(İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Sinan Melih NİGDELİ
(İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Gebrail BEKDAŞ
(İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2021Cilt: 7Sayı: 1ISSN: 2149-8024 / 2149-8024Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 26İngilizce

59 0
Evaluation of artificial neural network-based formulations for tuned mass dampers
Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are used to damp vibration of mechanical systems. TMDs are also used on structures to reduce the effects of strong forces such as winds and earthquakes. For the efficiency of TMD, optimization of TMD parameters is needed. Several classical formulations were proposed, but metaheuristic methods are generally used to find the best result. In addition, the metaheuristic based opti-mum results are used in machine learning of artificial intelligence-based models like artificial neural networks (ANN). These ANN models are also used in development of tuning equation via curve fitting. The classical and ANN-based formulations were found according to frequency domain responses. In the present study, the classical and ANN-based formulations were evaluated by comparing on time-history re-sponses of seismic structure. In comparison, near-fault ground motion records in-cluding directivity pulses are used. The ANN based methods have advantages by providing smaller stroke requirement and damping for TMDs.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Arfiadi Y (2016). Reducing response of structures by using optimum composite tuned mass dampers. Procedia Engineering, 161, 67–72.
  • Bekdaş G, Kayabekir AE, Nigdeli SM, Toklu YC (2019). Tranfer function amplitude minimization for structures with tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 552–562.
  • Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2011). Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search. Engineering Structures, 33, 2716–2723.
  • Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Yang XS (2017). Metaheuristic based optimization for tuned mass dampers using frequency domain responses. International Conference on Harmony Search Algorithm, Singapore, 271–279.
  • Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Yang XS (2018). A novel bat algorithm based optimum tuning of mass dampers for improving the seismic safety of structures. Engineering Structures, 159, 89–98.
  • Den Hartog JP (1947). Mechanical Vibrations. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  • Etedali S, Mollayi N (2018). Cuckoo search-based least squares support vector machine models for optimum tuning of tuned mass dampers. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 18(2), 1850028.
  • Farshidianfar A, Soheili S (2013). ABC optimization of TMD parameters for tall buildings with soil structure interaction. Interaction and Multiscale Mechanics, 6(4), 339–356.
  • FEMA P-695 (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  • Khatibinia M, Gholami H, Kamgar R (2018). Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 6(3), 1094–1104.
  • Khatibinia M, Gholami H, Labbafi SF (2016). Multi–objective optimization of tuned mass dampers considering soil–structure interaction. Iran University of Science & Technology, 6(4), 595–610.
  • Leung AYT, Zhang H (2008). Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures, 31(3), 715–728.
  • Mohebbi M, Shakeri K, Ghanbarpour Y, Majzoub H (2013). Designing optimal multiple tuned mass dampers using genetic algorithms (GAs) for mitigating the seismic response of structures. Journal of Vibration and Control, 19(4), 605–625.
  • Nigdeli SM, Bekdaş G (2017). Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(3), 912–922.
  • Pourzeynali S, Salimi S, Kalesar HE (2013). Robust multi-objective optimization design of TMD control device to reduce tall building responses against earthquake excitations using genetic algorithms. Scientia Iranica, 20 (2), 207–221.
  • Sadek F, Mohraz B, Taylor AW, Chung RM (1997). A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, 617–635.
  • Steward JP, Chiou S, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville PG, Abrahamson NA (2001). Ground Motion Evalution Procedures for Performance- Based Design. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Report 2001/09; September 2001.
  • Viana FAC, Kotinda GI, Rade DA, Steffen JV (2008). Tuning dynamic vibration absorbers by using ant colony optimization. Computers & Structures, 86(13-14), 1539–1549.
  • Warburton GB (1982). Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10, 381–401.
  • Yang XS (2012). Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation, 240–249.
  • Yang Y, Li C (2016). Performance of tuned tandem mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(10), e1974.
  • Yucel M, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Sevgen S (2019). Estimation of optimum tuned mass damper parameters via machine learning. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100847.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.