One of the most recent and exciting current in metaphilosophic which has quite profound works is experimental philosophy. Experimental philosophy suspects to the methodologies which it named as traditional philosophical methodologies except itself. It asserts that the methodologies like concept analysis and reflection are just like a philosophical speculation. It also defends that they are away from facts but they are constituted by introspection and informal dialogues. The main goal of the experimental philosophy is to research both nonphilosopher ordinary people’s interest to the terms used in philosophical discussions and search their intuition and estimation in their expressions by using their terms in systematically and in a controlled way. It also has the aim of testing philosophic allegations which have common sense and suitable positions by refusing the ones which aren’t supported by evidences. Experimental philosophy utilizes from non-philosophic hard science methodologies and studies like experimental psychology and statistics to be able to examine the common estimation in a controlled and systematic way. The reason why experimental philosophy use the term “experimental” is the effort of implicating in the methodologies of hard science to the philosophy by being interdisciplinary while doing this. The questions that experimental philosophy asks itself are these: Are our intuitions reliable enough for approaching the philosophical problems? What are the sorts of cognitive mechanism which give birth to our intuitions? Are those kinds of mechanism suitable enough for philosophical means? How do we know that whether what kind of intuitions are correct or not? What are our criterions for determining the correct intuitions jarring with each other? Experimental philosophy based answers to those questions consist of article’s topic. Another aim of this study is to introduce new philosophical methodology to the Turkish readers.