ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ

İbrahim KÜLÜNK (Düzce Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, Düzce, Türkiye)
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik)
0 0
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 78 Sayfa Aralığı: 796 - 807 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17755/esosder.718584 İndeks Tarihi: 18-05-2021

ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ

Öz:
Sovyetler Birliği‘nin dağılmasından sonra dünyanın iki önemli bölgesinde sosyalist ekonomik modelden liberalekonomi modeline geçiş süreci yaşanmıştır. İlki Doğu Avrupa ikincisi ise Çin‘dir. Doğu Avrupa ülkelerindeuygulanan geçiş ―şok terapi‖ olarak nitelendirilen hem ekonomik hem kurumsal bir dönüşümdür. Çin ise―aşamalı‖ bir geçişle önce ekonomik alanda daha sonra kısıtlı bir kurumsal dönüşümle bu süreci yönetmiştir.Bugün her iki bölgeye bakıldığında Çin‘in uyguladığı modelin diğerine göre çok daha olumlu sonuçları olduğugörülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, son 70 yılda Çin‘in bugüne kadarki uyguladığı ekonomi politikaları tarihsel birperspektifle incelenmiştir. Ayrıca Çin‘in 1991 – 2018 dönemi GSYH, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım, Sanayi veTicaret değişkenleri ile Johansen eşbütünleşme testi uygulanmıştır. Çıkan sonuca göre söz konusu değişkenleruzun dönemde birlikte hareket etmektedirler. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisine bakmak için yapılanGranger nedensellik testi sonucunda ise Çin‘de gelir artışının diğer değişkenler üzerinde pozitif bir ilişkisininolduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

A HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON CHINESE ECONOMIC GROWTH

Öz:
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a transition period from the socialist economic model to the liberal economy model in two important regions of the world. The first is Eastern Europe and the second is China. The transition applied in Eastern European countries is an economic and institutional transformation, which is described as "Shock Therapy". On the other hand, China managed this process with a ―Gradual‖ model, first in the economic field and then with limited institutional transformation. Looking at both regions today, it is seen that the model applied by China has much more positive results than the other. In this study, the economic policies of China in the past 70 years have been analyzed from a historical perspective. Also for the period 1991 – 2018 Johansen cointegration test was applied with GDP, Foreign Direct Investment, Industry and Trade variables. According to the result, these variables act together in the long term. Granger causality test shows that the increase in income in China has a positive relationship with other variables.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aghion, P., Blanchard O. J. (1994). On the speed of transition in Central Europe, National Bureau for Economic Research Macroeconomic Annual, (9), 283–320.
  • Ashton, B., Hill, K., Piazza, A., Zeitz, A. (1984). Famine in China, 1958–61, Population and Development Review, 10 (4), 613-645.
  • Aslund, A. (1991). Principles of privatization, Systemic Change and Stabilization in Eastern Europe, 17-31.
  • Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest, London, New York. Central European University Press.
  • Banister, J. (1987). China’s changing population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Berg A, Sachs J. (1992). Structural adjustment and international trade in Eastern Europe: The case of Poland, Economic Policy, 7 (14), 117–173.
  • Boycko M. (1992). When higher incomes reduce welfare: Queues, labor supply, and macro equilibrium in socialist economies, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, (3), 907–920.
  • Chan, Kam, Wing. (1994). Cities with invisible walls: Reinterpreting urbanization in post-1949 China. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
  • CIA (1959). Economic Relations of Communist China with the USSR since 1950. Economic Intelligence Report, CIA/RR, 59-16.
  • Clarke, S., Lee, C. H., Li, Q. (2004). Collective consultation and industrial relations in China. British journal of industrial relations, 42(2), 235-254.
  • Coale, A. J. (1981). Population trends, population policy, and population studies in China, Population and Development Review, 7, (1), 85–97.
  • Deniz, Y. (2014). Çin‘in ekonomik dönüşümü ve Üçüncü Dünya, Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 2(2), 64-80.
  • Dewatripont, M., Roland, G. (1992). The virtues of gradualism and legitimacy in the transition to a market economy, The Economic Journal, 102 (411), 291-300.
  • Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A., (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume: 74, Issue: 366, 427-431.
  • Engle, R. F., Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
  • Fang C, Garnaut R., Song, L. (2018). 40 years of China’s reform and development: How reform captured China’s demographic dividend., ANU Press.
  • Frydman, R., Rapaczynski A. (1994). Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the state withering away?. Central European University Press.
  • Gallagher, M., E. (2002). Reform and openness: Why China's economic reforms have delayed democracy. World Politics, 54 (3), 338-372.
  • Garnaut R. (2001). Twenty years of economic reform and structural change in the Chinese economy. In: Growth Without Miracles. Oxford University Press.
  • Global Times (2018). 40 years after reform and opening-up: China's GDP 1978-2017.‖ www.globaltimes.cn
  • Gold T., B. (1985). After comradeship: Personal relations in China since the cultural revolution, The China Quarterly, (104), 657-675.
  • Johansen, S., Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration— with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Kanbur R., Zhang, X. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness, Review of Development Economics, 9 (1), 87–106.
  • Kung J. K., Lin, L. (2003). The causes of China's great leap famine, 1959-1961, Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (1), 51-73.
  • Lin J., Y. (1988). The household responsibility system in China's agricultural reform: A theoretical and empirical study, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36 (3), 199-224.
  • Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest, London, New York. Central European University Press.
  • Banister, J. (1987). China’s changing population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Berg A, Sachs J. (1992). Structural adjustment and international trade in Eastern Europe: The case of Poland, Economic Policy, 7 (14), 117–173.
  • Boycko M. (1992). When higher incomes reduce welfare: Queues, labor supply, and macro equilibrium in socialist economies, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, (3), 907–920.
  • Chan, Kam, Wing. (1994). Cities with invisible walls: Reinterpreting urbanization in post-1949 China. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
  • CIA (1959). Economic Relations of Communist China with the USSR since 1950. Economic Intelligence Report, CIA/RR, 59-16.
  • Clarke, S., Lee, C. H., Li, Q. (2004). Collective consultation and industrial relations in China. British journal of industrial relations, 42(2), 235-254.
  • Coale, A. J. (1981). Population trends, population policy, and population studies in China, Population and Development Review, 7, (1), 85–97.
  • Deniz, Y. (2014). Çin‘in ekonomik dönüşümü ve Üçüncü Dünya, Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 2(2), 64-80.
  • Dewatripont, M., Roland, G. (1992). The virtues of gradualism and legitimacy in the transition to a market economy, The Economic Journal, 102 (411), 291-300.
  • Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A., (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume: 74, Issue: 366, 427-431.
  • Engle, R. F., Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
  • Fang C, Garnaut R., Song, L. (2018). 40 years of China’s reform and development: How reform captured China’s demographic dividend., ANU Press.
  • Frydman, R., Rapaczynski A. (1994). Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the state withering away?. Central European University Press.
  • Gallagher, M., E. (2002). Reform and openness: Why China's economic reforms have delayed democracy. World Politics, 54 (3), 338-372.
  • Garnaut R. (2001). Twenty years of economic reform and structural change in the Chinese economy. In: Growth Without Miracles. Oxford University Press.
  • Global Times (2018). 40 years after reform and opening-up: China's GDP 1978-2017.‖ www.globaltimes.cn
  • Gold T., B. (1985). After comradeship: Personal relations in China since the cultural revolution, The China Quarterly, (104), 657-675.
  • Johansen, S., Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration— with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Kanbur R., Zhang, X. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness, Review of Development Economics, 9 (1), 87–106.
  • Kung J. K., Lin, L. (2003). The causes of China's great leap famine, 1959-1961, Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (1), 51-73.
  • Lin J., Y. (1988). The household responsibility system in China's agricultural reform: A theoretical and empirical study, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36 (3), 199-224.
  • Ting Tih-Fen, (2004). Shifts in reproductive patterns in China, Population and Environment, 25(4), 299-317.
  • Woo W. T.(1994). The art of reforming centrally planned economies: Comparing China, Poland and Russia, Journal of Comprative Economics, (18), 276-308.
  • Worden, R. L., Savada, A. M., Dolan, R. E. (1987). China: A country study. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
  • World Bank. (2018, 2020). www.worldbank.org
  • Xiaoping, D. (1984). Build socialism with Chinese characteristics, pp. 1-5 in The Research Department of Party Literature, Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (1991).
  • Yao, S. (1999). A note on the causal factors of China‘s famine in 1959– 1961, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), 1365-1369.
  • Zhang, W, Yi, G. (1995). China's gradual reform: a historical perspective. CCER.
  • Zhou Y., Ma, L. C. J. (2003). China‘s urbanization levels: Reconstructing a baseline from the fifth population census, The China Quarterly, (173), 176-196.
  • Zhu X. (2012). Understanding ,hina‘s growth: Past, present and future, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26 (4), 103-124.
APA Kulunk İ (2021). ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. , 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
Chicago Kulunk İbrahim ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. (2021): 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
MLA Kulunk İbrahim ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. , 2021, ss.796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
AMA Kulunk İ ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. . 2021; 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
Vancouver Kulunk İ ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. . 2021; 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
IEEE Kulunk İ "ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ." , ss.796 - 807, 2021. 10.17755/esosder.718584
ISNAD Kulunk, İbrahim. "ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ". (2021), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.718584
APA Kulunk İ (2021). ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20(78), 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
Chicago Kulunk İbrahim ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20, no.78 (2021): 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
MLA Kulunk İbrahim ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), vol.20, no.78, 2021, ss.796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
AMA Kulunk İ ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(78): 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
Vancouver Kulunk İ ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(78): 796 - 807. 10.17755/esosder.718584
IEEE Kulunk İ "ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ." Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20, ss.796 - 807, 2021. 10.17755/esosder.718584
ISNAD Kulunk, İbrahim. "ÇİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNE TARİHSEL VE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR BAKIŞ". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20/78 (2021), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.718584
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
26-04-2024 1:43

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları