GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul

ERBAŞ, Adem erdem; EMRE, Bedel

GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul

Bedel EMRE, (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Avrasya Toprak Bilimi Enstitüsü, Yer Sistemi Bilimi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Adem Erdem ERBAŞ (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

5 1

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 31 - 52 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 30-04-2021

GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul

Öz:

This study presents a new planning approach within the context of the integrationof archaeological and geological data in the planning process conductedin multi-layered cities. The modern urban physical space in multi-layered citiesrequires greater integration of natural elements through the use of the new advancedtechnology. Even though the archaeological cultural heritage/inventory ismore recognizable in the urban space, the construction of modern cities increasesthe developmental pressure on the underground cultural heritage/inventory.This study seeks an alternative method for transferring the archaeological andgeological data for the Preservation-Oriented Zoning Practice Plan by using theGeographical Information Systems (GIS), in accordance with the decisions onregistering the cultural assets in Turkey. With this approach, the aim is to changespatial planners’ perception of three-dimensional space and to propose a modelfor integrating archaeological data with the decisions based on the preservationplan. The effect of the elevation details of both the archaeological and geologicaldata discussed on the integrated planning analysis and synthesis stage. The GISwere used for the spatialization of the archaeological data, while for the assessmentand transfer of the obtained data by using ArcGIS software and “georeferencing”and “overlay analysis”. In addition, a field study was performed in HistoricalPeninsula, Tahtakale Region, and in-depth interviews and structured meetingswere conducted with thirty-eight people to secure the contribution of differentdisciplines to the planning.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Ağır, A. (2009). İstanbul’un eski Venedik yerleşimi ve dönüşümü (Vol. 9). İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü.
Altuğ, K. (2012). Planlama İlkeleri ve Yapım Teknikleri Açısından Tarihi Yarımada’daki Bizans Dönemi Sarnıçları. Restorasyon ve Konservasyon Çalışmaları Dergisi, (15), 3-22.
Anichini, F., & Gattiglia, G. (2012). Urban Archaeological Information System. Considerations and critical aspects. Anichini F., Fabiani F., Gattiglia G., Gualandi ML, Mappa. Methodology Applied to Archaeological Potential Predicitivity, 1.
Aysu, M. E. (1977). Eski kent mekanlarını düzenleme ilkeleri. İMMMA.
Baratin, L., Bertozzi, S., & Moretti, E. (2013). GIS-Based Archaelogical Recording in Lebanon, 6th International Congress on “Science and Technology for the Safeguard of Cultural Heritage in the Mediterranean Basin”, pp. 187- 195, Athens, Greece
Barvika, S., Bondars, E., & Bondare, S. (2018). Contemporary Challenges in Planning for Shrinkage of Historic Places: A Review. Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(1), 133-140.
Bilgin, İ. (1996). Anadolu’da Modernleşme Sürecinde Konut ve Yerleşme. Tarihten Günümüze Anadolu’da Konut ve Yerleşme, 472-490.
Binan, D. U. (2013). Türkiye’de Çok Katmanlı Yerleşimlerde Tanımlama- Koruma Yaklaşımı ve Öneriler: Bergama Örneği. Tasarım+ Kuram, 9(16), 1-26.
Dinçer, İ. (2013). Kentleri dönüştürürken korumayı ve yenilemeyi birlikte düşünmek:“tarihi kentsel peyzaj” kavramının sunduğu olanaklar.
Erbey, D. (2017). The challenges on spatial continuity of urban regeneration projects: the case of fener balat historical district in Istanbul. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(3), 498-507.
Eyice, S. (1968). İstanbul maddesi. İslam Ansiklopedisi, 2.
Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites.
Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. I. (2008). Practical and theoretical geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell publishing.
Saner, T., & Kızıltan, Z. (2011). İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri arşiv belgeleri (1970-2010). 1. baskı. İstanbul. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 9-40.
Kuban, D. (1970). İstanbul’un tarihi yapısı. Mimarlık Dergisi, 5, 25-48.
Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, (2018). Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, 40. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı- 2018, cilt 1. sf 63, 80, 652, Yayın No: 183-1, Ankara 2019.
Lefebvre, H. (2015). Şehir Hakkı, Sel Yayıncılık.
Madanipour, A., & Hull, A. (2017). The Governance of Place: Space and planning processes. Routledge.
Marull, J., Pino, J., Tello, E., & Cordobilla, M. J. (2010). Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region. Land use policy, 27(2), 497- 510.
Moscati, P. (1998). GIS applications in Italian archaeology. established by: Mauro Cristofani and Riccardo Francovich, 191-236.
Moscati, P., & Tagliamonte, G. (2002). GIS Applications in Italian Archaeology: The Results of a Survey and the Development of the “Caere Project”. In Mapping the future of the past: managing the spatial dimension of the european archaeological resource (pp. 75-84). Universidad de Sevilla.
Müller-Wiener, W. (1998). Bizans’ tan Osmanlı’ya İstanbul Limanı (Die Hafen von Byzantion Konstantinupolis). History Foundation Yurt Publications, İstanbul.
Müller-Wiener, W. (2001). İstanbul’un Tarihsel Topografyası. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 1419, 534.
Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014). UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Applied Geomatics, 6 (1), 1–15.
Nicoletti, R. (2018). GIS applied to the urban archaeology of Enna (Sicily). Towards an archaeological potential predictive model. J-Reading-Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 2.
Okyay, İ. (2001). Fransa’da kentsel sit alanlarının korunması: Malraux yasası. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
Ozmen, I. H. (2007). Günışığında: İstanbul’un sekizbin yılı Marmaray, Metro ve Sultanahmet kazıları. Tarihe ve kültüre saygı: “Marmaray” (pp. 22- 29). İstanbul Vehbi Koç Vakfı.
Rodwell, D. (2003). Sustainability and the holistic approach to the conservation of historic cities. Journal of architectural conservation, 9(1), 58-73.
Tuna, N. (2003). İstanbul Suriçi’nde kentsel arkeolojik kültür mirası. İstanbul Dergisi, 46, 88-93.
ICOMOS (http://www.icomos. org. tr/Dosya l ar / ICOMOSTR_ tr0283353001536917510.pdf)
İBB. (2003). Tarihi Yarımada 1/5000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Nazım İmar Planı Raporu. Planlama ve İmar Müdürlüğü. İstanbul.
İBB. (2003). Fatih İlçesi 1/1000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Uygulama İmar Planı Plan Açıklama Raporu. Planlama Ve İmar Müdürlüğü. İstanbul.
İBB. (2003). Eminönü İlçesi 1/1000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Uygulama İmar Planı Plan Açıklama Raporu. Planlama Ve İmar Müdürlüğü. İstanbul .
İBB. (2009). 1/100.000 Ölçekli İstanbul İl Çevre Düzeni Planı Raporu. Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü. İstanbul.
İBB. (2009). Eyüp Kentsel Sit Alanı 1/5000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Revizyon Nazım İmar Planı Raporu, Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü. İstanbul.
İBB. (2010). Fatih İlçesi Kentsel Sit Alanı 1/5000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Nazım İmar Planı. Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü. İstanbul.
İBB. (2011). Tarihi Yarımada Yönetim Planı. İstanbul.

APA	EMRE B, ERBAŞ A (2020). GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. , 31 - 52.
Chicago	EMRE Bedel,ERBAŞ Adem erdem GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. (2020): 31 - 52.
MLA	EMRE Bedel,ERBAŞ Adem erdem GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. , 2020, ss.31 - 52.
AMA	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. . 2020; 31 - 52.
Vancouver	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. . 2020; 31 - 52.
IEEE	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A "GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul." , ss.31 - 52, 2020.
ISNAD	EMRE, Bedel - ERBAŞ, Adem erdem. "GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul". (2020), 31-52.

APA	EMRE B, ERBAŞ A (2020). GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 31 - 52.
Chicago	EMRE Bedel,ERBAŞ Adem erdem GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 17, no.2 (2020): 31 - 52.
MLA	EMRE Bedel,ERBAŞ Adem erdem GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.17, no.2, 2020, ss.31 - 52.
AMA	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 31 - 52.
Vancouver	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 31 - 52.
IEEE	EMRE B,ERBAŞ A "GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul." A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.31 - 52, 2020.
ISNAD	EMRE, Bedel - ERBAŞ, Adem erdem. "GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul". A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 17/2 (2020), 31-52.