PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 384 - 392 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 İndeks Tarihi: 26-06-2021
PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Öz: Introduction: Physical restraint (PR) is commonly used in healthcare institutions worldwide and controversial strategies in the medical field. The purpose of this study was to determine the PR prevalence in adult patients at a university hospital in Turkey.Materials and Methods: An observational and cross-sectional design was carried out. Prevalence rates were computed. A total of 6698 patients in 30 units were evaluated at 10 unit visits between July-September 2018. Patient and PR information form was used. Two researchers visited the units and proceeded with data collection. The study population consisted of all patients who were present in the hospital on the day of data collection.Results: Among 6698 patients, 287 (4.3%) patients were restrained. The highest overall prevalence of 69.6% was in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). The main reasons reported for using restraints were the prevention of pulling out medical devices (47 %). Age (p = 0.000) and units (e.g., surgical units, ICUs) (p = 0.000) were statistically significant predictors of PR. Age (p = .000) and units (p = .000) were statistically significant predictors of PR. The results show that for every additional 0.038 year in patients age, the patient becomes 1.038 times more likely to be restrained.Conclusion: In Turkey, the rate of application of PR is similar to that of world figures. Age is a very important variable in the use of PR. As they get older, their risk of being exposed to PR increases.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Demir A. Nurses’ use of physical restraints in four Turkish hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39(1):38-45. (PMID: 17393964).
- 2. Fariña-López E, Estévez-Guerra GJ, Gandoy-Crego M, Polo-Luque LM, Gómez-Cantorna C, Capezuti E. Perception of Spanish nursing staff on the use of physical restraints. J Nurs Scholarsh 2014;46(5): 322- 330. (PMID: 24754778).
- 3. Estévez-Guerra GJ, Fariña-López E, Núñez-González E, Gandoy-Crego M, Calvo-Francés F, Capezuti EA. The use of physical restraints in long-term care in Spain: a multi-center cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2017;17(1):29. (PMID: 28109267).
- 4. Eskandari F, Abdullah KL, Zainal NZ, Wong LP. Incidance rate and patterns of physical restraint use among adult patients in Malaysia. Clin Nurs Res 2018;27(3):278-295. (PMID: 27856788).
- 5. Kalula SZ, Petros SG. Use of physical restraint in hospital patients: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Curationis 2016;39(1): e1-e8. (PMID: 28155298).
- 6. Raguan B, Wolfovitz E, Gil E. Use of physical restraints in a general hospital: A cross-sectional observational study. Isr Med Assoc J 2015;17(10):633-8. (PMID: 26665319).
- 7. Shanahan D. Bedrails and vulnerable older adults: How should nurses make ‘safe and sound’ decisions surrounding their use? Int J Older People Nurs 2012;7(4):272–81. (PMID: 21722323).
- 8. Eşer İ, Hakverdioglu G. Deciding on using a physical restraint. Journal of Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing 2006;10(1):37-42. (in Turkish)
- 9. Hofmann H, Hahn S. Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2014;23: 3012–24. (PMID: 24125061).
- 10. Strout T. Perspectives on the experience of being physically restrained: An integrative review of the qualitative literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2010;19(6):416–27. (PMID: 21054728).
- 11. Minnick AF, Mion LC, Johnson ME, Catrambone C, Leipzig R. Prevalence and variation of physical restraint use in acute care settings in the US. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39(1):30–7. (PMID: 17393963).
- 12. Krüger C, Mayer H, Haastert B, Meyer G. Use of physical restraints in acute hospitals in Germany: A multi-centre cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50(12):1599– 606. (PMID: 23768409).
- 13. Galán CM, Trinidad D, Ramos P, et al. Use of physical restraints in an elderly population living in public nursing homes. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2008;43(4):208–13. (PMID: 18682141).
- 14. Suliman M. Prevalence of physical restraint among ventilated intensive care unit patients. J Clin Nurs 2018;27(19-20):3490-3496. (PMID: 29943878).
- 15. Akansel, N. Physical restraint practices among ICU nurses in one university hospital in weastern Turkey. Health Science Journal 2007; 1(4):1-6.
- 16. Turgay AS, Sarı D, Genc RE. Physical restraint use in Turkish ıntensive care units. Clin Nurse Spec 2009; 23(2):68-72. (PMID: 19225286).
- 17. Luk E, Sneyers B, Rose L, et al. Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units. Crit Care 2014;18(2):R46. (PMID: 24661688).
- 18. Unoki T, Sakuramoto H, Ouchi A, et al. Physical restraints in intensive care units: a national questionnaire survey of physical restraint use for critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Japan. Acute Med Surg 2018;6(1):68-72. (PMID: 30652000).
- 19. Van der Kooi AW, Peelen LM, Raijmakers RJ, et al. Use of physical restraints in Dutch intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study. Am J Crit Care 2015;24(6):488–495. (PMID: 26523006).
- 20. Kılıç G, Kutlutürkan S, Çevik B, Erdoğan B. The evaluation of ıntensive care unit nurses’ opinions on physical restraint application. Van Medical Journal 2018; 25(1), 11-16. (in Turkish).
- 21. Ministry of Health, Performance Management Quality Improvement Department. Hospital Service Quality Standards 2011; Ankara. [Internet] Available from: https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/ Eklenti/6116,sksenglish-2013pdf.pdf?0. Accessed: 06.03.2020
- 22. Bakır E, Şahin G, Dişel NR, Akpınar AA. The Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding to physical detection (FTE) application of health service providers working in emergency service in Adana. Zirve Medical Journal 2016; 1(1):10-16. (in Turkish).
- 23. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke J P. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335(7624):806-8. (PMID: 17947786)
- 24. Heinze C, Dassen T, Grittner U. Use of physical restraints in nursing homes and hospitals and related factors: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2012;21(7- 8):1033-1040. (PMID: 22176771).
- 25. Wong AH, Taylor RA, Ray JM, Bernstein SL. Physical restraint use in adult patients presenting to a general emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2019;73(2):183-192. (PMID: 30119940)
| APA | SÖYLEMEZ B, KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö, ÖZKAYA B, Özgül E (2020). PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. , 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| Chicago | SÖYLEMEZ Burcu AKPINAR,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Özlem,ÖZKAYA Bilgehan,Özgül Ecem PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. (2020): 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| MLA | SÖYLEMEZ Burcu AKPINAR,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Özlem,ÖZKAYA Bilgehan,Özgül Ecem PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. , 2020, ss.384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| AMA | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. . 2020; 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| Vancouver | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. . 2020; 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| IEEE | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E "PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY." , ss.384 - 392, 2020. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| ISNAD | SÖYLEMEZ, Burcu AKPINAR vd. "PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY". (2020), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| APA | SÖYLEMEZ B, KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö, ÖZKAYA B, Özgül E (2020). PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, 23(3), 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| Chicago | SÖYLEMEZ Burcu AKPINAR,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Özlem,ÖZKAYA Bilgehan,Özgül Ecem PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi 23, no.3 (2020): 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| MLA | SÖYLEMEZ Burcu AKPINAR,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Özlem,ÖZKAYA Bilgehan,Özgül Ecem PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, vol.23, no.3, 2020, ss.384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| AMA | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2020; 23(3): 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| Vancouver | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2020; 23(3): 384 - 392. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| IEEE | SÖYLEMEZ B,KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ Ö,ÖZKAYA B,Özgül E "PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY." Türk Geriatri Dergisi, 23, ss.384 - 392, 2020. 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
| ISNAD | SÖYLEMEZ, Burcu AKPINAR vd. "PREVALENCE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY". Türk Geriatri Dergisi 23/3 (2020), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.31086/tjgeri.2020.174 |
