Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 49 - 54 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2021

Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces

Öz:
Aim: In recent years, especially with the increase in aesthetic demands, there has been a requirement to use the best aesthetic materials for dental restorations. These restorations are especially needed in those teeth that have crown loss due to a tooth fracture or extreme anterior tooth decay, post-core treatment has been applied as getting support by tooth roots. Current treatments involve removing the aesthetic disadvantages and making use of the strength resistance of various metals. In this case, zirconium, which is a white-coloured metal, is preferred. In this study, zirconia posts with different surface treatments were cemented to the root canal and bond strength was then evaluated. Methodology: Forty mandibular second premolar teeth were used in this study. Crowns of all teeth were removed to 14 mm from the enamel-cement margin by separation under irrigation. Root canals were cleaned, shaped and filled. Teeth were kept in distilled water while zirconia posts were prepared. Zirconia posts were divided into four groups according to the surface treatment methods as follows: a control group, a CoJet applied group, a sandblasting+laser group and an Er:YAG laser group. The Er:YAG laser was administered at 450 mJ at 10 Hz for 60 seconds with a 100-μs pulse duration. Surface-treated posts were bonded to the root canal with Panavia F cement. Cores were made with the standardized strip crowns. 5000 cycles, 5-55 °C thermal cycle applied with transition time at 5 seconds. For push-out tests, roots were embedded in translucent acrylic resin and coronal, middle third and apical sections were cut into 1.5-mm slices. The maximum load at failure was recorded for each specimen in newtons and then converted into megapascals (MPa). Each specimen was inspected with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a magnification of 100 X. Data were analysed using Games-Howell tests with a significance level of 0.05. Results: The coronal section from Group 3 had the highest mean push-out bond strength (18.01 MPa), while the apical section from Group 1 had the lowest (4.49 MPa). Surface treatments had no significant effect on the mean push-out bond strengths of zirconia posts (p > 0.05). However, dividing the root canal into three sections had a significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.05). When the results were evaluated for all groups, the push-out bond strength was highest in the coronal section, then in the middle third and the lowest in the apical section. Conclusion: The combined application (sandblasting+laser) had a significant effect on the push-out bond strength of zirconia posts. The root region also had a significant effect on bond strength and there was a significant difference between the apical and coronal sections.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Kıvanç BH. Endodontik tedavili dişlerde post uygulamaları. Atatürk Ünv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2006; 2(4):18-23.
  • Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: The state of the art. Quintessence Int 1999;30:383-392.
  • Vigolo P, Givani A. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000;84(1):50-4. (Crossref)
  • Martins FV, Mattos CT, Cordeiro WJB and Fonseca EM. Evaluation of zirconia surface roughness after aluminium oxide airborne-particle abrasion and the erbium YAG, neodymium-doped YAG, or CO2 lasers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2019;121(6):895-903.(Crossref)
  • Feng X, Sun T, Liu R, Zhang Y. Influence of mesoporous silica coating treatment on push-out bond strength of zirconia posts. Bio-medical materials 2014;24(6):2187-2195. (Crossref)
  • Bedran-de-Castro AKB, Ambrosano GMB. Thermal and Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength to Dentin. Operative Dentistry 2004;29(1): 42-48.
  • Arslan H, Kurklu D, Ayrancı LB et al. Effects of post surface treatments including Er:YAG laser with different parameters on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts. Lasers in Medical Science 2014;29(5):1569-1574. (Crossref)
  • Dündar B, Güzel KG. An analysis of the shear strength of the bond between enamel and porcelain laminate veneers with different etching systems: acid and Er,Cr:YSGG laser separately and combined. Lasers in Medical Science 2011;26(6):777-782.(Crossref)
  • Korn SB, von Fraunhofer JA, Mueninghoff LA. An in vitro comparasion of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:509-514. (Crossref)
  • Eskitaşçıoğlu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods. J Endodont 2002;28:629-633. (Crossref)
  • Butz F, Lenon AM, Heydecke G et al. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14(1):58-64.
  • Özkurt Z, İşeri U, Kazazoğlu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J 2010;29(3):233-245. (Crossref)
  • Uludamar A, Akalın B, Özkan YK. Zirkonyum esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlarda simantasyon öncesi yüzey hazırlıkları. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14(2):140-153.
  • Christel P, Meunier A, Heler M et al. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of ytrium-oxide-partially-stabilizied zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23(1):45-61.(Crossref)
  • Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2(1):51-55.
  • Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:268-274. (Crossref)
  • Al-harbi F, Nathanson D. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 547-555. (Crossref)
  • Balbosh, A., Kern, M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 218-223. (Crossref)
  • Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I et al. Retention of core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:624-628. (Crossref)
  • Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent 2004;1:60-68.
  • Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14:64-71.(Crossref)
  • Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(2):131-135.
  • Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydın M. Infleunce of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99(5): 388-399. (Crossref)
  • Almufleh BS, Aleisa KI, Morgano SM. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(4):957-963. (Crossref)
APA YILMAZ b, İZGİ A (2020). Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. , 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
Chicago YILMAZ berivan,İZGİ Ayça Deniz Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. (2020): 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
MLA YILMAZ berivan,İZGİ Ayça Deniz Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. , 2020, ss.49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
AMA YILMAZ b,İZGİ A Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. . 2020; 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
Vancouver YILMAZ b,İZGİ A Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. . 2020; 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
IEEE YILMAZ b,İZGİ A "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces." , ss.49 - 54, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
ISNAD YILMAZ, berivan - İZGİ, Ayça Deniz. "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces". (2020), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
APA YILMAZ b, İZGİ A (2020). Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. International Dental Research, 10(2), 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
Chicago YILMAZ berivan,İZGİ Ayça Deniz Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. International Dental Research 10, no.2 (2020): 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
MLA YILMAZ berivan,İZGİ Ayça Deniz Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. International Dental Research, vol.10, no.2, 2020, ss.49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
AMA YILMAZ b,İZGİ A Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(2): 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
Vancouver YILMAZ b,İZGİ A Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(2): 49 - 54. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
IEEE YILMAZ b,İZGİ A "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces." International Dental Research, 10, ss.49 - 54, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4
ISNAD YILMAZ, berivan - İZGİ, Ayça Deniz. "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between zirconia posts and root surfaces". International Dental Research 10/2 (2020), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.4