Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 60 - 65 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2021

PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas

Öz:
PEEK is a widely accepted material in medicine and dentistry. The aim of our study is to define and summarize the application areas of PEEK in dentistry. A retrospective literature research was conducted using the keywords ‘polyetheretherketone’, ‘PEEK’, ‘dentistry’, ‘dental’,’ implant’, on the Pubmed and Google Scholar databases. The relevant articles were analyzed and summarized. In this review, the structure, properties and application areas of PEEK are explained. PEEK can be used in the biomedical field due to its excellent chemical and mechanical properties. Thanks to its bone-like elasticity modulus it can be used as an implant material, fixed and removable prostheses, obturators, pediatric dentistry, and orthodontics. In addition, PEEK is an alternative to metals due to its non-allergic and aesthetically acceptable properties. Nevertheless, improving PEEK's properties and increasing biocompatibility is a challenging process. It is expected that the use of PEEK in dentistry will increase due to the modifications applied.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone — A suitable material for fixed dental prostheses ? 2013;1209–16. (Crossref)
  • Tekin S, Adıgüzel Ö, Cangül S. An evaluation using micro-CT data of the stress formed in the crown and periodontal tissues from the use of PEEK post and PEEK crown: A 3D finite element analysis study. Int Dent Res 2018;8(3):144-50.(Crossref)
  • Nizam N, Gürlek Ö, Akcalı A. Estetik Bölgenin İmplantasyon Öncesi Sert ve Yumuşak Doku Ogmentasyonu ile Hazırlanması : Vaka Sunumu Implant Site Preparation with Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation in Esthetic Zone : A Case Report. EÜ Dişhek. Fak. Derg. 2014;35(2):41–6. (Crossref)
  • Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: A short-term clinical report. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2017;117(3):335–9. (Crossref)
  • Bds SN, Bds MSZ, Bds ZK, Bds FS. Applications of polyetheretherketone ( PEEK ) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2015;60(1):12–9. (Crossref)
  • Tekin S, Cangül S, Adıgüzel Ö, Değer Y. Areas for use of PEEK material in dentistry. Int Dent Res 2018;8(2):84-92.(Crossref)
  • Almasi D, Iqbal N, Sadeghi M, Sudin I, Rafiq M, Kadir A, et al. Preparation Methods for Improving PEEK’s Bioactivity for Orthopedic and Dental Application : A Review. International Journal of Biomaterials 2016;2016. (Crossref)
  • Schwitalla A, Mu W. PEEK Dental Implants : A Review of the Literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(6):743–9. (Crossref)
  • Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening J V, Foerster G Von. Polyetheretherketone cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1749–59. (Crossref)
  • Wenz LM, Memitt K, Brown SA, Moet A. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1990;24:207–15. (Crossref)
  • Di P, Dal TA, Kocatepe A, Di P, Dal TA, Di P, et al. POLİETER ETER KETON (PEEK) ve DENTAL KULLANIMI “ POLYETER ETHER KETONE (PEEK)” AND ITS DENTAL USE.:1–14.
  • Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 112(5):1278–88. (Crossref)
  • Zheng Y, Xiong C, Wang Z, Li X, Zhang L. A combination of CO 2 laser and plasma surface modification of poly ( etheretherketone ) to enhance osteoblast response. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;344:79–88. (Crossref)
  • Akkan CK, Hammadeh ME, May A, Park H, Abdul-khaliq H, Strunskus T, et al. Surface topography and wetting modifications of PEEK for implant applications. Lasers Med Sci 2014;1633–9. (Crossref)
  • Zhou H, Goel VK, Bhaduri SB. A fast route to modify biopolymer surface : A study on polyetheretherketone ( PEEK ). Mater Lett. 2014;125:96–8. (Crossref)
  • Stawarczyk B, Ing D, Cdt FH, Thrun H, Eichberger M. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs. J Prosthet Dent. 114(5):666–73. (Crossref)
  • Emera RMK, Altonbary GY. Retention force of zirconia bar retained implant overdenture: Clinical comparative study between PEEK and plastic clips. Int Dent Res 2019;9(3):92-8. (Crossref)
  • Al-Rabab’ah M, Hamadneh W, Alsalem I, Khraisat A, Karaky AA. Use of High Performance Polymers as Dental Implant Abutments and Frameworks : A Case Series Report. J Prosthodont. 2017;1–8. (Crossref)
  • Eduardo J, Sánchez M, Val D, Gómez-moreno G, Martínez CP, Ramírez-fernández MP, et al. Peri-implant tissue behavior around non-titanium material : Experimental study in dogs. Ann Anat. 2016;206:104–9. (Crossref)
  • Bakar A, Cheang P, Khor KA. Mechanical properties of injection molded hydroxyapatite-polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Manag Dyn Networks Organ Perspect Technol Enabled Inter-firm Collab. 2006;63:93–111.
  • Rabiei A, Sandukas S. Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013;101(9):2621-9. (Crossref)
  • Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs : Influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):7–12. (Crossref)
  • Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Surface properties of polyetheretherketone after different laboratory and chairside polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3): 419-25. (Crossref)
  • Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD / CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(3):321-8e2. (Crossref)
  • Taufall S, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;20-2493-2500. (Crossref)
  • Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6): 1489–97. (Crossref)
  • Cekic-nagas I, Egilmez F, Ergun G, Vallittu PK. Load-bearing capacity of novel resin-based fixed dental prosthesis materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(1):49–58. (Crossref)
  • Andrikopoulou E, Zoidis P. Modified PEEK Resin Bonded Fixed Dental Prosthesis for aYoung Cleft Lip and Palate Patient. 2016;28(4):201–7. (Crossref)
  • Ng ZY, Nawaz I. Computer-Designed PEEK Implants : A Peek Into The Future of Cranioplasty ? J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):55–8. (Crossref)
  • Rammos CK, Cayci C, Castro-Garcia JA, Feiz-Erfan I, Lettieri SC. Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone Implants for Repair of Craniofacial Defects. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(3):631–3. (Crossref)
  • Thomas M, Interlocking NJL, Oral IJ. Interlocking polyetheretherketone implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2016;45(8):969–70. (Crossref)
  • Wiesli MG, Özcan M. High-performance polymers and their potential application as medical and oral implant materials: A review. Implant Dent. 2015;24(4):448–57. (Crossref)
  • Rahmitasari F, Ishida Y, Kurahashi K, Matsuda T, Watanabe M, Ichikawa T. PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications. Dent J. 2017;5(35):1–8. (Crossref)
  • Zhao Y, Wong HM, Lui SC, Chong EYW, Wu G, Zhao X, et al. Plasma Surface Functionalized Polyetheretherketone for Enhanced Osseo-Integration at Bone-Implant Interface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2016;8(6):3901-11. (Crossref)
  • Schwitalla AD, Abou-emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech [Internet]. 2015;48(1):1–7. (Crossref)
  • Dominik A, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Abou-emara M, Lackmann J, Müller W-D, et al. Maximum insertion torque of a novel implant-abutment-interface design for PEEK dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater [Internet]. 2018;77(September 2017):85–9. (Crossref)
  • Elawadly T, Radi IAW, Khadem A El, Osman RB. Can PEEK Be an Implant Material ? Evaluation of Surface Topography and Wettability of Filled Versus Unfilled PEEK With Different Surface Roughness. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:456–61. (Crossref)
  • Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Work of adhesion between resin composite cements and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes Adhes [Internet]. 2014;54:184–90. (Crossref)
  • Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2014;30(8):e209–15. (Crossref)
  • Khonsari RH, Berthier P, Rouillon T, Perrin J, Corre P. Severe infectious complications after PEEK-derived implant placement : Report of three cases. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2014;26(4):477–82. (Crossref)
  • Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy SL, Slosar PJ, Schneider JM, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant Materials Generate Different Peri-implant Inflammatory Factors. Spine Epidemiol. 2015;40(6):399–404. (Crossref)
  • Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone : A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018;119(3):437–45. (Crossref)
  • Fleck EA. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium , polyetheretherketone , and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. 2014;28(1):1–5. (Crossref)
  • Rea M, Lang NP. Marginal healing using Polyetheretherketone as healing abutments : an experimental study in dogs. 2016;(Steinemann 1998):46–50. (Crossref)
  • Zoidis P. The all-on-4 modified polyetheretherketone treatment approach : A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 119(4):516–21. (Crossref)
  • Schwitalla AD, Abou-emara M, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Lackmann J, et al. The applicability of PEEK-based abutment screws. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater [Internet]. 2016;63:244–51. (Crossref)
  • Mounir M, Atef M, Abou-Elfetouh A, Hakam MM. Titanium and polyether ether sub-periosteal implants : two novel approaches for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic anterior maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2018;47(5):658–64. (Crossref)
  • 48. Soygun K, Demir H, Bolayir G, Demir AK. Esneyeblr Br Protez Kade Rezn Le Hareketl Bölümlü Protezlern Yapimi: Vaka Sunumu. Cumhur Üniversitesi Di? Hekim Fakültesi Derg. 2009;12(1):52–5.
  • 49. Yeşil Duymuş Z, Holoğlu B, Alkurt M. Poliamid yapıdaki protez kaide materyali ile hareketli bölümlü protez yapımı: iki vaka sunumu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011;185–90.
  • Gözneli R, Akatay ZL, Kulak Ozkan Y. Esneyebilir hareketli bölümlü protezler. Türk Diş Hekim Derg. 2012;85:119–23.
  • Vojdani M, Giti R. Polyamide as a Denture Base Material: A Literature Review. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2015;16(161):1–9.
  • Ucar Y, Akova T, Aysan I. Mechanical Properties of Polyamide Versus Different PMMA Denture Base Materials. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):173–6. (Crossref)
  • Lekha K, Roseline M, Savitha N, Nadiger R. Acetal resin as an esthetic clasp material. J Interdiscip Dent. 2012;2(1):11. (Crossref)
  • Ye H, Wang G, Kang J, Liu Y, Sun Y, Zhou Y. A novel computer-aided design/ computer assisted manufacture method for one-piece removable partial denture and evaluation of fit. 2018;31(2):149–51. (Crossref)
  • Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone ( PEEK ) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses . A Clinical Report. 2016;25:580–4. (Crossref)
  • Arnold C, Hey J, Schweyen R, Setz JM. Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018;119(4):586–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.017 (Crossref)
  • Hahnel S, Scherl C, Rosentritt M, Fh PD. Interim rehabilitation of occlusal vertical dimension using a double-crown-retained removable dental prosthesis with polyetheretherketone framework. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 119(3):315–8. (Crossref)
  • Costa-palau S, Torrents-nicolas J, Barberà MB, Cabratosa-termes J. Use ofpolyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis : A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;112(3):680-2. (Crossref)
  • Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, Vozza I, Brugnoletti O, Polimeni A, et al. Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(10):e1271–5. (Crossref)
  • Maekawa M, Kanno Z, Wada T, Hongo T, Doi H, Hanawa T, et al. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J [Internet]. 2015;34(1):114– 9. (Crossref)
  • Shirakawa N, Iwata T, Miyake S, Otuka T, Koizumi S, Kawata T. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires covered with a polyether ether ketone tube. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(4):442–9. (Crossref)
  • Tada Y, Hayakawa T, Nakamura Y. Load-deflection and friction properties of PEEK wires as alternative orthodontic wires. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(8):1–12. (Crossref)
APA AKAY C, Topcu Ersöz M (2020). PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. , 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
Chicago AKAY CANAN,Topcu Ersöz Mirac Berke PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. (2020): 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
MLA AKAY CANAN,Topcu Ersöz Mirac Berke PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. , 2020, ss.60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
AMA AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. . 2020; 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
Vancouver AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. . 2020; 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
IEEE AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M "PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas." , ss.60 - 65, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
ISNAD AKAY, CANAN - Topcu Ersöz, Mirac Berke. "PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas". (2020), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
APA AKAY C, Topcu Ersöz M (2020). PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. International Dental Research, 10(2), 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
Chicago AKAY CANAN,Topcu Ersöz Mirac Berke PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. International Dental Research 10, no.2 (2020): 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
MLA AKAY CANAN,Topcu Ersöz Mirac Berke PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. International Dental Research, vol.10, no.2, 2020, ss.60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
AMA AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(2): 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
Vancouver AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas. International Dental Research. 2020; 10(2): 60 - 65. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
IEEE AKAY C,Topcu Ersöz M "PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas." International Dental Research, 10, ss.60 - 65, 2020. 10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6
ISNAD AKAY, CANAN - Topcu Ersöz, Mirac Berke. "PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas". International Dental Research 10/2 (2020), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.6