Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 52 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496 İndeks Tarihi: 21-05-2021

Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods

Öz:
The wart is a dermatosis originated by Human Papilloma Virus. People can be infected by direct or indirect contact. Almost all age groups, especially children and young adults suffer from warts. Recently, new treatment methods including cryotherapy and immunotherapy have been developed as alternatives to conventional methods. Although the treatment decision process is very important, there is no validated decision strategy yet except for only a few studies. In this study, an expert system is proposed to predict whether the selected wart treatment method will be successful or not. The publicly available datasets are applied to the Multi-Layer Perceptron and the Extreme Learning Machine classification algorithms. We compute the classifier performances by the 10-fold cross-validation method. As a result, the multi-layer perceptron approach results in 78.95% of sensitivity, 98.60% of specificity, and 94.45% of accuracy to predict the success of a wart treatment method.
Anahtar Kelime:

Siğil Tedavi Yöntemlerinin Başarısının Tahmini

Öz:
Siğil, insanlara doğrudan veya dolaylı temastan bulaşabilen human papilloma virüsü kaynaklı bir cilt hastalığıdır. Neredeyse tümyaş grupları, özellikle çocuklar ve genç yetişkinler siğile katlanmaktadır. Son zamanlarda, geleneksel yöntemlere alternatif olarakkriyoterapi ve immünoterapi gibi yeni tedavi yöntemleri geliştirilmiştir. Tedavi karar süreci çok önemli olmasına rağmen, sadece birkaççalışma dışında henüz geçerliliği kabul edilen bir karar stratejisi yoktur. Bu çalışmada, seçilen siğil tedavisi yönteminin başarılı olupolmayacağını tahmin etmek için uzman bir sistem önerilmiştir. Açık erişime sahip veri setleri, Çok Katmanlı Algılayıcı ve AşırıÖğrenme Makinesi sınıflandırma algoritmalarına uygulanmıştır. Sınıflandırıcı performansını 10 kat çapraz doğrulama yöntemiylehesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, önerilen çok katmanlı algılayıcı yaklaşımının, siğil tedavisi yönteminin başarısını tahmin etmede %78,95duyarlılık, %98,60 özgüllük ve %94,45 hassasiyete sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdar, M., Wijayaningrum, V. N., Hussain, S., Alizadehsani, R., Plawiak, P., Acharya, U. R., Makarenkov, V. 2019. IAPSO-AIRS: A Novel Improved Machine Learning-Based System for Wart Disease Treatment. J. Med. Syst., 43(7): 220. https://doi/10.1007/s10916-019-1343-0.
  • Akben, S. B. 2018. Predicting the Success of Wart Treatment Methods Using Decision Tree Based Fuzzy Informative Images. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., 38(4): 819-827. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.06.007.
  • Bunte, K., Biehl, M., Jonkman, M. F., Petkov, N. 2011. Learning Effective Color Features for Content Based Image Retrieval in Dermatology. Pattern Recognit, 44: 1892-1902. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.patcog.2010.10.024.
  • Carman, K. B., Saglam, H., Carman, E., Ekici, A., Arslantas, D. 2013. Eskisehirde Bir Grup Okul Cocugunda Sigil Sikligi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr, 22(2): 66-69.
  • Clifton, M. M., Johnson, S. M., Roberson, P. K., Kincannon, J., Horn, T. D. 2003. Immunotherapy for Recalcitrant Warts in Children Using Intralesional Mumps or Candida Antigens. Pediatr Dermatol., 20: 268-271. https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1525-1470.2003.20318.x.
  • Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., Stork, D. G. 2000. Pattern Classification, 2nd edition, WiIey-Interscience. Flores, E., Scharcanski, J. 2016. Segmentation of Melanocytic Skin Lesions Using Feature Learning and Dictionaries. Expert Syst Appl., 56: 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2016.02.044.
  • Gamil, H., Elgharib, I., Nofal, A., Abd-Elaziz, T. 2010. Intralesional Immunotherapy of Plantar Warts: Report of a New Antigen Combination. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 63: 40-43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.023.
  • Giotis, I., Molders, N., Land, S., Biehl, M., Jonkman, M. F., Petkov, N. 2015. MED-NODE: A Computer-Assisted Melanoma Diagnosis System Using Non-Dermoscopic Images. Expert Syst. Appl., 42: 6578-6585. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.034.
  • Horn, T. D., Johnson, S. M., Helm, R. M., Roberson, P. K. 2005. Intralesional Immunotherapy of Warts with Mumps, Candida, and Trichophyton Skin Test Antigens: A SingleBlinded, Randomized, and Controlled Trial. Arch. Dermatol., 141: 589-594. http://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.5.589.
  • Hosrik, M. E. 2010. Dua ve Plasebonun Sigiller Uzerindeki Etkisi. Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences, Doctorate Thesis, Ankara.
  • Huang, G. B., Zhoui, H., Ding, X., Zhang, R. 2004. Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification. 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Budapest, Hungary. http://doi.org/10.1109/ TSMCB.2011.2168604.
  • Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., Siew, C. K. 2006. Extreme Learning Machine: Theory and Applications. Neurocomputing, 1(3): 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126.
  • Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., Siew, C. K. 2012. Extreme Learning Machine: A New Learning Scheme of Feedforward Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 42(2): 513-529. http://doi.org/10.1109/ IJCNN.2004.1380068.
  • Jain, S., Jagtap, V., Pise, N. 2015. Computer Aided Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Image Processing. Procedia Comput. Sci., 48: 735-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2015.04.209.
  • James, W. D., Berger, T. G., Elston, D. M. 2011. Viral Diseases. Andrews’s Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology, 11th Edition, Toronto, Saunders Elsevier.
  • Jia, W., Deng, Y., Xin, C., Liu, X., Pedrycz, W. 2019. A classification algorithm with Linear Discriminant Analysis and Axiomatic Fuzzy Sets. Math. Found. Comput., 2(1): 73-81. http://doi.org/10.3934/mfc.2019006.
  • Khatri, S., Arora, D., Kumar, A. 2018. Enhancing Decision Tree Classification Accuracy Through Genetically Programmed Attributes for Wart Treatment Method Identification. Procedia Comput. Sci., 132: 1685-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2018.05.141.
  • Khozeimeh, F., Jabbari Azad, F., Mahboubi Oskouei, Y., Jafari, M., Tehranian, S., Alizadehsani, R., Layegh, P. 2017a. Intralesional Immunotherapy Compared to Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Warts. Int. J. Dermatol., 56(4): 474-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.13535.
  • Khozeimeh, F., Alizadehsani, R., Roshanzamir, M., Khosravi, A., Layegh, P., Nahavandi, S. 2017b. An Expert System for Selecting Wart Treatment Method. Comput. Biol. Med., 81: 167-175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.01.001.
  • Kocer, S., Canal, M. R. 2011. Classifying Epilepsy Diseases Using Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm. J. Med. Syst., 35(4): 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916- 009-9385-3.
  • Lamminen, H., Ruohonen, K., Uusitalo, H. 2001. Visual Tests for Measuring the Picture Quality of Teleconsultations for Medical Purposes. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed., 65: 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2607(00)00120-6.
  • Lipke, M. M. 2006. An Armamentarium of Wart Treatments. Clin. Med. Res., 4: 273-293. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.4.4.273.
  • Maronn, M., Salm, C., Lyon, V., Galbraith, S. 2008. One-year Experience with Candida Antigen Immunotherapy for Warts and Molluscum. Pediatr. Dermatol., 25: 189-192. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00630.x.
  • McGibbon, D. 2006. Rook’s textbook of dermatology (7th edition). Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 31: 178-179.
  • Mirzaalian, H., Lee, T. K., Hamarneh, G. 2016. Skin Lesion Tracking Using Structured Graphical Models. Med. Image Anal., 27: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2015.03.001.
  • Nofal, A., Nofal, E. 2010. Intralesional Immunotherapy of Common Warts: Successful Treatment with Mumps Measles and Rubella Vaccine. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 24: 1166- 1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03611.x.
  • Oliveira, R. B., Marranghello, N., Pereira, A. S., Tavares, J. M. R. S. 2016. A Computational Approach for Detecting Pigmented Skin Lesions in Macroscopic Images. Expert Syst. Appl., 61:53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.017.
  • Pan, S., Iplikci, S., Warwick, K., Aziz, T. Z. 2012. Parkinsons Disease Tremor Classification-a Comparison between Support Vector Machines and Neural Networks. Expert Syst. Appl., 39(12): 10764-10771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2012.02.189.
  • Putra, M. A., Setiawan, N. A., Wibirama, S. 2018. Wart Treatment Method Selection Using AdaBoost with Random Forests as a Weak Learner. Communications in Science and Technology, 3(2): 52-56. https://doi.org/10.21924/cst.3.2.2018.96.
  • Rahmat, G. A., Primartha, R., Wijaya, A. 2019. Comparative Analysis of Classification Method for Wart Treatment Method. IOP Publishing, In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1196(1): 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1196/1/012012.
  • Russell, D. W., McCann, W. A., Maroncelli, H. E. 2010. Candida and Subsequent Cell Mediated-Panel Driven Intralesional Immunotherapy of Common Warts in Children and Adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 125(2): AB204. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.798.
  • Shrivastava, V. K., Londhe, N. D., Sonawane, R. S., Suri, J. S. 2015. Exploring the Color Feature Power for Psoriasis Risk Stratification and Classification: A Data Mining Paradigm. Comput. Biol. Med., 65: 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compbiomed.2015.07.021.
  • Silverberg, N. B., Lim, J. K., Paller, A. S., Mancini, A. J. 2000. Squaric Acid Immunotherapy for Warts in Children. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 42: 803-808. https://doi.org/10.1067/ mjd.2000.103631.
  • Sumithra, R., Suhil, M., Guru, D. S. 2015. Segmentation and Classification of Skin Lesions for Disease Diagnosis. Procedia Comput. Sci., 45: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2015.03.090.
  • Talabani, H., Avci, E. 2018. Impact of Various Kernels on Support Vector Machine Classification Performance for Treating Wart Disease. In 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing (IDAP), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAP.2018.8620876.
  • Uzun, R., Toksan, M., Isler, Y. 2018a. Use of Support Vector Machines to Predict the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. ASYU2018, 4-6 October, Adana, Turkey. https://doi. org/10.1109/ASYU.2018.8554010.
  • Uzun, R., Toksan, M., Isler, Y. 2018b. Choose of Wart Treatment Method Using Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbors Classifiers. SIU2018, IEEE, 2-5 May, Cesme, Izmir, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2018.8404398.
  • Uzun, R., Isler, Y., Toksan, M. 2019. Use of WEKA software package to predict the success of wart treatment methods. Düzce Ünv. Bilim ve Tek. Derg., 7(1): 699-708. https://doi. org/10.29130/dubited.448330.
  • Varol, G. 1998. Yaygın Verruca Vulgaris ve Verruka Plantaris Tedavisinde Oral Rantidin’in Etkinliği. Deri ve Zuhrevi Hastaliklar Anabilim Dali Baskanligi, GATA Military Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Türkiye.
APA ARSLAN R, İŞLER Y, TOKSAN M (2020). Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. , 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
Chicago ARSLAN Rukiye UZUN,İŞLER Yalçın,TOKSAN Mualla Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. (2020): 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
MLA ARSLAN Rukiye UZUN,İŞLER Yalçın,TOKSAN Mualla Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. , 2020, ss.44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
AMA ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. . 2020; 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
Vancouver ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. . 2020; 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
IEEE ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M "Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods." , ss.44 - 52, 2020. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
ISNAD ARSLAN, Rukiye UZUN vd. "Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods". (2020), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
APA ARSLAN R, İŞLER Y, TOKSAN M (2020). Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 10(1), 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
Chicago ARSLAN Rukiye UZUN,İŞLER Yalçın,TOKSAN Mualla Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 10, no.1 (2020): 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
MLA ARSLAN Rukiye UZUN,İŞLER Yalçın,TOKSAN Mualla Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, vol.10, no.1, 2020, ss.44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
AMA ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
Vancouver ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 44 - 52. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
IEEE ARSLAN R,İŞLER Y,TOKSAN M "Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods." Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 10, ss.44 - 52, 2020. 10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496
ISNAD ARSLAN, Rukiye UZUN vd. "Prediction of the Success of Wart Treatment Methods". Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 10/1 (2020), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.7212/zkufbd.v10i1.1496