Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 293 - 304 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2021

Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory

Öz:
Joint ventures have been on the agenda of international contractors for the last few decades. Managing international construction joint ventures (ICJVs) and the performance of ICJVs has become the main subjects that researchers focused on after 2000. It is not possible to make the definition of ICJVs in a traditional way. That’s why; the aim of this study is to make a contribution to the vague definition of ICJVs by using Ludwig Wittgenstein’s family-resemblance theory as a method. Wittgenstein supposed that it is possible to understand a complex concept as a network of overlapping similarities. Researchers have applied Wittgenstein’s family-resemblance theory to partnering, alliancing and relational contracting in construction. Similar to those studies, this study provides an innovative method to define vague concept of ICJVs by using Wittgenstein’s idea of family resemblance theory. Components of ICJVs that were determined through an intensive literature review are used in this study in order to make a comprehensive definition. Finally, it was stated that combinations of these components differ to due cases after applying the sunflower model to three international aviation projects. The contribution of this innovative definition can be useful for both industrial practitioners and researchers, since it provides a flexible and structured way to discuss the multifaceted concept of ICJVs. In the procurement phase of an ICJV, professionals may use sunflower model in order to understand the differential dynamics of the venture. The model will also be a tool for defining the specific components of each venture and a common starting point for discussions between partners, thus avoiding any misinterpretations of what an ICJV is.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Gundes S, Aydogan G (2016) Bibliometric analysis of research in international construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 43(4): 304-311.
  • [2] Child J (2002) A configurational analysis of international joint ventures. Organization Studies, 23(5): 781-815.
  • [3] Das TK, Teng B-S (2000) Instabilities of strategic alliances: an internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 1181): 77-101.
  • [4] Hyder AS, Ghauri PN (2000) Managing international joint venture relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(3): 205–218.
  • [5] Chan EHW, Tse RYC (2003) Cultural considerations in international construction contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4): 375-381.
  • [6] Mohamed S (2003) Performance in international construction joint ventures: modeling perspective.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(6): 619-626.
  • [7] Girmscheid G, Brockmann C (2010) Inter- and intraorganizational trust in international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000142
  • [8] Cheng EWL, Li H, Love PED, Irani Z (2004) Strategic alliances: A model for establishing long-term commitment to inter-organizational relations in construction. Building and Environment, 39(4): 459-468.
  • [9] Ping Ho S, Lin YH, Wu HL, Chu W (2009) Empirical test of a model for organizational governance structure choices in construction joint ventures. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3): 315-324.
  • [10] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2010) Toward a multidimensional performance measure for international joint ventures in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6): 403-411.
  • [11] Geringer JM. Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developing Countries. Quorum, New York, 1988.
  • [12] Geringer JM, Hebert L (1989) Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 2082): 235-254.
  • [13] Chen C, Messner JI (2009) Entry mode taxonomy for international construction markets. Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(1): 3–11.
  • [14] Norwood SR, Mansfield NR (1999) Joint venture issues concerning European and Asian construction markets of the 1990’s. Int J Proj Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00016-7
  • [15] Aydogan G (2018) Performance characteristics of international joint ventures in construction. Eurasian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2: 86–96.
  • [16] Kenyy A. Wittgenstein, Pelican Books, Harmondsworth, 1982.
  • [17] Murphy MA (1991) No more what is communication? Communication Research, 18: 825–835.
  • [18] Nyström J (2005) The definition of partnering as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5): 473-481.
  • [19] Yeung JFY, Chan APC, Chan DWM (2007) The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3): 219-231.
  • [20] Yeung JFY, Chan APC, Chan DWM (2012) Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2): 225-239.
  • [21] Bing L, Tiong RLK (1999) Risk management model for international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5): 377–384.
  • [22] Bing L, Tiong RL-K, Fan WW, Chew DA-S (1999) Risk management in international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(4): 277-284.
  • [23] Shen LY, Wu GWC, Ng CSK (2001) Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in china. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1):76–81.
  • [24] Zhao X, Hwang BG, Yu GS (2013) Identifying the critical risks in underground rail international construction joint ventures: Case study of Singapore. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4): 554-566.
  • [25] Pheng LS, Leong CHY (2000) Cross-cultural project management for international construction in China. International Journal of Project Management, 18(5): 307-316.
  • [26] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2008) Implications of culture in the performance of international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(5): 361-375.
  • [27] London K, Siva JPS (2011) The role of reflexive capability in relation to intellectual capital on multi international partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7): 846-855.
  • [28] Lin Y-H, Ho SP (2013) Impacts of governance structure strategies on the performance of construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139: 304–311.
  • [29] Luo J (2001) Assessing management and performance of Sinoforeign construction joint ventures. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1): 109-117.
  • [30] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2010) Performance of international joint ventures in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.19435479.0000022
  • [31] Gale A, Luo J (2004) Factors affecting construction joint ventures in China. International Journal of Project Management, 22(1): 33-42.
  • [32] Sillars DN, Kangari R (2004) Predicting organizational success within a project-based joint venture alliance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,13084): 500-508.
  • [33] Ozorhon B, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2007) Using analytic network process to predict the performance of international construction joint ventures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(3): 156-163.
  • [34] Walker DHT, Johannes DS (2003) Construction industry joint venture behavior in Hong Kong -Designed for collaborative results? International Journal of Project Management, 21(1): 39-49.
  • [35] Aydogan G, Koksal A (2013) An analysis of international construction risk factors on partner selection by applying ANP approach. International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, ICCREM 2013.
  • [36] Ranjay Gulati (1995) Does familiarity breed trust ? the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Management Journal, 38(1): 85-112.
  • [37] Das TK, Teng BS (2001) Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2): 251-283.
  • [38] Cullen JB, Johnson JL, Sakano T (2000) Success through commitment and trust: the soft side of strategic alliance management. Journal of World Business, 35(3): 223–240.
  • [39] Luo Y (2002) Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 903-919.
  • [40] Blodgett LL (1992) Research notes and communications factors in the instability of international joint ventures: An event history analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6): 475-481.
  • [41] Yan A, Gray B (1994) Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States–China Joint Ventures: A Comparative Case Study. Management Journal, 37(6): 1478-1517.
  • [42] Reus T, Rottig D (2009) Meta-analyses of international joint venture performance determinants: Evidence for theory, methodological artifacts and the unique context of China. Management International Review, 49(5): 607-640.
  • [43] Oetzel J (2005) Smaller may be beautiful but is it more risky? Assessing and managing political and economic risk in Costa Rica. International Business Review, 14(6): 765-790.
  • [44] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2007) Effect of host country and project conditions in international construction joint ventures. International Journal of Project Management, 25(8): 799-806.
  • [45] Luo Y (1997) Partner selection and venturing success: The case of joint ventures with firms in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science 8(6): 648–662.
  • [46] Gunhan S, Arditi D (2005) Factors affecting international construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(3): 273-281.
  • [47] Zhi H (1995) Risk management for overseas construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 13(4): 231-237.
  • [48] Hastak M, Shaked A (2002) ICRAM-1: Model for International Construction Risk Assessment. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(1): 59-69.
  • [49] Han, S.H. and Diekmann JE (2001) Approaches for making risk-based go/no go decision for international projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127: 300–308.
  • [50] Tone K, Skitmore M, Wong JKW (2009) An investigation of the impact of cross-cultural communication on the management of construction projects in Samoa. Construction Management and Economics, 27(4): 343-361.
  • [51] Ochieng EG, Price ADF (2010) Managing cross-cultural communication in multicultural construction project teams: The case of Kenya and UK. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5): 449-460.
APA aydogan g (2020). Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. , 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
Chicago aydogan guzin Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. (2020): 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
MLA aydogan guzin Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. , 2020, ss.293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
AMA aydogan g Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. . 2020; 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
Vancouver aydogan g Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. . 2020; 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
IEEE aydogan g "Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory." , ss.293 - 304, 2020. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
ISNAD aydogan, guzin. "Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory". (2020), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
APA aydogan g (2020). Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 3(4), 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
Chicago aydogan guzin Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 3, no.4 (2020): 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
MLA aydogan guzin Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.3, no.4, 2020, ss.293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
AMA aydogan g Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2020; 3(4): 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
Vancouver aydogan g Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2020; 3(4): 293 - 304. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
IEEE aydogan g "Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 3, ss.293 - 304, 2020. 10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304
ISNAD aydogan, guzin. "Defining international construction joint ventures from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance theory". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 3/4 (2020), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2020.04293304