Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 6 - 13 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153 İndeks Tarihi: 30-04-2021

Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis

Öz:
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness ofintraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) versus dextrose (DX) in combinationwith periarticular prolotherapy (PrT) in the treatment of recreational athletes with kneeosteoarthritis.Material and Methods: A total of 54 patients who had chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA)were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as PrT+HA(intraarticular hyaluronic acid combined with periarticular prolotherapy, n=27) andPrT+DX (intraarticular dextrose combined with periarticular prolotherapy, n=27). Clinicalefficacy and pain were evaluated via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the WesternOntario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at pre-treatment and one,three and six-month follow-ups.Results: Intra-group statistical analyses revealed significant improvements in PrT+HAand PrT+DX groups for WOMAC and VAS scores compared with baseline (p<0.001).When the two groups were compared, VAS and WOMAC scores in the first monthfollow-ups were significantly better in the PrT+DX group (p=0.022 and p=0.03,respectively) while sixth month follow-up scores were significantly better in the PrT+HAgroup (p<0.001 and p<0.005 respectively).Conclusions: Both of the intraarticular injections (HA and DX) are efficacious and safein treating knee osteoarthritis. HA offers advantage of higher treatment success, whileDX offers clinical efficacy with less cost.
Anahtar Kelime:

Rekreasyonel Sporcularda Diz Osteoartriti Tedavisinde Periartiküler Proloterapi ile Birlikte Uygulanan İntraartiküler Dekstroz ve Hiyalüronik Asit Enjeksiyonlarının Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, rekreasyonel sporculardaki diz osteoartritinin tedavisinde periartiküler proloterapi (PrT) ile birlikte uygulanan eklem içi hiyalüronik asit (HA) ve dekstroz (DX) enjeksiyonlarının etkinliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kronik diz osteoartriti (OA) olan toplam 54 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar PrT+HA (periartiküler PrT ile kombine intraartiküler HA, n=27) ve PrT+DX (periartiküler PrT ile kombine intraartiküler DX, n=27) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Klinik etkinlik ve ağrı, Visual Analog Skala (VAS) ve Western Ontario ve McMaster Üniversitesi Artrit İndeksi (WOMAC) kullanılarak tedavi öncesi, bir, üç ve altı aylık izlemlerle değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grup içi değerlendirmede her iki grupta da WOMAC ve VAS skorlarında tedavi öncesine göre anlamlı iyileşme gözlendi (p<0.001). Gruplar arası karşılaştırmada, VAS ve WOMAC skorları ilk ay takipleri PrT+DX grubunda anlamlı olarak daha iyi iken (sırasıyla p=0.022 ve p=0.03), altıncı ay takiplerde PrT+HA grubunda daha iyi olarak saptandı (sırasıyla p<0.001 ve p<0.005). Sonuç: Her iki intraartiküler enjeksiyon yöntemi de (HA ve DX), diz osteoartritinin tedavisinde etkili ve güvenlidir. HA, daha yüksek tedavi başarısı avantajı, DX ise daha az maliyetle anlamlı klinik etkinlik sunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Lories RJ, Luyten FP. The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(1):43-9.
  • 2. Jevsevar DS. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(9):571-6.
  • 3. Jones IA, Wilson M, Togashi R, et al. A randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular, autologous adipose tissue injections for the treatment of mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared to hyaluronic acid: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):383.
  • 4. Reeves KD, Topol GA, Fullerton BD. Evidence-based regenerative injection therapy (prolotherapy) in sports medicine. In: The Sports Medicine Resource Manual. Seidelberg PH, Beutler AI, Eds. Philadelphia: Saunders; p. 611-9; 2008.
  • 5. Akpancar S, Örsçelik A, Seven MM, et al. The effectiveness of prolotherapy on failed rotator cuff repair surgery. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2019;65:1-8. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.3222.
  • 6. Rabago D, Mundt M, Zgierska A, et al. Hypertonic dextrose injection (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: Long term outcomes. Complement Ther Med. 2015;23(3):388-95.
  • 7. Akpancar S, Seven MM, Tuzun HY, et al. Current concepts of prolotherapy in orthopedic surgery. Arc Trauma Res. 2017;6(2):e40447.
  • 8. Örsçelik A, Seven MM, Yıldız Y. Prolotherapy interventions in treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis. Turk J Sports Med. 2016;51(4):111-6.
  • 9. Ersen O, Koca K, Akpancar S, et al. A randomizedcontrolled trial of prolotherapy injections in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2018;64(1):59-65.
  • 10. Joshi Jubert N, Rodríguez L, Reverté-Vinaixa MM, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injections for advanced knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized, doubleblinded clinical trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(2): 2325967116689386.
  • 11. Apaydın AH, Örsçelik A, Yıldız Y. The effects of prolotherapy in recreational athletes with plantar fasciitis. Turk J Sports Med. 2018;53(1):37-46.
  • 12. Rabago D, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, et al. Dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):229-37.
  • 13. Ada AM. Prolotherapy applications in sports medicine. Turk J Sports Med. 2015:50(2):57-64.
  • 14. Eroğlu A, Sarı A, Durmuş B. Platelet-rich plasma vs prolotherapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis: randomized placebo-controlled trial. Turk J Sports Med. 2016;51(2):34-43.
  • 15. Jevsevar D, Donnelly P, Brown GA, et al. Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of the evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(24):2047–60.
  • 16. Bannuru RR, Vaysbrot EE, McIntyre LF. Did the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons osteoarthritis guidelines miss the mark? Arthroscopy. 2014;30(1):86-9.
  • 17. O'Reilly SC, Muir KR, Doherty M. Effectiveness of home exercise on pain and disability from osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(1):15-9.
  • 18. Rabago D, Zgierska A, Fortney L, et al. Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: results of a single-arm uncontrolled study with 1- year follow-up. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18(4):408-14.
  • 19. Kim JM. The effect of prolotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2002;26(4):445- 8.
  • 20. Sit RWS, Wu RWK, Reeves KD, et al. Efficacy of intraarticular hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy versus normal saline for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):157.
  • 21. Yavuz F, Kibar S, Balaban B. Hypertonic dextrose injection for the treatment of a Baker's cyst. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):YD01-2.
  • 22. Topol GA, Podesta LA, Reeves KD, et al. Chondrogenic effect of intra-articular hypertonic-dextrose (prolotherapy) in severe knee osteoarthritis. PM R. 2016;8(11):1072-82.
  • 23. Jensen KT, Rabago DP, Best TM, et al. Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(6) 816-23.
  • 24. Elmorsy S, Funakoshi T, Sasazawa F, et al. Chondroprotective effects of high-molecular-weight crosslinked hyaluronic acid in a rabbit knee osteoarthritis model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(1):121-7.
  • 25. Miller LE, Block JE. US-approved intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections are safe and effective in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;6:57- 63.
  • 26. Rutjes AW, Jüri P, da Costa BR, et al. Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(3):180-91.
  • 27. Levett PA, Hutmacher DW, Malda J, et al. Hyaluronic acid enhances the mechanical properties of tissueengineered cartilage constructs. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113216.
  • 28. Hafez MA, Askar M, Nabeel A, et al. Comparison between four types of single-dose hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized control trial. Remedy Open Access. 2017;2:1063.
  • 29. Navarro-Sarabia F, Coronel P, Collantes E, et al. A 40- month multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and carry-over effect of repeated intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis: the AMELIA project. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):1957-62.
  • 30. Abate M, Salini V. Hyaluronic acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis: what is new. Intech Open. 2012;101-22.
  • 31. Aaltonen K, Niemelä T, Sankari S, et al. Determination of the unsaturated disaccharides of hyaluronic acid in equine synovial fluid by high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. Acta Vet Scand. 2015;57(1):12.
  • 32. Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Hassanabadi H, et al. Knee osteoarthritis injection choices: platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (a one-year randomized clinical trial). Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;8:1-8.
  • 33. Chang KV, Hung CY, Aliwarga F, et al. Comparative effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections for treating knee joint cartilage degenerative pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(3):562-75.
  • 34. Lamo-Espinosa JM, Mora G, Blanco JF, et al. Intraarticular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II). J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):246.
APA ERDEM Y, Gul D, akpancar s (2020). Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. , 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
Chicago ERDEM Yusuf Can,Gul Deniz,akpancar serkan Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. (2020): 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
MLA ERDEM Yusuf Can,Gul Deniz,akpancar serkan Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. , 2020, ss.6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
AMA ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. . 2020; 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
Vancouver ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. . 2020; 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
IEEE ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s "Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis." , ss.6 - 13, 2020. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
ISNAD ERDEM, Yusuf Can vd. "Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis". (2020), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
APA ERDEM Y, Gul D, akpancar s (2020). Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 55(1), 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
Chicago ERDEM Yusuf Can,Gul Deniz,akpancar serkan Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi 55, no.1 (2020): 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
MLA ERDEM Yusuf Can,Gul Deniz,akpancar serkan Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, vol.55, no.1, 2020, ss.6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
AMA ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2020; 55(1): 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
Vancouver ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2020; 55(1): 6 - 13. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
IEEE ERDEM Y,Gul D,akpancar s "Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis." Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 55, ss.6 - 13, 2020. 10.5152/tjsm.2020.153
ISNAD ERDEM, Yusuf Can vd. "Comparison of Intraarticular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid versus Dextrose Applied with Periarticular Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Recreational Athletes with Knee Osteoarthritis". Spor Hekimliği Dergisi 55/1 (2020), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjsm.2020.153