Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 100 - 111 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122 İndeks Tarihi: 24-05-2021

Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model

Öz:
Purpose – This study analyzes the Borsa İstanbul against equity return anomalies. With this purpose, the role of key financial stability indicators on long and short-term volatility movements in Borsa Istanbul has been tested.Design/methodology/approach – The model used in the study attempts to explain the volatility in stock prices using Return on Equity, Equity Ratio, and Net forex position over net income. Zivot Andrews and ARDL bounds tests have been conducted on the series and cointegration relationships between all of the companies are detected. Following this, long term ARDL models and Error correction models have been implemented on each of the series. The data set used in the study covers the period between 2000Q3-2019Q4 at the quarterly frequency. 5 companies are selected out of the BIST100 index with the highest price maturity, excluding the financial institutions.Findings – Results of the study indicate that both Return on Equity and Equity Ratio have statistically significant, inverse relationships with the analyzed companies both long and in short term. However, for the companies used in the study, the net forex position had no significant effect.Discussion – As the majority of the stock price volatilities are affected negatively by the equity return factors, the findings of the study reject the existence of a market-wide equity return anomaly in the Turkish stock market. However, the net forex position is one of the most significant risk factors for the Turkish firms and as findings indicate, it is alarming that it plays no part at all in the investment decisions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aksoy, M., & Ulusoy, V. (2015). Analysis of relative return behaviour of Borsa İstanbul reit and Borsa İstanbul 100 index. Journal for Economic Forecasting, 1, 107–128.
  • Ali, A., & Badhani, K. (2020). Beta-Anomaly: Evidence from the Indian Equity Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 1–24.
  • Altın, H., & Yazan, Ö. (2016). The Effects of Trading at Sustainability Index on Stocks’ Abnormal Returns: Evidence from BIST Sustainability Index in Turkey. Journal of Business ve Economic Policy, 3(4), 72–78.
  • Azimli, A. (2019). Pricing the accrual effect in an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2180–2194.
  • Azimli, A. (2020). Pricing the common stocks in an emerging capital market: Comparison of the factor models. Borsa Istanbul Review.
  • Cengiz, H., Bilen, Ö., Büyüklü, A. H., & Damgacı, G. (2017). Stock market anomalies: The day of the week effects, evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(1), 4.
  • Çiçek, M. (2013). The Day-of-the-Week Effect on Return and Volatility in the Turkish Stock Markets. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 3(4), 143.
  • Çıkrıkçı, M., Olcay, Z. F., & Ozyesil, M. (2019). Short Term Underpricing Anomaly And Its Determinant Factors On Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Research On The Stocks Traded On The Borsa Istanbul (Bist). Journal Of Business Economics And Finance, 8(1), 1–16.
  • Çıkrıkçı, M., & Ozyesil, M. (2018). Announcement Effect Anomaly And Its Determinants On Seasoned Equity Offerings: Evidence From Turkey. Journal Of Economics Finance And Accounting, 5(2), 168–183.
  • Çıkrıkçı, M., & Ozyesil, M. (2018). Long Term Underperformance Anomaly and Its Dterminant Factors on Seasoned Equity Offerings: Evidence From Turkey. Journal of Business Economics And Finance, 7(3), 208– 227.
  • Ergun, Z. C. (2018). The Effect of Herd Behavior on Stock Markets during the Election Times: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. 97.
  • Faff, R. W., Brooks, R. D., & Kee, H. Y. (2002). New evidence on the impact of financial leverage on beta risk: A time-series approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 1–20.
  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
  • Fang, D., & Olteanu-Veerman, D. (2019). Decompose Composite Equity Issuance Anomaly. Available at SSRN 3456079.
  • Favilukis, J. Y., & Zhang, T. (2019). One Anomaly to Explain Them All. Available at SSRN 3444342.
  • Fernandez, P. (2006). Levered and unlevered beta. Available at SSRN 303170.
  • Haykir, O. (2018). Does MAX Anomaly Exist in Emerging Market: Evidence from the Turkish Stock Market? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(2), 148–153.
  • Karavardar, A. (2014). Benford’s Law and an Analysis in Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST). International Journal of Business and Management, 9(4), 160.
  • Kesriyeli, M., Özmen, E., & Yiğit, S. (2005). Corporate sector debt composition and exchange rate balance sheet effect in Turkey. Central Bank of Turkey Working Paper, 5, 16.
  • Kesriyeli, M., Özmen, E., & Yiğit, S. (2011). Corporate sector liability dollarization and exchange rate balance sheet effect in Turkey. Applied Economics, 43(30), 4741–4747.
  • Küçüksille, E., & Özmutaf, N. M. (2015). Is There Ramadan Effect in Turkish Stock Market? Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business/Alanya Isletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3).
  • Pesaran, M. H. (1997). The role of economic theory in modelling the long run. The Economic Journal, 107(440), 178–191.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.
  • Sahin, S., Topaloglu, E. E., & Ege, I. (2018). January Effect Revisited: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul and Bucharest Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(1), 159–166.
  • Sari, L. A., & Hutagaol, Y. R. (2009). Debt to equity ratio, degree of operating leverage stock beta and stock returns of food and beverages companies on the Indonesian stock exchange. Journal of Applied Finance and Accounting, 2(1), 1–12.
  • Taskinsoy, J. (2019). A Delicate Moment in Turkey’s Economic Transition: Can Turkey Survive Mounting Economic Problems without the IMF’s Bailout Package? Available at SSRN 3408520.
  • Toraman, C., Öztosun, E., & Çolakoğlu, E. (2017). Testing the Day-of-the-Week Anomaly for Sectoral Turkish Stock Market. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 8(1), 862–871.
  • Uğurlu, M., & Demir, Y. (2016). Firma büyüklüğü anomalisinin varlığının BİST’te test edilmesi. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 106–116.
  • Wang, Z. (2020). The High-Volume Return Premium and Economic Fundamentals. Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Forthcoming.
APA GÜLEÇ T (2021). Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. , 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
Chicago GÜLEÇ Tuna Can Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. (2021): 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
MLA GÜLEÇ Tuna Can Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. , 2021, ss.100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
AMA GÜLEÇ T Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. . 2021; 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
Vancouver GÜLEÇ T Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. . 2021; 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
IEEE GÜLEÇ T "Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model." , ss.100 - 111, 2021. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
ISNAD GÜLEÇ, Tuna Can. "Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model". (2021), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
APA GÜLEÇ T (2021). Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
Chicago GÜLEÇ Tuna Can Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 13, no.1 (2021): 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
MLA GÜLEÇ Tuna Can Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, 2021, ss.100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
AMA GÜLEÇ T Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2021; 13(1): 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
Vancouver GÜLEÇ T Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2021; 13(1): 100 - 111. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
IEEE GÜLEÇ T "Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model." İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, ss.100 - 111, 2021. 10.20491/isarder.2021.1122
ISNAD GÜLEÇ, Tuna Can. "Testing BIST for Equity Return Anomalies using ARDL Model". İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 13/1 (2021), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1122