Şeyhmus AKSOY
(Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Bolu, Türkiye)
Nihal MAMATOĞLU
(Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Bolu, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 8Sayı: 17ISSN: 2147-6489 / 2147-6489Sayfa Aralığı: 190 - 201İngilizce

56 0
Mediator Role Of Professional Self – Efficacy Belief Between Psychological Safety And Self – Reported Personal Initiative
The object of this study was to research the mediator role of professional self – efficacy belief between psychological safety and self – reported personal initaitive. Additionaly, self – reported personal initiative scale was adapted to Turkish. Firstly, pilot study was conducted to 100 occupational safety specialists to test psychometrics of self – reported personal initiative scale. Then, psychological safety, professional self –efficacy belief of occupational safety specialists and self – reported personal initiative scales were sent to occupational safety specialists with anonymous link. Similiar with pilot study, convenience method was used. Of 443 responses, 111 responses were disregarded because of the missing data and remaining 332 responses data was used for this study. According to correlation analysis results, there are significant relationships amongst psychological safety, professional self-efficacy belief and self-reported personal initiative. Regression analysis showed that professional self – efficacy belief has mediator role between psychological safety and self – reported personal initiative. Additionaly, psychometrics results of self - reported personal initiative showed that adapted scale was valid and reliable for Turkish sample.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Akboğa Kale et al., (2018). A field study about the development of occupational safety expertise system Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 20(2), 177-190.
  • Aksoy, Ş. (2019) The relationship between challenges of occupational safety specialists, psychological safety, professional self – efficacy belief and proactive work behavior. Master Thesis, Istanbul Bilgi University, İstanbul, Turkey
  • Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise Of Control, New York: Freeman.
  • Crant, J. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532-537
  • ÇSGB, ILO (2017). İş Güvenliği Uzmanlarının Görev ve Sorumluluklarının Yürütülmesi ile ilgili Araştırma. Ankara. Turkey
  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70, 139-l 61.
  • Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Self-reported personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37– 63
  • Gong, Y., Huang, J.C., Farh, J.L. (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad. Manag. J, 52, 765– 778.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work-role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Press.
  • Heuven, E., Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Huisman, N. (2006) The role of self-efficacy in performing emotion work. J. Vocat. Behav. 69, 222–235
  • Kish-Gephart, J.J., Detert, J.R., Treviño, L.K. & Edmondson, A.C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Res. Organ. Behav., 29, 163–193
  • LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868.
  • Mensah, A.O. & Lebbaeus, A. (2013). The influence of employees’ self-efficacy on their quality of work life: The case of Cape Coast, Ghana. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., 4, 195–205.
  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiative workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419.
  • Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. Doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554
  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behaviour at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652.
  • Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 401–411.
  • Roussin, C. J., Larraz, E., Jamieson, K., & Maestre, J. M. (2018). Psychological safety, self-efficacy, and speaking up in interprofessional health care simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 17, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.12.002.
  • Susan J. Ashford, Nancy Rothbard, Sandy Kristin Piderit, Jane E. Dutton (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 23-58
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Mayer, D.M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., Christensen, A.L. (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 115, 204–213
  • West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, 309–333.
  • Xie, J., Chu, X., Zhang, J. & Huang, J. (2014). Proactive personality and voice behavior: The influence of voice self-efficacy and delegation. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J., 42, 1191–1200.
  • Yener (2015). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the psychological safety, OÜSBAD, 280 – 305
  • Xue, Y., Li, X., Liang, H., & Li Y. (2020). How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees’ Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1162.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.