.
9. Liao S.H., Wen C.H., Artificial neural networks classification and clustering of methodologies and applications–literature analysis from 1995 to 2005, Expert Syst. Appl., 32 (1), 1-11, 2007.
10. Al-Shayea Q.K., Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8 (2), 150-154, 2011.
11. Yuce B., Rezgui Y., Mourshed M., ANN–GA smart appliance scheduling for optimised energy management in the domestic sector, Energy Build., 111, 311-325, 2016.
12. Voyant C., Notton G., Kalogirou S., Nivet M.L., Paoli C., Motte F., Fouilloy A., Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A reviews, Renewable Energy, 105, 569-582, 2017.
13. Notton G., Voyant C., Fouilloy A., Duchaud J.L., Nivet M.L., Some applications of ANN to solar radiation estimation and forecasting for energy applications, Applied Sciences, 9 (1), 209, 2019.
14. Dougherty M., A review of neural networks applied to transport, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 3 (4), 247-260, 1995.
15. Shankaracharya D.O., Samanta S., Vidyarthi A.S., Computational intelligence in early diabetes diagnosis: a reviews, The review of diabetic studies: RDS, 7 (4), 252, 2010.
16. Wong B.K., Selvi Y., Neural network applications in finance: A review and analysis of literature (1990– 1996), Information & Management, 34 (3), 129-139, 1998.
17. Kalogirou S.A., Artificial neural networks in renewable energy systems applications: A reviews, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 5 (4), 373-401, 2001.
18. Amasyali K., El-Gohary N.M., A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 81, 1192-1205, 2018.
19. Muralitharan K., Sakthivel R., Vishnuvarthan R., Neural network based optimization approach for energy demand prediction in smart grid. Neurocomputing, 273, 199-208, 2018.
20. Suganthi L., Samuel A.A., Energy models for demand forecasting—A reviews, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 16 (2), 1223-1240, 2012.
21. Weron R., Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future, International Journal of Forecasting, 30 (4), 1030-1081, 2014.
22. Wang Z., Srinivasan R.S., A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 75, 796-808, 2017.
23. Gandelli A., Grimaccia F., Leva S., Mussetta M., Ogliari, E., Hybrid model analysis and validation for PV energy production forecasting, In 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), IEEE, 1957-1962, July, 2014.
24. Li Z., Rahman S.M., Vega R., Dong B., A hierarchical approach using machine learning methods in solar photovoltaic energy production forecasting, Energies, 9 (1), 55, 2016.
25. Dolara A., Grimaccia F., Leva S., Mussetta M., Ogliari E., A physical hybrid artificial neural network for short term forecasting of PV plant power output, Energies, 8 (2), 1138-1153, 2015.
26. Yamayee Z.A., Maintenance scheduling: description, literature survey, and interface with overall operations scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, (8), 2770-2779, 1982.
27. Khalid A., Ioannis K., A survey of generator maintenance scheduling techniques, Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 12 (1), 10-17, 2012.
28. Froger A., Gendreau M., Mendoza J.E., Pinson É., Rousseau L.M., Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A reviews. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 251 (3), 695-706, 2016.
29. Huang S.J., Generator maintenance scheduling: a fuzzy system approach with genetic enhancement, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 41 (3), 233-239, 1997.
30. Frost D., Dechter R., Optimizing with constraints: a case study in scheduling maintenance of electric power units, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 469-469, 1998.
31. Chattopadhyay D., A practical maintenance scheduling program mathematical model and case study, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 13 (4), 1475-1480, 1998.
32. Anghinolfi D., Gambardella L.M., Montemanni R., Nattero C., Paolucci M., Toklu N.E., A matheuristic algorithm for a large-scale energy management problem, In International Conference on Large-Scale Scientific Computing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 173-181, June, 2011.
33. Lindner B.G., Brits R., Van Vuuren J.H., Bekker J., Tradeoffs between levelling the reserve margin and minimising production cost in generator maintenance scheduling for regulated power systems, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 101, 458-471, 2018.
34. Dopazo J.F., Merrill H.M., Optimal generator maintenance scheduling using integer programming, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 94 (5), 1537-1545, 1975.
35. Jost V., Savourey D., A 0–1 integer linear programming approach to schedule outages of nuclear power plants, Journal of Scheduling, 16 (6), 551-566, 2013.
36. Al-Khamis T.M., Vemuri S., Lemonidis L., Yellen J., Unit maintenance scheduling with fuel constraints, In Power Industry Computer Application Conference, IEEE, Conference Proceedings 113-119, May, 1991.
37. Dahal K.P., Aldridge C.J., McDonald J.R., Generator maintenance scheduling using a genetic algorithm with a fuzzy evaluation function, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 102 (1), 21-29, 1999.
38. Dahal K.P., Chakpitak N., Generator maintenance scheduling in power systems using metaheuristic-based hybrid approaches, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 77 (7), 771- 779, 2007.
39. Fetanat A., Shafipour G., Generation maintenance scheduling in power systems using ant colony optimization for continuous domains based 0–1 integer programming, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (8), 9729-9735, 2011.
40. Fourcade F., Johnson E., Bara M., Cortey-Dumont P., Optimizing nuclear power plant refueling with mixedinteger programming, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 97 (2), 269- 280, 1997.
41. Canto S.P., Application of Benders’ decomposition to power plant preventive maintenance scheduling, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 184 (2), 759-777, 2008.
42. Mollahassani-Pour M., Abdollahi A., Rashidinejad M., Application of a novel cost reduction index to preventive maintenance scheduling, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 56, 235-240, 2014.
43. Wang C., Wang Z., Short-term transmission line maintenance scheduling with wind energy integration, In Power & Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE, 1- 5, July, 2017.
44. Eygelaar J., Lötter D.P., van Vuuren J.H., Generator maintenance scheduling based on the risk of power generating unit failure, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 95, 83-95, 2018.
45. Mazidi P., Tohidi Y., Ramos A., Sanz-Bobi M.A., Profit-maximization generation maintenance scheduling through bi-level programming, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 264 (3), 1045-1057, 2018.
46. Behnia H., Akhbari M., Generation and transmission equipment maintenance scheduling by transmission switching and phase shifting transformer, International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 32 (1), 2483, 2019.
47. Lv C., Wang J., You S., Zhang Z., Short‐term transmission maintenance scheduling based on the Benders decomposition, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., 25 (4), 697-712, 2015.
48. Abirami M., Ganesan S., Subramanian S., Anandhakumar R., Source and transmission line maintenance outage scheduling in a power system using teaching learning based optimization algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput., 21, 72-83, 2014.
49. Baskar S., Subbaraj P., Rao M.V.C., Tamilselvi S., Genetic algorithms solution to generator maintenance scheduling with modified genetic operators, IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 150 (1), 56-60, 2003.
50. Yare Y., Venayagamoorthy G.K., Optimal maintenance scheduling of generators using multiple swarmsMDPSO framework, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 23 (6), 895-910, 2010.
51. Reihani E., Sarikhani A., Davodi M., Davodi M., Reliability based generator maintenance scheduling using hybrid evolutionary approach, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 42 (1), 434-439, 2012.
52. Zhong S., Pantelous A.A., Beer M., Zhou J., Constrained non-linear multi-objective optimisation of preventive maintenance scheduling for offshore wind farms, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 104, 347-369, 2018.
53. Zhu J., Yan W., Lin Y., Yu P., Xiong X., A new multiobjective immune algorithm for generation and transmission equipment maintenance scheduling. Int. J. Power Energy Syst., 37 (3), 2017.
54. Zhu J., Xuan P., Xie P., Hong C., Yan W., Generation and transmission equipment maintenance scheduling with load transfer, In Power & Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE, 1-5, July, 2017.
55. El-Amin I., Duffuaa S., Abbas M., A tabu search algorithm for maintenance scheduling of generating units, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 54 (2), 91-99, 2000.
56. Foong W.K., Simpson A.R., Maier H.R., Stolp S., Ant colony optimization for power plant maintenance scheduling optimization—a five-station hydropower system, Annals of Operations Research, 159 (1), 433- 450, 2008.
57. Suresh K., Kumarappan N., Hybrid improved binary particle swarm optimization approach for generation maintenance scheduling problem, Swarm Evol. Comput., 9, 69-89, 2013.
58. Burke E.K., Smith, A.J., Hybrid evolutionary techniques for the maintenance scheduling problem, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 15 (1), 122-128, 2000.
59. Gardi F., Nouioua K., Local search for mixed-integer nonlinear optimization: a methodology and an application, In European Conference on Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 167-178, April, 2011.
60. Min C.G., Kim M.K., Park J.K., Yoon Y.T., Gametheory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets, Energy, 55, 310-318, 2013.
61. El-Sharkh M.Y., El-Keib A.A., Chen H., A fuzzy evolutionary programming-based solution methodology for security-constrained generation maintenance scheduling, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 67 (1), 67-72, 2003.
62. Bisanovic S., Hajro M., Dlakic M., A profit-based maintenance scheduling of thermal power units in electricity market, International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 5 (3), 156-164, 2011.
63. Kralj B., Petrovic R., A multiobjective optimization approach to thermal generating units maintenance scheduling, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 84 (2), 481-493, 1995.
64. Mazidi P., Tohidi Y., Sanz-Bobi M.A., Strategic maintenance scheduling of an offshore wind farm in a deregulated power system, Energies, 10 (3), 313, 2017.
65. Lei X., Sandborn P.A., Maintenance scheduling based on remaining useful life predictions for wind farms managed using power purchase agreements, Renewable Energy, 116, 188-198, 2018.
66. Bangalore P., Patriksson M., Analysis of SCADA data for early fault detection, with application to the maintenance management of wind turbines, Renewable Energy, 115, 521-532, 2018.
67. Kovacs A., Erdős G., Viharos Z.J., Monostori L., A system for the detailed scheduling of wind farm maintenance, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60 (1), 497-501, 2011.
68. Khemmoudj M.O.I., Porcheron M., Bennaceur H., When constraint programming and local search solve the scheduling problem of electricité de france nuclear power plant outages, In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 271-283, September, 2006.
69. Gorge A., Lisser A., Zorgati R., Stochastic nuclear outages semidefinite relaxations, Computational Management Science, 9 (3), 363-379, 2012.
70. Helseth A., Fodstad M., Mo B., Optimal hydropower maintenance scheduling in liberalized markets, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 33 (6), 6989-6998, 2018.
71. Rodriguez J.A., Anjos M.F., Côté P., Desaulniers G., Milp formulations for generator maintenance scheduling in hydropower systems, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 33 (6), 6171-6180, 2018.
72. Chattopadhyay D., A game theoretic model for strategic maintenance and dispatch decisions, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 19 (4), 2014-2021, 2004.
73. Barot H., Bhattacharya K., Security coordinated maintenance scheduling in deregulation based on genco contribution to unserved energy, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 23 (4), 1871-1882, 2008.
74. Lindner B.G., Brits R., van Vuuren J.H., Bekker J., Tradeoffs between levelling the reserve margin and minimising production cost in generator maintenance scheduling for regulated power systems, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 101, 458-471, 2018.
75. Naebi Toutounchi A., Seyed Shenava S.J., Taheri S.S., Shayeghi H., MPEC approach for solving preventive maintenance scheduling of power units in a market environment, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, 40 (2), 436- 445, 2018.
76. McCulloch W.S., Pitts W., A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5 (4), 115-133, 1943.
77. Hebb D.O., The organization of behavior, 1949. 78. Rosenblatt F., The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychological Review, 65 (6), 386, 1958.
79. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J., Learning internal representation by backpropagating errors, DE Rumelhart, & JL McCleland Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, 1, 1986.
80. Haykin S., Neural networks and learning machines, Upper Saddle River: Pearson education, 3, 2009.
81. Haykin S., Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall PTR, 1994.
82. Jünger M., Liebling T.M., Naddef D., Nemhauser G.L., Pulleyblank W.R., Reinelt G., Wolsey L.A., 50 years of integer programming 1958-2008: from the early years to the state-of-the-art, Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
83. Taha H.A., Integer programming: theory, applications and computations, Academic Press, 2014.
84. Karaoğlan İ., Altiparmak F., Dengiz B., Analysis of maintenance policies in just in time production system, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 22 (1), 181-189, 2007.
85. Ertogral K., Erkoc M., Ülker D., A production scheduling model and analysis for the maintenance repair and overhaul service providers, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 30 (3), 513-522, 2015.
86. Orhan İ., Kapanoğlu M., Karakoç T.H., Concurrent aircraft routing and maintenance scheduling using goal programming, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27 (1),11-26, 2012.
87. Bulut M., Başoğlu B., Development of a hybrid system based on neural networks and expert systems for shortterm electricity demand forecasting, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32 (2), 575-583, 2017.
88. Akpinar M., Yumuşak N., Daily basis mid-term demand forecast of city natural gas using univariate statistical techniques, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 35 (2), 725-741, 2020.
89. Özcan E.C., Danışan T., Yumuşak R., Eren T., An artificial neural network model supported with multi criteria decision making approaches for maintenance planning in hydroelectric power plants, Maintenance and Reliability, In Press, 22 (3), 400-418, 2020.

APA	ÖZCAN E, DANIŞAN T, EREN T (2020). Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. , 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
Chicago	ÖZCAN Evrencan,DANIŞAN Tuğba,EREN Tamer Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. (2020): 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
MLA	ÖZCAN Evrencan,DANIŞAN Tuğba,EREN Tamer Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. , 2020, ss.1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
AMA	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. . 2020; 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
Vancouver	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. . 2020; 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
IEEE	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T "Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi." , ss.1815 - 1827, 2020. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
ISNAD	ÖZCAN, Evrencan vd. "Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi". (2020), 1815-1827. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.602774

APA	ÖZCAN E, DANIŞAN T, EREN T (2020). Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4), 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
Chicago	ÖZCAN Evrencan,DANIŞAN Tuğba,EREN Tamer Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 35, no.4 (2020): 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
MLA	ÖZCAN Evrencan,DANIŞAN Tuğba,EREN Tamer Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.35, no.4, 2020, ss.1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
AMA	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 35(4): 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
Vancouver	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 35(4): 1815 - 1827. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
IEEE	ÖZCAN E,DANIŞAN T,EREN T "Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi." Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, ss.1815 - 1827, 2020. 10.17341/gazimmfd.602774
ISNAD	ÖZCAN, Evrencan vd. "Hidroelektrik santrallarda bakım çizelgeleme için hibrid bir model önerisi". Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 35/4 (2020), 1815-1827. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.602774