Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 151 - 156 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1 İndeks Tarihi: 31-05-2021

Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients

Öz:
Aim: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of emergency abdominal surgery in the world. Although the etiology of appendicitis is still notfully known, possible causes include lumen obstruction. Fecaloid and lymphoid hyperplasia are the most common causes of lumen obstruction.However, some rare conditions may cause acute appendicitis by causing lumen obstruction. Here, we aimed to present the pathology results of 2076patients operated due to acute appendicitis in our hospital and the unexpected histopathological findings in the light of the literature.Method: Patients who were emergently operated with diagnosis of appendicitis between January 2016 and February 2020 in Gaziantep Dr. ErsinArslan Training and Research Hospital were retrospectively screened. Incidental appendectomies were excluded. Data of 2076 patients were reached.Gender, age, and pathology results of the patients were analyzed. Pathology preparations were reassessed by two pathologists. Pathology results wereanalyzed under two categories as general findings and unexpected findings. Fisher’s chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results: A total of 2076 patients were included in the study and analyzed. Of the patients, 1368 (66%) were man, 708 (34%) were woman, and themean age was 33±12.9 years. Acute appendicitis was found in 1309 (63.1%) patients, gangrenous-perforated appendicitis in 305 (14.7%) patients,negative appendectomy in 105 (5.1%) patients, phlegmonous appendicitis in 32 (1.5%) patients, and unexpected pathological findings in 62 (3%)patients. Among the unexpected pathological findings were fibrous obliteration in 31 (50%) patients, mucosal hyperplasia in 8 (13%) patients,appendicular diverticulitis in 7 (11.3%) patients, retention cyst in 5 (8.1%) patients, mucinous cystadenoma in 3 (4.8%) patients, well-differentiatedneuroendocrine tumor in 2 (3.2%) patients, eosinophilic infiltration in 2 (3.2%) patients, foreign body reaction in 2 (3.2%) patients, granulomatousappendicitis in 1 (1.6%) patient, and parasitic infestation was detected in 1 (1.6%) patient.Conclusion: Unexpected histopathological findings are rare in appendectomy specimens and these diagnoses help guide the patient’s treatment.
Anahtar Kelime:

Akut Apandisit Spesmenlerinde Beklenmeyen Histopatolojik Tanılar: 2076 Hastanın Retrospektif Analizi

Öz:
Amaç: Akut apandisit dünya üzerinde en sık acil karın ameliyatıdır. Apandisitin etiyolojisi hala tam olarak bilinmemekle birlikte olası nedenler arasında lümen obstrüksiyonu yer alır. Fekaloit ve lenfoid hiperplazi lümen obstrüksiyonuna neden olan en yaygın nedenlerdir. Ancak bazı nadir durumlar da lümen obstrüksiyonu yaparak akut apandisite neden olabilmektedir. Biz burada hastanemizde akut apandisit tanısıyla opere edilen 2076 hastanın patoloji sonuçlarını ve bunlar arasında beklenmeyen histopatolojik bulguları literatür eşliğinde sunmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Gaziantep Dr. Ersin Arslan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde Ocak 2016-Şubat 2020 tarihleri arasında akut apandisit tanısıyla acil opere edilen hastalar retrospektif olarak tarandı. İnsidental apendektomiler çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Toplam 2076 hastanın verisine ulaşıldı. Hastaların cinsiyet, yaş ve patoloji sonuçları analiz edildi. Patoloji preparatları iki patolog tarafından tekrar değerlendirildi. Patoloji sonuçları genel bulgular ve beklenmeyen bulgular olarak iki kategori altında incelendi. İstatistiksel analizde Fisher’s ki-kare testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 2076 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilip analiz edildi. Bu hastalar 1368 (%66) erkek olup, toplam yaş ortalaması 33±12,9 idi. Akut apandisit 1309 (%63,1), gangrenöz-perfore apandisit 305 (%14,7), negatif apendektomi 105 (%5,1), flegmanöz apandisit 32 (%1,5), beklenmeyen patolojik bulgular ise 62 (%3) hastada saptandı. Beklenmeyen patolojik bulgular içerisinde, 31 (%50) hastada fibröz obliterasyon 8 (%13) hastada mukozal hiperplazi, 7 (%11,3) hastada apendiküler divertikülit, 5 (%8,1) hastada retansiyon kisti 3 (%4,8) hastada müsinöz kistadenom 2 (%3,2) hastada iyi defansiye nöroendokrin tümör, 2 (%3,2) hastada eozinofilik infiltrasyon, 2 (%3,2) hastada yabancı cisim reaksiyonu, 1 (%1,6) hastada granülomatöz apandisit ve 1 (%1,6) hastada parazit enfestasyonu saptandı. Sonuç: Apendektomi spesmenlerinde beklenmedik histopatolojik bulgular nadir olup, bu tanılar hastanın tedavisini yönlendirmeye yardımcı olmaktadırlar.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Yilmaz M, Akbulut S, Kutluturk K, Sahin N, Arabaci E, Ara C, Yilmaz S. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:4015-4022.
  • 2. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, Kjellevold KH. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 1997;21:313-317.
  • 3. Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ 2017;357:1703.
  • 4. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:910-925.
  • 5. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 2006;41:745-749.
  • 6. Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, Semur H, Yagmur Y. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1961-1970.
  • 7. Limaiem F, Arfa N, Marsaoui L, Bouraoui S, Lahmar A, Mzabi S. Unexpected Histopathological Findings in Appendectomy Specimens: a Retrospective Study of 1627 Cases. Indian J Surg 2015;77:1285-1290.
  • 8. Şahin S, Seçkin S. Histopathological Diagnoses Detected in Appendectomy Specimens. Fırat Med J 2018;23:23-27.
  • 9. Orbatu D, Ekmekci S, Alaygut D, Sayan A, Özdemir T, Küçük Ü. Incidental Findings on Routine Histopathological Examination: Analysis of Pediatric Appendectomy Specimens. Behcet Uz Cocuk Hast Derg 2019;9:211-215.
  • 10. Gaitán HG, Reveiz L, Farquhar C, Elias VM. Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD007683.
  • 11. Patel AV, Friedman M, MacDermott RP. Crohn’s disease patient with right lower quadrant abdominal pain for 20 years due to an appendiceal neuroma (Fibrous obliteration of the appendix). Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;16:1093-1094.
  • 12. Aydın O, Aydın G, Pircanoğlu EM, Civelek S, Pehlivanlıoğlu F, Karaca G. A Rare Appendiceal Anomaly: Agenesis of the Vermiform Appendix. KÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2017;19:37-40.
  • 13. Erdoğan O, Arıcı C, Çolak T. Duplication of the appendix. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2000;6:66-68.
  • 14. Akbulut S, Koc C, Kocaaslan H, Gonultas F, Samdanci E, Yologlu S, Yilmaz S. Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019;11:19-26.
  • 15. Dincel O, Goksu M, Turk BA, Pehlivanoglu B, Isler S. Unexpected findings in the routine histopathological examinations of appendectomy specimens A retrospective analysis of 1,970 patients. Ann Ital Chir 2017;88:519-525.
  • 16. Emre A, Akbulut S, Bozdag Z, Yilmaz M, Kanlioz M, Emre R, Sahin N. Routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: retrospective analysis of 1255 patients. Int Surg 2013;98:354-362.
  • 17. Coulier B, Pierard F, Malbecq S. Appendicular diverticulitis in an Amyand’s hernia. JBR-BTR 2010;93:114.
  • 18. Manzanares-Campillo Mdel C, Pardo-García R, Martín-Fernández J. Appendicular pseudodiverticula and acute appendicitis. Our 12-year experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2011;103:582-585.
  • 19. Collins DC. A study of 50,000 specimens of the human vermiform appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1955;101:437-445.
  • 20. Hellsten S. Mucocele and carcınoma of the appendıx. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1964;60:473-482.
  • 21. Agrusa A, Romano G, Galia M, Cucinella G, Sorce V, Di Buono G, Agnello F, Amato G, Gulotta G. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: an uncertain nosological entity. Report of a case. G Chir 2016;37:86-89.
  • 22. Demetrashvili Z, Chkhaidze M, Khutsishvili K, Topchishvili G, Javakhishvili T, Pipia I, Qerqadze V. Mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of literature. Int Surg 2012;97:266-269.
  • 23. Rouchaud A, Glas L, Gayet M, Bellin MF. Appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014;95:113-116.
  • 24. MacGillivray JB. Mucosal metaplasia in the appendix. J Clin Pathol 1972;25:809-811.
  • 25. Younes M, Katikaneni PR, Lechago J. Association between mucosal hyperplasia of the appendix and adenocarcinoma of the colon. Histopathology 1995;26:33-37.
  • 26. Meyerding EV, Bertram HF. Nonspecific granulomatous inflammation (Crohn’s disease) of the appendix: a case report. Surgery 1953;34:891-894.
  • 27. Bronner MP. Granulomatous appendicitis and the appendix in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Semin Diagn Pathol 2004;21:98-107.
  • 28. AbdullGaffar B. Granulomatous diseases and granulomas of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 2010;18:14-20.
  • 29. Türkcü G, Keleş A, Alabalık U, Soylu B, İbiloğlu İ, Dursun FŞ, Oğuz A, Büyükbayram H. 1829 apendektomi materyalinin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2015;12:193- 199.
  • 30. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75-80.
  • 31. Goede AC, Caplin ME, Winslet MC. Carcinoid tumour of the appendix. Br J Surg 2003;90:1317-1322.
  • 32. Roggo A, Wood WC, Ottinger LW. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Ann Surg 1993;217:385-390.
  • 33. Modlin IM, Sandor A. An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer 1997;79:813-829.
  • 34. Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, Venturero M, Papa MZ, Zippel DB. The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2197-2199.
APA Uylas U, Gündoğdu R, Gemici K, TSAPLİNA M, Ayerden D (2020). Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. , 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
Chicago Uylas Ufuk,Gündoğdu Ramazan,Gemici Kazım,TSAPLİNA Marina,Ayerden Dila Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. (2020): 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
MLA Uylas Ufuk,Gündoğdu Ramazan,Gemici Kazım,TSAPLİNA Marina,Ayerden Dila Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. , 2020, ss.151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
AMA Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. . 2020; 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
Vancouver Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. . 2020; 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
IEEE Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D "Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients." , ss.151 - 156, 2020. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
ISNAD Uylas, Ufuk vd. "Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients". (2020), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
APA Uylas U, Gündoğdu R, Gemici K, TSAPLİNA M, Ayerden D (2020). Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, 30(3), 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
Chicago Uylas Ufuk,Gündoğdu Ramazan,Gemici Kazım,TSAPLİNA Marina,Ayerden Dila Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi 30, no.3 (2020): 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
MLA Uylas Ufuk,Gündoğdu Ramazan,Gemici Kazım,TSAPLİNA Marina,Ayerden Dila Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, vol.30, no.3, 2020, ss.151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
AMA Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2020; 30(3): 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
Vancouver Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2020; 30(3): 151 - 156. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
IEEE Uylas U,Gündoğdu R,Gemici K,TSAPLİNA M,Ayerden D "Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients." Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, 30, ss.151 - 156, 2020. 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1
ISNAD Uylas, Ufuk vd. "Unexpected Histopathological Diagnoses in Acute Appendicitis Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis of 2076 Patients". Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi 30/3 (2020), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-3-1