Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 745 - 750 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18621/eurj.419490 İndeks Tarihi: 30-04-2021

A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables

Öz:
Objective: The aim of the current study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP), hemodynamic parametersand throat pain in the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope under generalanesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged 18-65 years, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists physicalstatus). I-II, who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia were scheduled in the study. The groupswere allocated as Group M (Macintosh laryngoscope) and Group VL (videolaryngoscope). Standard anesthesiatechnique was used in both groups. To assess the depth of anesthesia which was kept between 40 and 60, aBispectral Index Monitor Model 2000 (Aspect Medical Systems, Inc, Newton, MA) was used throughout thestudy. We recorded hemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation before induction, at the 3rd and at the 10thminutes after intubation. The duration of intubation was recorded as the time from the laryngoscope enteringthe mouth to removal with end-tidal carbon dioxide on the monitor. IOP was measured before induction, andat the 3rd and 10th minutes after intubation. Inhalation agent was given after intubation. 78 patients wereincluded in the study. We recorded cough after extubation, and postoperative sore throat was evaluated by ananesthesiologist who was blinded to the group allocations at 10 minutes and at 24 hours postoperatively.Results: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding age (p > 0.05), mean body massindex (p = 0.157), mean ASA (p = 0.475), mean bispectral index values (p = 0.084) and mean operating time(p = 0.068). The mean duration of intubation was determined to be statistically significantly longer in GroupM than in Group VL (p = 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regardingModified Mallampati Score (p = 0.571) and Cormack Lehane Score (p = 0.819). The mean IOP at 3rd minuteafter intubation was determined to be statistically significantly higher in Group M (p = 0.0001). There was nostatistically significant difference between the groups in regarding cough after extubation (p = 0.549), throatpain at 10 minutes (p = 0.662) and at 24 hours postoperatively.Conclusions: C-MAC videolaryngoscope can be recommended as the first choice in patients with high IOPrequiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Vinayagam S, Dhanger S, Tilak P, Gnanasekar R. C-MAC® video laryngoscope with D-BLADE™ and Frova introducer for awake intubation in a patient with parapharyngeal mass. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:471-3.
  • [2] Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:41-52.
  • [3] Cavus E, Thee C, Moeller T, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Wagner K. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol 2011;11:6.
  • [4] Das B, Samal RK, Ghosh A, Kundu R. A randomised comparative study of the effect of Airtraq optical laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope on intraocular pressure in nonophthalmic surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016;66:19-23.
  • [5] Ahmad N, Zahoor A, Riad W, Al Motowa S. Influence of GlideScope assisted endotracheal intubation on intraocular pressure in ophthalmic patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9:195-8.
  • [6] Mahjoubifar M, Boroojeny SB. Hemodynamic changes during orotracheal intubation with the Glidescope and direct laryngoscope. IRCMJ 2010;12:406-8.
  • [7] Win NN, Kohase H, Yoshikawa F, Wakita R, Takahashi M, Kondo N, et al. Haemodynamic changes and heart rate variability during midazolam-propofol co-induction. Anaesthesia 2007;62:561-8.
  • [8] Yang JC, Siu TS, Ng KF, Gong Z, Tsui SL, Wong JS. Combined effect of isoflurane and esmolol on sympathetic responses to tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2000;38:123-30.
  • [9] Amini S, Shakib M. Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cesarean section with general anesthesia: application of glidescope® videolaryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope. Anesth Pain Med 2015;5:e21836.
  • [10] Karaman T, Dogru S, Karaman S, Demir S, Kaya Z, Suren M, et al. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth 2016;34:358-64.
  • [11] Canbay O, Celebi N, Sahin A, Celiker V, Ozgen S, Aypar U. Ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:490-3.
  • [12] Cirilla DJ 2nd, Ngo J, Vaisman V, Daly C, Ata A, Sandison M, et al. Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope? J Clin Anesth 2015;27:646-51.
  • [13] Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol 2013;79:121-9.
  • [14] Smereka J, Ladny JR, Naylor A, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. CMAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:1142-6
APA Ozhan Caparlar C, Bumin Aydın G, Sezer E, ergil j, Dogan A (2019). A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. , 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
Chicago Ozhan Caparlar Ceyda,Bumin Aydın Gözde,Sezer Evginar,ergil julide,Dogan Aysun Sanal A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. (2019): 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
MLA Ozhan Caparlar Ceyda,Bumin Aydın Gözde,Sezer Evginar,ergil julide,Dogan Aysun Sanal A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. , 2019, ss.745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
AMA Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. . 2019; 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
Vancouver Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. . 2019; 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
IEEE Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A "A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables." , ss.745 - 750, 2019. 10.18621/eurj.419490
ISNAD Ozhan Caparlar, Ceyda vd. "A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables". (2019), 745-750. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.419490
APA Ozhan Caparlar C, Bumin Aydın G, Sezer E, ergil j, Dogan A (2019). A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. The European Research Journal, 5(5), 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
Chicago Ozhan Caparlar Ceyda,Bumin Aydın Gözde,Sezer Evginar,ergil julide,Dogan Aysun Sanal A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. The European Research Journal 5, no.5 (2019): 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
MLA Ozhan Caparlar Ceyda,Bumin Aydın Gözde,Sezer Evginar,ergil julide,Dogan Aysun Sanal A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. The European Research Journal, vol.5, no.5, 2019, ss.745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
AMA Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. The European Research Journal. 2019; 5(5): 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
Vancouver Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables. The European Research Journal. 2019; 5(5): 745 - 750. 10.18621/eurj.419490
IEEE Ozhan Caparlar C,Bumin Aydın G,Sezer E,ergil j,Dogan A "A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables." The European Research Journal, 5, ss.745 - 750, 2019. 10.18621/eurj.419490
ISNAD Ozhan Caparlar, Ceyda vd. "A comparison of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in intraocular pressure changes, throat pain, intubation time and hemodynamic variables". The European Research Journal 5/5 (2019), 745-750. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.419490