Burcu DENİZ
(İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Odyoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Rışvan DENİZ
(İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Kulak, Burun ve Boğaz Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Eyyup KARA
(İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Odyoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Ahmet ATAŞ
(İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Kulak, Burun ve Boğaz Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2021Cilt: 8Sayı: 1ISSN: 2148-7588 / 2687-4644Sayfa Aralığı: 69 - 76Türkçe

138 0
Odyolojide Pandemi Etkisi: Tele-Odyoloji Uygulamaları
Yeni koronavirüs pandemisi ülkemiz ve dünya çapında devam ederken sosyal mesafe, karantina protokolleri ve enfeksiyon riski; işitme kayıplıhastaların tanı, takip ve rehabilitasyon süreçlerini kısıtlamaktadır. Dünya’da neler olursa olsun, hastaların ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için sürekliolarak yeni ve yenilikçi yollar aramaktayız. Yeni teknolojilerle desteklenmiş tele-odyoloji uygulamaları, doğrudan hasta temasından kaçınarakhastalığın yayılma riskinin azalmasına ve sosyal mesafenin korunmasına yardımcı olabilir. Bu derlemenin amacı, tele-odyoloji uygulamalarınınsosyal mesafe ve pandemi ile ilişkili klinik zorlukların üstesinden gelebilme fırsatını incelemektir.
DergiDerlemeErişime Açık
  • 1. Clement J. Global Digital Population as of April 2020 [Internet]. Statista. 2020. p. statista. Available from: https://www.statista. com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
  • 2. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırması [Internet]. 2019. Erişim linki: www.tuik.gov.t
  • 3. Todd Houston KBD. Using Telepractice to Improve Outcomes for Children with Hearing Loss & Their Families. In: the NCHAM book A resource guide for earkky hearing detection and intervention. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utach State University; 2011. p. 1-14.
  • 4. Vento BA. Book Review: Telepractice in Audiology. Int J Telereha- bilitation. 2016;8:49-50. [Crossref]
  • 5. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 (Yeni Koronavirüs Hastalığı) Nedir? [Internet]. 2020. Erişim linki: https://covid19bil- gi.saglik.gov.tr
  • 6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Telepractice [In- ternet]. ASHA. 2014. Available from: https://www.asha.org/Prac- tice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Telepractice/
  • 7. Krumm M. Audiology telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(5):224-229. [Crossref]
  • 8. Krumm M. A review of contemporary tele-audiology literature. J Hear Sci. 2016;6:9-21. [Crossref]
  • 9. Masalski M, Krecicki T. Self-test web-based pure-tone audiometry: Validity evaluation and measurement error analysis. J Med Inter- net Res. 2013;15(4):e71. [Crossref]
  • 10. Singh G. Teleaudiology: Are patients and practitioners ready for it? [Internet]. Phonak. 2014. Available from: www.phonakpro.com
  • 11. Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD, Mbao MN, Gallop M. Tele-otology: Plan- ning, design, development and implementation. J Telemed Tele- care. 2002;8(Suppl 3):14-17. [Crossref]
  • 12. Venail F, Akkari M, Merklen F, Samson J, Falinower S, Cizeron G, et al. Evaluation of otoscopy simulation as a training tool for real-time remote otoscopy. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(3):194-200. [Crossref]
  • 13. Eren H, Webster J, editors. Telemedicine and Electronic Medicine. CRC Press; 2015.
  • 14. Erkkola-Anttinen N, Irjala H, Laine MK, Tähtinen PA, Löyttyniemi E, Ruohola A. Smartphone Otoscopy Performed by Parents. Telemed e-Health. 2019;25(6):477-484. [Crossref]
  • 15. Busa J, Harrison J, Chappell J, Yoshinaga-Itano C, Grimes A, Brook- houser PE, et al. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):898-921. [Crossref]
  • 16. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Critical Updates on COVID-19 / Guidance on Newborn Screening During COVID-19. 2020.
  • 17. Krumm M, Ribera J, Schmiedge J. Using a telehealth medium for objective hearing testing: implications for supporting rural universal newborn hearing screening programs. In: Seminars in Hearing. Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New ...; 2005. p. 3-12. [Crossref]
  • 18. Ramkumar V, Hall JW, Nagarajan R, Shankarnarayan VC, Kumar- avelu S. Tele-ABR using a satellite connection in a mobile van for newborn hearing testing. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(5):233-237. [Crossref]
  • 19. Ramkumar V, Selvakumar K, Vanaja CS, Hall JW, Nagarajan R, Neethi J. Parents’ perceptions of tele-audiological testing in a ru- ral hearing screening program in South India. Int J Pediatr Otorhi- nolaryngol. 2016;89:60-66. [Crossref]
  • 20. Bopanna B, Harvey A, Hall JW, Vinaya M, Minihane Derek K, et al. Tele-audiology in a Pandemic and Beyond: Flexibility and Suit- ability in Audiology Practice [Internet]. Audiology Today. 2020. Available from: https://www.audiology.org/audiology-today-ju- lyaugust-2020/tele-audiology-pandemic-and-beyond-flexibili- ty-and-suitability
  • 21. Saliba J, Al-Reefi M, Carriere JS, Verma N, Provencal C, Rappaport JM. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2017;156(4):706-711. [Crossref]
  • 22. hearX Group. hearWHO [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https:// www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss/hearwho
  • 23. Bright T, Pallawela D. Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;3:e13. [Crossref]
  • 24. Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel DW, Motakef S, Upson GS. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(5):342-349. [Crossref]
  • 25. Interacoustics A/S. Remote Audiology System (RAS) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.interacoustics.com/us/ras
  • 26. Towers AD, Pisa J, Froelich TM, Krumm M. The reliability of click- evoked and frequency-specific auditory brainstem response test- ing using telehealth technology. Semin Hear. 2005;26(1):26-34. [Crossref]
  • 27. Polonenko MJ, Maddox RK. The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Re- sponse. Trends Hear. 2019;23:233121651987139. [Crossref]
  • 28. Fabry D. Remote hearing aid fitting applications. 8th Annu Mayo Clin Audiol videoconference, Rochester. 1996.
  • 29. Wesendahl T. Hearing aid fitting: Application of telemedicine in audiology. Int Tinnitus J. 2003;9:56-58.
  • 30. Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Signia TeleCare [Internet]. Available from: https://www.signia-pro.com.tr/telecare/
  • 31. GN ReSound A/S. Smart 3D [Internet]. Available from: www.re- sound.com/tr-tr
  • 32. Ferrari DV, Bernardez-Braga GRA. Remote probe microphone measurement to verify hearing aid performance. J Telemed Tele- care. 2009;15(3):122-124. [Crossref]
  • 33. Franck K. Telemedicine Offers Remote Cochlear Implant Program- ming. Volta Voices. 2006;13:16-19.
  • 34. Shapiro WH, Huang T, Shaw T, Roland JT, Lalwani AK. Remote intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implant surgery is feasible and efficient. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(4):495-498. [Crossref]
  • 35. Cochlear Nucleus CR120 Intraoperative Remote Assistant [Inter- net]. Available from: www.cochlear.com
  • 36. Tanamati LF, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Muniz LF, Samuel PA, Wiemes GRM, Lima DP, et al. Use of remote control in the intraoperative telemetry of cochlear implant: multicentric study. Braz J Otorhi- nolaryngol. 2019;85(4):502-509. [Crossref]
  • 37. Wesarg T, Wasowski A, Skarzynski H, Ramos A, Falcon Gonzalez JC, Kyriafinis G, et al. Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(12):1379-1388. [Crossref]
  • 38. Viirre E. Vestibular telemedicine and rehabilitation: Applications for virtual reality. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:299-305.
  • 39. Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van Der Loos HFM. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commer- cial games in therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93318. [Crossref]
  • 40. Schröder J, van Criekinge T, Embrechts E, Celis X, Van Schuppen J, Truijen S, et al. Combining the benefits of tele-rehabilitation and virtual reality-based balance training: a systematic review on feasibility and effectiveness. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(1):2-11. [Crossref]
  • 41. Wood S, Reidy K, Bell N, Feeney K, Meredith H, Knowles J. The emerging role of Microsoft Kinect in physiotherapy rehabilitation for stroke patients. Physiopedia; 2015.
  • 42. Fitzpatrick M, Harding L. Using the Wii for Vestibular rehabilita- tion. Vestib Disord Assoc Publ C-7. 2009; 1-3.
  • 43. Kerber KA, Burke JF, Skolarus LE, Meurer WJ, Callaghan BC, Brown DL, et al. Use of BPPV processes in emergency department dizzi- ness presentations: A population-based study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(3):425-430. [Crossref]
  • 44. Shah MU, Lotterman S, Roberts D, Eisen M. Smartphone telemed- ical emergency department consults for screening of nonacute dizziness. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(2):466-469. [Crossref]
  • 45. Guitton MJ. Telemedicine in Tinnitus: Feasibility, Advantages, Limitations, and Perspectives. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:1-7. [Crossref]
  • 46. Solomon M, Wagner SL, Goes J. Effects of a Web-based intervention for adults with chronic conditions on patient activation: online randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e32. [Crossref]
  • 47. Swanepoel DW, Hall JW. A Systematic Review of Telehealth Applica- tions in Audiology. Telemed e-Health. 2010;16(2):181-200. [Crossref]
  • 48. Brienza DM, McCue M. Introduction to Telerehabilitation. In: Tel- erehabilitation. Springer; 2013. p. 1-11.
  • 49. Hear and Say [Internet]. Available from: www.hearandsay.com.au

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.