Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 25 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048 İndeks Tarihi: 13-05-2021

Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study

Öz:
Objective: Several seminal studies have suggested that a combination therapy of biologics with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) improve disease outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Hence, most guidelines reflect this practice. It has also been shown that methotrexate (MTX) at a dose of 8-10 mg/week is perhaps sufficient to achieve better outcomes in early RA. However, it is not clear whether this strategy enhances biologic retention in the patients with established RA. We present a real-world retrospective study to investigate whether csDMARD co-prescription improves biologic retention and the optimal dose to preserve such response.Materials and methods: All patients prescribed biologic therapy for RA at our center between 2003 and 2017 were identified through the departmental database. They were split into five groups based on a weekly MTX dose (≤7.5 mg, 10-17.5 mg, ≥20 mg), other csDMARD prescription, or biologic monotherapy. The one-way analysis of variance model for independent values was utilized to ascertain the significance of data. The Mann-Whitney two-tailed U test was employed to determine the significance of relationship between the monotherapy group and other arms. The significance level was predefined at 0.05.Results: A total of 168 patients with 198 biologic events were included. The mean age was 59.4 years (range, 24-90 years). 78% were women. The mean disease duration was 155.6 months (range, 15-491). There was a statistically significant difference (p=0.03) in biologic retention among the five arms. Compared to monotherapy, the data remained significant for ≥20 mg MTX and csDMARD groups; however, the biologic retention in the other two MTX arms was not significant. There was no significant relationship among groups for DAS28 improvement (p=0.24).Conclusion: Our results suggest that to improve biologic retention, the MTX dose should be increased to 20 mg a week or more, and, in people with MTX intolerance, csDMARDs co-presciption can be an alternative strategy. Maintenance with a low-to-moderate MTX dose can lead to poorer retention rates.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Nisar MK, Östör AJK. The role of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis- a review. Eur Musculoskeletal Rev 2011; 6: 174-8.
  • 2. Nisar MK, Östör AJK. Disease remission the goal of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Practitioner 2010; 254: 17-21.
  • 3. Gabay C, Reik M, Scherer A, Finchk A, SCQM collaborating physicians. Effectiveness of biologic DMARDs in monotherapy versus in combination with synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015; 54: 1664-72. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 960-77. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Hazelwood GS, Barnabe C, Tomlinson G, Marshall D, Devoe D, Bombardier C. Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: abridged Cochrane systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 353: i1777. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Hetland ML, Lindegaard HM, Hansen A, et al. Do changes in prescription practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological agents affect treatment response and adherence to therapy? Results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO Registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1023-6 [CrossRef]
  • 7. Gomez-Reino JJ, Rodriguez-Lozano C, Campos- Fernandez C, et al. Change in the discontinuation pattern of tumour necrosis factor antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis over 10 years: data from the Spanish registry BIOBADASER 2.0. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 382-5 [CrossRef]
  • 8. Inui K, Koike T. Combination therapy with biologic agents in rheumatic diseases: current and future prospects. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2016; 8: 192-202. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Zhang J, Xie F, Delzell E, Yun H, Lewis JD, Haynes K, et al. Impact of biologic agents with and without concomitant methotrexate and at reduced doses in older rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015; 67: 624-32. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Singer O, Gibofsky A. Methotrexate versus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: what is new in 2011? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2011; 23: 288-92. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Ebina K, Hashimoto M, Yamamoto W, Ohnishi A, Kabata D, Hirano T, et al. Drug retention and discontinuation reasons between seven biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis -The ANSWER cohort study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0194130. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Burmester GR, Kivitz AJ, Kupper H, Arulmani U, Florentinus S, Goss SL, et al. Efficacy and safety of ascending methotrexate dose in combination with adalimumab: the randomised CONCERTO trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 1037-44. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Kaeley G, Evangelisto A, Nishio M, Liu S, Kupper H. Impact of methotrexate dose reduction upon initiation of adalimumab on clinical and ultrasonographic parameters in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 238. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Bartelds GM, Wijbrandts CA, Nurmohamed MT, Stapel S, Lems WF, Aarden L, Dijkmans BA, Tak PP, Wolbink GJ. Clinical response to adalimumab: relationship to anti-adalimumab antibodies and serum adalimumab concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: 921-6. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Goss SL, Klein CE, Jin Z, Locke CS, Rodila RC, Kupper S, Burmester G, Awni WM. Methotrexate Dose in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Impacts Methotrexate Polyglutamate Pharmacokinetics, Adalimumab Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy: Pharmacokinetic and Exposure- response Analysis of the CONCERTO Trial. Clin Therap 2018; 40: 309-19. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Nishina N, Kaneko Y, Kameda H, Kuwana M, Takeuchi T. Reduction of plasma IL-6 but not TNF-α by methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a potential biomarker for radiographic progression. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 32: 1661-6. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Souto A, Maneiro JR, Gomez-Reino JJ. Rate of discontinuation and drug survival of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of drug registries and health care databases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016; 55: 523-34. [CrossRef]
APA MOTHOJAKAN N, GORE J, Nisar M (2020). Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. , 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
Chicago MOTHOJAKAN Nadira B.,GORE Janki,Nisar Muhammad Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. (2020): 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
MLA MOTHOJAKAN Nadira B.,GORE Janki,Nisar Muhammad Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. , 2020, ss.21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
AMA MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. . 2020; 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
Vancouver MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. . 2020; 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
IEEE MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M "Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study." , ss.21 - 25, 2020. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
ISNAD MOTHOJAKAN, Nadira B. vd. "Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study". (2020), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
APA MOTHOJAKAN N, GORE J, Nisar M (2020). Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. European Journal of Rheumatology, 7(1), 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
Chicago MOTHOJAKAN Nadira B.,GORE Janki,Nisar Muhammad Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. European Journal of Rheumatology 7, no.1 (2020): 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
MLA MOTHOJAKAN Nadira B.,GORE Janki,Nisar Muhammad Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. European Journal of Rheumatology, vol.7, no.1, 2020, ss.21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
AMA MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. European Journal of Rheumatology. 2020; 7(1): 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
Vancouver MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study. European Journal of Rheumatology. 2020; 7(1): 21 - 25. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
IEEE MOTHOJAKAN N,GORE J,Nisar M "Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study." European Journal of Rheumatology, 7, ss.21 - 25, 2020. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048
ISNAD MOTHOJAKAN, Nadira B. vd. "Does biologic survival depend on co-prescribed methotrexate dose in established rheumatoid arthritis? A real-world study". European Journal of Rheumatology 7/1 (2020), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19048