(Yenimahalle Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye)
(Yenimahalle Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 22Sayı: 2ISSN: 2148-9645 / 2148-9645Sayfa Aralığı: 159 - 162İngilizce

54 0
Objective: Although many complications may occurafter splenectomy, post-splenectomy infection is one ofthe most frightening complications. Many prophylaxismethods have been used for this condition with very highrates of mortality and morbidity. In this study, we aimedto examine post-splenectomy infectious complications,in the cases in which all the measures were taken.Material and Methods: Thirty-two patients whounderwent emergency splenectomy were included in thestudy. Patients were given a sick leave of 20 days onisolated spleen trauma and at least 20 days formultitrauma patients. It was observed that some of thepatients had started to physically heavy work due tosocioeconomic reasons despite the sick leave report. Acomparison was performed between the patients whocompleted 20 days of rest (19 cases) (Group-1) and thepatients who started to work after resting time of lessthan 20 days (Group-2), in terms of the frequency ofpostoperative infection.Results: In Group-1, only 1 case had a simple infectionthat could be taken under control with a simpleantibiotic, while in Group 2, in 3 patients incision siteinfection, in 2 patients severe atypical pneumoniarequiring hospitalization and in 1 patient severe viralgastroenteritis requiring daily hospitalization wereobserved. Although there is an insufficient number ofpatients in the groups, there is a statistically significantdifference in terms of the frequency of infection betweenthe groups (p<0.05).Conclusion: Especially in the regions with low socioeconomicstatus, sick leaves could not be used properly.This study, showed that dehydration and malnutrition,which may be secondary to heavy work, contribute to thedevelopment of infection by suppressing the immunesystem, in addition to the defect caused by major surgicalintervention and splenectomy in the immune system,resulting in the high frequency of infection.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • 1. Weledji, Elroy P. Benefits and risks of splenectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12(2):113-9.
  • 2. King H. Susceptibility to infection after splenectomy performed in infancy. Ann Surg. 1952;136:239-42.
  • 3. Traub A, Giebink GS, Smith C, Kuni CC, Brekke ML, Edlund D et al. Splenic reticuloendothelial function after splenectomy, spleen repair and spleen autotransplantation. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(25):1559-64.
  • 4. Rosse WF. The spleen as a filter. N Engl J Med. 1987;17(11):704-6.
  • 5. Hosea SW, Brown EJ, Hamburger MI, Frank MM. Opsonic requirements for intravascular clearance after splenectomy. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(5):245-50.
  • 6. Thomsen RW, Schoonen WM, Farkas DK, Riis A, Jacobsen J, Fryzek JP et al. Risk for hospital contact with infection in patients with splenectomy: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(8):546-55.
  • 7. Shute PG. Splenectomy and susceptibility to malaria and babesiae infection. Br Med J. 1975;1(5956):516.
  • 8. Teo KG, Anavekar NS, Yazdabadi A, Ricketts S. Asplenic fulminant sepsis secondary to a dog bite complicated by toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevemse Johnson syndrome. N Z Med J. 2012;125(1358):74-7.
  • 9. Barmparas G, Lamb AW, Lee D, Nguyen B, Eng J, Bloom MB et al. Postoperative infection risk after splenectomy: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;17:10-4.
  • 10. Hansen K, Singer DB. Asplenic-hyposplenic overwhelming sepsis: postsplenectomy sepsis revisited. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;4(2):105-21.
  • 11. Dragomir M, Petrescu DGE, Manga GE, Călin GA, Vasilescu C. Patients After Splenectomy: Old risks and new perspectives. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016;111(5):393-9.
  • 12. Sinwar PD. Overwhelming post splenectomy infection syndrome-review study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1314-6.
  • 13. Skattum J, Naess PA, Gaarder C. Non-operative management and immune function after splenic injury. Br J Surg. 2012;99 Suppl 1:59-65.
  • 14. Bisharat N, Omari H, Lavi I, Raz R. Risk of infection and death among post-splenectomy patients. J Infect. 2001;43(3):182-6.
  • 15. Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline fo vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(3):309-18.
  • 16. Schwarzmann SW, Adler JL, Sullivan RJJ, Marine WM. Bacterial pneumonia during the Hong Kong influenza epidemic of 1968-1969. Arch Intern Med. 1971;127(6):1037-41.
  • 17. Wong KK, Jain S, Blanton L, Dhara R, Brammer L, Fry AM, Finelli L. Influenza-associated pediatric deaths in the United States, 2004-2012. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):796-804.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.