Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16 Sayfa Aralığı: 631 - 671 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18009/jcer.743769 İndeks Tarihi: 06-02-2021
Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research
Öz: The study was conducted to understand how Vocational School (VS)students learned the subject of limit-continuity in an environmentwhere CAS software was used. In the study, action research methodwas used, and the SOLO taxonomy was applied while evaluating andinterpreting the VS students’ observed learning outcomes. The studygroup included 32 associate VS students attending a state university.While answering the research problem, detailed information wasprovided about the levels of the SOLO taxonomy that the students’learning outcomes corresponded to. The learning environment wherethe CAS software was used did not help the VS students’ responsesreach the desired level of learning, yet the environment helped developthe students’ responses and interpret the general knowledge.
Anahtar Kelime: MYO Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Destekli Ortamda “Limit-Süreklilik” Konusundaki Öğrenmelerinin SOLO Taksonomisine Göre Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Eylem Araştırması
Öz: Bu çalışmada MYO öğrencilerinin bir BCS yazılımının kullanıldığı ortamda limit-süreklilik konusunu nasıl öğrendiklerini anlamak amaçlanmıştır. Eylem araştırması yöntemiyle yürütülen bu çalışmada MYO öğrencilerinin gözlenen öğrenme çıktıları değerlendirilirken ve yorumlanırken SOLO taksonomisi tercih edilmiştir. Çalışma grubunu bir devlet üniversitesinin bir Meslek Yüksekokulu’nda öğrenim gören 32 ön lisans öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma problemine cevap aranırken öğrencilerin öğrenme çıktılarının SOLO taksonomisinin hangi seviyesine karşılık geldiği hakkında detaylı bilgi verilmiştir. Çalışmada BCS yazılımı kullanılan öğrenme ortamı MYO öğrenci cevaplarını hedeflenen öğrenme seviyesine ulaştırmamış olsa da cevapların genel bilgiyi yorumlayabilecek seviyeye gelişim göstermesine katkı sağladığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akbulut, K., & Işık, A. (2005). Limit kavramının anlaşılmasında etkileşimli öğretim stratejisinin etkinliğinin incelenmesi ve bu süreçte karşılaşılan kavram yanılgıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 497-512.
- Baki, A. (2001). Bilişim teknolojisi ışığı altında matematik eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 149(91), 26-31.
- Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi (Genişletilmiş 4.baskı). Ankara: Derya Kitabevi.
- Baki, M., & Çekmez, E. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının limit kavramının formal tanımına yönelik anlamalarının incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 81-98.
- Biber, A. Ç., & Argün, Z. (2015). The relations between concept knowledge related to the limits concepts in one and two variables functions of mathematics teachers candidates. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 4(2), 501-515.
- Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In H. Rowe (Ed.), İntelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 57- 76). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.
- Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (2014). Evaluation the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New Jersey: Academic Press.
- Castro, C. H. (2011). Assesing the impact of computer programming in understandinglimits and derivatives in a secondary mathematics classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.
- Chang, Y. K., & Li, W. T. (2005). Existence results for second order impulsive functional differential inclusions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 301(2), 477-490.
- Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153-166). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Çavuş, H., & Eskitaşçıoğlu, E. İ. (2016). Türkiye'de matematik öğretiminde öğretmenlerin eğitim ortamlarında bilgisayar ve matematik programlarından yararlanma ölçütleri. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 17(3), 457-475.
- Çelik, D. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının cebirsel düşünme becerilerinin analitik incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
- Çetin, İ. (2009). Students’ understanding of limit concept: An APOS perspective. (Doktoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Dubinsky, E., Cottrill, J., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 167-192.
- Ertem-Akbaş, E. (2016). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin bilgisayar destekli ortamda “limitsüreklilik” konusundaki öğrenmelerinin solo taksonomisine göre değerlendirilmesi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
- Ertem-Akbaş, E. (2019). The impact of EBA (Educational Informatics Network) assisted mathematics teaching in 5th grade fractions on students’ achievements. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 120-145.
- Fern{ndez, E. (2004). The students’ take on the epsilon-delta definition of a limit. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 14(1), 43-54.
- Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1999). Dynamic geometry environments: What’s the point? Mathematics Teacher, 87(9), 716-717.
- Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research (2nd edition). Boston: Pearson Education.
- Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., Perry, B., & Putt, I. J. (2000). A framework for characterizing children's statistical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 269-307.
- Karadeniz, M. H., & Kelleci, D. (2015). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin matematik dersine ilişkin tutumlarının başarıya etkisi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14), 1-16.
- Kokol-Voljc, V. (2000). Examination questions when using CAS for school mathematics teaching. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 63- 75.
- Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 97-128.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage Pub.
- Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research a guide for the teacher researcher. (2nd. edition), New Jersey: Pearson Education.
- Monaghan, J., Sun, S., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Construction of the limit concept with a computer algebra system. Psychology of Mathematics Education,18, 279-286.
- Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, USA: Basic Books, Inc.
- Pegg, J., & Tall, D. (2005). The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(6), 468-475.
- Philips, K. D., & Carr, K. (2009). Dilemmas of trustworthiness in preservice teacher action research. Action Research, 7(2), 207-226.
- Sevimli, E., & Delice, A. (2015). Can technology-assisted instruction improve theoretical awareness? The case of fundamental theorem of calculus. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 68-92.
- Sıvacı, S. Y. (2003). Sınıf öğretmenliği son sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik alan ve meslek bilgisi yeterlilikleri ile derse yönelik tutumları. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
- Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
- Tall,D., &Vinner, S.(1981).Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particu lar reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics,12,151–169.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Yılmaz, G. K., Ertem, E., & Güven, B. (2013). Dinamik geometri yazılımı cabri’nin 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin trigonometri konusundaki öğrenmelerine etkisi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 200-216.
- Zengin, Y. (2017). Komşuluk ve yığılma noktası kavramlarının dinamik matematik ortamında keşfedilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 302-333.
| APA | ERTEM AKBAŞ E, Baki A (2020). Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. , 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| Chicago | ERTEM AKBAŞ Elif,Baki Adnan Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. (2020): 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| MLA | ERTEM AKBAŞ Elif,Baki Adnan Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. , 2020, ss.631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| AMA | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. . 2020; 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| Vancouver | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. . 2020; 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| IEEE | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A "Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research." , ss.631 - 671, 2020. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| ISNAD | ERTEM AKBAŞ, Elif - Baki, Adnan. "Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research". (2020), 631-671. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| APA | ERTEM AKBAŞ E, Baki A (2020). Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(16), 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| Chicago | ERTEM AKBAŞ Elif,Baki Adnan Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. Journal of Computer and Education Research 8, no.16 (2020): 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| MLA | ERTEM AKBAŞ Elif,Baki Adnan Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. Journal of Computer and Education Research, vol.8, no.16, 2020, ss.631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| AMA | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. Journal of Computer and Education Research. 2020; 8(16): 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| Vancouver | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research. Journal of Computer and Education Research. 2020; 8(16): 631 - 671. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| IEEE | ERTEM AKBAŞ E,Baki A "Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research." Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8, ss.631 - 671, 2020. 10.18009/jcer.743769 |
| ISNAD | ERTEM AKBAŞ, Elif - Baki, Adnan. "Evaluation of Students’ Learning the Subject of “Limit-Continuity” in a Computer-Aided Environment According to the SOLO Taxonomy: Action Research". Journal of Computer and Education Research 8/16 (2020), 631-671. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.743769 |
