The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 41 - 47 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 İndeks Tarihi: 20-05-2021
The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis
Öz: Objective: In this study evaluation of the ossification of iliac crest apophysis with widely used forensic staging system in idiopathic scoliosis patients.Method: Radiographs of 98 scoliosis patients (76 females, 22 males; age range: 5–24 years) were examined and 196 iliac crest apophyses were evaluated using forensic staging system.Results: The forensic staging system has four stages, and 6 substages (1,2a-c, 3a-c and 4). Of 196 iliac crests evaluated, 65 were stage 2 (Risser stage 4–5) and 6 were stage 3 (Risser stage 5).Conclusion: The forensic staging system for the ossification of the iliac crest apophysis provided more detailed clinical follow-up data. Studies with larger series may help to improve the forensic staging system.
Anahtar Kelime: İliyak Krest Apofizi için Adli Evreleme Sistemi ile Risser Sınıflandırmasının Karşılaştırması
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada, idiyopatik skolyoz hastalarında yaygın olarak kullanılan iliyak krest apofiz ossifikasyonunun adli evreleme sistemiyle değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: 98 skolyoz hastasının (76 kadın, 22 erkek; yaş aralığı: 5-24 yaş) radyografileri incelendi ve 196 iliak krest apofizi adli evreleme sistemine göre değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Adli evreleme sisteminde dört evre ve altı alt evre vardır (1,2a-c,3a-c ve 4). Değerlendirilen 196 iliak kanat grafisinden 65’inin evre 2 (Risser evre 4-5) ve 6’sının evre 3 (Risser evre 5) olduğu saptandı.Sonuç: İliyak krest apofizi için adli evreleme sistemi, daha ayrıntılı klinik takip verileri sağlamıştır. Daha geniş serilerle yapılan çalışmalar, adli evreleme sistemini iyileştirmeye yardımcı olabilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Kane WJ. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;(126):43-6. PMID: 598138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197707000-00006
- 2.Peterson LE, Nachemson AL. Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity. Logistic regression analysis based on data from The Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):823-7.doi: 10.2106/00004623-199506000-00002.
- 3.Risser JC. The Iliac apophysis; an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop.1958;11:111-9. PMID: 13561591.
- 4.Scoles PV, Salvagno R, Villalba K, Riew D. Relationship of iliac crest maturation to skeletal and chronologic age. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(6):639-44. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198811000-00002.
- 5.Diedrichs V, Wagner UA, Seiler W, Schmitt O. Reference values for development of the iliac crest apophysis (Risser sign). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb.1998;136(3):226-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1054227.
- 6.Bitan FD, Veliskakis KP, Campbell BC. Differences in the Risser grading systems in the United States and France. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(436):190-5. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000160819.10767.88.
- 7.Roach JW. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(3): 353-65. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70092-4.
- 8.Pinto WC, Avanzi O, Dezen E. Common sense in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(2):215-23. PMID: 8159396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31904-0
- 9.Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):815-22. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199506000-00001.
- 10.Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 1994;344(8934):1407-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90572-x.
- 11.Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, Herring JA. Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(5):685-93. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200005000-00009.
- 12.Nault ML, Parent S, Phan P, Roy-Beaudry M, Labelle H, Rivard M. A modified Risser grading system predicts the curve acceleration phase of female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1073-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01759.
- 13.Webb PA, Suchey JM. Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial clavicle in a modern multiracial sample of American males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985;68(4):457-66. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680402.
- 14.Coqueugniot H, Weaver TD. Brief communication: infracranial maturation in the skeletal collection from Coimbra, Portugal: new aging standards for epiphyseal union. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;134(3):424-37. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20683.
- 15.Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Wierer T, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A. Cameriere's approach modified for pelvic radiographs: a novel method to assess apophyseal iliac crest ossification for the purpose of forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(4):825-9. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0832-9.
- 16.Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Domnick C, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A. The iliac crest in forensic age diagnostics: evaluation of the apophyseal ossification in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(2):473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0763-x.
- 17.Guvener M, Korel N, Reimann F. Can the development and maturation of the pelvic bones be used to support and amplify the determination of bone age in adolescents and young adults? Rontgenpraxis. 1984;37(7):264-8. PMID: 6484752.
- 18.Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Timme M, Dvorak J, Schmeling A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the iliac crest: age estimation in under-20 soccer players. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(2):198-202. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9548-5.
- 19.Schmidt S, Schmeling A, Zwiesigk P, Pfeiffer H, Schulz R. Sonographic evaluation of apophyseal ossification of the iliac crest in forensic age diagnostics in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125(2):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0554-9.
- 20.Ekizoglu O, Inci E, Erdil I, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of the iliac crest apophysis: age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(4):1101-7. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1345-0.
- 21.Kreitner KF, Schweden F, Schild HH, Riepert T, Nafe B. Computerized tomography of the epiphyseal union of the medial clavicle: an auxiliary method of age determination during adolescence and the 3d decade of life? Rofo. 1997;166(6):481-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015463.
- 22.Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A. Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med. 2010;124(4):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0448-2.
- 23.Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Hodge D, et al. A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1427-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1427.
- 24.Bunnell WP. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(229):20-5. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198804000-00003.
- 25.Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation and ethnicity. Leg Med. 2005;7(2):134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2004.07.004.
- 26.Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G. Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(5):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s004149900102.
- 27.Wittschieber D, Schulz R, Vieth V, et al. Influence of the examiner's qualification and sources of error during stage determination of the medial clavicular epiphysis by means of computed tomography. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128(1):183-91. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0932-6.
| APA | basa c, Kaçmaz İ (2021). The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. , 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| Chicago | basa can doruk,Kaçmaz İsmail Eralp The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. (2021): 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| MLA | basa can doruk,Kaçmaz İsmail Eralp The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. , 2021, ss.41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| AMA | basa c,Kaçmaz İ The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. . 2021; 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| Vancouver | basa c,Kaçmaz İ The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. . 2021; 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| IEEE | basa c,Kaçmaz İ "The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis." , ss.41 - 47, 2021. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| ISNAD | basa, can doruk - Kaçmaz, İsmail Eralp. "The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis". (2021), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| APA | basa c, Kaçmaz İ (2021). The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, 17(1), 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| Chicago | basa can doruk,Kaçmaz İsmail Eralp The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 17, no.1 (2021): 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| MLA | basa can doruk,Kaçmaz İsmail Eralp The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, vol.17, no.1, 2021, ss.41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| AMA | basa c,Kaçmaz İ The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 17(1): 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| Vancouver | basa c,Kaçmaz İ The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 17(1): 41 - 47. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| IEEE | basa c,Kaçmaz İ "The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis." Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, 17, ss.41 - 47, 2021. 10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
| ISNAD | basa, can doruk - Kaçmaz, İsmail Eralp. "The Comparison Between Forensic Staging System and Risser Classification for Iliac Crest Apophysis". Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 17/1 (2021), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.5222/BMJ.2021.85547 |
