Difficulties of transported education application: A case study

Pınar YENGİN SARPKAYA, (Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Aydın, Türkiye)
Sinem DAL (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Aydın, Türkiye)
Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi
2 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 83 - 118 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004 İndeks Tarihi: 08-05-2021

Difficulties of transported education application: A case study

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to contribute to the improvement of the applicationby revealing the difficulties of transported education application in a secondaryschool. In this study, single holistic case design was followed. Data was collected through semi-structured interview and semi-structured observation forms. 11 participants, determined by the maximal variation sampling, were interviewed and 14 weeks of participant observation was made. Data were analyzed by content analysis. Findings revealed that most important difficulties of transported education; for students, coming to school early and without having breakfast, waste of time and sleeplessness; for administrators, heavy workload. For educational programs, most serious difficulty for students is not to participate in out of school activities. Besides, it was determined that of theschool-families cooperation was not of the desired quality. It was proposed todevelop a new working order for school buses, to carry out an action researchaimed at strengthening families' commitment to school, and to conductmultiple case studies in schools to be determined by extreme case sampling.
Anahtar Kelime:

Taşımalı eğitim uygulamasının güçlükleri: Bir durum çalışması

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir ortaokuldaki taşımalı eğitim uygulamasının güçlüklerini ortaya koyarak uygulamanın iyileştirilmesine katkı sunmaktır. Çalışmada, bütüncül tek durum deseni izlenmiştir. Veriler, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme ve gözlem formları aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesiyle belirlenen 11 katılımcıyla görüşülmüş ve 14 hafta katılımcı gözlem yapılmıştır. Veriler içerik çözümlemesiyle çözümlenmiştir. Bulgulara göre bu ortaokuldaki taşımalı eğitimin en önemli güçlükleri; öğrenciler açısından, okula kahvaltı yapmadan ve erken gelmek, zaman kaybı ve uykusuzluk; yönetim açısından yoğun iş yükü getirmesidir. Eğitim programları açısından taşımalı öğrencilerin ders dışı etkinliklere katılmak istedikleri halde katılamamaları en ciddi güçlüktür. Ayrıca, okul aile iş birliğinin istenen nitelikte olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Okul servisleri için yeni bir çalışma düzeninin geliştirilmesi, ailelerin okula bağlılığını güçlendirmeye dönük bir eylem araştırması yürütülmesi, aykırı durum örneklemesiyle belirlenecek okullarda çoklu durum araştırması yapılması önerilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ağırkaya, A. (2010). Taşımalı eğitim uygulamasında öğretmenler ve öğrencilerin karşılaştıkları güçlükler. Unpublished master’s thesis, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents' decision making. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 311-323.
  • Arı, A. (2000). İlköğretim uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi normal, taşımalı ve yatılı okulların karşılaştırılması. Unpublished master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi. Afyon.
  • Arı, A. (2003). The practice of transportational teaching at primary level (in case of Uşak). Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 23(1), 101-115.
  • Arslan Demir, B., & Yengin Sarpkaya, P. (2014). İlkokulda taşımalı eğitimin paydaşlarca çok yönlü değerlendirilmesi. In Celep, C (Ed.), 23. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı Bildiri Özetleri. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Aydın Timur, H. (2017). Taşımalı eğitim sistemi uygulamasının öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis. Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep.
  • Baştepe, İ. (2002). Normal ve taşımalı eğitim yapan resmi ilköğretim okul yönetici, öğretmen ve sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin okul (örgütsel) etkililik algıları. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
  • Bilek, E., & Kale, M. (2012). Application of mobile education according to the views of teachers working in transportation-centred schools. Gazi University Journal of Educational Faculty, 32(3), 609-632.
  • Bilgin Aksu, M., & Kaya, A. (2009). Transported education system, as a step to provide the equality of opportunity and possibility. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(27), 177-189.
  • Brink, H. I. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16(2), 35-38.
  • Christofides, L. N., Cirello, J., & Hoy, M. (2001). Family income and postsecondary education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 31(1), 177-208.
  • Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Educational Policy Improvement Center (NJ1). Retrieved February 10, 2020 from https://files. eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED539251.pdf.
  • Constitution of R.T. (1982, 18 Ekim). Resmi Gazete (Sayı:17863 (Mükerrer). Retrived December 23, 2019 from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2709.pdf.
  • Corak, M., Lipps, G., & Zhao, J. (2004). Family income and participation in post-secondary education (January 2004). IZA Discussion Paper No. 977; Statistics Canada Analytical Research Paper Series No. 210. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=491484.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (M. Bütün & C.B. Demir, Trans. eds). Ankara: Siyasal Publisher.
  • Çavuşoğlu, D., & Dönmez, B. (2018). Transported education application in Pazarcık according to the views of the managers, teachers, students and parents. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(4), 646-675.
  • Çetin, İ. (2016). Nitel içerik analizi. In M.Y. Özden & L. Durdu (Eds.), Eğitimde üretim tabanlı çalışmalar için nitel araştırma yöntemleri (pp. 125-148). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • De Broucker, P. (2005). Getting there and staying there: Low-income students and post-secondary education. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network, Incorporated. Retrieved March 05, 2020 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.565.2838&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Edwards, M. M. (1991). Building conditions, parental involvement and student achievement in the DC public school system. Unpublished master’s thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  • Epstein, J. L., & Connors, L. J. (1992). School and family partnerships. Practitioner, 18(4), 177-187.
  • Erlandson, D. A. Harris, E. L. Skipper, B. L. & Allen, S. T. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Finnie, R. Lascelles, E., & Sweetman, A. (2005). Who goes? The direct and indirect effects of family background on access to post-secondary education (No. 2005237e). Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
  • Frenette, M. (2004). Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter? Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 30(4), 427-443. Gibbons, S. & Vignoles, A. (2012). Geography, choice and participation in higher education in England. Regional science and urban economics, 42(1-2), 98-113.
  • Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Griffith, J. (1996). Relation of parental involvement, empowerment, and school traits to student academic performance. The Journal of educational research, 90(1), 33-41.
  • Hackett, M. W. (2007). Exploring the relationship between recreational sports employment and academic success. Recreational Sports Journal, 31(1), 69-74.
  • Halsey, P. A. (2005). Parent involvement in junior high schools: A failure to communicate. American Secondary Education, 34(1), 57-69.
  • Herman, J. L., & Yeh, J. P. (1983). Some effects of parent involvement in schools. The Urban Review, 15(1), 11-17.
  • Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32-42.
  • Howley, A., &Howley, C. (2001). Rural school bussing. (Information Analyses-ERIC Information Analysis Products). Retrieved March, 01, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED459969.pdf.
  • İnan, M., & Demir, M. (2018). Equality of opportunity in education and public policies: The case of Turkey. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(2), 337-359.
  • Jimerson, L. (2007). Slow Motion: Traveling by school bus in consolidated districts in west virginia. Rural school and community trust. Retrieved October 25, 2019 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499440.pdf.
  • Karacabey, M. F. & Boyacı, A. (2018). Factors contributing to secondary school dropouts and the dropouts’ socioeconomic profiles: Şanlıurfa sample. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(2), 247-293.
  • Karakütük, K. (2016). Eğitim planlaması. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  • Karakütük, M. (1996). Taşımalı ilköğretim uygulaması ve sorunları. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Kaya, N. Ç. (2017). Social assessment the student in bussing program. The Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, 46(2), 105-116.
  • Kurt, U., & Sezek, F. (2018). Investigation of students education life expectancy and physical space satisfaction from gender in regional boarding middle schools. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Faculty, 37,157-171.
  • Küçük, A. (2010). Taşımalı ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar (Aksaray İli Örneği). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Küçüksüleymanoğlu, R. (2006). Charter school (A case study in Bursa). İlköğretim Online, 5(2), 16-24.
  • Lavrijsen, J., & Nicaise, I. (2015). Social in equalities in early school leaving: The role of educational institutions and the socioeconomic context. European Education, 47(4), 295-310.
  • Machin, S., & Vignoles, A. (2004). Educational inequality: The widening socio-economic gap. Fiscal Studies, 25(2), 107-128.
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. USA: Sage.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma. Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, Trans. ed). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Publishing.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
  • Ministry of Interior (2020). Mülki idare birimleri. Retrieved April, 6, 2020 from https://www.eicisleri. gov.tr/Anasayfa/MulkiIdariBolumleri.aspx
  • Ministry of National Education Regulation on Access to Education via Transport. (2014, 11 Eylül). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 29116). Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2014_09/12024357_tasimayonetmeligi.pdf.
  • MoNE. (2019). Milli eğitim istatistikleri örgün eğitim 2018-2019. Retrieved April 5, 2020 from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_09/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2 018_2019.pdf.
  • MoNE. (2020). T.C. Milli eğitim bakanlığı 2019 yılı idare faaliyet raporu. Retrieved April 5, 2020 from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_03/12144540_28191618_Milli_EYitim_BakanlYYY _2019_YYlY_Ydare_Faaliyet_Raporu_28.02.2020.pdf. National Education Basic Law (1973, 14 Haziran). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 14574). Retrieved January 5, 2019 from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf.
  • Özgün, A. (2007). İstanbul’da taşımalı eğitimin okul-veli-öğrenci açısından olumlu ve olumsuz etkileri. Unpublished master’s thesis, Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Patton, Q. M. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (M. Bütün & C. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
  • Phelan, S. (2011). Case study research: Design and methods. Evaluation and Research in Education, 24, 221-222.
  • Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (D. Bayrak, H., B. Arslan &Z. Akyüz, Trans). Ankara: Siyasal Publishing.
  • Ramage, R. & Howley, A. (2005). Parents’ perceptions of the rural school bus ride. The Rural Educator, 27(1), 15-20.
  • Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J. & Coca, V. (2009). College readiness for all: The challenge for urban high schools. The future of Children, 19(1), 185-210.
  • Seçer, M. & Yelken, T. Y. (2009). Problems encountered by the 6th -7th -8th grade primary school students with transported education. İlköğretim Online, 8(1), 2-13.
  • Spence, B. (2000). Long school bus rides: Stealing the joy of childhood. Retrieved April, 5 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441640.pdf.
  • Spiess, C. K., & Wrohlich, K. (2010). Does distance determine who attends a university in Germany? Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 470-479.
  • Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school-and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and urban society, 40(2), 179-204.
  • Suda, O. (1976). Geniş açıklamalı ansiklopedik sosyalizm sözlüğü, İstanbul: Bahar Press. Şahin, S. & Avan, Y. (2012). Problems and solution proposals about safety transportation of students. Journal of Institute of Economic Development and Social Researches, 4(10), 440-447.
  • Şimşek, A., & Büyükkıdık, S. (2017). Evaluation of bussed education ımplementation with teachers’ and students’ opinions: Example of Bozova district. İlköğretim Online, 16(1), 15-34.
  • Tamer, M. G. (2014). Determination of the drop out reasons in the general high schools located in Trabzon province. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(2), 16-37.
  • Tanilli, S. (1989). Yüzyılların gerçeği ve mirası: İnsanlık tarihine giriş XVIII. yüzyıl (Cilt. IV). İstanbul: Say Pulishing.
  • Tanilli, S. (1993). Devlet ve demokrasi anayasa hukukuna giriş.(7. Baskı). İstanbul: Cem Publishing.
  • Taylı, A. (2008). The important problem in education system: School dropout. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 3(30), 89-97.
  • Turan, S. (2011). Taşımalı ilköğretim uygulamasında karşılaşılan güçlükler. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. UN. (2020). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved April 6, 2020 from https://archives.un.org/sites/archives.un.org/files/UDHR/udhr.pdf.
  • UNDP. (2019). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved April 6, 2020 from https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-4-qualityeducation. html.
  • Uraslu, T. (2017). Identify the problems that the principles of mobile primary schools encounter. International Journal of Leadership Training, 1(1), 40-43.
  • Uslu, Ö. (2017). İlköğretimde taşımalı eğitim uygulaması. Unpublished master’s thesis. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
  • Ülker, Y. (2009). Taşımalı ilköğretim uygulamasının genel durumu ve değerlendirilmesi (Muğla ili örneği). Unpublished master’s thesis, Muğla Üniversitesi, Muğla.
  • Wimberly, G. L. & Noeth, R. J. (2004). Schools involving parents in early post secondary planning. ACT Policy Report. ACT: Iowa City, IA.(IC 050804020 4746).
  • Yavuzarslan, H. Sağ, M. Çakmak, N. N. Ceylan, G. Şenoğlu, Ö. & Semerci, Ç.(2019). Students views on transported education: The case of Bartın city center. Bartın University Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 1-11.
  • Yeşilyurt, M., Orak, S., Tozlu, N., Uçak, A. & Sezer, D. (2007). An investigation of the transported primary education: An example from Van province. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 6(19), 197-213.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimsek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. London: Sage Publications. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Zars, B. (1998). Long rides, tough hides: Enduring long school busrides. Retrieved March 15, 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432419.pdf.
APA YENGIN SARPKAYA P, Dal S (2020). Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. , 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
Chicago YENGIN SARPKAYA PINAR,Dal Sinem Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. (2020): 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
MLA YENGIN SARPKAYA PINAR,Dal Sinem Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. , 2020, ss.83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
AMA YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. . 2020; 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
Vancouver YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. . 2020; 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
IEEE YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S "Difficulties of transported education application: A case study." , ss.83 - 118, 2020. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
ISNAD YENGIN SARPKAYA, PINAR - Dal, Sinem. "Difficulties of transported education application: A case study". (2020), 83-118. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
APA YENGIN SARPKAYA P, Dal S (2020). Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
Chicago YENGIN SARPKAYA PINAR,Dal Sinem Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi 10, no.1 (2020): 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
MLA YENGIN SARPKAYA PINAR,Dal Sinem Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol.10, no.1, 2020, ss.83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
AMA YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
Vancouver YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S Difficulties of transported education application: A case study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 83 - 118. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
IEEE YENGIN SARPKAYA P,Dal S "Difficulties of transported education application: A case study." Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 10, ss.83 - 118, 2020. 10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
ISNAD YENGIN SARPKAYA, PINAR - Dal, Sinem. "Difficulties of transported education application: A case study". Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi 10/1 (2020), 83-118. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2020.004
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 19:18

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları