Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees

Yetkin KAMUK (Hitit Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Antrenörlük Eğitimi Bölümü, Çorum, TÜRKİYE)
Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
3 1
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 379 - 386 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853 İndeks Tarihi: 20-06-2021

Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees

Öz:
Objective: Self-esteem and self-handicapping wereconsidered as some of the components that affect success. This paperaimed to investigate self-esteem and self-handicapping levels of active Category I (top-level) wrestling referees in Turkey. Material andMethods: A personal information questionnaire, Rosenberg’s (1965)self-esteem scale which was adapted into Turkish by Cuhadaroglu(Öner, 2012) and Rhodewalt’s (1990) self-handicapping scale whichwas adapted into Turkish by Akin (2012) were used to collect data.There were 22 Category I wrestling referees in Turkey when the studywas conducted and each of them participated voluntarily. Differencesbetween groups were analysed by using Mann-Whitney U and differences among multiple groups were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis Htest. The level of agreement between two referee observers’ scoreswas tested by using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen’skappa. Results: It was found that the subjects had a relatively highlevel of self-esteem (mean=34.27) and a relatively low level of selfhandicapping score (mean=44.50). It was also found that self-esteemand self-handicapping scores of the subjects did not show any statistically significant difference by the level of income or level of education (p>.05). It was found that the level of experience causedself-handicapping scores to decrease as the level of experience increased but the difference was not enough to be statistically significant (p=0.28). Conclusion: It was concluded that Turkish Category Iwrestling referees were selected in a proper way so that they have agood level of self esteem (34.27±3.94) and low level of self-handicapping (44.50±10.60).
Anahtar Kelime:

Kategori I Türk Güreş Hakemlerinin Kendini Sabotaj ve Benlik Saygısı Düzeyleri

Öz:
Amaç: Benlik saygısı ve kendini sabotaj kavramları, başarıyı etkileyen bileşenlerden bazılarıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de aktif olarak görev yapan Kategori I (en üst düzey) güreş hakemlerinin kendini sabotaj ve benlik saygısı düzeylerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Verilerin toplanması için; kişisel bilgi formu, Rosenberg (1965) tarafından geliştirilen ve Türkçe’ye uyarlaması Çuhadaroğlu tarafından yapılan benlik saygısı ölçeği (Öner, 2012) ile Rhodewalt (1990) tarafından geliştirilen ve Akın (2012) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan kendini sabotaj ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın yapıldığı esnada Türkiye Güreş Federasyonu bünyesinde görev yapan 22 adet Kategori I hakeminin tamamı gönüllü olarak çalışmaya katılmıştır. Gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar Mann-Whitney U testi ile çoklu gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar ise Kruskal-Wallis H testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Hakem gözlemcilerinin puanları arasındaki uyum, sınıfiçi korelasyon katsayısı ve kappa testi kulllanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Deneklerin göreceli olarak yüksek benlik saygısı düzeyine (ortalama=34,27) ve göreceli olarak düşük bir kendini sabotaj (ortalama=44,50) düzeyine sahip oldukları bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, benlik saygısı ve kendini sabotaj puanlarının aylık gelir düzeyi ya da eğitim düzeyine göre anlamlı bir farka sahip olmadıkları bulunmuştur (p>0,05). Mesleki tecrübe süresi arttıkça kendini sabotaj puanlarının azaldığı görülmüş ancak bu farkın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmaya yetecek düzeyde olmadığı (p=0,28) tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Türkiye Güreş Federasyonunda görevli Kategori I hakemlerinin iyi düzeyde benlik saygısı seviyesine (34,27±3,94) sahip oldukları ve kendini sabotaj düzeylerinin (44,50±10,60) düşük düzeyde olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Grasso J. Historical Dictionary of Wrestling. 1st ed. Maryland: Scarecrow Press; 2014. p.1. [Link]
  • 2. uWW. Regulations for the International Refereeing Body. (Retrieved: 14.4.2019) [Link]
  • 3. Isik O, Gumus H. Evaluation of effective demographic variables in competition performances of Turkish wrestling referees. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2018;13(1):60-71. [Crossref]
  • 4. Coudevylle GR, Ginis KAM, Famose JP. Determinants of self-handicapping strategies in sport and their effects on athletic performance. Soc Behav Pers. 2008;36(3):391-8. [Crossref]
  • 5. Kearns H, Forbes A, Gardiner M. A cognitive behavioural coaching intervention for the treatment of perfectionism and self-handicapping in a nonclinical population. Behav Change. 2007;24(3):157-72. [Crossref]
  • 6. Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30(8):957-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 7. Ganda DR, Boruchovitch E. Self-handicapping strategies for learning of preservice teachers. Estud Psicol (Campinas). 2015;32(3):417-25. [Crossref]
  • 8. Chen Z, Sung K, Wang K. Self-esteem, achievement goals,and self-handicapping in college physical education. Psychol Rep. 2017;121(4):690-704. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 9. Rappo G, Alesi M, Pepi A. The effects of school anxiety on self-esteem and self-handicapping in pupils attending primary school. Eur J Develop Psychol. 2017;14(4):465-76. [Crossref]
  • 10. Saygılı G, Kesecioğlu Tİ, Kırıktaş H. [The effect of educational level on self-esteem]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching. 2015;4(2):210-7. [Link]
  • 11. Aryana M. Relationship between self-esteem and academic achievement amongst pre university students. J Appl Sci. 2010;10(20):2474-7. [Crossref]
  • 12. Adil A, Ameer S, Ghayas S. Impact of academic psychological capital on academic achievement among university undergraduates: roles of flow and self-handicapping behaviour. Psych J. 2020;9(1):56-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 13. urdan T. Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. J Educ Psychol. 2004;96(2):251-64. [Crossref]
  • 14. del Mar Ferradás MM, Freire C, RodríguezMartínez S, Pi-eiro-Aguín I. Self-handicapping and self-esteem profiles and their relation to achievement goals. Ann Psychol. 2018;34(3): 545-54. [Crossref]
  • 15. Buckley RC. Aging adventure athletes assess achievements and alter aspirations to maintain self-esteem. Front Psychol. 2018;9:225. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 16. Gustafsson H, Martinent G, Isoard-Gautheur S, Hassmén P, Guillet-Descas E. Performance based self-esteem and athlete-identity in athlete burnout: a person-centered approach. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;38:56-60. [Crossref]
  • 17. Galante M, Ward RM. Female student leaders: an examination of transformational leadership, athletics, and selfesteem. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;106:157-62. [Crossref]
  • 18. Orlenko HGO, Malyk I. Formation of adequate self-esteem in tennis players in the system of psychological training. J Phys Edu Sport. 2017;17(S1):66-9. [Crossref]
  • 19. Schwebel FJ, Smith RE, Smoll FL. Measurement of perceived parental success standards in sport and relations with athletes' self-esteem, performance anxiety, and achievement goal orientation: comparing parental and coach influences. Child Development Research. 2016;1-13. [Crossref]
  • 20. Gatzke JE, Barry CM, Papadakis AA, Grover RL. The buffering effect of friendship quality on the relation between perceived athletic discrepancies and self-esteem in female collegiate athletes. Athletic Insight. 2015;7(1): 83-99. [Link]
  • 21. Hofseth E, Toering T, Jordet G. Shame proneness, guilt proneness, behavioural self-handicapping, and skill level: a mediational analysis. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2015;27(3): 359-70. [Crossref]
  • 22. Kamuk Yu, Evli F, Tecimer H. [Self-handicapping levels of football referees]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018;11(3):2257-67. [Crossref]
  • 23. Barbas I, Bebetsos E, Christos K, Curby D, Mirzaei B. Investigation of ego and task orientation among international wrestling referees. Physical Education of Students. 2016;20(6):49-54. [Crossref]
  • 24. Khan A, Fleva E, Qazi T. Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in teachers' efficacy in primary schools. Psychology. 2015;6(1): 117-25. [Crossref]
  • 25. Türkiye Güreş Federasyonu. Kanun ve Yönetmelik, Güreş Hakem Yönetmeliği Devamı 4 ve 5. Bölüm. (Retrieved: 10.4.2019) [Link]
  • 26. uWW. Officials' List for 2019. (Retrieved: 27.4.2019) [Link]
  • 27. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. 1st ed. Princeton: Princeton university Press;1965. p.16-36. [Crossref]
  • 28. Öner N. [Examples from the psychological tests used in Turkey: A reference source]. Türkiye'de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testlerden Örnekler: Bir Başvuru Kaynağı. Genişletilmiş ve gözden geçirilmiş 7. Baskı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi; 2012. p.455- 457.
  • 29. Rhodewalt F. Self-handicappers: individual differences in the preference for anticipatory selfprotective acts. In: Higgins RL, Snyder CR, Berglas S, eds. Self-Handicapping: The Paradox That Isn't. Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. 1st ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1990. p.69-103. [Crossref]
  • 30. Akın A. [Self-handicapping scale: a study of validity and reliability]. Education and Science. 2012;37(164):176-87. [Link]
  • 31. Clarke IE, MacCann C. Internal and external aspects of self-handicapping reflect the distinction between motivations and behaviours: evidence from the self-handicapping scale. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;100:6-11. [Crossref]
  • 32. Schwinger M, Wirthwein L, Lemmer G, Steinmayr R. Academic self-handicapping and achievement: a meta-analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2014;106(3):744-61. [Crossref]
  • 33. Duda JL. Goal perspectives, participation and persistence in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1989;20(1):42- 56. [Link]
  • 34. Prapavessis H, Grove JR. Self-handicapping and self-esteem. J Appl Sport Psychol. 1998;10(2):175-84. [Crossref]
  • 35. Ogihara Y. A decline in self-esteem in adults over 50 is not found in Japan: age differences in self-esteem from young adulthood to old age. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):274. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 36. Raposo JV, Freitas CA. [Self-steem among the youth of trás-os-montes]. Estud Psicol (Campinas). 1999;16(3):32-46. [Crossref]
  • 37. Kearns H, Forbes A, Gardiner M, Marshall K. When a high distinction isn't good enough: a review of perfectionism and self-handicapping. Aust J Educ. 2008;35(3):21-36. [Link]
  • 38. Karner-Huţuleac A. Perfectionism and selfhandicapping in adult education. ProcediaSoc Behav Sci. 2014;142:434-8. [Crossref]
  • 39. Hobden K, Pliner P. Self-handicapping and dimensions of perfectionism: self presentation vs self-protection. J Res Pers. 1995;29(4):461-74. [Crossref]
  • 40. Hirt ER, Deppe RK, Gordon LJ. Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(6):981-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 41. Bénabou R, Tirole J. Self-confidence and personal motivation. Q J Econ. 2002;117(3):871- 915. [Crossref]
  • 42. Branden N. The nature and source of self-esteem. The Psychology of Self-esteem: A Revolutionary Approach to Self-understanding That Launched a New Era in Modern Psychology. 1st ed. San Francisco: Wiley Company; 2001. p.109-111. [Link]
  • 43. Van Hootegem A, De Witte H, De Cuyper N, Elst TV. Job insecurity and the willingness to undertake training: the moderating role of perceived employability. Journal of Career Development. 2019;46(4):395-409. [Crossref]
  • 44. del Mar Ferradás Canedo M, Rodríguez CF, Fernández BR, Arias AV. Defensive pessimism, self-esteem and achievement goals: a person-centered approach. Psicothema. 2018;30(1):53-8. [Link]
  • 45. Yavuzer Y. Investigating the relationship between self-handicapping tendencies, self-esteem and cognitive distortions. Educ Sci: Theory Pract. 2015;15(4):879 90. [Crossref]
APA KAMUK Y (2020). Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. , 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
Chicago KAMUK Yetkin Utku Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. (2020): 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
MLA KAMUK Yetkin Utku Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. , 2020, ss.379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
AMA KAMUK Y Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. . 2020; 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
Vancouver KAMUK Y Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. . 2020; 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
IEEE KAMUK Y "Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees." , ss.379 - 386, 2020. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
ISNAD KAMUK, Yetkin Utku. "Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees". (2020), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
APA KAMUK Y (2020). Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
Chicago KAMUK Yetkin Utku Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 12, no.3 (2020): 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
MLA KAMUK Yetkin Utku Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.12, no.3, 2020, ss.379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
AMA KAMUK Y Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 12(3): 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
Vancouver KAMUK Y Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 12(3): 379 - 386. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
IEEE KAMUK Y "Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees." Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, ss.379 - 386, 2020. 10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
ISNAD KAMUK, Yetkin Utku. "Self-Handicapping and Self-esteem Levels of Turkish Category I Wrestling Referees". Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 12/3 (2020), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.5336/sportsci.2020-74853
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
29-04-2024 8:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları