Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents

ATASOY, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma; Emiroğlu, Oya Nuran

doi:10.14744/phd.2020.67044

Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents

Esma KABASAKAL, (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Oya Nuran EMİROĞLU (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi

2 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 315 - 322 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/phd.2020.67044 İndeks Tarihi: 15-05-2021

Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents

Öz:

Objectives: The research aims to examine the relationships between irrational thinking and subjective well-being, self-efficacy, and social acceptance of adolescents with disabilities. The study was designed as a descriptive and cor-relational study.Methods: he research was conducted between October 25, 2017, and January 17, 2018, with 212 students. Data were collected using the “Adolescent Irrational Belief Scale”, “Adolescent Subjective Well-being Scale”, “General Self-Efficacy Scale”, and “Social Acceptance Scale”. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used in statistical analysis to determine the relationships and correlations.Results: The level of irrational beliefs in adolescents revealed that there was a negative linear correlation between the subjective well-being level (r=-0.265), self-efficacy level (r=-0.265), and social acceptance of disability level (r=-0.162). Thus, the irrational belief levels of adolescents increased with decreasing levels of subjective well-being, self-efficacy, and social acceptance of disabled people. The results obtained from the social acceptance scale revealed that there was also a positive correlation between the subjective well-being (r=0.205) and self-efficacy (r=0.260) levels of adolescents. Conclusion: Positive relationships between adolescents’ self-efficacy, subjective well-being, and social acceptance were determined in the study, while they had a negative relationship with irrational beliefs. The findings suggested that adolescents develop rational thinking skills that include philosophical items.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Millî Eğitim İstatistikleri, Örgün Eğitim (1. Dönem) 2016/'17. Retrieved February 12, 2002, from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_03/31152628_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2016_2017_1.pdf.
2. Arslan S, Kılıç Y. Perceived school support in ınclusiveeducation. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;18:1–11.
3. Ceylan F, Yıkmış A. Kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin sergilediği problem davranışlara yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin uygu-ladıkları önleme ve müdahale stratejileri. [Unpublished mas-ter's thesis], Abant İzzet Baysal University; 2015.
4. Humphrey N, Symes W. Perceptions of social support and ex-perience of bullying among pupils with autistic spectrum dis-orders in mainstream secondary schools. EuropeanJournal of Special Needs Education 2010;25:77–91.
5. Görmez A, Tekinarslan İÇ. Kaynaştırma sınıflarındaki özel ger-eksinimli olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin yalnızlığını yordamada algılanan sosyal desteğin etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2017;42:15–28.
6. Sadioglu O, Bilgin A, Batu S, Oksal A. Problems, expectations, and suggestions of elementary teachers regarding inclusion. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 2013;13:1760–5.
7. Saraç T, Çolak A. Kaynaştırma Uygulamaları Sürecinde İlköğre-tim Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Karşılaştıkları Sorunlara İlişkin Görüş ve Önerileri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2012;8:13–28.
8. Sülün K, Girli A. İlköğretim Genel Eğitim Sınıfı ile Özel Eğitim Sınıfında Öğrenim Gören Kaynaştırma Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Becerilerinin İncelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergi-si 2016;7:1–24.
9. Caprara GV, Steca P, Gerbino M, Pacielloi M, Vecchio GM. Look-ing for adolescents' well-being: self-efficacy beliefs as deter-minants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiol Psichi-atr Soc 2006;15:30–43.
10. Telef BB, Ergün E. Self-efficacy as a predictor of highschools-tudents’ subjectivewell-being. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi 2013;6:423–33.
11. Tong Y, Song S. A study on general self-efficacy and subjective wellbeing of low SES-college students in a Chinese university. College Student Journal 2004;38:637–42.
12. Omizo MM, LO FLG, Williams RE. Rational‐Emotive Education, Self‐Concept, and Locus of Control Among Learning‐Disabled Students. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling 1986;25:58–69.
13. Gündoğan S. Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin saldırganlık düzey-lerinin, algılanan sosyal destek ve öznel iyi oluş açısından ince-lenmesi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Bilim Dalı; 2016.
14. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in Adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press; 2003.
15. Strobel M, Tumasjan A, Spörrle M. Be yourself, believe in your-self, and be happy: self-efficacy as a mediator between per-sonality factors and subjective well-being. Scand J Psychol 2011;52:43–8.
16. Bandura A. Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist 1993;28:117–48.
17. Gonzalez JE, et al. Rational emotive therapy with children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Emotional and be-havioral Disorders 2004;12:222–35.
18. Dryden W, David D. Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: Cur-rent Status. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2008;22:195–209.
19. Kendall PC, Haaga DA, Ellis A, Bernard M, DiGiuseppe R, Kassi-nove H. Rational-emotive therapy in the 1990s and beyond: Current status, recent revisions, and research questions. Clini-cal Psychology Review 1995;15:169–85.
20. Ciarrochi J. Relation ships between dysfunctional beliefs and positive and negative indices of well-being: A critical evaluation of the Common Beliefs Survey-III. Journal of Ratio-nal-Emotiveand Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 2004;22:171–88.
21. Ellis A, David D, Lynn SJ. Rational and irrational beliefs: A his-torical and conceptual perspective. In: David D, Lynn SJ, Ellis A, (editors). Rational and irrational beliefs: Research, theory, and clinical practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Pres; 2010.
22. Momeni S. Öznel iyi oluşun, kişilik özellikleri, akılcı olmayan inanışlar ve sosyal destekle ilişkisi: Bir model sınaması. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı; 2016.
23. Ofole NM, Okopi F. Therapeuticeffect of RationalEmotive Be-haviourTherapy in fostering Self-Efficacy amongs academ-ically-at-risk learners in National Open University of Nigeria. GARJERR 2012;:211–8.
24. Çivitci A. Ergenler için mantıkdışı inançlar ölçeğinin geliştir-ilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Türk Psikolojik Danış-ma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 2006;3:69–80.
25. Eryilmaz A. Ergen öznel iyi oluş ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Jour-nal of Turkish Educational Sciences 2009;7:975–89.
26. Şirin A, Ulaş E. Ortaokul öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluş düzeyleri ile karakter eğitimi uygulamaları arasındaki ilişkinin incelen-mesi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi 2015;13:279–307.
27. Çetin F, Fikirkoca A. Rol Ötesi Olumlu Davranışlar Kişisel ve Tutumsal Faktörlerle Öngörülebilir mi? Ankara Üniversitesi Si-yasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi 2010;65:41.
28. Civelek, A. H. Eğitilebilir Zihinsel Özürlü Çocukların Sosyal Ka-bul Görmelerinde Normal Çocukların Bilgilendirilmelerinin ve İki Grubun Resim-iş ile Beden Eğitimi Derslerinde Bütünleştir-ilmelerinin Etkileri. [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi], Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü; 1990.
29. Özgönenel SÖ, Girli A. Otizmli Kaynaştırma Öğrencilerinin Sınıflarında Akran İlişkilerinin Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Eğitim Programının Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi. Elementary Education Online 2016;15:286–98.
30. Rusting C. Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: three conceptual frameworks. Psy-chological Bulletin 1998;124:165–96.
31. Liu EZF, Ho HC, Song YJ. Effects of an online rational emotive curriculum on primary school students' tendencies for online and real-world aggression. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 2011;10:83–93.
32. Margolis S, Lyubomirsky S. Cognitive Outlooks and wellbeing. In: Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L (Editors). Handbook of Well-Being. Noba Scholar Handbook series: Subjective wellbeing. Salt Lake City UT: DEF Publishers; 2018.
33. Petrides KV, Gómez MG, Pérez-González JC. Pathways into psychopathology: Modeling the effects of trait emotional in-telligence, mindfulness, and irrational beliefs in a clinical sam-ple. Clin Psychol Psychother 2017;24:1130–41.
34. David D, Cotet C, Matu S, Mogoase C, Stefan S. 50 years of ra-tional-emotive and cognitive-behavioral therapy: A systemat-ic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 2018;74:304–18.
35. Natvig GK, Albrektsen G, Qvarnstrøm U. Associations between psychosocial factors and happiness among school adoles-cents. Int J Nurs Pract 2003;9:166–75.
36. Kvarme LG, Helseth S, Sørum R, Luth-Hansen V, Haugland S, Natvig GK. The effect of a solution-focused approach to improve self-efficacy in socially withdrawn school chil-dren: a non-randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2010;47:1389–96.
37. Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D. General self‐efficacy and self es-teem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behav-ior 2004;25:375–39.
38. Holder MD, Coleman B. The contribution of social relation-ships to children’s happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies 2009;10:329–49.
39. Magaletta PR, Oliver JM. The hope construct, will, and ways: Their relations with self-efficacy, optimism, and general well-being. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999;55:539–51.
40. Certel, ZZ. Bahadır, AS. Saracaloğlu, Varol R. Lise öğrencileri-nin öz-yeterlikleri ile öznel iyi oluş düzeyleri arasındaki iliş-kinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2015;4:307–18.
41. İkiz E, Telef, BB. The effects of socioeconomic status and gen-der besides the predictive effect of self-efficacy on life satis-faction in adolescence. International Journal of Social Science 2013;6:1201–16.4
2. Özbay Y, Palancı M, Kandemir M, Çakır O. Üniversite öğrencil-erinin öznel iyi oluşlarının duygusal düzenleme, mizah, sosyal öz-yeterlik ve başa çıkma davranışları ile yordanması. Türk Eği-tim Bilimleri Dergisi 2012;10:325–45.
43. Moradi S, Rashidi A, Golmohammadian M. The effectiveness of positive thinking skills on academic procrastination of high school female students kermanshah City. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci 2017. [Epub ahead of print]

APA	ATASOY A, Emiroğlu O (2020). Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. , 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
Chicago	ATASOY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma,Emiroğlu Oya Nuran Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. (2020): 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
MLA	ATASOY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma,Emiroğlu Oya Nuran Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. , 2020, ss.315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
AMA	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. . 2020; 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
Vancouver	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. . 2020; 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
IEEE	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O "Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents." , ss.315 - 322, 2020. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
ISNAD	ATASOY, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma - Emiroğlu, Oya Nuran. "Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents". (2020), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2020.67044

APA	ATASOY A, Emiroğlu O (2020). Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 11(4), 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
Chicago	ATASOY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma,Emiroğlu Oya Nuran Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi 11, no.4 (2020): 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
MLA	ATASOY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma,Emiroğlu Oya Nuran Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, vol.11, no.4, 2020, ss.315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
AMA	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2020; 11(4): 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
Vancouver	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2020; 11(4): 315 - 322. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
IEEE	ATASOY A,Emiroğlu O "Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents." Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 11, ss.315 - 322, 2020. 10.14744/phd.2020.67044
ISNAD	ATASOY, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esma - Emiroğlu, Oya Nuran. "Determining the relationships between adolescent subjective well-being, self-efficacy, social acceptancelevel, and irrational beliefs in adolescents". Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi 11/4 (2020), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2020.67044