RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY

Meltem AKCA, (Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Gazipaşa Havacılık ve Uzay Bilimleri Fakültesi, Havacılık Yönetimi Bölümü, Antalya, Türkiye)
Mübeyyen KÜÇÜKOĞLU (Trakya Üniversitesi, Keşan Yusuf Çapraz Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksekokulu, Uluslararası Ticaret Bölümü, Edirne, Türkiye)
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 136 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136 İndeks Tarihi: 11-05-2021

RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY

Öz:
Employee behaviors gets popular in today’s academic and business environment because of itsimpact on organizational outcomes. Especially, increase of the dark attitudes of managers andcolleagues towards the individuals, affects the formation of employees’ deviance behaviors. Inthis context, workplace bullying is considered as one of the types of destructive approaches inorganizations that excluding someone in social environment or influencing co-workers jobsustainability with the harassment and offending emotions. Rising of workplace bullying inorganizations leads employees to demonstrate negative behaviors which are defined ascounterproductive work behaviors. On the other side, personality traits of an employee mayhave a major role in transformation of perception of negative attitudes towards to the workoutcomes. For this reason, it was aimed to find out the role of conscientiousness, one of thepersonality traits of Five Factor Model, in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors. Statistical analyzes were made with the participation of204 employees of a logistics company. According to findings it was revealed out thatconscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors.
Anahtar Kelime:

İŞ YERİ ZORBALIĞI, SORUMLULUK VE ÜRETKENLİK KARŞITI İŞ DAVRANIŞLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER: LOJİSTİK ŞİRKETİNDE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Öz:
Çalışan davranışları, örgütsel sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisi nedeniyle günümüzün akademik ve iş ortamında popüler hale gelmektedir. Özellikle yöneticilerin ve meslektaşların kişilere yönelik karanlık tutumlarının artması, çalışanların sapma davranışlarının oluşumunu etkilemektedir. Bu bağlamda, işyeri zorbalığı, organizasyonlarda bir çalışanı dışlayan veya iş arkadaşlarının iş sürdürülebilirliğini taciz ve rahatsız edici duygularla etkileyen yıkıcı yaklaşım türlerinden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Örgütlerde işyerinde zorbalığın artması, çalışanların üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları olarak tanımlanan olumsuz davranışlar sergilemelerine yol açmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, bir çalışanın kişilik özellikleri, olumsuz tutum algısının iş sonuçlarına dönüştürülmesinde önemli bir rol oynayabilir. Bu nedenle, beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinden sorumluluğun, işyerinde zorbalık ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki etkileşimde rolünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Lojistik şirketinin 204 çalışanının katılımıyla istatistiksel analizler yapılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, işyerinde zorbalık ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki etkileşimde sorumluluğun düzenleyici rolü olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abas, C., Omar, F., Halim, F. W., & Hafidz, S. W. M. (2015). The mediating role of organizational-based self-esteem in perceived organizational support and counterproductive work behaviour relationship. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(9), 99-108.
  • Abdullah, A., & Halim, F. W. (2016). The influence of work ethic and counterproductive work behaviour of civil servants. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 3(1), 1-14.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  • Akgündüz, Y., and Akdağ, G. (2014). İşgörenlerin kişilik özelliklerinin temel benlik değerlendirmelerine ve işten ayrılma niyetlerine etkisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(24), 295-318.
  • Ayoko, O., Callan, V. and Härtel, C. (2003), Workplace Conflict, Bullying, and Counterproductive Behaviors. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 283-301.
  • Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723–752.
  • Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43-50.
  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
  • Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(2), 410-424.
  • Berthelsen M, Skogstad A, Lau B, Einarsen S (2011) Do they stay or do they go? A longitudinal study of intentions to leave and exclusion from working life among targets of workplace bullying. Int J Manpower, 32(2), 178–193.
  • Björkqvist, K, Österman, K. ve Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184
  • Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107-121.
  • Bolton, L. R., Becker, L. K., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 537-541.
  • Bowling, N. A., Burns, G. N., Stewart, S. M., & Gruys, M. L. (2011). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as moderators of the relationship between neuroticism and counterproductive work behaviors: A constructive replication. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(3), 320-330.
  • Bruk-Lee, V. and Spector, P.E. (2006), The social stressors-counterproductive work behaviors link: are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same?. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 145-156.
  • Bulutlar, F., and Unler Oz, E. (2009). The effects of ethical climates on bullying behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 273–295.
  • Carnelley, K. B., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Optimism about love relationships: General vs specific lessons from one's personal experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 5-20.
  • Chang, K., & Smithikrai, C. (2010). Counterproductive behaviour at work: an investigation into reduction strategies. The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(8), 1272-1288.
  • Chang, P. C. M., Su, A. T., & Mizanur, M. M. (2018). Workplace bullying and its association with depression and self-esteem among health care workers in selected hospitals in sarawak. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 75(2), A340-A341.
  • Ciby, M., & Raya, R. P. (2014). Exploring Victims’ Experiences of Workplace Bullying: A Grounded Theory Approach. Vikalpa, 39(2), 69–82.
  • Ciby, M., & Raya, R. P. (2018). Workplace Bullying and Physical Ill-Health: Role of Negative Emotions and Perceived Organizational Support. In Indian Perspectives on Workplace Bullying (pp. 33-57). Springer, Singapore.
  • Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 599-609.
  • Collins, J.M. and Griffin R.W. (1998) Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Violent and Deviant Behavior. In R.W. Griffin, A. O'Leary-Kelly and J.M. Collins (eds), Monographs in organizational behavior and industrial relations, Stamford, CT: JAI Press
  • Constantino, G. T., Domingez, J. F. M., & Galan, J. A. G. (2006). Acoso laboral: Relaciones conla cultura organizacional y los resultados personales. Mobbing: itsrelationships with organizational culture and personel outcomes. Psicothema, 18(4), 766-771.
  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of occupational health psychology, 6(1), 64-80.
  • Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653-665.
  • Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M. (2005), Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.
  • Decker, P. J. (1986). Social learning theory and leadership. Journal of Management Development, 5(3), 46-58.
  • Demirtas, Z. (2018). The Relationships between Organizational Values, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Silence and Affective Commitment. Online Submission, 4(11), 108- 125.
  • DeShong, H. L., Grant, D. M., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2015). Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The Five-Factor Model and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 55-60.
  • Devonish, D. (2013). Workplace bullying, employee performance and behaviors. Employee Relations, 35(6), 630–647.
  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E.G. (2003). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Einarsen, S., & Nielsen, M. B. (2015). Workplace bullying as an antecedent of mental health problems: a five-year prospective and representative study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 88(2), 131-142.
  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and victims, 12(3), 247-263.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & stress, 23(1), 24-44.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen (Ed.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 3– 40). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
  • Einarsen, S., Matthiesen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1998). Bullying, burnout and well-being among assistant nurses. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety Australia and New Zealand, 14, 563-568.
  • Einarsen,S., Skogstad,A., Rørvik, E., Lande, A.B., & Nielsen, M.B. (2018) Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: a moderated mediation analysis, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3), 549-570.
  • Elliott, R. T. (2010). Examining the relationship between personality characteristics and unethical behaviors resulting in economic crime. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(3), 269-276.
  • Farhadi, H., Fatimah, O., Nasir, R., & Shahrazad, W. W. (2012). Agreeableness and conscientiousness as antecedents of deviant behavior in workplace. Asian Social Science, 8(9), 2-7.
  • Farr-Wharton, B., Shacklock, K., Brunetto, Y., Teo, S. T., & Farr-Wharton, R. (2017). Workplace bullying, workplace relationships and job outcomes for police officers in Australia. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 325-332.
  • Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2005). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 438–456.
  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
  • Francioli, L., Høgh, A., Conway, P. M., Costa, G., Karasek, R., & Hansen, Å. M. (2016). Do personal dispositions affect the relationship between psychosocial working conditions and workplace bullying? Ethics & Behavior, 26(6), 451-469.
  • Glambek, M., Nielsen, M. B., Gjerstad, J., & Einarsen, S. (2018). Gender differences in the relationship between workplace bullying and subjective back and neck pain: A twowave study in a Norwegian probability sample. Journal of psychosomatic research, 106, 73-75.
  • Glambek, M., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2018). Workplace bullying, the development of job insecurity and the role of laissez-faire leadership: A two-wave moderated mediation study. Work & Stress, 32(3), 1-16.
  • Glasø, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 313–319.
  • Greenberg, J. (1997). The STEAL motive: Managing the social determinants of employee theft. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International journal of selection and assessment, 11(1), 30-42.
  • Gültaç, A. S. and Erigüç, G. (2019). Geçmişten Günümüze Örgütlerde Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları: Kavramsal Bir Bakış Açısı. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 36, 51-68.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). Aracı, Düzenleyici ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri, Ankara: Seçkin Kitabevi.
  • Hafidz, S. W. M. (2012). Individual differences as antecedents of counterproductive work behaviour. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 220-226.
  • Harlos K., Knoll M. (2018) Employee Silence and Workplace Bullying. In: D'Cruz P. et al. (eds) Pathways of Job-related Negative Behaviour. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment, Singapore: Springer.
  • Hastings, S. E., & O’Neill, T. A. (2009). Predicting workplace deviance using broad versus narrow personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 289-293.
  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work & Stress, 23(4), 349-358.
  • Hauge, L., Skogstad, A. and Einarsen, S. (2010). The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(9), 426-433.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.
  • Herschcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 24-44.
  • Heyde, A. V. D., Miebach, J., & Kluge, A. (2014). Counterproductive work behaviour in a simulated production context: An exploratory study with personality traits as predictors of safety-related rule violations. J Ergonomics, 4(130), 1-9.
  • Hitlan, R. T., & Noel, J. (2009). The influence of workplace exclusion and personality on counterproductive work behaviours: An interactionist perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(4), 477-502.
  • Hitlan, R. T., Cliffton, R. J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 217–236.
  • Hoel, H., Sheehan, M., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Organisational effects of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace. CRC Press.
  • Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. Journal of Applied psychology, 74(2), 273-279.
  • Hooper, D. and Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 20–30.
  • Hsieh, Y. H., Wang, H. H., & Ma, S. C. (2019). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between workplace bullying, mental health and an intention to leave among nurses in Taiwan. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 32(2), 245-254.
  • Instone, K. (2012). Counterproductive Work Behavior. White paper. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
  • Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Raver, J. L. (2014). Is it better to be average? High and low performance as predictors of employee victimization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 296–309.
  • Jex, S. M., & Beehr, T. A. (1991). Emerging theoretical and methodological issues in the study of work-related stress. Research in personnel and human resources management, 9(31), l-365.
  • Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 797.
  • Kaya, Ş.D., Tekpınar, L., and Tekin, G. (2019). İş Yeri Zorbalığı ve Sinizm: Sağlık Kurumlarında Çalışan Güvenliği Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42, 1-22.
  • Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85–117.
  • Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Prosser, M., & Cameron, J. E. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 18-25.
  • Kim, E., & Glomb, T. M. (2014). Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 619–634.
  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of applied psychology, 95(1), 1-31.
  • Koç, F.P. and Bayraktar., O. (2019). Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Üzerinde Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etkisi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 19-39.
  • Kozako, I. N. A. M. F., Safin, S. Z., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2013). The relationship of big five personality traits on counterproductive work behaviour among hotel employees: An exploratory study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 181-187.
  • Lallukka, T., Rahkonen, O., & Lahelma, E. (2011). Workplace bullying and subsequent sleep problems - the Helsinki Health Study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health,37(3), 204-212.
  • Lever, I., Dyball, D., Greenberg, N., & Stevelink, S. A. (2019). Health consequences of bullying in the healthcare workplace: A systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 3195-3209.
  • Leymann, H. (1996). The Content and Development of Mobbing at Work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psyhology, 5(2), 165-184.
  • Lind, K., Glasø, L., Pallesen, S., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Personality profiles among targets and nontargets of workplace bullying. European Psychologist, 14(3), 231-237.
  • Livne, Y., & Goussinsky, R. (2018). Workplace bullying and burnout among healthcare employees: The moderating effect of control‐related resources. Nursing & health sciences, 20(1), 89-98.
  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Tracy, S. J., & Alberts, J. K. (2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree, and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 837–862.
  • Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1‐2), 36-50.
  • Matthiesen, S. B. ve Einarsen, S. (2004). Psychiatric distress and symptoms of PTSD among victims of bullying at work. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32, 335-356.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full 5-factor model and wellbeing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.
  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the 5-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
  • Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: The role of state negative affectivity and generalized self–efficacy. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 43(5), 397-405.
  • Miller, P., Brook, L., Stomski, N. J., Ditchburn, G., & Morrison, P. (2019). Depression, suicide risk, and workplace bullying: a comparative study of fly-in, fly-out and residential resource workers in Australia. Australian health review, 44(2), 248-253.
  • Nasir, M., & Bashir, A. (2012). Examining workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(4), 240-253.
  • Nielsen, M. B., & Knardahl, S. (2015). Is workplace bullying related to the personality traits of victims? A two-year prospective study. Work & Stress, 29(2), 128-149.
  • Nielsen, M. B., Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2008). Sense of coherence as a protective mechanism among targets of workplace bullying. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 128–136.
  • O’Moore,M., Seigne,E., McGuire,L., & Smith,M. (1998) Victims of workplace bullying in Ireland, The Irish Journal of Psychology, 19(2-3), 345-357.
  • Öksüzoğlu, T. and Şeşen, H. (2018). Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti Kamu İşyerlerinde Mobbing Olgusu: Sendikaların Rolü Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 51(1), 133-166.
  • Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, CC. (1996). A theory of conscientiousness at work. Paper presented at the 11th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology, San Diego: CA.
  • Özkalp, E. and Kırel, Ç.(2016). Örgütsel Davranış, Bursa: Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Parzefall, M. R., & Salin, D. M. (2010). Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 63, 761–780.
  • Penney, L. M., Hunter, E. M., & Perry, S. J. (2011). Personality and counterproductive work behaviour: Using conservation of resources theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 58-77.
  • Persson, R., Høgh, A., Grynderup, M. B., Willert, M. V., Gullander, M., Hansen, Å. M., ... & Kaerlev, L. (2016). Relationship between changes in workplace bullying status and the reporting of personality characteristics. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 58(9), 902-910.
  • Pervin L.(1993). Personality. Theory and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Purpora, C., Cooper, A., Sharifi, C., & Lieggi, M. (2019). Workplace bullying and risk of burnout in nurses: a systematic review protocol. JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, 17(12), 2532-2540.
  • Quine, L. (2001). Workplace bullying in nurses. Journal of health psychology, 6(1), 73-84.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of management journal, 38(2), 555-572.
  • Rodriguez-Munoz A, Baillien E, De Witte H, Moreno-Jimenez B, Pastor JC (2009) Crosslagged relationships between workplace bullying, job satisfaction and engagement: two longitudinal studies. Work Stress 23(3), 225–243.
  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Moreno-Jiménez,B., & Sanz-Vergel,A.S. (2015). Reciprocal relations between workplace bullying, anxiety, and vigor: a two-wave longitudinal study. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 28(5), 514-530.
  • Salin, D. (2015). Risk factors of workplace bullying for men and women: The role of the psychosocial and physical work environment. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 56(1), 69-77.
  • Salin, D., & Hoel, H. (2011). Organizational causes of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 227–243). London, UK: Taylor & Francis
  • Samnani, A. K., & Singh, P. (2014). Performance-enhancing compensation practices and employee productivity: The role of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 5-16.
  • Scherer, K. T., Baysinger, M., Zolynsky, D., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behaviors with sub-clinical psychopathy: Beyond the Five Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 300-305.
  • Semmer, N. (2003). Individual differences, work stress and health. In S. Mj, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 83– 120). New York, NY: Wiley
  • Somer, O. (1998). The structure of adjectives defining personality traits in Turkish and the five-factor model. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 13(42), 17-32.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. In. Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.). Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of occupational health psychology, 3(4), 356-367.
  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?. Journal of vocational behavior, 68(3), 446-460.
  • Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied psychology, 75(4), 378-385.
  • Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 164-169.
APA Akca M, Tepe Küçükoğlu M (2020). RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. , 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
Chicago Akca Meltem,Tepe Küçükoğlu Mübeyyen RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. (2020): 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
MLA Akca Meltem,Tepe Küçükoğlu Mübeyyen RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. , 2020, ss.117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
AMA Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. . 2020; 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
Vancouver Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. . 2020; 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
IEEE Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M "RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY." , ss.117 - 136, 2020. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
ISNAD Akca, Meltem - Tepe Küçükoğlu, Mübeyyen. "RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY". (2020), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
APA Akca M, Tepe Küçükoğlu M (2020). RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 8(1), 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
Chicago Akca Meltem,Tepe Küçükoğlu Mübeyyen RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 8, no.1 (2020): 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
MLA Akca Meltem,Tepe Küçükoğlu Mübeyyen RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, vol.8, no.1, 2020, ss.117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
AMA Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2020; 8(1): 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
Vancouver Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2020; 8(1): 117 - 136. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
IEEE Akca M,Tepe Küçükoğlu M "RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY." Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 8, ss.117 - 136, 2020. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
ISNAD Akca, Meltem - Tepe Küçükoğlu, Mübeyyen. "RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY". Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 8/1 (2020), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2020.8/1.117-136
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 17:36

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları