The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery

KOYTAK, Arif; KIRIK, Furkan; OZDEMIR, Hakan; SAHAN, Betul

doi:10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29

The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery

Betul SAHAN, (Tuzla Devlet Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Furkan KIRIK, (Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Arif KOYTAK, (Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Hakan OZDEMIR (Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Glokom Katarakt

5 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 162 - 168 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2021

The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery

Öz:

Purpose: Postoperative refraction has become important with improvements in cataract surgery. In this study, our aim was to investigate the effects of phacoemulsifi cation-intraocular lens (P-IOL) implantation on anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and to assess relationship between these parameters and axial length (AL) and postoperative refractive error.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 231 patients who underwent P-IOL implantation between January 2012 and June 2014. Scheimpfl ug imaging system was used for the determination of ACA, ACV and ACD values at preoperative and postoperative month 3. Partial coherence laser interferometry was used for preoperative AL, target postoperative refractive error and IOL power calculated by SRK-T formula. Spherical equivalent (SE=spherical error plus cylindrical error /2) at postoperative month 3 was recorded. Postoperative refractive error was calculated as mean error (ME=postoperative refraction-target refraction) and mean absolute error (MAE=absolute of ME). Data obtained at preoperative period and postoperative month 3 were compared.Results: Preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD were 30,2 ±12,1°, 130,7 ±41,2 mm³, 2,6 ±0,4 mm while postoperative ACA, ACV, ACD were 42,7 ±5,8°, 172,1 ±28,2 mm³, 4,1 ±0,7 mm respectively. Anterior chamber parameters were increased after P-IOL implantation, as all differences being statistically signifi cant (p=0.001). No signifi cant correlation was found between ME and ACA, ACV, ACD, AL. Again, no signifi cant correlation was found between MAE and ACA, ACV, ACD. Only a weak correlation was found between MAE and AL.Conclusion: Anterior chamber parameters measurements after P-IOL are signifi cantly increased compared to preoperative values. There was no signifi cant correlation between preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD and AL, and postoperative refractive error.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Tappin MJ, Ferguson VM. Per-operative retinoscopy as a predictor of fi nal post-operative refraction. Eye (Lond) 1999;13:559-61.
2. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:552- 6.
3. Koranyi G, Lydahl E, Norrby S, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement: a-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:243-7.
4. Altan C, Bayraktar S, Altan T, et al. Anterior chamber depth, iridocorneal angle width, and intraocular pressure changes after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation in eyes without glaucoma and with open iridocorneal angles. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:832-8.
5. Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Tsukahara S. Effects of small-incision phacoemulsifi cation and intraocular lens implantation on anterior chamber depth and intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2006;15:103-9.
6. Miyata K, Otani S, Honbou N, et al. Use of Scheimpfl ug corneal anterior-posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:546-9.
7. Kelman CD. Phaco-emulsiftcation and aspiration: A new technique of cataract removal (a preliminary report). Am J Ophthalmol 1967;64:23-35.
8. Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Anterior chamber parameters measured by the Pentacam CES after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation in normotensive eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:544-8.
9. Doganay S, Bozgul Firat P, Emre S, et al. Evaluation of anterior segment parameter changes using the Pentacam after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:601-6.
10. Simon SS, Chee YE, Haddadin RI, et al. Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2014;121:440-4.
11. Kugelberg M, Lundstrom M. Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1935-9.
12. de Juan V, Martin R, Perez I, et al. Infl uence of axial length in refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2010;85:144-8.
13. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:368-76.
14. Ueda T, Ikeda H, Ota T, et al. Relationship between postoperative refractive outcomes and cataract density: multiple regression analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:806-9.
15. Briesen S, Ng EY, Roberts H. Validity of fi rst post-operative day automated refraction following dense cataract extraction. Clin Exp Optom 2011;94:187-92.
16. Holladay JT. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1356-70.
17. Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H. Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber depth prediction algorithm. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:313- 19.
18. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpfl ug system, optical low-coherence refl ectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1729-35.
19. Salvi SM, Soong TK, Kumar BV, et al. Central corneal thickness changes after phacoemulsifi cation cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1426-8.
20. Villada JR, Raj PS, Lewis AE, et al. Comparative evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 570 and Canon RK-1 autorefractors: II. Objective autorefraction in pseudophakes. Eye (Lond) 1992;6:287-9.
21. Raj PS, Akingbehin T, Levy AM. Objective autorefraction in posterior chamber pseudophakia. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74:731-3.
22. Richards SC, Olson RJ, Richards WL. Factors associated with poor predictability by intraocular lens calculation formulas. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:515-8.
23. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refi ning intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:17-24.
24. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:524-34.
25. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, et al. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:861-867.
26. Lagrasta JM, Allemann N, Scapucin L, et al. Clinical results in phacoemulsifi cation using the SRK/T formula. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009;72:189-93.
27. Abulafi a A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:548-56.
28. El-Nafees R, Moawad A, Kishk H, et al. Intra-ocular lens power calculation in patients with high axial myopia before cataract surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2010;24:77-80.
29. Eom Y, Kang SY, Song JS, et al. Comparison of Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the anterior chamber depth in short eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:818-24.
30. Rho CR, Joo CK. Effects of steep meridian incision on corneal astigmatism in phacoemulsifi cation cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:666-71.

APA	SAHAN B, KIRIK F, KOYTAK A, OZDEMIR H (2020). The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. , 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
Chicago	SAHAN Betul,KIRIK Furkan,KOYTAK Arif,OZDEMIR Hakan The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. (2020): 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
MLA	SAHAN Betul,KIRIK Furkan,KOYTAK Arif,OZDEMIR Hakan The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. , 2020, ss.162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
AMA	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. . 2020; 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
Vancouver	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. . 2020; 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
IEEE	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H "The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery." , ss.162 - 168, 2020. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
ISNAD	SAHAN, Betul vd. "The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery". (2020), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29

APA	SAHAN B, KIRIK F, KOYTAK A, OZDEMIR H (2020). The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt, 15(3), 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
Chicago	SAHAN Betul,KIRIK Furkan,KOYTAK Arif,OZDEMIR Hakan The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt 15, no.3 (2020): 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
MLA	SAHAN Betul,KIRIK Furkan,KOYTAK Arif,OZDEMIR Hakan The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt, vol.15, no.3, 2020, ss.162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
AMA	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt. 2020; 15(3): 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
Vancouver	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt. 2020; 15(3): 162 - 168. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
IEEE	SAHAN B,KIRIK F,KOYTAK A,OZDEMIR H "The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery." Glokom Katarakt, 15, ss.162 - 168, 2020. 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29
ISNAD	SAHAN, Betul vd. "The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery". Glokom Katarakt 15/3 (2020), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.29