Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 66 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 140 - 146 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2021

Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study

Öz:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy when applied in addition to a conventional physical therapy program would provide any further benefits in reducing pain and functional limitation in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.Patients and methods: This double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study included a total of 63 patients (15 males, 48 females; mean age 45.1; range, 25 to 59 years) with a complaint of mechanical neck pain between January 2016 and September 2016. The patients were divided into two groups as PEMF therapy group (n=33) and control group (n=30). A total of 15 sessions of conventional physical therapy program were applied to both groups for a total of three weeks. In addition, the active group received 20-min PEMF and the control group received 20-min sham PEMF. The patients were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. The therapeutic effect was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Pain Disability Scale (NPDS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Physician Global Assessment (PGA).Results: At baseline, two groups were similar in terms of the demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05). There were significant improvements in the VAS, NPDS, SF-36, and physician global assessment after treatment in both groups. However, the PEMF group was not found to be superior to the sham group in terms of improvements in the outcome parameters.Conclusion: Our study findings indicate that PEMF therapy is safe in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. However, it does not provide further improvement in pain and functionality when applied in addition to a conventional physical therapy.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:783-92.
  • 2. Yamato TP, Saragiotto BT, Maher C. Therapeutic exercise for chronic non-specific neck pain: PEDro systematic review update. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:1350.
  • 3. Yıldız M, Tuna H, Kokino S. Kronik Boyun Ağrılı Olgularda Spinal Mobilite, Ağrı ve Özürlülük İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2005;51:127-30.
  • 4. Bruflat AK, Balter JE, McGuire D, Fethke NB, Maluf KS. Stress management as an adjunct to physical therapy for chronic neck pain. Phys Ther 2012;92:1348-59.
  • 5. Sarig-Bahat H. Evidence for exercise therapy in mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther 2003;8:10-20.
  • 6. Durmuş B. Servikal bölge sorunlarında egzersiz reçeteleme. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2014;60:S15-S24
  • 7. Markov MS. Expanding use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapies. Electromagn Biol Med 2007;26:257-74.
  • 8. Sutbeyaz ST, Sezer N, Koseoglu BF. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, shamcontrolled trial. Rheumatol Int 2006;26:320-4.
  • 9. Foley KT, Mroz TE, Arnold PM, Chandler HC Jr, Dixon RA, Girasole GJ, et al. Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion. Spine J 2008;8:436-42.
  • 10. Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Acceleration of fracture repair by electromagnetic fields. A surgically noninvasive method. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1974;238:242-62.
  • 11. Alper S. Manyetik alan tedavisi. In: Beyazova M, editör. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Güneş Kitapevi; 2011. s. 1075-83.
  • 12. Sutbeyaz ST, Sezer N, Koseoglu F, Kibar S. Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical study. Clin J Pain 2009;25:722-8.
  • 13. Hattapoğlu E, Batmaz İ, Dilek B, Karakoç M, Em S, Çevik R. Efficiency of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Pain, Disability, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Turk J Med Sci 2019;49:1095-101.
  • 14. Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, Darden 2nd BV. Development of the neck pain and disability scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1290-4.
  • 15. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagli N. The Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of Neck Disability Index in Patients With Neck Pain: A Turkish Version Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E362-5.
  • 16. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
  • 17. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Memiş A. Kısa Form 36’nin Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirligi ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6.
  • 18. Kroeling P, Gross A, Graham N, Burnie SJ, Szeto G, Goldsmith CH, et al. Electrotherapy for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8:CD004251.
  • 19. Markov MS. Magnetic field therapy: a review. Electromagn Biol Med 2007;26:1-23.
  • 20. Turan Y, Taştaban E. Magnetoterapi-magnetik akım tedavisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J PM&R-Special Topics 2015;8:98-103.
  • 21. Thomas AW, Graham K, Prato FS, McKay J, Forster PM, Moulin DE, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical trial using a low-frequency magnetic field in the treatment of musculoskeletal chronic pain. Pain Res Manag 2007;12:249-58.
  • 22. Turan Y, Bayraktar K, Kahvecioglu F, Tastaban E, Aydin E, Kurt Omurlu I, et al. Is magnetotherapy applied to bilateral hips effective in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Rheumatol Int 2014;34:357-65.
  • 23. Zwolińska J, Gąsior M, Śnieżek E, Kwolek A. The use of magnetic fields in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the literature. Reumatologia 2016;54:201-6.
APA KARAKAŞ M, GÖK H (2020). Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. , 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
Chicago KARAKAŞ MERVE,GÖK HAYDAR Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. (2020): 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
MLA KARAKAŞ MERVE,GÖK HAYDAR Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. , 2020, ss.140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
AMA KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. . 2020; 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
Vancouver KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. . 2020; 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
IEEE KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H "Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study." , ss.140 - 146, 2020. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
ISNAD KARAKAŞ, MERVE - GÖK, HAYDAR. "Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study". (2020), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
APA KARAKAŞ M, GÖK H (2020). Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66(2), 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
Chicago KARAKAŞ MERVE,GÖK HAYDAR Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66, no.2 (2020): 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
MLA KARAKAŞ MERVE,GÖK HAYDAR Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.66, no.2, 2020, ss.140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
AMA KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 66(2): 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
Vancouver KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 66(2): 140 - 146. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
IEEE KARAKAŞ M,GÖK H "Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, ss.140 - 146, 2020. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169
ISNAD KARAKAŞ, MERVE - GÖK, HAYDAR. "Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66/2 (2020), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169