Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 157 - 182 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 03-05-2021

Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme

Öz:
Bilimsel ve teknolojik gelişmelerin baş döndürücü bir hızla ilerlediği ortamda gelişmelere ayakuydurabilmek, dünyaya daha geniş bir pencereden bakabilmek ve fikir üretebilmek bireylerin alacağı eğitimile mümkündür. Günümüzde bireylerin geçmişe göre daha karmaşık becerilere sahip olması gerekmektedir.Bu doğrultuda eğitim kurumları da araştıran, sorgulayan, karşılaştığı problemlere çözüm üretebilenöğrenciler yetiştirme görevini üstlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin eğitim öğretim sürecinde aktif rol almasının önplanda tutulması ile beraber probleme dayalı öğrenme (PDÖ) yaklaşımı da ön plana çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmada probleme dayalı öğrenme (PDÖ) yaklaşımı ile ilgili kavramsal bir çözümleme yapmak ve bu yaklaşımıngenel bir çerçevesini oluşturarak sanal ortamlarda kullanılabilirliğini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçdoğrultusunda PDÖ yaklaşımı, faydaları ve sınırlılıkları, öğrenme süreci, öğretmen ve öğrenci rolleri iledeğerlendirme süreçleri hakkında literatür bilgisine yer verildikten sonra sanal öğrenme ortamlarında PDÖyaklaşımı kullanımına ilişkin sürecin nasıl ilerleyebileceği konusunda bilgiler sunulmuştur. Sanal ortamlarPDÖ yaklaşımının bazı gereksinimlerini karşılayabilecek niteliktedir. Ancak uygulama sürecinin titizlik ileyürütülmesi gereklidir. PDÖ yaklaşımının temeli olarak görülen oturumların planlanma süreci ve oturumlarşeklinde düzenlenmesi önemli görülmektedir. Bütün bunlar düzenlenirken de öğretmenlerin süreçte rehberkonumunda olması ve süreci doğru bir şekilde yönlendirmesi de PDÖ sürecinin sağlıklı bir şekildeyürütülmesini sağlayacaktır. Ayrıca sanal ortam, PDÖ yaklaşımı sürecine göre tasarlanırken çeşitli tasarımilkeleri de göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Problem Based Virtual Learning: A Conceptual Analysis

Öz:
Looking at the world from a board perspective, having an innovative mindset, creating ideas that are in line with the environment with accelerating scientific and technological developments are possible only when individuals get a quality education. Individuals living in the modern world have to acquire complex skills. In line with this current necessity, educational institutions have undertaken the mission of educating and supporting students who can research, question and produce solutions to the problems they encounter. The active role of students in training processes has been prioritized in today’s educational institutions and Problem-Based Learning Approach (PBL) has accordingly become more important. The goal of this study is to make a conceptual analysis of the Problem-Based Learning approach and evaluate its availability in virtual environments by establishing a general framework of the approach. In line with this purpose, literature information about PBL, its benefits and limitations, the learning process, teacher and student roles and evaluation processes are firstly presented in the study; after setting this basis, information about the course of proceeding in terms of the use of PBL approach is presented. Virtual environments are qualified to meet some necessities of the PBL approach. However, it is crucial to carefully follow the application process; planning and organizing the sessions of PBL, which are highly important parts of the approach, are significant. The position of teachers as guides in this process and their ability to organize and guide the process correctly will contribute to the success of putting the PBL approach into practice. On the other hand, it is necessary to consider the different design principles while designing a virtual environment according to the PBL approach process.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alagöz, B. (2009). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarında çevre bilincinin geliştirilmesinde probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin etkisi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academıc Medıcıne-Phıladelphıa-, 68(1), 52-81.
  • Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem‐based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 21-29.
  • Alper, A., ve Deryakulu, D. (2010). Web ortamlı probleme dayalı öğrenmede bilişsel esneklik düzeyinin öğrenci başarısı ve tutumları üzerindeki etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(148), 49-63.
  • Alper, A., Öztürk, S., ve Altun, C. A. (2014). Türkiye’de probleme dayalı öğrenme çalışmaları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(1), 397-422.
  • Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
  • Arslan, M. (2007). Eğitimde yapılandırmacı yaklaşımlar. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 41-61.
  • Atıcı, B. (2004). Sosyal bilgi inşasına dayalı sanal öğrenme çevrelerinin öğrenci başarısı ve tutumlarına etkisi [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Fırat Üniversitesi.
  • Atıcı, B. (2007). The efficiency of virtual learning environments based on social knowledge construction on learners' achievement and attitudes. Egitim ve Bilim, 32(143), 41-54.
  • Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 3(1), 18-23.
  • Ay, Y., Tüysüz, C., ve Kuşdemir, M. (2013). Probleme dayalı öğrenmenin 10. sınıf “karışımlar” ünitesinde öğrenci başarısı, tutum ve motivasyona etkisinin incelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 195-224.
  • Bach, S., Haynes, P., & Smith, J. L. (2007). Online learning and teaching in higher education. Mcgraw-Hill international.
  • Balay, R. (2004). Küreselleşme, bilgi toplumu ve eğitim. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 61-82.
  • Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem based learning methods. Medical Educaiton, 20, 481-486.
  • Barrows, H. S., & Kelson, A. M. (1993). Problem-based learning: A total approach to education (Monograph). Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
  • Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
  • Barrows, H. S. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a things as PBL? Distance Education, 23(1), 119-122.
  • Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (2011). New approaches to problem-based learning. Routledge.
  • Bate, E., Hommes, J., Duvivier, R., & Taylor, D. C. (2014). Problem-based learning (PBL): getting the most out of your students–their roles and responsibilities: AMEE guide no. 84. Medical Teacher, 36(1), 1-12.
  • Biber, M., ve Başer, N. E. (2012). Probleme dayalı öğrenme sürecine yönelik nitel bir değerlendirme. Hasan Ali Yücel Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi (HAYEF), 9(1), 12-33.
  • Bignell, S., & Parson, V. (2010). Best practice in virtual worlds teaching: A guide to using problem-based learning in second life. http://previewpsych.org/BPD2.0.pdf
  • Cantürk-Günhan, B., ve Başer, N. (2009). Probleme dayalı öğrenmeye ilişkin öğrenci, öğretmen ve öğretim üyelerinin görüşleri. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 134-155.
  • Carey, L., & Whittaker, K. A. (2002). Experience of problem-based learning: Issues for community specialist practitioner students. Nurse Education Today, 22(8), 661–668.
  • Chin C., & Chia, L. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education, 88(5), 707-727.
  • Chun, J., & Chon. S. (2004). Promoting student learning through a student-centered problem-based learning subject curriculum. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 157-168.
  • Çakır, R. (2013). Okullarda teknoloji entegrasyonu, teknoloji liderliği ve teknoloji planlaması. K.
  • Çağıltay ve Y. Göktaş (Yay. haz.). Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri: Teoriler, Araştırmalar, Eğilimler içinde (s. 397-412). Pegem Akademi.
  • Çelen, F. K., Çelik, A., ve Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Türk eğitim sistemi ve PISA sonuçları. Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 1-9.
  • Çetin, E., & Solmaz, E. (2017). Is ICT integration a magic wand for education? A comparative historical analysis between Singapore and Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, (12), 31-47.
  • Çetin, Y., Mirasyedioğlu, S., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2019). An inquiry into the underlying reasons for the impact of technology enhanced problem-based learning activities on students’ attitudes and achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(79), 191-208.
  • Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Ascd.
  • Demirel, Ö. (2011). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri: Öğretme sanatı. Pegem Akademi.
  • Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891-916.
  • Dina, A. T., & Ciornei, S. I. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of computer assisted language learning and teaching for foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 248-252.
  • Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical" how to" for teaching under graduate courses in any discipline. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Duruhan, K. (2004, 6-9 Temmuz). Türkiye’de okulda geleneksel anlayış ve yöntemlerle insan yetiştirmenin olumsuz etkileri [Konferans sunumu]. İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.
  • Dyson, L. E., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the mlearning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 250-267.
  • Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through problem based learning. College Teaching, 48(2), 55-57.
  • Ersoy, E. (2010). Probleme dayalı öğrenme sürecinin öğrenci motivasyonuna etkisi. Turkish Studies, 5(4), 336-358.
  • Ersoy, E., ve Başer, N. E. (2011). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminde uygulanan senaryoların kalıcılığa etkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 355-366.
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40- 54.
  • Essalmi, F., Ayed, L. J. B., Jemni, M., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2015). Generalized metrics for the analysis of e-learning personalization strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 310- 322.
  • Finkle, S. L., & Torp, L. L. (1995). Introductory Documents. AVAİLABLE from the Center for Problem-Based Learning. Illinois Math and Science Academy, 1500, 60506-1000.
  • Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-278.
  • Goodnough, K., & Cashion, M. (2006). Exploring problem‐based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation ıssues. School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 280-295.
  • Goodnough, K. (2011). Examining the long‐term impact of collaborative action research on teacher identity and practice: The perceptions of K–12 teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 73-86.
  • Gould, K., Sadera, W., & McNary, S. (2015). Comparing changes in content knowledge between online problem based learning and traditional instruction in undergraduate health professional students. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 74-86.
  • Hack, C., McKillop, A., Sweetman, S., & McCormack, J. (2015). An evaluation of resource development and dissemination activities designed to promote problem-based learning at the university of Ulster. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(2), 218- 228.
  • Heemskerk, I., Kuiper, E., & Meijer, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard and virtual learning environment combined: Effects on mathematics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 465-478.
  • Herron, J. H., & Major, C. H. (2004). Community college leaders attitudes problem based learning as a method for teaching leadership. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(10), 805-821.
  • Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Sience, 38(6), 571-606.
  • Hill, J. (2012). Problem-based learning: Math made relevant [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Moravian College. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
  • Hoffman, B. (1998). Integrating the disciplines in the elementary grades with problem‐based learning. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 64(3), 9‐14.
  • Horton, W. (2000). Desinging web-based training. John Wiley & Sons. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Yao-Ting, S. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving-based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 17- 28.
  • Howard, J. B. (1999). Using a social studies theme to conceptualize a problem. Social Studies, 90(4), 171-175.
  • Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51- 55.
  • Hsu, Y. C. (1999). Evaluation Theory in Problem Based Learning Approach. In The National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology [AECT](21st).
  • Hung, D. (2002). Situated Cognition and Problem-Based Learning: Implications for Learning and Instruction with Technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393-414.
  • Hussain, R. M. R., Mamat, W. H. W., Salleh, N., Saat, R. M., & Harland, T. (2007).
  • Problem‐based learning in Asian Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 761-772.
  • İslamoğlu, H., Ursavaş, Ö. F., ve Resioğlu, İ. (2015). FATİH projesi üzerine yapılan akademik çalışmaların içerik analizi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 161-183.
  • Johnson, M.S., &Finucane, P. M. (2000). The emergence of problem-based learning in medical education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6(3), 281-291.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problemsolving learning out comes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
  • Kalaycı, N. (2001). Sosyal bilgilerde problem çözme ve uygulamalar. Gazi Kitabevi. Kaptan, F., ve Korkmaz, H. (2001). Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(20), 185-192.
  • Kaya, S. (2013). İşbirlikli öğrenme ve akran değerlendirmenin akademik başarı, bilişüstü yeti ve yardım davranışlarına etkisi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi.
  • Karal, H., Çebi, A., Pekşen, M., Turgut, Y. E. (2010). Sözel problemlerin anlamlandırılması ve çözümünde web tabanlı eğitsel simülasyonların etkisi. University of Gaziantep Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 147-162.
  • Kılıç, İ., & Moralar, A. (2015). The effect of problem-based learning approach on academic success and motivation in science education. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5(5), 625- 636.
  • Kurubacak, G. (2000). Online learning: A study of students' attitudes towards web-based ınstruction (WBI) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Cincinnati.
  • Lai, H.-J. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of interactive whiteboard training workshops: A case study from Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 511–522.
  • Lambros, A. (2002). Problem Based Learning in K-8 Classrooms. California: Corwin Press, Inc. A Sage Publications Company.
  • Lewin, C., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B., & Haldane, M. (2009). The impact of formal and informal professional development opportunities on primary teachers’ adoption of interactive whiteboards. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 173-185.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2. Edition). Cambridge University Press.
  • Magen-Nagar, N., & Peled, B. (2013). Characteristics of Israeli school teachers in computer-based learning environments. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1-34.
  • MEB. (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları (İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar) Fen Bilimleri Dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • MEB. (2018). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Temel Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Moust, J. H., Berkel, H. V., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher education, 50(4), 665- 683.
  • Murray, I., & Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Staff development in problem based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 107-126.
  • Nendaz, M.R., & Tekian, A. (1999). Assesment in problem-based learning medical schools: A literatüre review. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11(4), 232-243.
  • Nicholl, T. A., & Lou, K. (2012). A model for small-group problem-based learning in a large class facilitated by one ınstructor. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(6), 1-6.
  • Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2007). The interplay of perceptions of the learning environment, personality and learning strategies: A study amongst international business studies students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 59-77.
  • Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2007). Peer assessment in problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), 169-186.
  • Parlak, B. (2017). Dijital çağda eğitim: Olanaklar ve uygulamalar üzerine bir analiz. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22(15), 1741-1759.
  • Peterson, T. O. (2004). So you’re thinking of trying problem based learning? Three critical success factors for implementation. Journal of Management Education, 28(5), 630-647.
  • Phungsuk, R., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2017). Development of a problem-based learning model via a virtual learning environment. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 297-306.
  • Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., & Koller, D. (2013). Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579.
  • Pinto, P. R., Rendas, A., & Gamboa, T. (2001). Tutors' performance evaluation: A feedback tool for the PBL learning process. Medical Teacher, 23(3), 289-294.
  • Prieto, L. P., Dlab, M. H., Gutierrez, I., Abdulwahed, M., & Balid, W. (2011). Orchestrating technology enhanced learning: A literature review and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(6), 583-598.
  • Ram, P. (1999). Problem-based learning in undergraduate education. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 1122-1126.
  • Owston, R. D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33.
  • Saka, A. Z. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde yeni yaklaşımlar. Özgür Taşkın (Ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Problem Based Learning: an İnstructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. CRLT Technical Report No. 16-01, Indiana University.
  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.
  • Selçuk, S. G., ve Şahin, M. (2008). Probleme dayalı öğrenme ve öğretmen eğitimi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 12-19.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2001). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim, kuramdan uygulamaya. Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Severiens, S., & Schmidt, H. (2009). Academic and social ıntegration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59-69.
  • Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91-97.
  • Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem‐based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792-806.
  • Schmidt, H. G., Van der Arend, A., Moust, J. H., Kokx, I., & Boon, L. (1993). Influence of tutors' subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68(10), 784-791.
  • Shen, V. R., Wang, Y. Y., Yang, C. Y., & Yeh, S. T. (2012). Verification of problem-based learning systems using modified petri nets. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12636-12649.
  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
  • Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Moerkerke, G., Merrienboer, J. J. G. V., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2001). Peer assessment in problem based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 153-173.
  • Şenocak, E., ve Taşkesenligil, Y. (2005). Probleme dayalı öğrenme ve fen eğitiminde uygulanabilirliği. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 359-366.
  • Song, H. D., Grabowski, B., Koszalka, T. A., & Harkness, W. L. (2006). Patterns of instructionaldesign factors prompting reflective thinking in middle-school and college level problembased learning environments. Instructional Science, 34(1), 63-87.
  • Sönmez, D., & Lee, H. (2003). Problem-based learning in science. Columbus, OH: Clearing House for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education:(ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED482714).
  • Strobel, J., & Van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of metaanalyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44-58.
  • Tareef, A. B. (2014). The effects of computer-assisted learning on the achievement and problem solving skills of the educational statistics students. European Scientific Journal, 10(28), 271-279.
  • Taşkesenligil, Y., Şenocak, E., ve Sözbilir, M. (2008). Probleme dayalı öğrenme teorik temelleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 177, 50-64.
  • Taylor, D. C., & Hamdy, H. (2013). Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE guide no. 83. Medical Teacher, 35(11), 1561-1572.
  • Tenório, T., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Pedro, A., & Ospina, P. (2016). A gamified peer assessment model for on-line learning environments in a competitive context. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 247-263.
  • Trop, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities, problem based learning for K-12 education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Trop, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Tseng, K. H., Chiang, F. K., & Hsu, W. H. (2008). Interactive processes and learning attitudes in a web-based problem-based learning (PBL) platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 940-955.
  • Tuncer, M., ve Taşpınar, M. (2007). Sanal eğitim-öğretim ve geleceği. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(20), 112-133.
  • Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Techonology and problem-based learning. Information Science Publishing.
  • Uyar, G., ve Bal, A. P. (2015). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin akademik başarıya etkisi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5(4), 361-374.
  • Van Tryon, P. J. S., & Bishop, M. J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3), 291-315.
  • Wilder, S. (2015). Impact of problem-based learning on academic achievement in high school: A systematic review. Educational Review, 67(4), 414-435.
  • Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326(7384), 328-330.
  • Yaman, S. (2003). Fen bilgisi eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
APA AKTI ASLAN S, DURUHAN K (2020). Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. , 157 - 182.
Chicago AKTI ASLAN SEDA,DURUHAN Kemal Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. (2020): 157 - 182.
MLA AKTI ASLAN SEDA,DURUHAN Kemal Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. , 2020, ss.157 - 182.
AMA AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. . 2020; 157 - 182.
Vancouver AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. . 2020; 157 - 182.
IEEE AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K "Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme." , ss.157 - 182, 2020.
ISNAD AKTI ASLAN, SEDA - DURUHAN, Kemal. "Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme". (2020), 157-182.
APA AKTI ASLAN S, DURUHAN K (2020). Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences, 15(2), 157 - 182.
Chicago AKTI ASLAN SEDA,DURUHAN Kemal Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences 15, no.2 (2020): 157 - 182.
MLA AKTI ASLAN SEDA,DURUHAN Kemal Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences, vol.15, no.2, 2020, ss.157 - 182.
AMA AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences. 2020; 15(2): 157 - 182.
Vancouver AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences. 2020; 15(2): 157 - 182.
IEEE AKTI ASLAN S,DURUHAN K "Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme." Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences, 15, ss.157 - 182, 2020.
ISNAD AKTI ASLAN, SEDA - DURUHAN, Kemal. "Probleme Dayalı Sanal Öğrenme: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme". Turkish Studies - Information Technologies and Applied Sciences 15/2 (2020), 157-182.