Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 143 - 157 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 30-04-2021

Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts

Öz:
Comparing architectural designs as well as measuring their level of success is achallenging task. Tracking of occupant movements provides objective data facilitatingthe development of new metrics for evaluating spatial layouts. This paperstarts by outlining an overall methodology for Spatial Layout Evaluation based onoccupant movements. Then, a platform for acquisition and interpretation of objectivedata to better understand how space is utilized by occupants is introduced.This platform is the Trajectory Data Processing Framework (TDPF). It supportsinvestigating correlations between occupant movements and problems associatedwith spatial layouts. Finally, as a proof-of-concept implementation of this framework,a set of tools for analysis of occupant interaction with layouts, called OccupantLayout Interaction Analysis (OLIA), is presented.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Al-Sayed, K. (2014) Space Syntax methodology. [Book]. A teaching guide for the MRes/MSc Space Syntax course (version 5). Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL: London, UK.
  • Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47–65.
  • Brunetti A., Buongiorno D., Trotta G.F., Bevilacqua V. (2018). Computer vision and deep learning techniques for pedestrian detection and tracking: A survey. Neurocomputing, 300, 17-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom. 2018.01.092.
  • Conroy, R. D. (2001). The Secret is to Follow Your Nose. Proceedings- 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, 1–14.
  • Cross, N. (2001). Can a Machine Design ? Design Issues, MIT Press, 17(4), 44–50.
  • Dawes, M., & Ostwald, M. J. (2013). Precise Locations in Space : An Alternative Approach to Space Syntax Analysis Using Intersection Points. Architecture Research, 3(1), 1–11. https:// doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20130301.01
  • Dehghan A., Idrees H., Zamir A.R., and Shah M. (2014). Automatic Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians in Videos with Various Crowd Densities. In: Weidmann U., Kirsch U., Schreckenberg M. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer, Cham
  • Golledge, R. G. (1992). Place Recognition and Wayfinding: Making Sense of Space. Geoforum, 23(2), 199–214.
  • Hartkopf, V., & Loftness, V. (1999). Global relevance of total building performance. Automation in Construction, 8(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0926-5805(98)00085-5
  • Hillier, B., Major, M., Desyllas, J., Karimi, K., Campos, B., & Stonor, T. (1996). Tate Gallery, Millbank: A study of the existing layout and new masterplan proposal. Retrieved from http:// eprints.ucl.ac.uk/932
  • Inglay, R. S., Park, O., & Andheri, E. (2010). Application of Systematic Layout Planning in Hypermarkets. Application of Systematic Layout Planning in Hypermarkets.
  • Jo, J. H., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Space layout planning using an evolutionary approach. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12, 149–162.
  • Krosnick, J. a., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. Handbook of Survey Research, 94305, 886. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976. tb10115.x
  • Labeodan, T., Zeiler, W., Boxem, G., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Occupancy measurement in commercial office buildings for demand-driven control applications - A survey and detection system evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 93, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild. 2015.02.028
  • Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.201 0.495217
  • Liggett, R. S. (2000). Automated facilities layout: Past, present and future. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926- 5805(99)00005-9
  • Michalek, J., Choudhary, R., & Papalambros, P. (2002). Architectural layout design optimization. Engineering Optimization, 34(5), 461–484. https:// doi.org/10.1080/03052150214016
  • Nourian, P., Rezvani, S., & Sariyildiz, S. (2010). Designing with Space Syntax. ECAADe 31, 1, 357–366.
  • Ong, R., Wachowicz, M., Nanni, M., & Renso, C. (2010). From pattern discovery to pattern interpretation in movement data. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM, (c), 527–534. https://doi. org/10.1109/ICDMW.2010.144
  • Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0142-694x(98)00029-5
  • Oxman, R. (2008). Performance- based Design : Current Practices and Research Issues. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 06(01), 1–17. https://doi. org/10.1260/147807708784640090
  • Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Assessing Building Performance. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Sato, Y., & Osana, Y. (2012). Office layout plan evaluation system using evacuation simulation considering other agents’ action. Conference Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2, 1911–1916. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICSMC.2012.6378017
  • Tomé, A., Kuipers, M., Pinheiro, T., Nunes, M., & Heitor, T. (2015). Spaceuse analysis through computer vision. Automation in Construction, 57, 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. 2015.04.013
  • Varlander, S. (2012). Individual Flexibility in the Workplace: A Spatial Perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(1), 33–61. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0021886311407666
  • Wineman, J. D., & Peponis, J. (2010). Constructing Spatial Meaning. Environment and Behavior. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916509335534
  • Woo, J. H., Clayton, M. J., Johnson, R. E., Flores, B. E., & Ellis, C. (2004). Dynamic Knowledge Map: Reusing experts’ tacit knowledge in the AEC industry. In Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. 2003.09.003
  • Zheng, Y. (2015). Trajectory Data Mining. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. https:// doi.org/10.1145/2743025
APA Başarır L, İlal M (2020). Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. , 143 - 157.
Chicago Başarır Lale,İlal Mustafa Emre Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. (2020): 143 - 157.
MLA Başarır Lale,İlal Mustafa Emre Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. , 2020, ss.143 - 157.
AMA Başarır L,İlal M Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. . 2020; 143 - 157.
Vancouver Başarır L,İlal M Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. . 2020; 143 - 157.
IEEE Başarır L,İlal M "Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts." , ss.143 - 157, 2020.
ISNAD Başarır, Lale - İlal, Mustafa Emre. "Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts". (2020), 143-157.
APA Başarır L, İlal M (2020). Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 143 - 157.
Chicago Başarır Lale,İlal Mustafa Emre Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 17, no.2 (2020): 143 - 157.
MLA Başarır Lale,İlal Mustafa Emre Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.17, no.2, 2020, ss.143 - 157.
AMA Başarır L,İlal M Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 143 - 157.
Vancouver Başarır L,İlal M Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 143 - 157.
IEEE Başarır L,İlal M "Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.143 - 157, 2020.
ISNAD Başarır, Lale - İlal, Mustafa Emre. "Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 17/2 (2020), 143-157.