Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 667 - 686 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159 İndeks Tarihi: 24-05-2021

Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması

Öz:
Amaç – Bu araştırma, Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsünün (Software Development Life Cycle, SDLC) altı süreci; Planlama, Analiz, Tasarım, Gerçekleştirme, Test & Entegrasyon, Bakım, bağlamında ERP Yaşam Döngüsünün uygulama öncesi, uygulama aşaması ve uygulama sonrası aşamalarında tamamlanması beklenen temel iş uygulamalarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.Yöntem – ERP uzmanları (n=10) ile üç aşamalı, sıralama tipi, nitel bir Delphi çalışması yürütülmüştür. Delphi çalışmasının ilk turunda, bir ERP uygulaması için gerekli temel iş uygulamaları tanımlanmıştır. İkinci turda katılımcılardan her aşamada tanımlanan uygulamaları değerlendirmeleri ve en önemli olanlarını seçmeleri istenmiştir. Üçüncü turda katılımcılardan bir önceki turdan gelen uygulamaları önem sırasına göre sıralamaları istenmiştir.Bulgular – Elde edilen bulgulara göre ERP uygulama öncesi Planlama, Analiz, Test & Entegrasyon süreçleriiçin belirlenen temel iş uygulamaları için katılımcılar arasında iyi derecede uzlaşma sağlanmıştır. ERP uygulama aşamasında ise Analiz, Tasarım ve Bakım süreçlerindeki uygulamalar için orta derecede uzlaşma, Test & Entegrasyon sürecindeki uygulamalar için güçlü bir uzlaşma, Gerçekleştirme sürecindeki uygulamalar için zayıf bir uzlaşma sağlanmıştır. ERP uygulama sonrası Test & Entegrasyon ve Bakım süreçlerindeki uygulamalar için ise uzmanlar arasında güçlü bir uzlaşma sağlanmıştır.Tartışma – ERP uygulamaları işletmeler açısından oldukça maliyetli, zaman gerektiren ve genellikle adaptasyonu zor bir süreçtir. Bu sürecin üstesinden gelinmesinde işletmeleri zorlayan konulardan biri de ERP projeleri için etkili bir uygulama metodunun olmamasıdır. Bu araştırma, ERP projelerini SDLC bakış açısından incelemektedir. ERP Yaşam Döngüsü içinde hangi aşamada hangi SDLC sürecindeki iş uygulamalarının önemli görüldüğünü uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda ortaya konmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

ERP Implementation From Software Development Life Cycle Perspective: A Delphi Study

Öz:
Purpose – This research aims to identify the best business practices for an ERP implementation in the contextof the six processes of the Software Development Life Cycle (Planning, Analysis, Design, Implementation,Test & Integration, Maintenance) that should be completed during the pre-implementation, implementationand post-implementation phases. Design/methodology/approach – In this research, a three-step, qualitative, ranking-type Delphi study wasconducted with ERP experts (n=10). In the first round of the Delphi process, the fundamental businesspractices required for an ERP implementation are defined. In the second round, participants were asked toevaluate the practices identified at each stage and list the most important ones. In the third round, theparticipants are asked to rank the practices in order of importance. Findings – According to the findings, a good level of agreement was achieved among the participants forthe business practices determined in the Planning, Analysis, Testing & Integration processes in the pre implementation phase. In the ERP implementation phase, a medium level of agreement for applications inthe Analysis, Design, and Maintenance processes, as well as a strong agreement for applications in the Testand Integration process, and a weak agreement for applications in the implementation process. A strongaggrement has been reached among experts for applications in Test & Integration and Maintenanceprocesses in the post-implementation phase. Discussion – ERP implementation is a very costly, time-consuming, and often difficult process forbusinesses. One of the challenges for businesses to overcome this process is the lack of an effectiveimplementation method for ERP projects. This research examined ERP projects from the SDLC perspectiveand provided results as to which stage in the ERP life cycle, the business applications in the SDLC processare considered important in line with experts’ consensus.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Addison, T. (2003). E-commerce project development risks: Evidence from a Delphi survey. International Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 25-40.
  • Ahituv, N., Neumann, S., & Zviran, M. (2002). A system development methodology for ERP systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(3), 56-67.
  • Akkermans, H. A., Bogerd, P., Yücesan, E., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). The impact of ERP on supply chain management: Exploratory findings from a European Delphi study. European Journal of operational research, 146(2), 284-301.
  • Alsharari, N. M. (2017). Institutional logics and ERP implementation in public sector agency. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(2), 417-425.
  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2012). Risk assessment in ERP projects. Information Systems, 37(3), 183- 199.
  • Al-Zoubi, M. (2018). The role of technology, organization, and environment factors in enterprise resource planning implementation success in Jordan. International Business Research, 11(8), 48-65.
  • Alsulami, M., Scheepers, H., & Rahim, M. M. (2016). A Comparison between Organizational Stakeholders' and External Consultants' Perceptions on CSFs Affecting ERP Life Cycle Phases. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 4676-4685). IEEE.
  • Ansari, M., Rahmany Youshanlouei, H., Mirkazemi Mood, M., Sarabi, N., & Jabarzadeh, Y. (2011). Identifying and ranking the critical success factors in the Implementation of knowledge management using the DELPHI method: a case study of the Municipality of 22th district of Tehran. In 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management. University of Passau. Germany.
  • Asl, M. B., Khalilzadeh, A., Youshanlouei, H. R., & Mood, M. M. (2012). Identifying and ranking the effective factors on selecting Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system using the combined Delphi and Shannon Entropy approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 513-520.
  • Bacon, C. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2001). A systemic framework for the field of information systems. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(2), 46-67.
  • Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5).
  • Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458-467.
  • Day, J., & Bobeva, M. (2005). A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-116.
  • Dey, P. K., Clegg, B. T., & Bennett, D. J. (2010). Managing enterprise resource planning projects. Business Process Management Journal.
  • El Mariouli, M., & Laassiri, J. (2018). Applying Agile Procedure Model to Improve ERP Systems Implementation Strategy. In International Conference Europe Middle East & North Africa Information Systems and Technologies to Support Learning (pp. 471-481). Springer, Cham.
  • Cafiso, S., Di Graziano, A., & Pappalardo, G. (2013). Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Safety science, 57, 254-263.
  • Carson, W. A. (2005). Successful implementation of enterprise resource planning software: A Delphi study (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
  • Chang, S. I. (2004). ERP life cycle implementation, management and support: implications for practice and research. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE.
  • Chang, S. I., Gable, G., Smythe, E., & Timbrell, G. (2000). A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues. ICIS 2000 Proceedings, 49.
  • Chang, S. I., & Gable, G. G. (2001). A Delphi examination of public sector ERP lifecycle implementation, management and support issues. Journal of decision systems, 10(1), 29-48.
  • Chen, C. C., Law, C. C., & Yang, S. C. (2009). Managing ERP implementation failure: a project management perspective. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 56(1), 157-170.
  • Cruz-Cunha, M. M., Silva, J. P., Gonçalves, J. J., Fernandes, J. A., & Ávila, P. S. (2016). ERP selection using an AHP-based decision support system. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 29(4), 65-81.
  • Deshmukh, A. A., & Kumar, A. (2016). An ERP life cycle and its competitive advantages in SMEs. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 3(6), 369-374.
  • Esteves, J., & Pastor, J. (1999). An ERP lifecycle-based research agenda. In 1st international workshop in enterprise management & resource planning.
  • Grenci, R. T., & Hull, B. Z. (2020). New dog, old tricks: ERP and the systems development life cycle. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(3), 7.
  • Graefe, A., & Armstrong, J. S. (2011). Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 183-195.
  • Haddara, M., & Elragal, A. (2011). ERP lifecycle: When to retire your ERP system?. In International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems (pp. 168-177). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Haddara, M. (2018). ERP systems selection in multinational enterprises: a practical guide. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 6(1), 43-57.
  • Haddara, M., & Moen, H. (2017). User resistance in ERP implementations: A literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 859-865.
  • Hadaya, P., Cassivi, L., & Chalabi, C. (2012). IT project management resources and capabilities: a Delphi study. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(2), 216-229.
  • Henk, A., & Fallmyr, T. (2019). Navigating through institutional complexity: adoption of a process view in functional organizations. Business Process Management Journal.
  • Huang, S. M., Chang, I. C., Li, S. H., & Lin, M. T. (2004). Assessing risk in ERP projects: identify and prioritize the factors. Industrial management & data systems.
  • Huang, T., & Yasuda, K. (2014). ERP life cycle models: an annotated bibliographic review. In Proceedings of the 15th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference (pp. 70-77).
  • Huang, T., & Yasuda, K. (2016a). Comprehensive review of literature survey articles on ERP. Business Process Management Journal.
  • Huang, T., & Yasuda, K. (2016b). Reinventing the ERP life cycle model: from go-Live to withdrawal. Journal of Enterprise Resource Planning Studies, 2016, 1-21.
  • Huang, S. M., Chang, I. C., Li, S. H., & Lin, M. T. (2004). Assessing risk in ERP projects: identify and prioritize the factors. Industrial management & data systems.
  • Hong, S. G., Siau, K., & Kim, J. W. (2016). The impact of ISP, BPR, and customization on ERP performance in manufacturing SMEs of Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
  • Iskanius, P. (2009). Risk Management in ERP Project in the Context of SMEs. Engineering Letters, 17(4).
  • Jagoda, K., & Samaranayake, P. (2017). An integrated framework for ERP system implementation. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.
  • Kanchana, V., & Sri, R. S. (2018). Investigation and study of vital factors in selection, implementation and satisfaction of ERP in small and medium scale industries. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(2), 1150.
  • Kraljic, A., & Kraljic, T. (2018). Agile software engineering practices and ERP implementation with focus on SAP activate methodology. In International Conference on Business Informatics Research (pp. 190-201). Springer, Cham.
  • Kronbichler, S. A., Ostermann, H., & Staudinger, R. (2009). A review of critical success factors for ERPprojects. The Open Information Systems Journal, 3(1).
  • Landeta, J., Barrutia, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1629-1641.
  • Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2001). An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 111-118.
  • Leu, J. D., & Lee, L. J. H. (2017). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation using the value engineering methodology and Six Sigma tools. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(8), 1243-1261.
  • Leyh, C. (2016). Critical success factors for ERP projects in small and medium-sized enterprises—the perspective of selected ERP system vendors. In Multidimensional views on enterprise information systems (pp. 7-22). Springer, Cham.
  • Li-Man, L., Ching-Jen, H., & Xiang-Yu, L. (2018). Applying Project Management Perspective for ERP Implementation: A Case Study. Proceedings of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 8, 40.
  • Lin, T. C., Huang, S. L., & Chiang, S. C. (2018). User resistance to the implementation of information systems: A psychological contract breach perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(4), 2.
  • Linstone H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method-techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, 3-12.
  • Liu, S., Zhang, J., Keil, M., & Chen, T. (2010). Comparing senior executive and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Chinese Delphi study. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 319-355.
  • Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management.
  • Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., & Kurnia, S. (2017). To use or not to use: Modelling end user grumbling as user resistance in pre-implementation stage of enterprise resource planning system. Information Systems, 69, 164-179.
  • Makkonen, M., Hujala, T., & Uusivuori, J. (2016). Policy experts' propensity to change their opinion along Delphi rounds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 61-68.
  • Meissonier, R., Houzé, E., & Bessière, V. (2013). Cross-cultural frictions in information system management: Research perspectives on ERP implementation misfits in Thailand. International Business Research, 6(2), 150.
  • Mihailescu, D., Mihailescu, M., & Carlsson, S. (2018). Instantiations of an ERP Implementation Methodology: A Critical Realist Case Study. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
  • Mudiraj, A. R. (2014). BPR: The First Step for ERP Implementation. Int. Res. J. Commer. Bus. Soc. Sci, 2(13), 1-2.
  • Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), 15-29.
  • Ononiwu, C. G. (2013). A delphi examination of inhibitors of the effective use of process industry enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: A case study of New Zealand's process industry. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 16(2), 116.
  • Panorama Consulting (2020), “The 2020 ERP Report.” https://www.panorama-consulting.com/resourcecenter/2020-erp-report/ (Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2020).
  • Peffers, K., & Tuunanen, T. (2005). Planning for IS applications: a practical, information theoretical method and case study in mobile financial services. Information & Management, 42(3), 483-501.
  • Peslak, A. R., Subramanian, G. H., & Clayton, G. E. (2008). The phases of ERP software implementation and maintenance: A model for predicting preferred ERP use. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 25-33.
  • Reitsma, E., Hilletofth, P. (2018). Critical success factors for ERP system implementation: A user perspective. European Business Review.
  • Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763-774.
  • Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001). Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of management information systems, 17(4), 5-36.
  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management–a Delphi study. Business strategy and the environment, 17(8), 455-466.
  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn McGrawHill Book Company. New York, 144-151.
  • Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21.
  • Sumner, M. (2000). Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects. Journal of information technology, 15(4), 317- 327.
  • Vadivelu, K., Balaji, N., Poongavanam, N., Tamilselvan, S., & Rajakumar, R. (2018). Cloud-ERP: Implementation strategies, benefits and challenges. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(14), 1359-1364.
  • Venkatesh, V. (2019). “One-Size-Does-Not-Fit-All”: Teaching MBA Students Different ERP Implementation Strategies. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(2), 2.
  • Yasuda, K., & Huang, T. (2014). Review of the concepts, meanings, and uses of the life cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference, October (pp. 12-15).
  • Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  • Zunder, T. H., & Islam, D. M. Z. (2011). E-logistics systems applications for service users and providers. Transportation research record, 2238(1), 50-60.
  • Wong, B., Tein, D. (2003). Critical success factors for ERP projects. In Project Management conference. AIPM.
APA EKREN G, Turan A (2021). Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. , 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
Chicago EKREN GÜLAY,Turan Aykut Hamit Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. (2021): 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
MLA EKREN GÜLAY,Turan Aykut Hamit Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. , 2021, ss.667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
AMA EKREN G,Turan A Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. . 2021; 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
Vancouver EKREN G,Turan A Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. . 2021; 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
IEEE EKREN G,Turan A "Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması." , ss.667 - 686, 2021. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
ISNAD EKREN, GÜLAY - Turan, Aykut Hamit. "Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması". (2021), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
APA EKREN G, Turan A (2021). Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
Chicago EKREN GÜLAY,Turan Aykut Hamit Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 13, no.1 (2021): 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
MLA EKREN GÜLAY,Turan Aykut Hamit Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, 2021, ss.667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
AMA EKREN G,Turan A Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2021; 13(1): 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
Vancouver EKREN G,Turan A Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2021; 13(1): 667 - 686. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
IEEE EKREN G,Turan A "Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması." İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, ss.667 - 686, 2021. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1159
ISNAD EKREN, GÜLAY - Turan, Aykut Hamit. "Yazılım Geliştirme Yaşam Döngüsü Bakış Açısından ERP Uygulaması: Bir DelphiÇalışması". İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 13/1 (2021), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1159