Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures

POLAT, Mehmet Emrah; Ghahramanzadeh asl, Hojjat; yanık, saim

doi:10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2

Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures

Mehmet Emrah POLAT, (Harran Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Hojjat Ghahramanzadeh ASL, (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü, Trabzon, Türkiye)

Saim YANIK (Harran Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

International Dental Research

0 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 6 - 11 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2 İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2021

Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures

Öz:

Aim: The aim of this in-vitro experimental study is to compare thebiomechanical behaviors of three single-miniplate osteosynthesisconfigurations used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.Methodology: Fifteen synthetic polyurethane hemimandible replicasincluding the medullar and cortical portions were used in this study. Thereplicas were divided randomly into three groups (n = 5/group). Data fromthe three groups were compared using analysis of variance and theTamhane T2 test. p<0.05 were considered to indicate significance. Thereplicas in all groups were fixed with 7-mm-long self-tapping screws and2.0-mm four-hole miniplates in three different configurations externaloblique, lateral angulus superior and lateral angulus inferiorconfiguration.Results: The replicas were tested on a servo-electric test machine, andthe data were transmitted to a computer for analysis of peakdisplacement and peak force. Peak load and peak displacement did nodiffer significantly among the three groups.Conclusion: This experimental study showed that the torsional forcesresulting from the fixation of miniplates for the treatment of mandibularangle fracture did not differ among the three configurations tested.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Alpert P. Complications in mandibular fracture treatment. Probl Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;1:253.
2. de Matos FP, Arnez MF, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE. A retrospective study of mandibular fracture in a 40-month period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(1):10-5. (Crossref)
3. Sakr K, Farag IA, Zeitoun IM. Review of 509 mandibular fractures treated at the University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44(2):107-11. (Crossref)
4. Adeyemo WL, Iwegbu IO, Bello SA, Okoturo E, Olaitan AA, Ladeinde AL, et al. Management of mandibular fractures in a developing country: a review of 314 cases from two urban centers in Nigeria. World Jour Surg. 2008;32(12):2631-5. (Crossref)
5. Champy M, Lodde JP, Jaeger JH, Wilk A, and Gerber JC. Mandibular osteosynthesis according to the Michelet technic: Justification of new material: Results. Rev. Stomatol. Chir. Maxillofac. 77: 252, 1976.
6. Bormann KH, Wild S, Gellrich NC, Kokemuller H, Stuhmer C, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Five-year retrospective study of mandibular fractures in Freiburg, Germany: incidence, etiology, treatment, and complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(6):1251-5. (Crossref)
7. Bayat M, Garajei A, Ghorbani K, Motamedi MH. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using a single bioresorbable miniplate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(7):1573-7. (Crossref)
8. Ellis E, 3rd. Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28(4):243-52. (Crossref)
9. Feller KU, Richter G, Schneider M, Eckelt U. Combination of microplate and miniplate for osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(1):78-83. (Crossref)
10. Ellis E, 3rd, Walker L. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two noncompression miniplates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(10):1032-6; discussion 6-7. (Crossref)
11. Siddiqui A, Markose G, Moos KF, McMahon J, Ayoub AF. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(3):223-5. (Crossref)
12. Hayter JP, Cawood JI. The functional case for miniplates in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22(2):91- 6. (Crossref)
13. Regev E, Shiff JS, Kiss A, Fialkov JA. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis. Plast Rec Surg. 2010;125(6):1753-60. (Crossref)
14. Sugar AW, Gibbons AJ, Patton DW, Silvester KC, Hodder SC, Gray M, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a single miniplate placed either transbuccally and intra‑orally, or intra‑orally alone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:241‑5. (Crossref)
15. Alkan A, Celebi N, Ozden B, Bas B, Inal S. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:752‑6. (Crossref)
16. Gonzales DMC, Spagnol G, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE. In vitro evaluation of the resistance of three types of fixation to treat fractures of the mandibular angle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;(55):136-40. (Crossref)
17. Kroon FH, Mathisson M, Cordey JR, Rahn BA. The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures—an in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;(19):199–204. (Crossref)
18. Bredbenner TL, Haug RH. Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;(90):574-80. (Crossref)
19. Ellis E, 3rd, Throckmorton GS. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(4):389-95. (Crossref)
20. Tate GS, Ellis E, 3rd, Throckmorton G. Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(7):734-6. (Crossref)
21. Rudderman RH, Mullen RL, Phillips JH. The biophysics of mandibular fractures: an evolution toward understanding. Plast and Rec Surg. 2008;121(2):596-607. (Crossref)
22. Ayali A, Erkmen E. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different plating techniques for unfavorable mandibular angle fractures. J of Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(3):603-7 (Crossref)
23. Omezli MM, Ayrancı F, Polat ME, Dayı E, Ghahramanzadehasl H, Karagol S. Biomechanical comparison of transoral and transbuccal lateral cortical plate fixation fort he management of mandibular angle fractures. Nig J Cli Pract. 2017;(20):1438- 8. (Crossref)
24. Kumar S, Prabhakar V, Rao K, Brar R. A comparative review of treatment of 80 mandibular angle fracture fixation with miniplates using three different techniques. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;(63):190‑2. (Crossref)
25. Wan K, Williamson RA, Gebauer D, Hird K. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular anglefractures: Does the transbuccal technique produce fewer complications after treatment than the transoral technique? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2620‑8. (Crossref)

APA	POLAT M, Ghahramanzadeh asl H, yanık s (2020). Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. , 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
Chicago	POLAT Mehmet Emrah,Ghahramanzadeh asl Hojjat,yanık saim Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. (2020): 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
MLA	POLAT Mehmet Emrah,Ghahramanzadeh asl Hojjat,yanık saim Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. , 2020, ss.6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
AMA	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. . 2020; 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
Vancouver	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. . 2020; 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
IEEE	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s "Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures." , ss.6 - 11, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
ISNAD	POLAT, Mehmet Emrah vd. "Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures". (2020), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2

APA	POLAT M, Ghahramanzadeh asl H, yanık s (2020). Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research, 10(1), 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
Chicago	POLAT Mehmet Emrah,Ghahramanzadeh asl Hojjat,yanık saim Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research 10, no.1 (2020): 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
MLA	POLAT Mehmet Emrah,Ghahramanzadeh asl Hojjat,yanık saim Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research, vol.10, no.1, 2020, ss.6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
AMA	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(1): 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
Vancouver	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(1): 6 - 11. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
IEEE	POLAT M,Ghahramanzadeh asl H,yanık s "Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures." International Dental Research, 10, ss.6 - 11, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2
ISNAD	POLAT, Mehmet Emrah vd. "Effect of plate configuration on resistance in mandibular angle fractures". International Dental Research 10/1 (2020), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.2