(TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
İbrahim ÖZTÜRK
(Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Türker ÖZKAN
(Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 8Sayı: 17ISSN: 2147-6489 / 2147-6489Sayfa Aralığı: 171 - 179İngilizce

35 0
Differences in Traffic Climate between Driving Simulation Scenarios with Different Complexity Levels
Road traffic injuries are one of the most important public health problems all over the world. Despite of the globality of the problem, driver behaviors, road traffic accidents and injuries show regional difference. Perceived traffic climate is related to driver behaviors. In order to predict driver behaviors, Traffic Climate Scale is used, whichmeasures road users’ perceptions towards traffic system. Previously, the validity of Traffic Climate Scale was tested with self-report measures (i.e. Driver Behavior Questionnaire) and with simulator based results. Characteristics of simulator scenarios show differences based on purpose of research questions. However, researchers do not have enough information about whether participants perceive these differences or not. With respect to this, the aim of the present study is to test whether Traffic Climate Scale could be used to evaluate the characteristics of a simulated driving environment. For this reason, a total of 78 participants between the ages of 18 and 25 (M = 22.28, SD = 1.64) drove two driving simulation scenarios. High complexity scenario was perceived as more internally demanding than low complexity scenario. The results showed that, in addition to the country-level measurement of traffic climate, traffic climate measurement might be used to evaluate the perception of driving simulation scenarios. There is also a need of future studies that includes different driving simulators and scenarios.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Calvi, A., Benedetto, A., & De Blasiis, M. R. (2012). A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 195-203.
  • Carsten, O., & Jamson, A. H. (2011). Driving simulators as research tools in traffic psychology. In Handbook of Traffic Psychology (pp. 87-96). Academic Press.
  • Chu, W., Wu, C., Atombo, C., Zhang, H., & Özkan, T. (2019). Traffic climate, driver behaviour, and accidents involvement in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 122, 119-126.
  • Gehlert, T., Hagemeister, C., & Özkan, T. (2014). Traffic safety climate attitudes of road users in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 326–336.
  • Lajunen, T., Parker, D., & Summala, H. (2004). The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: A cross cultural study. Accident Analysis&Prevention, 36(2), 231-238.
  • Malnaca, K. (2008). Risk homeostasis theory in traffic safety. In Proceedings of the 21th ICTCT Workshop.
  • Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2011). Person and environment: Traffic culture. Handbook of Traffic Psychology, 179–192.
  • Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J., Parker, D., & Summala, H. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 227–242.
  • Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?. Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315–1332.
  • Ronen, A., & Yair, N. (2013). The adaptation period to a driving simulator. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 94-106.
  • Rudin-Brown, C. M., Edquist, J., & Lenné, M. G. (2014). Effects of driving experience and sensation seeking on drivers’ adaptation to road environment complexity. Safety Science, 62, 121-129.
  • Üzümcüoğlu, Y., Özkan, T., Wu, C., & Zhang, H. (2019). How drivers perceive traffic? How they behave in traffic of Turkey and China?. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 64, 463-471.
  • Üzümcüoğlu-Zihni, Y. (2018). The Relationship Between Traffic Climate And Driver Behaviors: Explicit And Implicit Measures With Turkish And Chinese Samples(Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University).
  • Warner, H. W., Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., & Tzamalouka, G. (2011). Cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ tendency to commit different aberrant driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 390–399.
  • Wilde, G. J. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2(4), 209-225.
  • World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018. Retrieved from
  • Zhang, Q., Ge, Y., Qu, W., Zhang, K., & Sun, X. (2018). The traffic climate in China: The mediating effect of traffic safety climate between personality and dangerous driving behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 113, 213–223.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.